POLYGON’S MATIC or Solana - page 13.

Pamadar

legendary

Activity: 2982

Merit: 1028

Quote from: Abiky on November 17, 2021, 09:10:28 AM

Quote from: Pamadar on November 02, 2021, 11:55:52 AM

Developers always look for good alternatives when creating project, Matic provides cheaper fees but do have a good quality of services.

Though that's an advantage, I also agree that both are good for investors, definitely depending on how you project your goals between these two good and quality assets.

More on your own interpretations and how well you see the future for both coins, you have to decide according to your proper understanding.

Both are good projects, but only one is truly decentralized. Polygon fits the bill nicely as a decentralized alternative of the ETH blockchain. Solana, on the other hand, is less-decentralized making it extremely-vulnerable to external attacks. The fact that the network was disrupted a while ago, tells us that Solana is not as reliable as we thought it would be.

Ultimately, it all comes down to a person's preference. As long as these coins have strong community backing, they won't be going anywhere soon. Who knows how far Polygon and Solana will go? Just my thoughts Grin

Very good point, it's investor's preference to how to pick between the two,

as long as they are willing to support the asset that they believe to be more successful.
It's them that will invest, by doing deeper analyzation
will help to protect their money.

We don't know what will be the fate of these two coins, all the developments and progress
will be the deciding factor for more success
in the future.

FanEagle

legendary

Activity: 3066

Merit: 1129

Both of the cryptocurrencies are good, but I think Solana has a higher security and a bigger hype. Even though the Solana’s ecosystem is bigger in this case, the Polygon’s community is believed to be more stronger than that of Solana. Both of them are good and they have the same aim of improving the scalability issues of the blockchain, though they have different approach to doing that.

In terms of the features that they both has to offer, Polygon has a faster transaction because it makes use of the Proof of Stake mechanism, so the transactions are confirmed in less than two seconds (<2) for every transactions. It aims to solve the issue of scalability, with a higher TPS of 65,000 which is really good if you should compare with daily methods of transactions that we use, such as VISA. Finally it has a lower transaction cost.

Solana also has a lot of features that makes it really good such as the PoH, Turbine, Gulf stream, and a lot more. So it is up to you on which you would choose. But like I said at first, Polygon has a stronger community, while Solana has the highest hype. Hypes don’t last for long, but having a strong community would take a project far.

ZaraCB

full member

Activity: 333

Merit: 105

www.cd3d.app

Between Polygon and Solana I prefer Polygon (Matic) network. Because its transaction fee is very low and transaction speed is high.
On the other hand, I have not done any transaction in solana network yet. Solana wallet seems strange to me.

Balmain

hero member

Activity: 2156

Merit: 685

The two projects have transparent secure and fast blockchains so I can't tell them apart. Both have millions of investors and large communities. Although SOL is a bit newer, it has come to its current state with huge funding and I believe it will develop further. Both are logical projects to invest in, in my opinion. Looks like they're going to keep being Major for many years.

Rehan Zakir

member

Activity: 812

Merit: 53

Both are good coins and as well as good Blockchains. I like both coins and holding both coins for long term. Both coins will perform good in future. So hold both coins at cheap prices. Don't buy it at once wait for dump and then buy it.
Both Blockchains are really fast, transparent and secure.

mdzahed134

sr. member

Activity: 2226

Merit: 259

DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook

MATIC & Solana definitely both of promising. I recommend to buy both of coins. Solana price too high, If right now MATIC is pretty low i think it will big profits in long run investment. In the development Solana is strong fundamental than MATIC. But to use MATIC network is quite easy accessible, like as ETH and MATIC are similar just changing network from Metamask.

Abiky

legendary

Activity: 3220

Merit: 1363

www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games

Quote from: Pamadar on November 02, 2021, 11:55:52 AM

Developers always look for good alternatives when creating project, Matic provides cheaper fees but do have a good quality of services.

Though that's an advantage, I also agree that both are good for investors, definitely depending on how you project your goals between these two good and quality assets.

More on your own interpretations and how well you see the future for both coins, you have to decide according to your proper understanding.

Both are good projects, but only one is truly decentralized. Polygon fits the bill nicely as a decentralized alternative of the ETH blockchain. Solana, on the other hand, is less-decentralized making it extremely-vulnerable to external attacks. The fact that the network was disrupted a while ago, tells us that Solana is not as reliable as we thought it would be.

Ultimately, it all comes down to a person's preference. As long as these coins have strong community backing, they won't be going anywhere soon. Who knows how far Polygon and Solana will go? Just my thoughts Grin

Anonymous100

member

Activity: 423

Merit: 11

Quote from: CryptoWarriorsssss on July 08, 2021, 09:21:16 PM

~

Between Polygon and Solana, I'm more interested in Solana. Because the Solana system was built from the ground up. Not on a mainnet system. Maybe Polygon is almost the same as Binance Smart Chain, we can still use the same wallet just need to change the mainnet system.
But if you say Bitcoin competitor, I think this is the dream of people who don't sleep. Bitcoin does not provide smart contract services, and the capabilities of the Bitcoin blockchain system have been tested for years without any changes. Solana's rivals may be BSC, Tron, ADA, in terms of a better blockchain concept going forward and mass adoption.

LUCKMCFLY

legendary

Activity: 2632

Merit: 1883

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: lixer on November 02, 2021, 04:36:31 PM

Quote from: Sweetbtc on November 02, 2021, 01:41:29 PM

Solona Usecase and partnerships are much higher than Matics at this time. Specially in Nfts Solona beat all other contracts even Etherium.
Matic fee is very low and many Gaming projects are entering in Matic and this is positive signs for Matics. I believe that in near future Matics and Solona both will beat Etherium and Bsc.

Solana team is doing some better from other projects because they are feeling in near future we will have some good hype in NFT games and NFT related stuff, so they are doing partnerships and better features in this way even Matic is also having some good at gaming industry and too many new gamer projects joining them just because of very low cost, but this is good for community and devs as now they have some good choices for their projects with very good features and fees is also very affordable as sometime back we were living with just alone Ethereum.

Currently, Ethereum team is also doing some better if they solve fees issue then surely this competition could be much better, and we will have some more interesting features and developments in these platforms for crypto community.

Corresponding to his statement, today I was seeing a very interesting project that is of NFT origin running through Polygon, and the truth was in the pre-sale stage of a Metaverse, the truth is that the project has a lot of future, I think now everything is It will go through the metaverses and through the NFTs, and in the sale through the Polygon network for those who entered it was a success, it lasted 30 minutes and things went well, what I do not like about these networks is that there is always a bridge that When you make the change, it takes away some of the fee, and it is not necessary, if there is a network that has already had many beta tests, at least the fee should not be charged, it is a way to be able to compete with networks such as BSC and obviously ETH, but in itself, everything was very fast and safe, the truth is the experience with Polygon ..

Devifajarina

full member

Activity: 602

Merit: 102

Trident Protocol | Simple «buy-hold-earn» system!

Quote from: PeerSend on November 02, 2021, 12:29:17 AM

Both are interesting techwise.

I lean more towards Solana, as it has much better PR, community, and major players backing.

For me, both have different portions, but in its development, matic has an easier and cheaper transaction rate, while Solana has a large ecosystem and is fully supported by the community, both in my opinion are good and can be used according to the needs of the community for both, this is that encourage people to choose one of the two, this bias cannot be interpreted on a small scale.

lixer

hero member

Activity: 2688

Merit: 588

Quote from: Sweetbtc on November 02, 2021, 01:41:29 PM

Solona Usecase and partnerships are much higher than Matics at this time. Specially in Nfts Solona beat all other contracts even Etherium.
Matic fee is very low and many Gaming projects are entering in Matic and this is positive signs for Matics. I believe that in near future Matics and Solona both will beat Etherium and Bsc.

Solana team is doing some better from other projects because they are feeling in near future we will have some good hype in NFT games and NFT related stuff, so they are doing partnerships and better features in this way even Matic is also having some good at gaming industry and too many new gamer projects joining them just because of very low cost, but this is good for community and devs as now they have some good choices for their projects with very good features and fees is also very affordable as sometime back we were living with just alone Ethereum.

Currently, Ethereum team is also doing some better if they solve fees issue then surely this competition could be much better, and we will have some more interesting features and developments in these platforms for crypto community.

Sweetbtc

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 503

👉bit.ly/3QXp3oh | 🔥 Ultimate Launc

Solona Usecase and partnerships are much higher than Matics at this time. Specially in Nfts Solona beat all other contracts even Etherium.
Matic fee is very low and many Gaming projects are entering in Matic and this is positive signs for Matics. I believe that in near future Matics and Solona both will beat Etherium and Bsc.

Pamadar

legendary

Activity: 2982

Merit: 1028

Quote from: Joshapat on November 02, 2021, 01:42:59 AM

I've tried both and for transaction fees I think Polygon is 50% cheaper than Solana, this is what makes many devs currently switch projects to Polygon because I believe Polygon is a coin that will be a tough competitor to BSC.

Developers always look for good alternatives when creating project, Matic provides cheaper fees but do have a good quality of services.

Though that's an advantage, I also agree that both are good for investors, definitely depending on how you project your goals between these two good and quality assets.

More on your own interpretations and how well you see the future for both coins, you have to decide according to your proper understanding.

Wildwest

sr. member

Activity: 1701

Merit: 308

Both coins can indeed be relied on because they have their own advantages, but polygon coins are easier for us to use because there are many platforms that adopt polygon so that for the development of both coins are superior to polygon, and I have tried to use the solana network but the arrangement is very complicated so we are a little difficult in using the network, but for polygon networks we can connect with metamask and how to use it is very easy so I prefer polygon network.

Joshapat

sr. member

Activity: 1526

Merit: 255

I've tried both and for transaction fees I think Polygon is 50% cheaper than Solana, this is what makes many devs currently switch projects to Polygon because I believe Polygon is a coin that will be a tough competitor to BSC.

PeerSend

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

Both are interesting techwise.

I lean more towards Solana, as it has much better PR, community, and major players backing.

elisabetheva

full member

Activity: 1708

Merit: 105

Quote from: otundebis on November 01, 2021, 12:44:58 PM

Polygon naturally flows into ethereum platform. If you have worked on ethereum platform, you don't need to repeat your work if you are going to launch on polygon platforms! The EVM compatibility just make your work easy. Solana however require new language, new structures and totally different protocol! I prefer polygon to Solana for my work!

indeed because both are new platforms, it is clear to prove whether which one is better cannot be done quickly and needs to be analyzed in real time in the future. you are right that polygons are identical to the ethereum platform and it is clear that its development guarantees that, but because the cost of ethereum gas is still high, there will be problems of its own at a certain time.

more merchants signed up to SOL for DeFi and NFT projects, a very consistent increase in the number of active traders. even some oracle networks like Switchboard are bringing feeds to Solana, obviously greatly underpinning Solana's popularity, which has the effect of making it mainstream and increasing demand across exchanges.

but everything will be visible for a while and can't see for now. so both have their own advantages and who is more ready to compete, because the competition is not only on the platform of the two of them alone because there are other platforms that are also very good.

bishopcrypto

jr. member

Activity: 139

Merit: 6

Quote from: Jaered on July 09, 2021, 03:24:23 AM

I think Matic has the slight edge in that it has a more burgeoning community which drives more adoption

Matic also has OpenSea which is not only a legacy project and largest NFT market, it's a major on-ramp for noobs.

Devifajarina

full member

Activity: 602

Merit: 102

Trident Protocol | Simple «buy-hold-earn» system!

Quote from: CryptoWarriorsssss on July 08, 2021, 09:21:16 PM

POLYGON’S MATIC or Solana

No Doubt， Both are smart contract platforms that support several DeFi and NFT protocols.

Polygon had a well-developed NFT ecosystem with many tools, marketplaces and other products being built on it.

It has more than 150 NFT Dapps and marketplaces like OpenSea already built and working on it.

But Solana is undoubtedly a worthy contender.BTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTC

lots of the NFT/ game project on Solana ecosystem.

Such as ：$Aurory ，Burnt Fiance ， Solanians

Plus ： new NFT marketplace -SolPixel Powered by Solana

what is your options or opinions? Huh

There are no similarities that can compare Solana with Bitcoin, the two are very clear the difference, both the selling price and the buying price, let alone talking about people's interest in Solana and bitcoin, it is certain that people prefer bitcoin to make investments that have a clear big impact on crypto, even the level of stability of these two coins tends to be more secure than bitcoin compared to solana, even if it is considered a competition, then bitcoin is more superior than solana.

otundebis

full member

Activity: 630

Merit: 100

Polygon naturally flows into ethereum platform. If you have worked on ethereum platform, you don't need to repeat your work if you are going to launch on polygon platforms! The EVM compatibility just make your work easy. Solana however require new language, new structures and totally different protocol! I prefer polygon to Solana for my work!

Topic: POLYGON’S MATIC or Solana - page 13. (Read 13499 times)