Topic: POLYGON’S MATIC or Solana - page 15. (Read 13475 times)
I prefer polygons to Solana, currently more and more large projects are using the Polygon platform so I'm optimistic that in a year Polygon will be in the top 10, devs. use Polygon because of its many advantages and is suitable for making large projects such as DeFi and NFT.
I think Solana would overtake even Binance Smart Chain one day? Why? It has some properties that are really desirable in a proper blockchain, for example faster transaction speed and much more lower transaction fees. I feel BSC fees are topping up, probably because of popularity caused by its more dapps
Why don't you think logically about this, because in the past many people said that BSC will overtake ETH one day, but in reality none of that exists even though the transaction fee on BSC is cheaper than on ERC20 which is owned by Ethereum, but none of it was able to overtake ETH.Likewise with Solana, she will not be able to overtake BSC just by relying on cheap transaction fees and better transaction speeds, because the rival is Binance, not shitcoin.
I'm more interested in using a polygon wallet (Matic) than solana. Solana in my opinion is a bit complicated, maybe it could be because I rarely use it.
Matic itself has now changed to polygon network which aims to solve problems on the ethereum blockchain because the fees charged are too high.
Matic itself has now changed to polygon network which aims to solve problems on the ethereum blockchain because the fees charged are too high.
Both Polygon and Solana are great networks and real competitors to BSC. They all enable dApps to be built on, enable cheap & fast transactions, and both have fairly large communities that build on them.
Despite this though, Solana has probably had a much faster growth rate and overall the community is expanding faster but other than that it is hard to compare the two as they're both great is just that Solana is accelerating quite a bit faster than Polygon.
Despite this though, Solana has probably had a much faster growth rate and overall the community is expanding faster but other than that it is hard to compare the two as they're both great is just that Solana is accelerating quite a bit faster than Polygon.
Both projects are good, but only one prioritizes decentralization/security/censorship-resistance above all else. Polygon relies on the ETH blockchain to achieve this, making it a better option than Solana. Of course, not everyone will think this way. There are people who prefer convenience on top of anything else. Solana has its own separate blockchain network, so chances of it achieving high TPS are extremely high. But this comes at a cost of reduced security/reliability/decentralization.
Consider how Solana faced a network disruption not long ago. If it was as secure and decentralized as Polygon, it would've resisted such an attack. For this and many other reasons, I think Polygon (MATIC) will lead the way for a very long time. It's not about an specific cryptocurrency, but rather Blockchain technology as a whole. As long as projects work together to improve Blockchain tech, nothing else matters. Just my thoughts
Hey there,
I profit of this topic to ask my question here.
I'd like to get some matic Polygon but I see like 2 versions of the coin?
Matic and matic network... What is the difference. Is one of it deprecated/abandoned?
Thanks for any intel
I profit of this topic to ask my question here.
I'd like to get some matic Polygon but I see like 2 versions of the coin?
Matic and matic network... What is the difference. Is one of it deprecated/abandoned?
Thanks for any intel
I choose the both of them. they are wonderful projects. i think both of them are the ethereum killers with huge potentials of drawing investors mind away from ethereum. what matters most is the fees and as long as these platforms offers charges very low and allow users to transact in a fast pace. i pick both because they leverage with ethereum failed to offer and work on it.
answer is really simple - both
why would you pick between Polygon and Solana, when both brings extra low transactions, and have vibrant communities that support their development
Polygon has support from Ethereum ecosystem, Solana has more money investments attached to it, but both should be good for future development, bear in mind that any of this is not financial advise, and you should do your own analysis before investment
why would you pick between Polygon and Solana, when both brings extra low transactions, and have vibrant communities that support their development
Polygon has support from Ethereum ecosystem, Solana has more money investments attached to it, but both should be good for future development, bear in mind that any of this is not financial advise, and you should do your own analysis before investment
SOLANA is more aggressive than MATIC for me, where if we are going to make a comparison, indeed I never saw that the MATIC token actually increased that much during an uptrend in a market where only SOLANA, CARDANO and XRP have the spotlight even nowadays when it comes to altcoins to be honest, actually they are making new highs of all time along with BITCOIN and ETHEREUM for your information, so if i was going to pick which one is good maybe for now it is SOLANA.
Lets just say that the valuation is not everything in the market. I am yet to follow any project that uses Solana but i know plenty of projects that use Matic especially projects that are built on top of Ethereum and majority of the NFT projects are using Matic but i am yet to follow the use case of Solana and any major projects using them. The valuation is not everything as every shit coin rises once in a while and that does not mean they are good 
.
I think Solana would overtake even Binance Smart Chain one day? Why? It has some properties that are really desirable in a proper blockchain, for example faster transaction speed and much more lower transaction fees. I feel BSC fees are topping up, probably because of popularity caused by its more dapps
Beginners always get to know Bitcoin faster than Solana, so whatever you will say, every new person who wants to know cryptocurrency always remembers Bitcoin first, then Altcoins and this is a very basic difference between the two.
That's true, but that doesn't mean beginners will directly play a role and contribute to bitcoin, this will be very dangerous for them, bitcoin is not an investment for beginners, the level of risk posed to bitcoin will be very big for them, that's why I say beginners are not suitable to do this , it's true that everyone who knows the first rare crypto that they will learn is bitcoin, but that doesn't mean it's the right step, I think beginners are more suitable to invest in altcoins, considering the level of stability is easier to get?
POLYGON’S MATIC or Solana
No Doubt， Both are smart contract platforms that support several DeFi and NFT protocols.
Polygon had a well-developed NFT ecosystem with many tools, marketplaces and other products being built on it.
It has more than 150 NFT Dapps and marketplaces like OpenSea already built and working on it.
But Solana is undoubtedly a worthy contender.BTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTC
lots of the NFT/ game project on Solana ecosystem.
Such as ：$Aurory ，Burnt Fiance ， Solanians
Plus ： new NFT marketplace -SolPixel Powered by Solana
what is your options or opinions?
SOLANA is more aggressive than MATIC for me, where if we are going to make a comparison, indeed I never saw that the MATIC token actually increased that much during an uptrend in a market where only SOLANA, CARDANO and XRP have the spotlight even nowadays when it comes to altcoins to be honest, actually they are making new highs of all time along with BITCOIN and ETHEREUM for your information, so if i was going to pick which one is good maybe for now it is SOLANA. No Doubt， Both are smart contract platforms that support several DeFi and NFT protocols.
Polygon had a well-developed NFT ecosystem with many tools, marketplaces and other products being built on it.
It has more than 150 NFT Dapps and marketplaces like OpenSea already built and working on it.
But Solana is undoubtedly a worthy contender.BTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTC
lots of the NFT/ game project on Solana ecosystem.
Such as ：$Aurory ，Burnt Fiance ， Solanians
Plus ： new NFT marketplace -SolPixel Powered by Solana
what is your options or opinions?
Solana looks more interesting then layer 2 solution Polygon. I think that Solana may became a great competitor to Ethereum and Polygon will lose its users with ETH 2.0 launch.
For me I prefer polygon over the solana.
I have used the polygon more than that of matic, and the bridge on erc-20 is the best that interest me the most on that smartchain.
I have used the polygon more than that of matic, and the bridge on erc-20 is the best that interest me the most on that smartchain.
Since the tragedy that happened a few days ago on the solana network, somehow my personal perception of solana has changed drastically. My belief in solana has almost disappeared, that's why for now, I tend to choose polygons over solana
Both Polygon and Solana are great networks and real competitors to BSC. They all enable dApps to be built on, enable cheap & fast transactions, and both have fairly large communities that build on them.
Despite this though, Solana has probably had a much faster growth rate and overall the community is expanding faster but other than that it is hard to compare the two as they're both great is just that Solana is accelerating quite a bit faster than Polygon.
Despite this though, Solana has probably had a much faster growth rate and overall the community is expanding faster but other than that it is hard to compare the two as they're both great is just that Solana is accelerating quite a bit faster than Polygon.
POLYGON’S MATIC or Solana
No Doubt， Both are smart contract platforms that support several DeFi and NFT protocols.
Polygon had a well-developed NFT ecosystem with many tools, marketplaces and other products being built on it.
It has more than 150 NFT Dapps and marketplaces like OpenSea already built and working on it.
But Solana is undoubtedly a worthy contender.BTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTC
lots of the NFT/ game project on Solana ecosystem.
Such as ：$Aurory ，Burnt Fiance ， Solanians
Plus ： new NFT marketplace -SolPixel Powered by Solana
what is your options or opinions?
No Doubt， Both are smart contract platforms that support several DeFi and NFT protocols.
Polygon had a well-developed NFT ecosystem with many tools, marketplaces and other products being built on it.
It has more than 150 NFT Dapps and marketplaces like OpenSea already built and working on it.
But Solana is undoubtedly a worthy contender.BTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTC
lots of the NFT/ game project on Solana ecosystem.
Such as ：$Aurory ，Burnt Fiance ， Solanians
Plus ： new NFT marketplace -SolPixel Powered by Solana
what is your options or opinions?
I'd go for Polygon (MATIC) instead of Solana. The reasons for this are pretty obvious. Polygon is a Layer-Two scaling solution, so this means it has all of the security advantages the original ETH blockchain has. Not like Solana which has its own blockchain network that is still experimental. Its lack of security/reliability/decentralization has led to a major network disruption/outage a couple of weeks ago. Who'd want to trust Solana with their money when it can be easily attacked? With Polygon, you'll have the benefits of scalability (low fees, fast transactions) without sacrificing security/reliability/decentralization in return. With a direct link to the ETH blockchain, Polygon (MATIC) enjoys from an ever-growing library of dApps and tokens built on the Ethereum platform.
This is only an opinion, and should not be taken as investment advice. Always do your own research about the project you're willing to invest into before making the move. Only then you'll be able to avoid huge losses in the long run. It's not about Polygon or Solana, but rather how Blockchain technology can improve our lives for the better. As long as it works as intended, nothing else matters. Just my thoughts
Ben solana için bir şey diyemem ama matic için çok şey diyebilirim. matici 3 yıldır takip ediyorum. hem ağ olarak hem topluluk olarak hem teknolojisi ekibi olarak gerçekten büyük proje. şu an bence çok ucuz btc ath yapacaksa matic hala ucuz...
Both of these coins are very good and you actually do not need to pick between them. Just get both of them and you will be fine. If you have a thousand dollars and you can't decide if you want to put it on sol or matic then you should be putting 500 dollars in matic and 500 dollars in solana. That way it is going to be easier and they both look great.
Take time to review and understand the benefits of both coins. If you are unsure, it's best to buy both and allow the progress and development to push the value up. So far, we see how these two coins perform and both mostly in favor of the investors and holders.
Extraordinary conditions do happen when a good coin goes down and if you put it in both of them that means you are dropping the risk as well. If one of them drops, then you end up with half of your investment still in a good coin.
More on your deep knowledge about splitting your investment, but if you have that understanding, it will give you decent comfort
while waiting for the coin to perform.
Solana is much more effective at leveraging crypto technology that most projects created on the solana network are more useful in this space and not just pump and dump projects.
solana directly supports new projects on the network to strengthen solana itself, not with matic which does not dare to be directly involved in new projects running on its blockchain.
solana directly supports new projects on the network to strengthen solana itself, not with matic which does not dare to be directly involved in new projects running on its blockchain.
I only responded to what was the topic of conversation, where the topic that was created was impossible, so I tried to rationalize the topic, as I said before, that there is no way Solana can replace Bitcoin, this is not an easy thing for Solana, Bitcoin has achieved a time when many people were against bitcoin, but today the opposition is slowly recovering, in fact many people have changed their mindset, from not liking bitcoin to a very promising investment and no other format can replace it, let alone Solana?
That is the basis why everyone cannot accept the statement that Solana will replace Bitcoin, this does not represent a fundamental study of strong references, Solana is very different from Bitcoin, in any way the two are very different, and need appropriate rebuttals for any topic that is not based, so that the information provided does not mislead anyone who sees it, especially for those beginners, who do not really understand the comparisons given?
Jump to: