my choice is polygon, for all the time of use there are no problems with the network, transactions are fast and most importantly cheap, but the solana network has hung up several times and this is a big minus today, this project occupies the top 10 CMC and should work without failures.
What do you mean Solana network has hung up several times, i have not encountered that situation. When it comes to investment, i will go to Matic aka Polygon because of the use case and the really low valuation and on the other hand Solana had its rally and majority of the projects that uses ETH network as their base platform usually migrate to Polygon because of the ease of migration and i always felt it is undervalued. 
Topic: POLYGON’S MATIC or Solana - page 12. (Read 13491 times)
my choice is polygon, for all the time of use there are no problems with the network, transactions are fast and most importantly cheap, but the solana network has hung up several times and this is a big minus today, this project occupies the top 10 CMC and should work without failures.
Both are great to invest, SOL has increased a lot in few months, but the matic is still there so now the chances of matic breakout are more than Solana breakout. There is also another project same as these. Terra is also a good project and growing too fast looking competitive with Solana .
Let's see who wins.
Let's see who wins.
On my opinion, both of those deserves attention. Im buying 30%/30% for both in my portfolio.
We cant say they are similar, they are different, Matic it's 1 layer problem solution resolve for Ethereum, which contains same secure like in eth, lower commission for mass adoption and faster network on PoS.
Solana have the same, lower commission, faster network and etc, but one different resolve, solana its hybrid PoS and Proof of History.
So ive think we should use both of them.
We cant say they are similar, they are different, Matic it's 1 layer problem solution resolve for Ethereum, which contains same secure like in eth, lower commission for mass adoption and faster network on PoS.
Solana have the same, lower commission, faster network and etc, but one different resolve, solana its hybrid PoS and Proof of History.
So ive think we should use both of them.
In terms of quality I prefer solana. As much as gozali NFT who had trended with polygon networks I think NFT in opensea is mostly just duplication, Solana is more qualified even though it does not have a large community can lift some projects that are published in their networks, such as Solanium and Samo.
I chose MATIC, many predictions from experts that Matic will continue to grow so that it will become a big platform, even many analysts believe that this year Matic will compete with ERC and BSC.
I've never used the Solana network, but I think the MATIC network which is fast and cheap than BSC or ethereum makes me optimistic that the MATIC network will soon become the first choice of developers, and it is evident that many NFT and Metaverse projects are using MATIC.
MATIC is the true winner here since it focuses on decentralization/security/reliability. Its competitor, Solana, has been facing several network outages putting its reliability in question. I wouldn't count on SOL for serious transactions, as the network is too flawed. Not like MATIC which is secured by the main Ethereum blockchain. It's a sidechain after all. The coin is trading below $2, as not many people are aware of its true benefits. Once Polygon gains traction, MATIC will surely go all the way to the moon. Who knows what will be of both chains in the future? Just my thoughts
In my opinion, these two platforms are worthy. But Polygon gets more preference. It's kind of intuitive. I use it more, but I also consider it promising to invest in SOL. I think they have everything ahead.
I Buy Sell and trade both Solona and Matic. Of the two, I prefer the Matic Token tie because it is a very good and high quality token. And it's much faster and safer. You can invest in matic token with your eyes closed.
These two coins are good choices to be made as investments because they have the potential and can provide a large return due to the increasing popularity of Matic and Solana to date, so far many investors have chosen these two coins to invest, but regardless of the development of these two coins, very good so far, but in terms of security I will choose MATIC over SOL because the security offered by MATIC is more promising.
I've used both and I can say that polygon is more friendly, solana wallet is confusing to many newbies I've seen but I don't care though, I want coins like these two in my portfolio for long term, I believe they will keep growing and growing, Polkadot and Avalanche are a must have too
I've never used the Solana network, but I think the MATIC network which is fast and cheap than BSC or ethereum makes me optimistic that the MATIC network will soon become the first choice of developers, and it is evident that many NFT and Metaverse projects are using MATIC.
both! but as for me - matic more comfortable to use! dont understand why someone choose solana?
At present we can see that the polygon matic platform is moving much further from Solana. We now see the location of the Polygon Matic Platform right after the Binance Smart Chain Platform. This polygon metic platform is expected to go a long way in the future.
Well at the current market scenario i will pick matic in my bag no doubt both had great volume and both are good but i am still very much positive about Matic price it can go beyond to 10$ in 2022 according to my assumptions as we are seeing alot of new project is launching in the matic Network on the other hand solana had also shown an amazing growth over a past period of time but still i think polygon will be Cheap and it will that hidden gem that i pick
Why not both platforms? Both are actually promising to hold. MATIC or SOL, will possibly give you good profits this year. So diversify your portfolio, and keep up with their progress to check where they are heading. Both projects are showing very good sign in the market.
I think Solana edges it by the skin of Samo's snarling tooth. Why? Its sharding power and the transaction speed is the upper hand it holds on its opponents. Mind you I rate Polygon too and have quite a bag, but I still think Polygon and Cardano can't hold a candle on Solana. Polkadot comes close
Well at the current market scenario i will pick matic in my bag no doubt both had great volume and both are good but i am still very much positive about Matic price it can go beyond to 10$ in 2022 according to my assumptions as we are seeing alot of new project is launching in the matic Network on the other hand solana had also shown an amazing growth over a past period of time but still i think polygon will be Cheap and it will that hidden gem that i pick
Both of the cryptocurrencies are good, but I think Solana has a higher security and a bigger hype. Even though the Solana’s ecosystem is bigger in this case, the Polygon’s community is believed to be more stronger than that of Solana. Both of them are good and they have the same aim of improving the scalability issues of the blockchain, though they have different approach to doing that.
In terms of the features that they both has to offer, Polygon has a faster transaction because it makes use of the Proof of Stake mechanism, so the transactions are confirmed in less than two seconds (<2) for every transactions. It aims to solve the issue of scalability, with a higher TPS of 65,000 which is really good if you should compare with daily methods of transactions that we use, such as VISA. Finally it has a lower transaction cost.
Solana also has a lot of features that makes it really good such as the PoH, Turbine, Gulf stream, and a lot more. So it is up to you on which you would choose. But like I said at first, Polygon has a stronger community, while Solana has the highest hype. Hypes don’t last for long, but having a strong community would take a project far.
In terms of the features that they both has to offer, Polygon has a faster transaction because it makes use of the Proof of Stake mechanism, so the transactions are confirmed in less than two seconds (<2) for every transactions. It aims to solve the issue of scalability, with a higher TPS of 65,000 which is really good if you should compare with daily methods of transactions that we use, such as VISA. Finally it has a lower transaction cost.
Solana also has a lot of features that makes it really good such as the PoH, Turbine, Gulf stream, and a lot more. So it is up to you on which you would choose. But like I said at first, Polygon has a stronger community, while Solana has the highest hype. Hypes don’t last for long, but having a strong community would take a project far.
You've said it yourself. Solana is full of hype. Not like Polygon which is decentralized and has a proven track record of development and innovation. I wouldn't say Solana has a higher security than Polygon, simply because it's been a victim of external attacks (network disruptions) over the course of the year. Developers are now proposing an "observation system" that would greatly centralize the network if implemented. With this, I wouldn't count on SOL as a serious long term investment. Not like Polygon which is a sidechain of the Ethereum blockchain. The network enjoys all of the security and reliability of its parent chain.
Using MATIC would be no different than using ETH (except for the fact that the UX on Polygon is better than ETH with the low fees and fast TX confirmation times). At nearly $3 per coin, I'd say MATIC is extremely undervalued. Who knows if someday MATIC surpasses SOL in market cap? Just my opinion
Both cannot be doubted. It has its own advantages. However, I tend to polygon when it comes to performance. Plus polygon depends on the new network. I am sure, when solana starts large transaction costs will also be higher. There polygon will be ready to replace solana position.
when it comes to gas I think it comes back to their prices.look at ETH when their prices go up now their gas is very crazy and users are always complaining.
Currently, I also feel that BNB has increased slightly, although not significantly.
and This will also certainly apply to Sol. Their prices are currently slowly rising and continue to get more attention from most people and indirectly they will also have an effect on gas and of course this will continue to increase when indeed they continue to rise
Both cannot be doubted. It has its own advantages. However, I tend to polygon when it comes to performance. Plus polygon depends on the new network. I am sure, when solana starts large transaction costs will also be higher. There polygon will be ready to replace solana position.
Jump to: