Author

Topic: [POOL][Scrypt][Scrypt-N][X11] Profit switching pool - wafflepool.com - page 219. (Read 465769 times)

sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
I thought I saw someone said the whale had left but according to this he's back http://wafflepool.com/miner/14t8yB3PDGfZT3VppxMY4J9xiBaXUcZvKp.  A $60,147.45 payout for today - tried to trace it in the block chain but it appears to get divided up to small chunks over dozens of transactions all happening one after the other.  No idea whats going on there.


Waffle left? huh? Who said that? He commented a page or so back

Anyway I still haven't got paid , thought id chuck that in, Previous day I was Paid at 3am, AEST
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
I thought I saw someone said the whale had left but according to this he's back http://wafflepool.com/miner/14t8yB3PDGfZT3VppxMY4J9xiBaXUcZvKp.  A $60,147.45 payout for today - tried to trace it in the block chain but it appears to get divided up to small chunks over dozens of transactions all happening one after the other.  No idea whats going on there.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
Is there a way to put BTC in the Unconverted balances? Then the BTC held at Cryptsy could represent unwithdrawn BTC that are not eligible for distribution.

I would second this.  If we go to multiple payouts it's going to be difficult on our side to keep track of payouts and hence profitability - very easy for people to start complaining about 0.0004 BTC/MH payouts.  So long as I can check a miner and see its pending and paid for a 24 hour period I can keep up with the accounting on my side.

Paid, Pending Payout, Unconverted and Total.  Total is what I care about.  People may only look at paid in their BTC/MH calculations but I count it all so exchange problems don't spook me.

+1

Multiple payouts not that great, Curious about how some multipools manage and handle multiple exchanges..
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
http://waffles.wilschrader.com/

is not working from my Work Internet but it  was yesterday, is there something wrong on sites end Or my works end..

Site is down.

Thanks the normal Stats page is not very good or accurate at times I have found, Hashrate doesn't match
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
WAFFLEStats is down so I relied on the WafflePool stats page today.  

MH (Avg)=28.16 MH
Hours=115.98
BTC/MH (Avg of 11 miners)=0.01022109
BTC/MH (Max of 11 miners)=0.01150922
BTC/MH (Min of 11 miners)=0.00976015

Trend=-3.23%  (calculated from last average)



newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
Is there a way to put BTC in the Unconverted balances? Then the BTC held at Cryptsy could represent unwithdrawn BTC that are not eligible for distribution.

I would second this.  If we go to multiple payouts it's going to be difficult on our side to keep track of payouts and hence profitability - very easy for people to start complaining about 0.0004 BTC/MH payouts.  So long as I can check a miner and see its pending and paid for a 24 hour period I can keep up with the accounting on my side.

Paid, Pending Payout, Unconverted and Total.  Total is what I care about.  People may only look at paid in their BTC/MH calculations but I count it all so exchange problems don't spook me.
full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 102
http://waffles.wilschrader.com/

is not working from my Work Internet but it  was yesterday, is there something wrong on sites end Or my works end..

Site is down.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
http://waffles.wilschrader.com/

is not working from my Work Internet but it  was yesterday, is there something wrong on sites end Or my works end..
sr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 250
This is the best pool! Thanks waffle!

I have been here almost a week and loving it...low low rejects.....good payouts....

This pool is the tits!



this pool it the best because its admin it the best
thank you waffle  for great pool
sr. member
Activity: 249
Merit: 250
This is the best pool! Thanks waffle!

I have been here almost a week and loving it...low low rejects.....good payouts....

This pool is the tits!



+1
sr. member
Activity: 394
Merit: 250
This is the best pool! Thanks waffle!

I have been here almost a week and loving it...low low rejects.....good payouts....

This pool is the tits!

full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
Is there a way to put BTC in the Unconverted balances? Then the BTC held at Cryptsy could represent unwithdrawn BTC that are not eligible for distribution.
legendary
Activity: 1318
Merit: 1040
Quote
Feb 27, 2014 (partial)   -2.72436108   17.50 GH/s   -0.09745466
lol  we are donating to the pool right now Grin
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
Proposal:  If Cryptsy pendings cause you to only have XX% of the BTC owed to pool members, then pay each pool member XX% of what is owed.  I think this is much fairer than paying some and not paying others.
I would be strongly against this... it makes accounting a pain in the ass.

Keep doing what you have been doing, poolwaffle.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Hey guys, payment update.  Our withdrawals from last night and this morning went through a bit ago, but we have the same problem as a few days ago.  Essentially the amount withdrawn doesn't cover all of the new earnings since the withdrawal started.  So I've got another withdrawal pending now (I'm expecting it to take the normal 6-12 hours cryptsy is taking), and for now I'll do what I did last time, which is run payouts in order of longest time since payout.  I think this is probably going to become more of a standard thing due to the delays at cryptsy.  I know there was a bit of dislike to it last time, as it brings up the question "why did half the users get paid", but at least for the immediate future while we figure out how to get these withdrawals processed faster (I'll look into their new auto-withdrawal API), it does at least let us get some of the payments out to miners.  And as long as its done in a consistent manner, I don't think its a huge issue.

So the current plan, for the next few days (at least) is to pay out users as we have the funds.  Anyone over the threshold (0.01btc) will be eligible for payouts, and we'll select users who haven't been paid in the longest time first.  We'll pay out all of the funds we have at the time, and run another set of payouts every time a cryptsy deposit clears.  We'll likely be running them twice a day (we'll see).

This method will work nicely in the future as well assuming constant delays from cryptsy (I'm doubtful of them getting fixed), so we can make multiple requests throughout the day, and payouts as they come in.

Proposal:  If Cryptsy pendings cause you to only have XX% of the BTC owed to pool members, then pay each pool member XX% of what is owed.  I think this is much fairer than paying some and not paying others.
member
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
Hey guys, payment update.  Our withdrawals from last night and this morning went through a bit ago, but we have the same problem as a few days ago.  Essentially the amount withdrawn doesn't cover all of the new earnings since the withdrawal started.  So I've got another withdrawal pending now (I'm expecting it to take the normal 6-12 hours cryptsy is taking), and for now I'll do what I did last time, which is run payouts in order of longest time since payout.  I think this is probably going to become more of a standard thing due to the delays at cryptsy.  I know there was a bit of dislike to it last time, as it brings up the question "why did half the users get paid", but at least for the immediate future while we figure out how to get these withdrawals processed faster (I'll look into their new auto-withdrawal API), it does at least let us get some of the payments out to miners.  And as long as its done in a consistent manner, I don't think its a huge issue.

So the current plan, for the next few days (at least) is to pay out users as we have the funds.  Anyone over the threshold (0.01btc) will be eligible for payouts, and we'll select users who haven't been paid in the longest time first.  We'll pay out all of the funds we have at the time, and run another set of payouts every time a cryptsy deposit clears.  We'll likely be running them twice a day (we'll see).

This method will work nicely in the future as well assuming constant delays from cryptsy (I'm doubtful of them getting fixed), so we can make multiple requests throughout the day, and payouts as they come in.

just got my payment, thank you waffles
member
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
Have a couple of rigs pointed to clevermining.  Rejects are anywhere between 5-20%, but if the whole pool is affected then I wouldn't mind since it should even out.  What I don't like is the supposed bitcoin per megahash rate listed at the top of the page since it only includes accepted shares & not your total mining power. 

no idea how you have the patience to do so.  i was on clevermining for maybe 2 hours, and ran the fuck away from there.  rejects were so bad.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 254
Hey guys, payment update.  Our withdrawals from last night and this morning went through a bit ago, but we have the same problem as a few days ago.  Essentially the amount withdrawn doesn't cover all of the new earnings since the withdrawal started.  So I've got another withdrawal pending now (I'm expecting it to take the normal 6-12 hours cryptsy is taking), and for now I'll do what I did last time, which is run payouts in order of longest time since payout.  I think this is probably going to become more of a standard thing due to the delays at cryptsy.  I know there was a bit of dislike to it last time, as it brings up the question "why did half the users get paid", but at least for the immediate future while we figure out how to get these withdrawals processed faster (I'll look into their new auto-withdrawal API), it does at least let us get some of the payments out to miners.  And as long as its done in a consistent manner, I don't think its a huge issue.

So the current plan, for the next few days (at least) is to pay out users as we have the funds.  Anyone over the threshold (0.01btc) will be eligible for payouts, and we'll select users who haven't been paid in the longest time first.  We'll pay out all of the funds we have at the time, and run another set of payouts every time a cryptsy deposit clears.  We'll likely be running them twice a day (we'll see).

This method will work nicely in the future as well assuming constant delays from cryptsy (I'm doubtful of them getting fixed), so we can make multiple requests throughout the day, and payouts as they come in.
sr. member
Activity: 249
Merit: 250
I gotta admit, I never had problems with waffle. Really low reject rates too.

I also admit that I am testing out clevermining to see if their claims of profitability match their stats. My reject rate there though....  Cry

Please report back, as this is a great piece of info.  We can obviously claim 10% higher stats, if 10% of everyones hashrate gets rejected Smiley  I'm personally too involved to give any sort of non-biased stats, and I appreciate anyone that can come back and say "from time A to B, I earned C on wafflepool, and D on ".  WP has things to learn from other pools, they have things to learn from us Smiley

Ran for 24h at clevermining, hashing at 3.6 MH/s, their website reports I had a 13% reject rate (0.5 MH) and my profits were 0.03139240 btc.

If you do the math vs my actual hashrate, that would only be 0.00872 btc/MH.
If you calculate it out vs my accepted MH, that would be 0.0101265 btc/MH.

So read it however you want. Your btc/MH is fairly accurate there based on accepted MH, not your actual hash rate.
Only 13%?? You got LUCKY ^_^ as for me I'll stick to my less than 1% on WafflePool haha

I tried out clevermining last weekend and my reject rate was 30-60% depending on miners. Here it's less than 1%.

thats crazy lol. im under 1% on coinsolver too. idk why clever has so many rejects

Have a couple of rigs pointed to clevermining.  Rejects are anywhere between 5-20%, but if the whole pool is affected then I wouldn't mind since it should even out.  What I don't like is the supposed bitcoin per megahash rate listed at the top of the page since it only includes accepted shares & not your total mining power. 
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
I gotta admit, I never had problems with waffle. Really low reject rates too.

I also admit that I am testing out clevermining to see if their claims of profitability match their stats. My reject rate there though....  Cry

Please report back, as this is a great piece of info.  We can obviously claim 10% higher stats, if 10% of everyones hashrate gets rejected Smiley  I'm personally too involved to give any sort of non-biased stats, and I appreciate anyone that can come back and say "from time A to B, I earned C on wafflepool, and D on ".  WP has things to learn from other pools, they have things to learn from us Smiley

Ran for 24h at clevermining, hashing at 3.6 MH/s, their website reports I had a 13% reject rate (0.5 MH) and my profits were 0.03139240 btc.

If you do the math vs my actual hashrate, that would only be 0.00872 btc/MH.
If you calculate it out vs my accepted MH, that would be 0.0101265 btc/MH.

So read it however you want. Your btc/MH is fairly accurate there based on accepted MH, not your actual hash rate.
Only 13%?? You got LUCKY ^_^ as for me I'll stick to my less than 1% on WafflePool haha

I tried out clevermining last weekend and my reject rate was 30-60% depending on miners. Here it's less than 1%.

thats crazy lol. im under 1% on coinsolver too. idk why clever has so many rejects
Jump to: