Topic: [POOL][Scrypt][Scrypt-N][X11] Profit switching pool - wafflepool.com - page 63. (Read 465769 times)
June 07, 2014, 03:33:58 PM
Temps are MUCH lower with X11 give it a try
June 07, 2014, 03:04:06 PM
You can get 2 - 2.1Mh easy with your 750ti.
My ccminer:
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
ccminer50.exe --algo=x11 -o stratum+tcp://eu.wafflepool.com:3331 -u xxxx -p d=0.008
Overclock setting:
https://i.imgur.com/6ngHYsJ.png
I guess I could, but currently I'm limited with my overclocking potential, since all of the four cards are so tightly packed together. So even with this happy little gpu, the temps tend to go really high really fast. I'll probably try with a different setup with risers later, but for now this has to do.
But I'm still curious why the difference in MHash between pools.
June 07, 2014, 02:27:41 PM
I am very green to mining. I currently use BMAT for scrypt mining with 2 AMD R7970HD cards. I would like to switch over to the X11 when it becomes available but as I understand it BMAT won't do X11 mining. Since I need an operating system that will run off a USB stick could someone please give me some help or suggestions on how to go about this? Thanks in advance!
I personally haven't tried it, but I think this is what you might want to look into: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/pimp-os-is-the-fastest-and-easiest-way-to-mine-all-crypto-currencies-558715
June 07, 2014, 01:44:22 PM
I am very green to mining. I currently use BMAT for scrypt mining with 2 AMD R7970HD cards. I would like to switch over to the X11 when it becomes available but as I understand it BMAT won't do X11 mining. Since I need an operating system that will run off a USB stick could someone please give me some help or suggestions on how to go about this? Thanks in advance!
June 07, 2014, 12:05:23 PM
Hi guys,
I have 4 750ti's running X11 and in another pool they all average at about 1750 khash/s (as reported by ccminer). However, in Wafflepool I get only about 1550 per gpu, with everything else in the environment exactly the same. I was wondering why that might be. I've tried a couple of different difficulty settings, but they don't seem to make a difference in this regard.
I have 4 750ti's running X11 and in another pool they all average at about 1750 khash/s (as reported by ccminer). However, in Wafflepool I get only about 1550 per gpu, with everything else in the environment exactly the same. I was wondering why that might be. I've tried a couple of different difficulty settings, but they don't seem to make a difference in this regard.
You can get 2 - 2.1Mh easy with your 750ti.
My ccminer:
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
ccminer50.exe --algo=x11 -o stratum+tcp://eu.wafflepool.com:3331 -u xxxx -p d=0.008
Overclock setting:
June 07, 2014, 07:18:51 AM
Hi guys,
I have 4 750ti's running X11 and in another pool they all average at about 1750 khash/s (as reported by ccminer). However, in Wafflepool I get only about 1550 per gpu, with everything else in the environment exactly the same. I was wondering why that might be. I've tried a couple of different difficulty settings, but they don't seem to make a difference in this regard.
I have 4 750ti's running X11 and in another pool they all average at about 1750 khash/s (as reported by ccminer). However, in Wafflepool I get only about 1550 per gpu, with everything else in the environment exactly the same. I was wondering why that might be. I've tried a couple of different difficulty settings, but they don't seem to make a difference in this regard.
June 07, 2014, 04:44:39 AM
Alright, I have about 340 Mh/s thrown at the X11 beta, lets test this puppy out... Thanks for your hard work PW!
June 07, 2014, 02:01:00 AM
I can confirm that catalyst 14.6 beta increases hashrate on x11mod from 3.1 to 3.7 HOWEVER I am getting absolutely no shares accepted. Going back to 14.4.
EDIT: 14.4 working fine with x11mod. 14.6 beta breaks something in x11mod.cl (darkcoin.cl works on 14.6)
EDIT: 14.4 working fine with x11mod. 14.6 beta breaks something in x11mod.cl (darkcoin.cl works on 14.6)
Yep
See here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/new-amd-drivers-146-possible-speed-increase-627142
Make sure you completely remove the amd drivers when reverting back!
I used DDU to get rid of 14.6. I fought x11mod for a day trying to get it going on 14.6 LOL.
14.6 broken
And i'm so glad you guys know what you're doing, because otherwise I get a ton of emails like "shits broke, fix it", and can't find the problem
Clearly the problem is with the new OpenCL implementation as I had to delete all the *.bin files generated with 14.6 to get 14.4 working again ...
June 07, 2014, 01:00:03 AM
@PW what's your threshold to enable darkcoin?
June 07, 2014, 12:48:50 AM
I can confirm that catalyst 14.6 beta increases hashrate on x11mod from 3.1 to 3.7 HOWEVER I am getting absolutely no shares accepted. Going back to 14.4.
EDIT: 14.4 working fine with x11mod. 14.6 beta breaks something in x11mod.cl (darkcoin.cl works on 14.6)
EDIT: 14.4 working fine with x11mod. 14.6 beta breaks something in x11mod.cl (darkcoin.cl works on 14.6)
Yep
See here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/new-amd-drivers-146-possible-speed-increase-627142
Make sure you completely remove the amd drivers when reverting back!
I used DDU to get rid of 14.6. I fought x11mod for a day trying to get it going on 14.6 LOL.
14.6 broken
And i'm so glad you guys know what you're doing, because otherwise I get a ton of emails like "shits broke, fix it", and can't find the problem
June 07, 2014, 12:45:31 AM
I can confirm that catalyst 14.6 beta increases hashrate on x11mod from 3.1 to 3.7 HOWEVER I am getting absolutely no shares accepted. Going back to 14.4.
EDIT: 14.4 working fine with x11mod. 14.6 beta breaks something in x11mod.cl (darkcoin.cl works on 14.6)
EDIT: 14.4 working fine with x11mod. 14.6 beta breaks something in x11mod.cl (darkcoin.cl works on 14.6)
Yep
See here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/new-amd-drivers-146-possible-speed-increase-627142
Make sure you completely remove the amd drivers when reverting back!
I used DDU to get rid of 14.6. I fought x11mod for a day trying to get it going on 14.6 LOL.
14.6 broken
June 07, 2014, 12:36:17 AM
I can confirm that catalyst 14.6 beta increases hashrate on x11mod from 3.1 to 3.7 HOWEVER I am getting absolutely no shares accepted. Going back to 14.4.
EDIT: 14.4 working fine with x11mod. 14.6 beta breaks something in x11mod.cl (darkcoin.cl works on 14.6)
EDIT: 14.4 working fine with x11mod. 14.6 beta breaks something in x11mod.cl (darkcoin.cl works on 14.6)
Yep
See here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/new-amd-drivers-146-possible-speed-increase-627142
Make sure you completely remove the amd drivers when reverting back!
June 07, 2014, 12:13:49 AM
I can confirm that catalyst 14.6 beta increases hashrate on x11mod from 3.1 to 3.7 HOWEVER I am getting absolutely no shares accepted. Going back to 14.4.
EDIT: 14.4 working fine with x11mod. 14.6 beta breaks something in x11mod.cl (darkcoin.cl works on 14.6)
EDIT: 14.4 working fine with x11mod. 14.6 beta breaks something in x11mod.cl (darkcoin.cl works on 14.6)
June 06, 2014, 11:26:47 PM
Good to know, thanks
The 4x is just what I had picked up from other places around the web. Eventually we'll move to client-specified (saved via cookie) for the multipliers, cause for some of you, a 120% X11 is worse than a 105% Scrypt-N, etc.
Good idea to make it a multiplier set in cookie so I can get accurate judge of which algo to mine ... The 4x is just what I had picked up from other places around the web. Eventually we'll move to client-specified (saved via cookie) for the multipliers, cause for some of you, a 120% X11 is worse than a 105% Scrypt-N, etc.
June 06, 2014, 11:16:05 PM
my calculation was off ... closer to 4.2
June 06, 2014, 10:53:10 PM
@PW
I'm getting 3.0MHs consistent X11 with 280X which only did 730KHs on scrypt = 5X ratio ...
I'm getting 3.0MHs consistent X11 with 280X which only did 730KHs on scrypt = 5X ratio ...
Good to know, thanks
The 4x is just what I had picked up from other places around the web. Eventually we'll move to client-specified (saved via cookie) for the multipliers, cause for some of you, a 120% X11 is worse than a 105% Scrypt-N, etc.
June 06, 2014, 10:17:33 PM
@PW
EDIT: I'm getting 3.1MHs consistent X11 with 280X which only did 730KHs on scrypt = 4.2X ratio ...
EDIT: I'm getting 3.1MHs consistent X11 with 280X which only did 730KHs on scrypt = 4.2X ratio ...
June 06, 2014, 09:45:53 PM
Thanks, getting 3.0MHs from 280X now.
"intensity" : "15",
"worksize" : "256",
"kernel" : "x11mod",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "24576",
"shaders" : "2048",
"gpu-threads" : "4",
"gpu-engine" : "1050-1100",
GPU 67.0C
WU 0.049
Had to limit to I=15, I=16 crashes 14.4 catalyst, might try 14.6 beta I've heard it is an impressive boost in hashrate ...
Going to mess with another box now with the 7950
"intensity" : "15",
"worksize" : "256",
"kernel" : "x11mod",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "24576",
"shaders" : "2048",
"gpu-threads" : "4",
"gpu-engine" : "1050-1100",
GPU 67.0C
WU 0.049
Had to limit to I=15, I=16 crashes 14.4 catalyst, might try 14.6 beta I've heard it is an impressive boost in hashrate ...
Going to mess with another box now with the 7950
June 06, 2014, 08:47:08 PM
R9280X sgminer 4.1 x11x13mod
EDIT: I could use a config for 7950 also
EDIT: I could use a config for 7950 also
Here is what works for me.
280X = 3 MH/s
Quote
"worksize": "256",
"intensity": "16",
"thread-concurrency": "8192",
"vectors" : "1",
"gpu-engine" : "1045",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500",
"gpu-powertune" : "-20",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"kernel": "x11mod",
"intensity": "16",
"thread-concurrency": "8192",
"vectors" : "1",
"gpu-engine" : "1045",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500",
"gpu-powertune" : "-20",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"kernel": "x11mod",
7950 = 2.63 MH/s
Quote
"worksize": "256",
"intensity": "20",
"thread-concurrency": "14336",
"vectors" : "1",
"gpu-engine" : "1100",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250",
"gpu-powertune" : "0",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-threads" : "1",
"kernel": "x11mod",
"intensity": "20",
"thread-concurrency": "14336",
"vectors" : "1",
"gpu-engine" : "1100",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250",
"gpu-powertune" : "0",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-threads" : "1",
"kernel": "x11mod",
These are fairly conservative settings, I just mostly copied them over from an old scrypt config and got 4x X11 rate, so I didn't bother yet to go any further. If you can get these to work you can try adjusting gpu-engine up, gpu-memclock can probably be lowered. You can also experiment with xintensity and/or thread-concurrency.
June 06, 2014, 07:29:38 PM
x11mod = 3.7Mhs and no shares + HW errors
darkcoin = 2.2MHs and getting shares
darkcoin = 2.2MHs and getting shares
What kind of GPU(s) are you using? If it's one of 7950/280X/270X/290 I can give you some settings to try with x11mod that work for me.
R9280X sgminer 4.1 x11x13mod
Working config:
{
"pools" : [
{
"url" : "stratum+tcp://uswest.wafflepool.com:3331",
"user" : "1HANJQygp3jHuzutceBgMT7wfCgEug6h4L_gpu3",
"pass" : "d=0.008"
}
]
,
"intensity" : "13",
"worksize" : "256",
"kernel" : "darkcoin",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "24576",
"shaders" : "2048",
"gpu-threads" : "4",
"gpu-engine" : "1050-1075",
"gpu-fan" : "70-100",
"auto-fan" : true,
"gpu-memclock" : "1600",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0",
"gpu-powertune" : "0",
"gpu-vddc" : "0.000",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-overheat" : "85",
"temp-target" : "70",
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "90",
"failover-switch-delay" : "60",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"log" : "5",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"queue" : "0",
"scan-time" : "60",
"tcp-keepalive" : "30",
"temp-hysteresis" : "2",
"shares" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin",
"no-client-reconnect" : true
}
Quote
sgminer 4.1.0 - Started: [2014-06-06 18:05:00] - [0 days 00:53:50]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):2.216M (avg):2.237Mh/s | A:175 R:5 HW:0 WU:0.028/m
ST: 0 SS: 0 NB: 131 LW: 3973 GF: 1 RF: 0
Connected to uswest.wafflepool.com:3331 (stratum) diff 0.008 as user 1HANJQygp3j
Block: 11c99260... Diff:25 Started: [18:58:46] Best share: 1.454
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU managementettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 0: 66.0C 2809RPM | 2.256M/2.239Mh/s | A:175 R: 2.8% HW:0 WU:0.028/m I:13
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[18:57:10] Stratum from Pool 0 detected new block
[18:57:12] Accepted 0e4f7683 Diff 0.070/0.008 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[18:57:46] Accepted 1e3eb667 Diff 0.033/0.008 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[18:58:00] Accepted 17b646de Diff 0.042/0.008 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[18:58:09] Stratum from Pool 0 detected new block
[18:58:14] Stratum from Pool 0 detected new block
[18:58:20] Stratum from Pool 0 detected new block
[18:58:27] Network diff set to 24
[18:58:27] Stratum from Pool 0 requested work restart
[18:58:27] New block detected on network before pool notification
[18:58:29] Accepted 77b411eb Diff 0.008/0.008 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[18:58:40] Accepted 571d6658 Diff 0.011/0.008 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[18:58:46] Network diff set to 25
[18:58:46] Stratum from Pool 0 detected new block
EDIT: I could use a config for 7950 also --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):2.216M (avg):2.237Mh/s | A:175 R:5 HW:0 WU:0.028/m
ST: 0 SS: 0 NB: 131 LW: 3973 GF: 1 RF: 0
Connected to uswest.wafflepool.com:3331 (stratum) diff 0.008 as user 1HANJQygp3j
Block: 11c99260... Diff:25 Started: [18:58:46] Best share: 1.454
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management
GPU 0: 66.0C 2809RPM | 2.256M/2.239Mh/s | A:175 R: 2.8% HW:0 WU:0.028/m I:13
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[18:57:10] Stratum from Pool 0 detected new block
[18:57:12] Accepted 0e4f7683 Diff 0.070/0.008 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[18:57:46] Accepted 1e3eb667 Diff 0.033/0.008 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[18:58:00] Accepted 17b646de Diff 0.042/0.008 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[18:58:09] Stratum from Pool 0 detected new block
[18:58:14] Stratum from Pool 0 detected new block
[18:58:20] Stratum from Pool 0 detected new block
[18:58:27] Network diff set to 24
[18:58:27] Stratum from Pool 0 requested work restart
[18:58:27] New block detected on network before pool notification
[18:58:29] Accepted 77b411eb Diff 0.008/0.008 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[18:58:40] Accepted 571d6658 Diff 0.011/0.008 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[18:58:46] Network diff set to 25
[18:58:46] Stratum from Pool 0 detected new block
Jump to: