Author

Topic: [PoS+PoW] eXocoin [EXO]-gen 2.0- dev. from scratch! Give-Away | Open Beta - page 284. (Read 415654 times)

legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1004
No reply from eXo, I would be getting very suspicious.  Even though many people have money in escrow, others have sent BTC directly, all resulting of the buzz generated in the Nxt thread, so I would say it's irresponsible for Anon to be posting info on this in Nxt and others should avoid doing so in the future.
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
maybe Exo_coin and Exokk are the same person and this is a one man show)

If they are the same person, I doubt he has skills to write any credible software.

Hopefully they are not.

I think Anon should have not posted this to Nxt thread.

That's how this dead thread resurrected.

full member
Activity: 231
Merit: 100
Only with money that Anon has hoarded give to start a new coin in case of scam
Smiley
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
I just want to add tht of the exo coin dev is a scammer hes a daft one. Because so much more funds could be generated by following through with the creation of exocoin than just scamming 50btc from investors. Think about it

Well this depends, if this is a scam and if he is just an ordinary Joe in crypto world which Exokk (maybe Exo_coin and Exokk are the same person and this is a one man show) first 50 posts suggest that he is than this is his max and 60+ BTC is a lottery winnings for a man like this. To continue scamming after these 60+ BTC you need to understand crypto world much better.

This until now could have done anybody with at least 2 months experience in Crypto, just reading threads on this website for example and with a good scamming plan which this would be if it is a scam and of course with lot of luck (Anon's interest). Beyond this it would be impossible to go for average Joe.

I am still waiting to see if I will invest, lets see what happens in the next 8 hours.
For now it's just dead silence.
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 268
Internet of Value
Quote
The NEM community has already expressed a 50/50 stance on the individuals removal.

This should not be a question of voting. Rules were set. No one should be able to change the rule and remove people after the fact, even with voting.

Quote
Sure, perhaps UP acted a bit rash


Perhaps? Seriously? He removed someone from the list because he didn't like whatever he posted.  What does this say about him?  At least he is very thin skinned.


Quote
but the offer to reinstate his stake is there,

Which he did  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=426303.msg5276278#msg5276278

but no response

Lets be clear that only one person is running the show there .. so it really doesn't matter what people "voted" or what anyone else said.  




The voting is unofficial made by a NEM member. It doesn't affect my  decision but I will take input from that poll. YES, I am running the fundraising on behalf of the development team.  

It is my responsibility alone to uphold the social contract and principle in the first page of the fundraising. It is not a democratic decision. But people have a choice to participate or leave.
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 268
Internet of Value
I think its funny how these new coins try to beat nxt distribution with all these mad ideas on how to keep it fair. But none of them succeed. Take nem for example sock puppet accs, exo has the same problem with the 1st level 2nd level 3rd level investments. Looks like nxt did alright.
Oh by the way im in on exo regardless of distribution this only matters to those that missed out learned this with nxt

Nem has at least 1500 unique accounts and a strong community right from start. That's what success means. Sock puppet accounts have never been an issue to me.
Nxt IPO was fair in its own way and nem did not intend to be "fairer" than nxt. You can stop speculating on what nem trying to do because beating some other crypto in any aspect isn't one of them.

You do  have a really  think skin. You removed someone from the stake list because he said something you didn't like.

Sorry, but that is really bad bad start to Nem

He said he was "interested" because he did not realize how NEM turned out to be. So he "joined in" by a mistake. So I corrected that and he was given a choice again. Similarly,  that applies to any people who ask for a refund. NEM is not selling stakes so there is no contract that you would have a stake if you say or do something.

That is how NEM will operate and read this post carefully before you think otherwise https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5283736
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
I just want to add tht of the exo coin dev is a scammer hes a daft one. Because so much more funds could be generated by following through with the creation of exocoin than just scamming 50btc from investors. Think about it
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
Quote
The NEM community has already expressed a 50/50 stance on the individuals removal.

This should not be a question of voting. Rules were set. No one should be able to change the rule and remove people after the fact, even with voting.

Quote
Sure, perhaps UP acted a bit rash


Perhaps? Seriously? He removed someone from the list because he didn't like whatever he posted.  What does this say about him?  At least he is very thin skinned.


Quote
but the offer to reinstate his stake is there,

Which he did  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=426303.msg5276278#msg5276278

but no response

Lets be clear that only one person is running the show there .. so it really doesn't matter what people "voted" or what anyone else said.  


newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
Hi Anon136,

Just send you 1.009BTC (1BTC exo + 0.009 fee)
TransactionID:  5b55e5d0b5be44e89ed59fcf55945a39af466945c4e561fcb19fbc83046e1324

Thanks,
Qwitnix
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1055



Sorry, I couldn't resist!  Grin
member
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
it seems writing nice text means a lot.
ppl here are fond of risk. Good luck, investors.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Ye dont wanna jump to conclusions here but it is very quiet on the devs part here. Please respond and answer ppls questions. The only other reason is maybe they are busy writing the whitepaper? But im sure a quick update and message from the devs would be nice

Well Exo_coin was last active today so I am sure he saw all of the questions.

Name:   eXo_coin
Posts:   44
Activity:   44
Position:   Jr. Member
Date Registered:   January 09, 2014, 12:45:13 PM
Last Active:   Today at 11:34:59 AM
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
Ye dont wanna jump to conclusions here but it is very quiet on the devs part here. Please respond and answer ppls questions. The only other reason is maybe they are busy writing the whitepaper? But im sure a quick update and message from the devs would be nice
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
transaction ID:ddd38047d89ceb0056576c5fabd3acc839c4b7b81cec3db11ab1becc386eb89e
0.1BTC

transaction ID: b36cc3fce17aef39301e7abadd1ee1cf04aeed0fdf6e3d79ba16fb086f714939
0.11BTC

transaction ID: e626f4377078c8ab075e094ffb9d351cc8050a9d2d716c586dfe84fc5c83c9c5
0.09BTC

total: 0.3 BTC

 Wink 

The email I used for register is [email protected]
hero member
Activity: 497
Merit: 501
I think its funny how these new coins try to beat nxt distribution with all these mad ideas on how to keep it fair. But none of them succeed. Take nem for example sock puppet accs, exo has the same problem with the 1st level 2nd level 3rd level investments. Looks like nxt did alright.
Oh by the way im in on exo regardless of distribution this only matters to those that missed out learned this with nxt

Nem has at least 1500 unique accounts and a strong community right from start. That's what success means. Sock puppet accounts have never been an issue to me.
Nxt IPO was fair in its own way and nem did not intend to be "fairer" than nxt. You can stop speculating on what nem trying to do because beating some other crypto in any aspect isn't one of them.

You do  have a really  think skin. You removed someone from the stake list because he said something you didn't like.

Sorry, but that is really bad bad start to Nem

Hardly the right thread for this. The NEM community has already expressed a 50/50 stance on the individuals removal. This does not show a mob mentality and if anything, a very diplomatic stance towards the situation.

With this in mind, the person in question made posts with strong implications they wish to have no part in it. Sure, perhaps UP acted a bit rash, but the offer to reinstate his stake is there, so stop making an issue where there is none; as long as the offer still stands for him to reclaim the stake, this argument is absolutely feeble. The choice is his if he'd rather continue his tirade or actually reclaim his stake.


Back on the subject thread, i'm disappointed to still not see any response from any of the eXo team, and honestly i lose faith with each passing hour as long as nothing is heard. The only consolation is the fact the BTC/LTC funds still remain in the original fundraising accounts.
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
I think its funny how these new coins try to beat nxt distribution with all these mad ideas on how to keep it fair. But none of them succeed. Take nem for example sock puppet accs, exo has the same problem with the 1st level 2nd level 3rd level investments. Looks like nxt did alright.
Oh by the way im in on exo regardless of distribution this only matters to those that missed out learned this with nxt

Nem has at least 1500 unique accounts and a strong community right from start. That's what success means. Sock puppet accounts have never been an issue to me.
Nxt IPO was fair in its own way and nem did not intend to be "fairer" than nxt. You can stop speculating on what nem trying to do because beating some other crypto in any aspect isn't one of them.

You do  have a really  think skin. You removed someone from the stake list because he said something you didn't like.

Sorry, but that is really bad bad start to Nem
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1010
I think its funny how these new coins try to beat nxt distribution with all these mad ideas on how to keep it fair. But none of them succeed. Take nem for example sock puppet accs, exo has the same problem with the 1st level 2nd level 3rd level investments. Looks like nxt did alright.
Oh by the way im in on exo regardless of distribution this only matters to those that missed out learned this with nxt

Nem has at least 1500 unique accounts and a strong community right from start. That's what success means. Sock puppet accounts have never been an issue to me.
Nxt IPO was fair in its own way and nem did not intend to be "fairer" than nxt. You can stop speculating on what nem trying to do because beating some other crypto in any aspect isn't one of them.

There will always be complainers.
Frankly, I'm amazed by the amount of activity that NEM generates. If you can get people *involved* with the coin instead of just having people hoarding them, that's a very good sign.

People looking for a "perfect" launch are searching for the mystical Land of Free Pie.
i may have been misunderstood whith my comment. I wasnt bashing any coin im an investor with nem along with exo. I was merley stating all the ipos refer to bettering the distribution that nxt had. Thats all. And so far i havnt seen a reason to believe any of these ipos have had better distribution than nxt had. I mean even if you have a few thousand investors from btt its still not fairly distributed is it we have 7 billion ppl on the plant a few thousand btt members is not truly distributed is it?
I wish all the ipos good luck epsecially nem as i feel it has more to offer than any 2.0 clone

Ah yes. I agree completely.
If all you have is the same code and only differ in your AIM for "better distribution", you are just being silly.
"Better distribution" is a dream and not a business plan in itself.

sr. member
Activity: 338
Merit: 250
Hi Anon136,

I just now sent you 0,5BTC
TX id: 58c6bd09e50ccc43a8903808c4f875d6e78b372d0c6956123107eeaf8eb81ab5
Username: Mikesbmw

Oh, i just saw that you get a 0.005BTC escrow fee (of course)
TX id: e407d43c3cb0c50c1514c5c29bdf6115e919d0e60a711394bcbb628997cbd28b

Thanks in advance!
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
I think its funny how these new coins try to beat nxt distribution with all these mad ideas on how to keep it fair. But none of them succeed. Take nem for example sock puppet accs, exo has the same problem with the 1st level 2nd level 3rd level investments. Looks like nxt did alright.
Oh by the way im in on exo regardless of distribution this only matters to those that missed out learned this with nxt

Nem has at least 1500 unique accounts and a strong community right from start. That's what success means. Sock puppet accounts have never been an issue to me.
Nxt IPO was fair in its own way and nem did not intend to be "fairer" than nxt. You can stop speculating on what nem trying to do because beating some other crypto in any aspect isn't one of them.

There will always be complainers.
Frankly, I'm amazed by the amount of activity that NEM generates. If you can get people *involved* with the coin instead of just having people hoarding them, that's a very good sign.

People looking for a "perfect" launch are searching for the mystical Land of Free Pie.
i may have been misunderstood whith my comment. I wasnt bashing any coin im an investor with nem along with exo. I was merley stating all the ipos refer to bettering the distribution that nxt had. Thats all. And so far i havnt seen a reason to believe any of these ipos have had better distribution than nxt had. I mean even if you have a few thousand investors from btt its still not fairly distributed is it we have 7 billion ppl on the plant a few thousand btt members is not truly distributed is it?
I wish all the ipos good luck epsecially nem as i feel it has more to offer than any 2.0 clone
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
hi, Anon136

I just sent 1.009 btc to you for eXocoin, and 1 BTC for IPO and 0.009 BTC for your escrow fee.

thanks!

the TXID link is following:

https://blockchain.info/en/tx/ae15495b619d528c0703b2981f171885f95ea5aa45ca94fd8f651285a1347e06

rgs,
Jump to: