I think there is good reason to freak out a bit.
Right now this coin is on the edge...
I don't think so. Potcoin looks to be in the lead when it comes to partnering with the legal cannabis trade, that hasn't changed in the last few days. I get tired of seeing posters act like they want developers to act like counselors too and post here every few hours just to re-assure people, it's kinda sad
For the record ... I have been investing/trading in virtually every market, Stock, commodity, Futures, FOREX... for over 20 years. I also own my own software/web development company that specializes in writing algorithms that trade the aforementioned markets. A rookie I am not. This is not about needing emotional support; for me at least, its not about coin price. In fact if you notice in all my references and posts ... I have never mentioned price.
So please be careful parsing my statements and choosing what to hear. While I hope POT still has a future and a bright future, my concerns are not about price in the least. As a result I still own a chunk (and will continue to hold until it becomes valuable or goes to zero). My points are related to clarity, communication and adoption. The folks running POT are not very transparent and forth coming with information when questions are asked and are not very responsive to criticism or even suggestion.
So the question is ... how is POT being run?
There are two base models I see that POT (or any project like this) can be run, and successfully run ...
1) As a business -- all control, PR and effort is dictated by the people in charge of POT. This can work if the pockets are deep enough to support developing , marketing and PR efforts. In the end its just software and there are countless examples of how to run a software company. Think Microsoft.
2) Partner with the community -- final decisions are made by the controlling interest but are made based on a solid clear communication and feedback from the community of supporters and users. Think Wordpress, or virtually any strong open source project.
I work under the assumption that POT wants to partner with and build the community. And I choose to become part of the community dialogue and try to offer criticism as well as solutions. No one has all the right answers, however, with a strong community, POT stands a much better chance at widespread success.
If in reality, POT is trying to operate under the "as a business" model ... then I will personally rethink my stance. But we have been given no indication of how POT is operating. Again ... communication and transparency.