And to Dooglus re: the 90% bets with R2W... basically backing out at the last possible moment, with the random assertion that you do not trust Dean was pretty terrible on your part. You basically accused him of fraud and it was wrong. If you feel that way, don't come on the site, discuss it like you are about to do it, then throw Dean under the bus at the last second and question his character. I was disappointed and shocked that someone with as big a voice as yours in the bitcoin community would do that to someone who has a flawless record of honesty and trust built up over 12+ months of running a gambling site, and it felt like an unnecessary cheap shot.
I think you misunderstood.
I never agreed to play Road's game, and didn't back out.
I also didn't accuse Dean of anything.
I said Road's game wasn't provably fair since it was open to collusion. I didn't say Dean would collude, I said he could.
Someone (you?) said he would be unlikely to ruin his reputation over a small amount like 20 BTC. In response I said that he had already risked his reputation by refusing to pay out a similar amount to sjess so I wouldn't be so sure.
I don't have logs of the chat - this is from memory. Sorry for any confusion.
Anyone that was there can see right through this... you went so far as to tell Road to go ahead and send you the BTC for escrow. So to say you didn't agree to play/didn't back out is trying to skirt by on a technicality - the progress bar was at 90%. There was plenty of discussion and everyone in chat got the impression the betting was imminent. At the very end, after every detail had been sorted and Road was ready to send the bitcoin, you came out in chat and said you had no way of making sure it was provably fair, because Dean could see the seed before each roll (sorry if my jargon is slightly off because I do not know the technicalities of how it works) and there was potential for collusion. This is where my beef comes in... this comes across as a unnecessary cheap shot at Dean. You are basically saying you feel strong enough that he might be a fraud and willingly participate with members to scam other members such as yourself for a quick buck, that he might do so. This is completely within your right to feel he is capable of that, but do not come in the chat and spend 20 minutes arranging details of a bet and get ready to do it, then randomly back out last minute by throwing Dean under the bus. Better yet, never say a single word to the PRC community or visit the site until you come up with some kind of proof or precedent with Dean's past actions for heinous accusations. Saying "I also didn't accuse Dean of anything." is bogus. There was some serious accusations that were implied.
If you were some random person in chat that did this it wouldn't be a big deal, but you are one of the most trusted people in all of bitcoin, and your word carries alot of weight. That is why, even with no affiliation with Dean/PRC other than being an investor, this got me so fired up and I felt I needed to say something.
Also, comparing the sjess situation to this where you are accusing Dean of potentially being a fraud is such a terrible comparison on so many levels, it is again an irresponsible statement coming from someone with alot of influence in this community. My statement was that if we really think about the situation, did you really think Dean was going to scam his members now, after 12+ months with a flawless record, ~$400k invested, and the potential to replace JD and make millions of dollars if he just remains trustworthy, for a cut of 10 btc and the potential for Road2Wealth to ruin his entire business if he wanted or if something leaked? Not happening. Regardless, this statement was just off the cuff and is completely irrelevant to the point I'm trying to make, and honestly it feels like you were just trying to use something I said to further your point, regardless of context. You should choose your words and actions more carefully in this type of situation when you have so much influence over a community.