Topic: [PRE-ANN] Stone - DAG Data-Structured Private Cryptocurrency - page 15. (Read 42228 times)
February 20, 2018, 11:02:28 AM
Ti'll the end of the month then Felix
February 20, 2018, 10:28:21 AM
Thanks for the vote of confidence BKCCI 
As i mentioned earlier in the thread, this week has been rather fufilling with purely distribution scammers, ive had to re-audit the entire speadsheet, i have it under control, but its paused code progression for bit, but priorities, distribution is a rather valid part of this project.
Felixando
As i mentioned earlier in the thread, this week has been rather fufilling with purely distribution scammers, ive had to re-audit the entire speadsheet, i have it under control, but its paused code progression for bit, but priorities, distribution is a rather valid part of this project.
Felixando
Thanks for your response. Does this mean publication of code will be postponed?
Hello Yeuph, my reasoning is not related to an 'unsafe investment', as the project will be completed, there is no doubt in my mind. My reasoning is more so that the initial investors flip the investment and sell for 1/10th of what its worth due to fear from the FUD on this forum, when realistically these people who are downtalking the project are trying to do exactly that, cause fear to scoop up discounted coins, there are actually groups of people who make a living of this type of foul play.
Plus i believe if you have initially wanted to take part in the Stone community, why sell before the first release? Is that why you wanted to be part of Stone? to sell before the first wallet release?
What will end up happening is people will become impatient, sell, a large holder will scoop up a large portion of the supply, then will wait till release and initiate a pump and dump, i do not condone these kind of schemes.
If you are patient, you will see great results, what you must understand is that these projects are not just coded up in a day or a week, otherwise we would already have a private DAG protocol, this is something new, something exciting, if your a fearful person, you most likely wont win in this game.
felixando
Plus i believe if you have initially wanted to take part in the Stone community, why sell before the first release? Is that why you wanted to be part of Stone? to sell before the first wallet release?
What will end up happening is people will become impatient, sell, a large holder will scoop up a large portion of the supply, then will wait till release and initiate a pump and dump, i do not condone these kind of schemes.
If you are patient, you will see great results, what you must understand is that these projects are not just coded up in a day or a week, otherwise we would already have a private DAG protocol, this is something new, something exciting, if your a fearful person, you most likely wont win in this game.
felixando
Your reasoning makes sense, however, by distributing ERC20 tokens first you have made a scenario like what you're trying to prevent possible in the first place. If you would really wanted to avoid a scenario like this to happen, distribution of the actual Stone coins, once the wallet is released, would have made a lot more sense and it wouldn't have wasted your time now with fake donators claiming their share of tokens. Don't you see that this looks rather fishy to many people coming here? It is kind of obvious what creates the biggest FUD here - the non-existent proof of code.
I am distributing the tokens now so we do not have any issues at launch, that's the last thing i want, i'm clearing up all distribution before the swap. This way we have clear skies ahead on launch and i can focus on code, if i have to spend 2 months distributing after launch it wont go down well if there are wallet issues, then pause distribution and people scream, i pause coding and people scream, i do not want this scenario.
You may fantasize all you desire, anything can look fishy if you stare at it long enough, the project is barely 1.5 months old, i have stated from the start i will not release partial incomplete code just to satisfy the select few for 5 minutes, until they then start to criticize my code, because its incomplete. Just sit tight and go to the park feed the ducks, take a breather.
felixando
Well on that note, do you mind telling us how you managed to apply to binance with that partially completed code. or where you just lying nd trying to boost up investment by posting a pic which specific use is to indicate an application to binance.
Also, what kind of crypto scene are you involved in that restricts free trade. Last i checked there are several accts that have requested a refund after donating to this project, and you restricting their ability to get out of their position while they still have a chance. pretty much defeats the entire spirit of what crypto represents.
For a project the received half a million in funding ( i still shudder every time i think about it) you could have easily set up a website and created a placeholder token that wasn't accessible till the platform was complete and the coins have been swapped akin to what exscudo, tezo and countless other projects have done, so this idea of releasing ERC 20 and restricting it's use is a little more than fishy. I personally still think that a long con is in play, i just need awhile to figure out the angle.
Anyway, there is no need bothering with my unproven hypothesis, but could you plz provide us with info on how you managed to pull off the binance application without a complete code. Thanks
I've said it before, and ill say it again; bitcointalk forums are exhausting, i could supply every last request the members ask for, and yet they will find something else new to harp on about, a little concerning but i will not let it get to me, i do appreciate the positive side of the community, and i am placing all my efforts into it for you guys
felixando
you wouldn't be the first dev being annoyed and exhausting from the forum. The amount of FUD is in no comparison to some years ago
February 20, 2018, 10:22:01 AM
Thanks for the vote of confidence BKCCI
As i mentioned earlier in the thread, this week has been rather fufilling with purely distribution scammers, ive had to re-audit the entire speadsheet, i have it under control, but its paused code progression for bit, but priorities, distribution is a rather valid part of this project.
Felixando
As i mentioned earlier in the thread, this week has been rather fufilling with purely distribution scammers, ive had to re-audit the entire speadsheet, i have it under control, but its paused code progression for bit, but priorities, distribution is a rather valid part of this project.
Felixando
Thanks for your response. Does this mean publication of code will be postponed?
Hello Yeuph, my reasoning is not related to an 'unsafe investment', as the project will be completed, there is no doubt in my mind. My reasoning is more so that the initial investors flip the investment and sell for 1/10th of what its worth due to fear from the FUD on this forum, when realistically these people who are downtalking the project are trying to do exactly that, cause fear to scoop up discounted coins, there are actually groups of people who make a living of this type of foul play.
Plus i believe if you have initially wanted to take part in the Stone community, why sell before the first release? Is that why you wanted to be part of Stone? to sell before the first wallet release?
What will end up happening is people will become impatient, sell, a large holder will scoop up a large portion of the supply, then will wait till release and initiate a pump and dump, i do not condone these kind of schemes.
If you are patient, you will see great results, what you must understand is that these projects are not just coded up in a day or a week, otherwise we would already have a private DAG protocol, this is something new, something exciting, if your a fearful person, you most likely wont win in this game.
felixando
Plus i believe if you have initially wanted to take part in the Stone community, why sell before the first release? Is that why you wanted to be part of Stone? to sell before the first wallet release?
What will end up happening is people will become impatient, sell, a large holder will scoop up a large portion of the supply, then will wait till release and initiate a pump and dump, i do not condone these kind of schemes.
If you are patient, you will see great results, what you must understand is that these projects are not just coded up in a day or a week, otherwise we would already have a private DAG protocol, this is something new, something exciting, if your a fearful person, you most likely wont win in this game.
felixando
Your reasoning makes sense, however, by distributing ERC20 tokens first you have made a scenario like what you're trying to prevent possible in the first place. If you would really wanted to avoid a scenario like this to happen, distribution of the actual Stone coins, once the wallet is released, would have made a lot more sense and it wouldn't have wasted your time now with fake donators claiming their share of tokens. Don't you see that this looks rather fishy to many people coming here? It is kind of obvious what creates the biggest FUD here - the non-existent proof of code.
I am distributing the tokens now so we do not have any issues at launch, that's the last thing i want, i'm clearing up all distribution before the swap. This way we have clear skies ahead on launch and i can focus on code, if i have to spend 2 months distributing after launch it wont go down well if there are wallet issues, then pause distribution and people scream, i pause coding and people scream, i do not want this scenario.
You may fantasize all you desire, anything can look fishy if you stare at it long enough, the project is barely 1.5 months old, i have stated from the start i will not release partial incomplete code just to satisfy the select few for 5 minutes, until they then start to criticize my code, because its incomplete. Just sit tight and go to the park feed the ducks, take a breather.
felixando
Well on that note, do you mind telling us how you managed to apply to binance with that partially completed code. or where you just lying nd trying to boost up investment by posting a pic which specific use is to indicate an application to binance.
Also, what kind of crypto scene are you involved in that restricts free trade. Last i checked there are several accts that have requested a refund after donating to this project, and you restricting their ability to get out of their position while they still have a chance. pretty much defeats the entire spirit of what crypto represents.
For a project the received half a million in funding ( i still shudder every time i think about it) you could have easily set up a website and created a placeholder token that wasn't accessible till the platform was complete and the coins have been swapped akin to what exscudo, tezo and countless other projects have done, so this idea of releasing ERC 20 and restricting it's use is a little more than fishy. I personally still think that a long con is in play, i just need awhile to figure out the angle.
Anyway, there is no need bothering with my unproven hypothesis, but could you plz provide us with info on how you managed to pull off the binance application without a complete code. Thanks
I've said it before, and ill say it again; bitcointalk forums are exhausting, i could supply every last request the members ask for, and yet they will find something else new to harp on about, a little concerning but i will not let it get to me, i do appreciate the positive side of the community, and i am placing all my efforts into it for you guys
felixando
February 20, 2018, 09:53:37 AM
Anyway, there is no need bothering with my unproven hypothesis, but could you plz provide us with info on how you managed to pull off the binance application without a complete code. Thanks
Filing an application is not difficult, anyone could do it. But Binance doesn't give out any information about the status of an application, they wouldn't even tell the founder of a project if it is rejected, instead they get in contact if they want to pursue further steps towards adding a coin. You can read more specifics from this post by the CEO of Binance Changpeng Zhao: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/binance-listing-tips-changpeng-zhao/.
Interesting quote from it:
Quote
We do not accept teams using the Binance name for their gains without our consent. These include guys who say they “will list on, targets to be on, is a partner of” Binance without our explicit consent, in the hope to boost their credibility and coin price.
We do not allow teams disclosing they will get listed on Binance until their coin starts trading. If this info leaks out, we will put the listing on hold, possibly indefinitely.
If you are eager to tell your community you have applied to Binance, we allow a “Binance Application In Progress” image.
We do not allow teams disclosing they will get listed on Binance until their coin starts trading. If this info leaks out, we will put the listing on hold, possibly indefinitely.
If you are eager to tell your community you have applied to Binance, we allow a “Binance Application In Progress” image.
So an application is simply done, but making it a successful one is difficult since they ask for a lot of details. For anyone interested, here is the application form: https://support.binance.com/hc/en-us/articles/115000822512.
February 20, 2018, 09:14:38 AM
Thanks for the vote of confidence BKCCI
As i mentioned earlier in the thread, this week has been rather fufilling with purely distribution scammers, ive had to re-audit the entire speadsheet, i have it under control, but its paused code progression for bit, but priorities, distribution is a rather valid part of this project.
Felixando
As i mentioned earlier in the thread, this week has been rather fufilling with purely distribution scammers, ive had to re-audit the entire speadsheet, i have it under control, but its paused code progression for bit, but priorities, distribution is a rather valid part of this project.
Felixando
Thanks for your response. Does this mean publication of code will be postponed?
Hello Yeuph, my reasoning is not related to an 'unsafe investment', as the project will be completed, there is no doubt in my mind. My reasoning is more so that the initial investors flip the investment and sell for 1/10th of what its worth due to fear from the FUD on this forum, when realistically these people who are downtalking the project are trying to do exactly that, cause fear to scoop up discounted coins, there are actually groups of people who make a living of this type of foul play.
Plus i believe if you have initially wanted to take part in the Stone community, why sell before the first release? Is that why you wanted to be part of Stone? to sell before the first wallet release?
What will end up happening is people will become impatient, sell, a large holder will scoop up a large portion of the supply, then will wait till release and initiate a pump and dump, i do not condone these kind of schemes.
If you are patient, you will see great results, what you must understand is that these projects are not just coded up in a day or a week, otherwise we would already have a private DAG protocol, this is something new, something exciting, if your a fearful person, you most likely wont win in this game.
felixando
Plus i believe if you have initially wanted to take part in the Stone community, why sell before the first release? Is that why you wanted to be part of Stone? to sell before the first wallet release?
What will end up happening is people will become impatient, sell, a large holder will scoop up a large portion of the supply, then will wait till release and initiate a pump and dump, i do not condone these kind of schemes.
If you are patient, you will see great results, what you must understand is that these projects are not just coded up in a day or a week, otherwise we would already have a private DAG protocol, this is something new, something exciting, if your a fearful person, you most likely wont win in this game.
felixando
Your reasoning makes sense, however, by distributing ERC20 tokens first you have made a scenario like what you're trying to prevent possible in the first place. If you would really wanted to avoid a scenario like this to happen, distribution of the actual Stone coins, once the wallet is released, would have made a lot more sense and it wouldn't have wasted your time now with fake donators claiming their share of tokens. Don't you see that this looks rather fishy to many people coming here? It is kind of obvious what creates the biggest FUD here - the non-existent proof of code.
I am distributing the tokens now so we do not have any issues at launch, that's the last thing i want, i'm clearing up all distribution before the swap. This way we have clear skies ahead on launch and i can focus on code, if i have to spend 2 months distributing after launch it wont go down well if there are wallet issues, then pause distribution and people scream, i pause coding and people scream, i do not want this scenario.
You may fantasize all you desire, anything can look fishy if you stare at it long enough, the project is barely 1.5 months old, i have stated from the start i will not release partial incomplete code just to satisfy the select few for 5 minutes, until they then start to criticize my code, because its incomplete. Just sit tight and go to the park feed the ducks, take a breather.
felixando
Well on that note, do you mind telling us how you managed to apply to binance with that partially completed code. or where you just lying nd trying to boost up investment by posting a pic which specific use is to indicate an application to binance.
Also, what kind of crypto scene are you involved in that restricts free trade. Last i checked there are several accts that have requested a refund after donating to this project, and you restricting their ability to get out of their position while they still have a chance. pretty much defeats the entire spirit of what crypto represents.
For a project the received half a million in funding ( i still shudder every time i think about it) you could have easily set up a website and created a placeholder token that wasn't accessible till the platform was complete and the coins have been swapped akin to what exscudo, tezo and countless other projects have done, so this idea of releasing ERC 20 and restricting it's use is a little more than fishy. I personally still think that a long con is in play, i just need awhile to figure out the angle.
Anyway, there is no need bothering with my unproven hypothesis, but could you plz provide us with info on how you managed to pull off the binance application without a complete code. Thanks
February 20, 2018, 08:33:52 AM
Thanks for the vote of confidence BKCCI
As i mentioned earlier in the thread, this week has been rather fufilling with purely distribution scammers, ive had to re-audit the entire speadsheet, i have it under control, but its paused code progression for bit, but priorities, distribution is a rather valid part of this project.
Felixando
As i mentioned earlier in the thread, this week has been rather fufilling with purely distribution scammers, ive had to re-audit the entire speadsheet, i have it under control, but its paused code progression for bit, but priorities, distribution is a rather valid part of this project.
Felixando
Thanks for your response. Does this mean publication of code will be postponed?
Hello Yeuph, my reasoning is not related to an 'unsafe investment', as the project will be completed, there is no doubt in my mind. My reasoning is more so that the initial investors flip the investment and sell for 1/10th of what its worth due to fear from the FUD on this forum, when realistically these people who are downtalking the project are trying to do exactly that, cause fear to scoop up discounted coins, there are actually groups of people who make a living of this type of foul play.
Plus i believe if you have initially wanted to take part in the Stone community, why sell before the first release? Is that why you wanted to be part of Stone? to sell before the first wallet release?
What will end up happening is people will become impatient, sell, a large holder will scoop up a large portion of the supply, then will wait till release and initiate a pump and dump, i do not condone these kind of schemes.
If you are patient, you will see great results, what you must understand is that these projects are not just coded up in a day or a week, otherwise we would already have a private DAG protocol, this is something new, something exciting, if your a fearful person, you most likely wont win in this game.
felixando
Plus i believe if you have initially wanted to take part in the Stone community, why sell before the first release? Is that why you wanted to be part of Stone? to sell before the first wallet release?
What will end up happening is people will become impatient, sell, a large holder will scoop up a large portion of the supply, then will wait till release and initiate a pump and dump, i do not condone these kind of schemes.
If you are patient, you will see great results, what you must understand is that these projects are not just coded up in a day or a week, otherwise we would already have a private DAG protocol, this is something new, something exciting, if your a fearful person, you most likely wont win in this game.
felixando
Your reasoning makes sense, however, by distributing ERC20 tokens first you have made a scenario like what you're trying to prevent possible in the first place. If you would really wanted to avoid a scenario like this to happen, distribution of the actual Stone coins, once the wallet is released, would have made a lot more sense and it wouldn't have wasted your time now with fake donators claiming their share of tokens. Don't you see that this looks rather fishy to many people coming here? It is kind of obvious what creates the biggest FUD here - the non-existent proof of code.
I am distributing the tokens now so we do not have any issues at launch, that's the last thing i want, i'm clearing up all distribution before the swap. This way we have clear skies ahead on launch and i can focus on code, if i have to spend 2 months distributing after launch it wont go down well if there are wallet issues, then pause distribution and people scream, i pause coding and people scream, i do not want this scenario.
You may fantasize all you desire, anything can look fishy if you stare at it long enough, the project is barely 1.5 months old, i have stated from the start i will not release partial incomplete code just to satisfy the select few for 5 minutes, until they then start to criticize my code, because its incomplete. Just sit tight and go to the park feed the ducks, take a breather.
felixando
February 20, 2018, 08:27:12 AM
Thanks for the vote of confidence BKCCI
As i mentioned earlier in the thread, this week has been rather fufilling with purely distribution scammers, ive had to re-audit the entire speadsheet, i have it under control, but its paused code progression for bit, but priorities, distribution is a rather valid part of this project.
Felixando
As i mentioned earlier in the thread, this week has been rather fufilling with purely distribution scammers, ive had to re-audit the entire speadsheet, i have it under control, but its paused code progression for bit, but priorities, distribution is a rather valid part of this project.
Felixando
Thanks for your response. Does this mean publication of code will be postponed?
Hello Yeuph, my reasoning is not related to an 'unsafe investment', as the project will be completed, there is no doubt in my mind. My reasoning is more so that the initial investors flip the investment and sell for 1/10th of what its worth due to fear from the FUD on this forum, when realistically these people who are downtalking the project are trying to do exactly that, cause fear to scoop up discounted coins, there are actually groups of people who make a living of this type of foul play.
Plus i believe if you have initially wanted to take part in the Stone community, why sell before the first release? Is that why you wanted to be part of Stone? to sell before the first wallet release?
What will end up happening is people will become impatient, sell, a large holder will scoop up a large portion of the supply, then will wait till release and initiate a pump and dump, i do not condone these kind of schemes.
If you are patient, you will see great results, what you must understand is that these projects are not just coded up in a day or a week, otherwise we would already have a private DAG protocol, this is something new, something exciting, if your a fearful person, you most likely wont win in this game.
felixando
Plus i believe if you have initially wanted to take part in the Stone community, why sell before the first release? Is that why you wanted to be part of Stone? to sell before the first wallet release?
What will end up happening is people will become impatient, sell, a large holder will scoop up a large portion of the supply, then will wait till release and initiate a pump and dump, i do not condone these kind of schemes.
If you are patient, you will see great results, what you must understand is that these projects are not just coded up in a day or a week, otherwise we would already have a private DAG protocol, this is something new, something exciting, if your a fearful person, you most likely wont win in this game.
felixando
Your reasoning makes sense, however, by distributing ERC20 tokens first you have made a scenario like what you're trying to prevent possible in the first place. If you would really wanted to avoid a scenario like this to happen, distribution of the actual Stone coins, once the wallet is released, would have made a lot more sense and it wouldn't have wasted your time now with fake donators claiming their share of tokens. Don't you see that this looks rather fishy to many people coming here? It is kind of obvious what creates the biggest FUD here - the non-existent proof of code.
February 20, 2018, 06:56:25 AM
@felixando
I'm curious dude... You recommended that no one trade/purchase the ERC20 tokens yet. I received my tokens but I'm thinking about picking up a few more off of Ether Delta while they are still so cheap. I also have a small community of a few hundred people that follow me for crypto advice and they want to purchase Stone (I've been keeping them updated on the project) and I *could* technically send them to Ether Delta to grab some; however you explicitly said we should wait. Is there a particular reason why you don't believe people should purchase/trade/sell the tokens yet or is it merely "The project isn't complete and it may not be a safe investment"?
Thanks for the tokens dude. I think everyone is aware that an ERC20 token is simply that but it really feels like the project is moving along now.
Hello Yeuph, my reasoning is not related to an 'unsafe investment', as the project will be completed, there is no doubt in my mind. My reasoning is more so that the initial investors flip the investment and sell for 1/10th of what its worth due to fear from the FUD on this forum, when realistically these people who are downtalking the project are trying to do exactly that, cause fear to scoop up discounted coins, there are actually groups of people who make a living of this type of foul play.I'm curious dude... You recommended that no one trade/purchase the ERC20 tokens yet. I received my tokens but I'm thinking about picking up a few more off of Ether Delta while they are still so cheap. I also have a small community of a few hundred people that follow me for crypto advice and they want to purchase Stone (I've been keeping them updated on the project) and I *could* technically send them to Ether Delta to grab some; however you explicitly said we should wait. Is there a particular reason why you don't believe people should purchase/trade/sell the tokens yet or is it merely "The project isn't complete and it may not be a safe investment"?
Thanks for the tokens dude. I think everyone is aware that an ERC20 token is simply that but it really feels like the project is moving along now.
Plus i believe if you have initially wanted to take part in the Stone community, why sell before the first release? Is that why you wanted to be part of Stone? to sell before the first wallet release?
What will end up happening is people will become impatient, sell, a large holder will scoop up a large portion of the supply, then will wait till release and initiate a pump and dump, i do not condone these kind of schemes.
If you are patient, you will see great results, what you must understand is that these projects are not just coded up in a day or a week, otherwise we would already have a private DAG protocol, this is something new, something exciting, if your a fearful person, you most likely wont win in this game.
felixando
February 20, 2018, 05:47:38 AM
This project needs a team already. There are so many things that needs to be done and 1 person can't absolutely do all of that alone.
All projects are already existing teams and they are responsible for the success of a project
If the project only runs with 1 person it is impossible to succeed
February 20, 2018, 05:31:43 AM
@felixando
I'm curious dude... You recommended that no one trade/purchase the ERC20 tokens yet. I received my tokens but I'm thinking about picking up a few more off of Ether Delta while they are still so cheap. I also have a small community of a few hundred people that follow me for crypto advice and they want to purchase Stone (I've been keeping them updated on the project) and I *could* technically send them to Ether Delta to grab some; however you explicitly said we should wait. Is there a particular reason why you don't believe people should purchase/trade/sell the tokens yet or is it merely "The project isn't complete and it may not be a safe investment"?
Thanks for the tokens dude. I think everyone is aware that an ERC20 token is simply that but it really feels like the project is moving along now.
I'm curious dude... You recommended that no one trade/purchase the ERC20 tokens yet. I received my tokens but I'm thinking about picking up a few more off of Ether Delta while they are still so cheap. I also have a small community of a few hundred people that follow me for crypto advice and they want to purchase Stone (I've been keeping them updated on the project) and I *could* technically send them to Ether Delta to grab some; however you explicitly said we should wait. Is there a particular reason why you don't believe people should purchase/trade/sell the tokens yet or is it merely "The project isn't complete and it may not be a safe investment"?
Thanks for the tokens dude. I think everyone is aware that an ERC20 token is simply that but it really feels like the project is moving along now.
February 20, 2018, 05:03:00 AM
As the community is growing, i'm in need of a dedicated website & possibly forum down the track - if there any strictly professional web developers/graphic designers here who have the time to complete a wordpress website, i can reward in Stone & BTC for the right candidate, please PM me with your portfolio.
felixando
felixando
Did anyone get in contact with felixando regarding his request?
Token distribution will not be instant, it will take place in batches over a period of 7 days, please do not ask multiple times.
felixando
felixando
5 days into the distribution phase now, let's see if all of them will be done within the next two days.
8 more days until the end of the month and the promised public Github repository.
Stay tuned everyone, it is the week of truth.
Thanks for the vote of confidence BKCCI
As i mentioned earlier in the thread, this week has been rather fufilling with purely distribution scammers, ive had to re-audit the entire speadsheet, i have it under control, but its paused code progression for bit, but priorities, distribution is a rather valid part of this project.
Felixando
February 20, 2018, 01:12:49 AM
As the community is growing, i'm in need of a dedicated website & possibly forum down the track - if there any strictly professional web developers/graphic designers here who have the time to complete a wordpress website, i can reward in Stone & BTC for the right candidate, please PM me with your portfolio.
felixando
felixando
Did anyone get in contact with felixando regarding his request?
Token distribution will not be instant, it will take place in batches over a period of 7 days, please do not ask multiple times.
felixando
felixando
5 days into the distribution phase now, let's see if all of them will be done within the next two days.
8 more days until the end of the month and the promised public Github repository.
Stay tuned everyone, it is the week of truth.
February 19, 2018, 08:50:05 PM
This project needs a team already. There are so many things that needs to be done and 1 person can't absolutely do all of that alone.
February 19, 2018, 04:09:35 PM
Islapdonkey is not someone to trust. See link below where they tried to extort money.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/extortion-group-islapdonkey-joosep-etc-2381660
Just a common criminal lol.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/extortion-group-islapdonkey-joosep-etc-2381660
Just a common criminal lol.
Unluckily for you, you didn't take the time to research and see that i have dedicated the past yr to fighting scam on this forum and i have made alot of enemies due to it. Several scam artist who made malicious claim against me with hope that it destroys my voice on the forum. But due to my diligent nature, i have managed to prove them all false and got every single acct tagged.
So could you plz stop with the deflection and provide a code. I mean a link was posted that a binance application is in progress and you can't do it without a code, so give us something. You don't even have to provide the entire thing just something to prove that am wrong. And if am wrong, i will apologize, and invest. But till then stop with the stupid deflection and provide a proof to support your cause
Islapdonkey is a huge scammer and needs to be banned
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/extortion-group-islapdonkey-joosep-etc-2381660
How do you prove Islapdonkey is Scammer. Just with Big Bold Letters you can't prove some one to be scammer. He have legit concern and Mr. Felixando can prove him wrong by posting some Source code of the project. I requested Islapdonkey to may be give some time but he questioned me asking may be overnight your penis can grow 5 inch, Yes he is right overnight nothing happens like my Penis won't grow taller or Felixando can't bring entire code in overnight.
If he is Legit he would have lot of code work done since two months obviously he can post in Github to shut every negative thinker in this community and give some thing back to his supports especially a donators.
I often think "StoneSoup" is shadow of Felixando anyways that's not the point here we need Github with some proof of work until then Tokens, Project everything is Scam.
Go thru initial comments by Mr. Felixando in a first page
Work Ethics
What i can promise you
Dedication - He only showed dedication on responding to material which don't keep this coin any value like Distribution, exchange, advertising
Constant updates - Not a one update of "Proof of Work - Code work"
a finished product - You know the answer after two months where we stand with this project
a quality product delivered in a timely manner - "I don't know the meaning of timely manner, No actual product no status update on real product""
What i cannot promise you
Exchange listings - "Only thing he try showing some image of Binance listing, he try to fool people and try to get momentum to gain more donations right before closing date"
Price increases -"All the postings in this tread are related to Coin Matrix, distribution and how to trade etc but nothing related to actual product code"
Advertising - "Again all i can see is Twitter or any other advertising plans but no product"
False hype - "Again all i see is trying to Hype coin with not clue of one code line"
An unfinished product, i always complete a project. - "I hope he will but loosing confidence day by day with people attacking on ones questioning the legitimacy of the project"
I guess i am still dreaming Mr.Felixando will release this product but will hang tight to see how it unfolds.
February 19, 2018, 02:45:37 PM
Islapdonkey is not someone to trust. See link below where they tried to extort money.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/extortion-group-islapdonkey-joosep-etc-2381660
Just a common criminal lol.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/extortion-group-islapdonkey-joosep-etc-2381660
Just a common criminal lol.
Unluckily for you, you didn't take the time to research and see that i have dedicated the past yr to fighting scam on this forum and i have made alot of enemies due to it. Several scam artist who made malicious claim against me with hope that it destroys my voice on the forum. But due to my diligent nature, i have managed to prove them all false and got every single acct tagged.
So could you plz stop with the deflection and provide a code. I mean a link was posted that a binance application is in progress and you can't do it without a code, so give us something. You don't even have to provide the entire thing just something to prove that am wrong. And if am wrong, i will apologize, and invest. But till then stop with the stupid deflection and provide a proof to support your cause
Islapdonkey is a huge scammer and needs to be banned
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/extortion-group-islapdonkey-joosep-etc-2381660
That doesnt tell me that hes a scammer or that he needs to be banned. Why are you acting crazy?
February 19, 2018, 12:30:19 PM
You can check the contact address and see which address have been sent tokens. I'm still waiting on mine as are some other. But there are 58 address or so that have been sent tokens
February 19, 2018, 12:07:52 PM
Islapdonkey is not someone to trust. See link below where they tried to extort money.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/extortion-group-islapdonkey-joosep-etc-2381660
Just a common criminal lol.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/extortion-group-islapdonkey-joosep-etc-2381660
Just a common criminal lol.
Unluckily for you, you didn't take the time to research and see that i have dedicated the past yr to fighting scam on this forum and i have made alot of enemies due to it. Several scam artist who made malicious claim against me with hope that it destroys my voice on the forum. But due to my diligent nature, i have managed to prove them all false and got every single acct tagged.
So could you plz stop with the deflection and provide a code. I mean a link was posted that a binance application is in progress and you can't do it without a code, so give us something. You don't even have to provide the entire thing just something to prove that am wrong. And if am wrong, i will apologize, and invest. But till then stop with the stupid deflection and provide a proof to support your cause
Islapdonkey is a huge scammer and needs to be banned
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/extortion-group-islapdonkey-joosep-etc-2381660
This doesn' check out numbnuts.
Perhaps it is you who is the scammer.
February 19, 2018, 11:42:00 AM
Islapdonkey is not someone to trust. See link below where they tried to extort money.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/extortion-group-islapdonkey-joosep-etc-2381660
Just a common criminal lol.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/extortion-group-islapdonkey-joosep-etc-2381660
Just a common criminal lol.
Unluckily for you, you didn't take the time to research and see that i have dedicated the past yr to fighting scam on this forum and i have made alot of enemies due to it. Several scam artist who made malicious claim against me with hope that it destroys my voice on the forum. But due to my diligent nature, i have managed to prove them all false and got every single acct tagged.
So could you plz stop with the deflection and provide a code. I mean a link was posted that a binance application is in progress and you can't do it without a code, so give us something. You don't even have to provide the entire thing just something to prove that am wrong. And if am wrong, i will apologize, and invest. But till then stop with the stupid deflection and provide a proof to support your cause
Islapdonkey is a huge scammer and needs to be banned
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/extortion-group-islapdonkey-joosep-etc-2381660
February 19, 2018, 11:32:18 AM
Is there a batch schedule we can refer to for the erc20 payouts?
No nothing like that is known. but you will surely receive your stash if you did donate. a statement was issued just one page back
February 19, 2018, 11:22:35 AM
Is there a batch schedule we can refer to for the erc20 payouts?
Jump to: