After detailed discussions with Anon136, we have concluded that while
we would like to give IPO investors flexability with an escrow option,
the complexities and risks involved are prohibitive and we should
better focus our time on other tasks.
Why would there be complexities and risks?!?!?
We hoped it would be simple and easy too, but it's not. In a nutshell, Anon136 and the Heavycoin devs could not formulate what a fair acceptance criteria would be for satisfying the escrow and sending the IPO capital to the Heavycoin developers.
We initially hoped for something simple and clear--- an acceptance criteria of "we launch Heavycoin on time, the IPO investors get their HVC, decentralized voting is working and the code shows that the non-visible features are implemented (eg. Ultra-secure, HEFTY1, Temporal Retargeting)." However, Anon136 felt he must validate that all the Heavycoin contributions and innovations are satisfied over the longer term. This process could take months or years and would ultimately be very hard for him to judge, so it was not a viable option for him (nor us). Also, from our perspective, we did not like the idea of a 3rd party with such strong influence over Heavycoin's future.
Though we felt it a little extreme, we understand where he is coming from, as he must also look after his own reputation. We'd encourage you to inquire with Anon136 if you need more explanation.
We send funds to Anon136... you send him/us the Heavycoins... he releases BTC to you.
To be honest... it is actually less work for you devs if you send the coins to him...
No. We would still need to do all the bookkeeping, but with added complexity. For example, there would be Anon136's layer of fees to be stripped off of each investment, which we'd have to keep track of. Also, right now we are distributing a bulk of the coins instantly and directly through the genesis block. It requires no lengthy manual distribution or escrow process. If we went with escrow, then we should really bin the keygen/genesis block method and all HVC would need be distributed through him.
Edit: Can you please explain what would have been different if Come-from-Beyond had accepted to do escrow? Couldn't Anon136 just do it under the same terms?
...just trying to understand...
We don't know. He said he's not interested and the discussion ended there, so we don't know what, if anything, would be different if he had accepted. Maybe he's tired of IPOs after having done one himself. Maybe he's wise to the fact that an innovative coin is harder to judge, ie. acceptance criteria. We only asked Come-from-Beyond because we trust him more and he's more well-known than Anon136.