Yes, comparing these two players cannot be done, and that applies not only to these two players, but to all players. But if you have to compare then I have to see the position of these two players swapped, I mean what can Erling Haaland do if he is at Liverpool in a downturn like this season, and also what Nunez can do if he is at Manchester City who is playing very solidly , now maybe I will be able to compare the two because they are in the same position, but that is impossible to do right?
But on the other hand, I can't deny that Nunez disappointed many people who had high expectations for him. I'm not going to try to blame him because maybe that happened because of Liverpool's inconsistent condition this season.
I believe that key player injuries and inadequate player acquisitions were the most influential factors contributing to Liverpool's inconsistency this season. As a result, The Reds dropped out of the top four in the standings and failed to qualify for the next season's Champions League. Injuries to key players disrupted the team's balance, and they lacked adequate replacements. In such circumstances, Liverpool attempted to bring in backup players like Arthur from Juventus. In my opinion, their main weaknesses this season were in the midfield and forward lines. The occurrence of simultaneous player injuries left the manager with limited options and challenges in player rotation.
Perhaps this could be a valuable learning experience for Liverpool to rebuild their squad, and they must be truly astute in acquiring new players in the future. It would be futile to purchase expensive players who fail to provide significant contributions that justify their price.
I have looked at all the positions that have been at Liverpool this season playing under their form, the defenders, the forward lines, and my focus is on their midfield. Some of the players who have missed a lot this season have been in the midfield, and to be honest it really felt like Liverpool's game. When they returned, Liverpool slowly got on to their usual trajectory, although perhaps they have a lot of flaws to work on and the inconsistency still stuck with them. Jurgen Klopp was wrong in anticipating in my opinion, because he didn't realize the players he had couldn't close the gap left.
Many people believe that Haaland is better than Benzema, Mbappe, Ronaldo, and Messi today, but I make it clear to them that even if Haaland plays for another five years, he won't be able to match what these players have already accomplished because all of these players create opportunities for themselves to score goals; they don't always rely on others.
Those people have a right to their opinions no matter how weird it may seem. In my own opinion, Haaland currently is nothing compared to Mbappe. While Mbappe himself being in top form can’t be placed on the same league as Messi or Ronaldo.
Personally, I don’t even believe Haaland could ever play better than Messi although that remains to be seen. Messi and Ronaldo have had a very successful career scoring goals as well as creating chances for other to score. Let’s see Haaland top that
I agree with you that they have the right to express their opinion, even though it may be contrary to what we see and believe.
For more than a decade, Ronaldo and Messi have maintained their existence in the world of football, and the two have even managed to break the notion that many say that their time is over. I'm not going to say Erling Haaland won't last as long as Ronaldo and Messi did, but my question is will he be able to stay at his best for a long time to come? he's still young, I'm pretty sure he can develop his skills even more, but unforeseen things might happen, so I want to see how long he lasts.
