Hmm, perhaps it would be better if there were a coefficient that Stunna could apply for longer-serving, loyal participants of the PrimeDice signature campaign.
I champion this idea because there is little incentive for users to stick with PrimeDice when a 'better' offer comes around. I've also been a part of the PrimeDice campaign for around six months, sticking through thick and thin. Yet some fair weather user can waltz on in and receive the same rate as me, despite them selling out PrimeDice in the past.
If there were a coefficient that could be applied to the final payout then that would be nice, for instance:
1 x new to two months
1.1 x two to three months
1.2 x three to five months
1.3 x six to 12 months
1.5 x 12 months +
Okay so I just plucked the coefficients out of the air, they aren't based on anything around profit and loss etc. But the principle is that people will think twice, perhaps thrice times before selling out PrimeDice for another, higher paying offer in future.
I like this idea,I have been a part of PD campaign for 5 months, even there are some other campaigns with higher rate.
Same here, after I joined the campaign in early december (was allowed to join even though I had very low rank back then) and I haven't even considered switching campaigns.
I mentioned this earlier that there should be some sort of reward for those who stay with PD and not switch to the highest bidder immediately and then when that won't work they just come back and everything is fine again, doesn't feel as good for those that were loyal to PD, in my opinion. Also now it looks like there are hundreds jumping on the PD campaign since theirs didn't work out, I just hope Stunna has the time and patience to deal with everyone new.
But yes you raise a valid point. The coefficients I suggested were purely to illustrate the point, I agree that they needen't be so high, as it makes a dramatic difference.
