Author

Topic: [PrimeDice] (Staff Only) Earn Bitcoins Simply By Posting - page 314. (Read 595273 times)

legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1029
Now that the Ritz campaign has ended, I'm considering signing up with Prime Dice. Has anyone had any problems with it? It seems to work well from what I've read.

Nah, I don't think anybody has had problems with Stunna. I didn't even have problems when he first started this campaign.

That's good to know. Were the rates of pay lower or higher in the past or just the same?

The rates were higher, I think. But I really can't remember. Bitcoin was at $80 than, so I'm thinking they were higher.

Rate were actually somewhat the same.  When Stunna first launched this campaign, it was still 2.4 BTC/month...  And it went as low as 0.0002 BTC per post for everyone. 

Also, I remember TradeFortress was the first one to start a pay per post signature campaign Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
Now that the Ritz campaign has ended, I'm considering signing up with Prime Dice. Has anyone had any problems with it? It seems to work well from what I've read.

Nah, I don't think anybody has had problems with Stunna. I didn't even have problems when he first started this campaign.

That's good to know. Were the rates of pay lower or higher in the past or just the same?

The rates were higher, I think. But I really can't remember. Bitcoin was at $80 than, so I'm thinking they were higher.
sed
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
Basically, I can't wait till I grow up and get enough rank to join primedice campaign and then make a little btc for my activity on the forum.  From what I can tell the campaign at updown is falling apart and the fxopen one also seems a bit shaky.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Okay how about this idea:
A person part of the campaign should make a thread to DISCUSS on and off topic things about this thread. Then everyone post there not here? Just a suggestion.

That would just make people spam even more about things that aren't really worth talking about. In my opinion.

You do realize that there is an off-topic forum where things like "how long you have been logged in to bitcointalk" are being discussed? Just saying. It's all relative here.
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1004
Starting posts: 190
Bitcoin address: 1DhYK1GMz39rdTNRYPFFu8LtHSvCBFQifd

Changed signature from UpDown.bt to PrimeDice. I know Stunna is trustworthy and legit, and I also feel like UpDown.bt's gambling site might be easily manipulated in favor of the house. I only post relevant posts, no BS.

Thanks,
snarlpill

UpDown.bt's completely retarded... Look at the house rake for "Planes in the air"... So stupid.

It's like that because it's the most predictabe factor in their website...

That's irrelevant. If someone was to say, wager .01BTC. They have a 50/50 chance. If they win they get .013. If they lose, there goes their .01BTC. That's a 70% house rake.

Your point is only correct if your chances of winning are only 50/50.  Is that the case?

I believe so, is there something I'm missing?
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
Starting posts: 190
Bitcoin address: 1DhYK1GMz39rdTNRYPFFu8LtHSvCBFQifd

Changed signature from UpDown.bt to PrimeDice. I know Stunna is trustworthy and legit, and I also feel like UpDown.bt's gambling site might be easily manipulated in favor of the house. I only post relevant posts, no BS.

Thanks,
snarlpill

UpDown.bt's completely retarded... Look at the house rake for "Planes in the air"... So stupid.

It's like that because it's the most predictabe factor in their website...

That's irrelevant. If someone was to say, wager .01BTC. They have a 50/50 chance. If they win they get .013. If they lose, there goes their .01BTC. That's a 70% house rake.

Your point is only correct if your chances of winning are only 50/50.  Is that the case?
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1004
Starting posts: 190
Bitcoin address: 1DhYK1GMz39rdTNRYPFFu8LtHSvCBFQifd

Changed signature from UpDown.bt to PrimeDice. I know Stunna is trustworthy and legit, and I also feel like UpDown.bt's gambling site might be easily manipulated in favor of the house. I only post relevant posts, no BS.

Thanks,
snarlpill

UpDown.bt's completely retarded... Look at the house rake for "Planes in the air"... So stupid.

It's like that because it's the most predictabe factor in their website...

That's irrelevant. If someone was to say, wager .01BTC. They have a 50/50 chance. If they win they get .013. If they lose, there goes their .01BTC. That's a 70% house rake.
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1451
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Starting posts: 190
Bitcoin address: 1DhYK1GMz39rdTNRYPFFu8LtHSvCBFQifd

Changed signature from UpDown.bt to PrimeDice. I know Stunna is trustworthy and legit, and I also feel like UpDown.bt's gambling site might be easily manipulated in favor of the house. I only post relevant posts, no BS.

Thanks,
snarlpill

UpDown.bt's completely retarded... Look at the house rake for "Planes in the air"... So stupid.

It's like that because it's the most predictabe factor in their website...
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Will Bitcoin Rise Again to $60,000?
Okay how about this idea:
A person part of the campaign should make a thread to DISCUSS on and off topic things about this thread. Then everyone post there not here? Just a suggestion.

That would just make people spam even more about things that aren't really worth talking about. In my opinion.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
Buy and sell bitcoins,
Starting posts: 190
Bitcoin address: 1DhYK1GMz39rdTNRYPFFu8LtHSvCBFQifd

Changed signature from UpDown.bt to PrimeDice. I know Stunna is trustworthy and legit, and I also feel like UpDown.bt's gambling site might be easily manipulated in favor of the house. I only post relevant posts, no BS.

Thanks,
snarlpill
Is that a reason not to advertise? Isn't it up to each user to examine the website they use for gambling on their own? Anyways, he clearly has issues with his campaign, therefore I also switched, haha.

You don't have any ethical issues with advertising a business that you personally believe is deceptive or untrustworthy? I advertise for FXOPEN because they are a trustworthy business. If my opinion changes on that, I won't advertise.
He didn't state that he things they're untrustworthy, and that's not what I replied to. "might be easily manipulated =/= it's manipulated".

I think the implication there is clear. We're playing with semantics. Nobody would care if it could be easily manipulated if they were confident the owner wouldn't do it. (And why else mention it as a reason to stop advertising?)

It seemed pretty clear what you were replying to when you suggested it was only on the users, not the advertisers, to examine the site. I disagree. I advertised for a while for Bitcoinsports.eu, who ended up scamming a bunch of people. Fuck doing that again.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 256
Starting posts: 190
Bitcoin address: 1DhYK1GMz39rdTNRYPFFu8LtHSvCBFQifd

Changed signature from UpDown.bt to PrimeDice. I know Stunna is trustworthy and legit, and I also feel like UpDown.bt's gambling site might be easily manipulated in favor of the house. I only post relevant posts, no BS.

Thanks,
snarlpill
Is that a reason not to advertise? Isn't it up to each user to examine the website they use for gambling on their own? Anyways, he clearly has issues with his campaign, therefore I also switched, haha.

You don't have any ethical issues with advertising a business that you personally believe is deceptive or untrustworthy? I advertise for FXOPEN because they are a trustworthy business. If my opinion changes on that, I won't advertise.
He didn't state that he things they're untrustworthy, and that's not what I replied to. "might be easily manipulated =/= it's manipulated".
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1004
Starting posts: 190
Bitcoin address: 1DhYK1GMz39rdTNRYPFFu8LtHSvCBFQifd

Changed signature from UpDown.bt to PrimeDice. I know Stunna is trustworthy and legit, and I also feel like UpDown.bt's gambling site might be easily manipulated in favor of the house. I only post relevant posts, no BS.

Thanks,
snarlpill

UpDown.bt's completely retarded... Look at the house rake for "Planes in the air"... So stupid.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
Buy and sell bitcoins,
Starting posts: 190
Bitcoin address: 1DhYK1GMz39rdTNRYPFFu8LtHSvCBFQifd

Changed signature from UpDown.bt to PrimeDice. I know Stunna is trustworthy and legit, and I also feel like UpDown.bt's gambling site might be easily manipulated in favor of the house. I only post relevant posts, no BS.

Thanks,
snarlpill
Is that a reason not to advertise? Isn't it up to each user to examine the website they use for gambling on their own? Anyways, he clearly has issues with his campaign, therefore I also switched, haha.

You don't have any ethical issues with advertising a business that you personally believe is deceptive or untrustworthy? I advertise for FXOPEN because they are a trustworthy business. If my opinion changes on that, I won't advertise.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Now that the Ritz campaign has ended, I'm considering signing up with Prime Dice. Has anyone had any problems with it? It seems to work well from what I've read.

Nah, I don't think anybody has had problems with Stunna. I didn't even have problems when he first started this campaign.

That's good to know. Were the rates of pay lower or higher in the past or just the same?
Sometimes there's a delay with payments when Stunna is really busy but it's always solved within 72h
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Now that the Ritz campaign has ended, I'm considering signing up with Prime Dice. Has anyone had any problems with it? It seems to work well from what I've read.

Nah, I don't think anybody has had problems with Stunna. I didn't even have problems when he first started this campaign.

That's good to know. Were the rates of pay lower or higher in the past or just the same?
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
Now that the Ritz campaign has ended, I'm considering signing up with Prime Dice. Has anyone had any problems with it? It seems to work well from what I've read.

Nah, I don't think anybody has had problems with Stunna. I didn't even have problems when he first started this campaign.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
Starting posts: 412
Bitcoin address: 16aiaHDTT5nPEA6kQhpVe87tXBSAb8DyZs
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Does anyone know if my signature is in 'the highest level of formatting my user group allows' as the campaign requires?

Hopefully this is the correct way Smiley It still looks the same as before, is it correct now?


Yes, you are a Member and you have a Member signature, but you don't need to double post. Just edit your last one.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Hopefully this is the correct way Smiley It still looks the same as before, is it correct now?
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Does anyone know if my signature is in 'the highest level of formatting my user group allows' as the campaign requires?
Jump to: