Author

Topic: [PrimeDice] (Staff Only) Earn Bitcoins Simply By Posting - page 311. (Read 595273 times)

legendary
Activity: 1789
Merit: 1008
Keep it dense, yeah?
Hmm, perhaps it would be better if there were a coefficient that Stunna could apply for longer-serving, loyal participants of the PrimeDice signature campaign.

I champion this idea because there is little incentive for users to stick with PrimeDice when a 'better' offer comes around. I've also been a part of the PrimeDice campaign for around six months, sticking through thick and thin. Yet some fair weather user can waltz on in and receive the same rate as me, despite them selling out PrimeDice in the past.

If there were a coefficient that could be applied to the final payout then that would be nice, for instance:

1 x new to two months
1.1 x two to three months
1.2 x three to five months
1.3 x six to 12 months
1.5 x 12 months +

Okay so I just plucked the coefficients out of the air, they aren't based on anything around profit and loss etc. But the principle is that people will think twice, perhaps thrice times before selling out PrimeDice for another, higher paying offer in future.
I like this idea, however it might make it harder to keep track of all payments, you'd have to know each time a user changes his signature, and so on. Would be hell to keep track of, I think.

Maybe it needs to be considered as consistent payouts - Stunna will keep a record of who has payouts, you can then identify who has two months of payouts at-a-glance.

It is extra work, but what it means is that people think twice before moving. I suppose you could say "but what is to stop other campaigns from implementing the same mechanism?"
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 256
Hmm, perhaps it would be better if there were a coefficient that Stunna could apply for longer-serving, loyal participants of the PrimeDice signature campaign.

I champion this idea because there is little incentive for users to stick with PrimeDice when a 'better' offer comes around. I've also been a part of the PrimeDice campaign for around six months, sticking through thick and thin. Yet some fair weather user can waltz on in and receive the same rate as me, despite them selling out PrimeDice in the past.

If there were a coefficient that could be applied to the final payout then that would be nice, for instance:

1 x new to two months
1.1 x two to three months
1.2 x three to five months
1.3 x six to 12 months
1.5 x 12 months +

Okay so I just plucked the coefficients out of the air, they aren't based on anything around profit and loss etc. But the principle is that people will think twice, perhaps thrice times before selling out PrimeDice for another, higher paying offer in future.
I like this idea, however it might make it harder to keep track of all payments, you'd have to know each time a user changes his signature, and so on. Would be hell to keep track of, I think.

Probably would, yeah. I find the current system pretty fair to everyone. And it really seems like it's the best signature campaign around.
Definitely. I was tempted by the other campaigns' promises of higher rates and whatnot, but in the end they're all having problems paying out, confirming people and so on.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 587
Space Lord
Hmm, perhaps it would be better if there were a coefficient that Stunna could apply for longer-serving, loyal participants of the PrimeDice signature campaign.

I champion this idea because there is little incentive for users to stick with PrimeDice when a 'better' offer comes around. I've also been a part of the PrimeDice campaign for around six months, sticking through thick and thin. Yet some fair weather user can waltz on in and receive the same rate as me, despite them selling out PrimeDice in the past.

If there were a coefficient that could be applied to the final payout then that would be nice, for instance:

1 x new to two months
1.1 x two to three months
1.2 x three to five months
1.3 x six to 12 months
1.5 x 12 months +

Okay so I just plucked the coefficients out of the air, they aren't based on anything around profit and loss etc. But the principle is that people will think twice, perhaps thrice times before selling out PrimeDice for another, higher paying offer in future.
I like this idea, however it might make it harder to keep track of all payments, you'd have to know each time a user changes his signature, and so on. Would be hell to keep track of, I think.

Probably would, yeah. I find the current system pretty fair to everyone. And it really seems like it's the best signature campaign around.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 256
Hmm, perhaps it would be better if there were a coefficient that Stunna could apply for longer-serving, loyal participants of the PrimeDice signature campaign.

I champion this idea because there is little incentive for users to stick with PrimeDice when a 'better' offer comes around. I've also been a part of the PrimeDice campaign for around six months, sticking through thick and thin. Yet some fair weather user can waltz on in and receive the same rate as me, despite them selling out PrimeDice in the past.

If there were a coefficient that could be applied to the final payout then that would be nice, for instance:

1 x new to two months
1.1 x two to three months
1.2 x three to five months
1.3 x six to 12 months
1.5 x 12 months +

Okay so I just plucked the coefficients out of the air, they aren't based on anything around profit and loss etc. But the principle is that people will think twice, perhaps thrice times before selling out PrimeDice for another, higher paying offer in future.
I like this idea, however it might make it harder to keep track of all payments, you'd have to know each time a user changes his signature, and so on. Would be hell to keep track of, I think.
legendary
Activity: 1789
Merit: 1008
Keep it dense, yeah?
Hmm, perhaps it would be better if there were a coefficient that Stunna could apply for longer-serving, loyal participants of the PrimeDice signature campaign.

I champion this idea because there is little incentive for users to stick with PrimeDice when a 'better' offer comes around. I've also been a part of the PrimeDice campaign for around six months, sticking through thick and thin. Yet some fair weather user can waltz on in and receive the same rate as me, despite them selling out PrimeDice in the past.

If there were a coefficient that could be applied to the final payout then that would be nice, for instance:

1 x new to two months
1.1 x two to three months
1.2 x three to five months
1.3 x six to 12 months
1.5 x 12 months +

Okay so I just plucked the coefficients out of the air, they aren't based on anything around profit and loss etc. But the principle is that people will think twice, perhaps thrice times before selling out PrimeDice for another, higher paying offer in future.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1029
Starting posts: 138
Bitcoin address: 1DnmUN4v6udwxmDuddbE3a6fn3CL98yT89
legendary
Activity: 2124
Merit: 1013
K-ing®
posts: 693
BTC address: 1EQ7zx9HLdmBdfUUwkA2fnCiKF2M5bEzwd

ty
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
My Skype: nishtrip15 Yahoo: tbnten
Starting posts: 171
BTC address: 1QHtYLPMGuXDcBZZuwBPMRdEEpUukJ5bUL
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
Super Smash Bros. Ultimate Available Now!
Starting posts: 255
Bitcoin address: 1ELuGSK1qyNLPChHhPX1yja6iQ4x9jdEdQ
legendary
Activity: 1445
Merit: 1000
Starting posts: 355
Bitcoin address: 15ywjmXiGdKBeHGN4Pgg4LMmGWAELoNs1V
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
★☆★777Coin★☆★
Is there max post per month/week restriction ?
But you are not allowed to join this campaign until you have rank of Member for more details you can read post 1
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 587
Space Lord
Starting posts: 732
Bitcoin address: 152KxdQdNfEmEjbs7YHTr2NaN7nTqeiBJc
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1451
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Is there max post per month/week restriction ?

There is a monthly limit of 2.4 BTC but I think that that's it. Besies that, you should be careful not to get banned for spamin. Yeah, that's a thing too.
member
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
Is there max post per month/week restriction ?
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Skoupi the Great
Starting posts: 123
Bitcoin address: 16B3bnrgKYc9BBM5x3wUg8VEXUdhxm6zG9
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1029
Starting posts: 3970
Bitcoin address: 1Q2CupiU5DfWupRGBQ66QYRqvxoNxGZCcn
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1029
After last month's payment Stunna left some positive trust for me (and many others).  However, I now see it is gone.  Is this just the trust system being wonky or did Stunna delete it?  I'm cool either way, just curious, is it discussed anywhere?

No doubt this signature campaign is the best, thanks Stunna!

Its discussed a few pages back, Stunna did remove it.

Yes, there was debate upon whether participating in a signature campaign warrants any trust...it was decided that putting a logo in your signature doesn't deem you any trust here...

He paid people 5 BTC who had posts on the official Ripple thread to edit their posts to "Ripple is a scam" or something like that, and yeah.. he was a very influential person Tongue

And I once again plan to join stunna's campaign for the month..  Roll Eyes  Thanks!
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 256
After last month's payment Stunna left some positive trust for me (and many others).  However, I now see it is gone.  Is this just the trust system being wonky or did Stunna delete it?  I'm cool either way, just curious, is it discussed anywhere?

No doubt this signature campaign is the best, thanks Stunna!

Its discussed a few pages back, Stunna did remove it.

Back on page 306.  Here is the link if anyone else is curious: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7053782

Sorry to see it go, but probably a good call!
Definitely was the right choice, for the reasons he described himself. The trust system is tricky, and has to be used properly.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Starting posts: 432
Bitcoin address: 1Lo9X3SvXmEV8Xc98eXEGEf7DQqzmqMDsb
legendary
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000
After last month's payment Stunna left some positive trust for me (and many others).  However, I now see it is gone.  Is this just the trust system being wonky or did Stunna delete it?  I'm cool either way, just curious, is it discussed anywhere?

No doubt this signature campaign is the best, thanks Stunna!

Its discussed a few pages back, Stunna did remove it.

Back on page 306.  Here is the link if anyone else is curious: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7053782

Sorry to see it go, but probably a good call!
Jump to: