Pages:
Author

Topic: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no - page 20. (Read 43396 times)

legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
LOL at the sudden resurgence of self-escrowing account-seller posts and their sock-puppets (gorgon666). It is almost as if they are the same person chasing the same shadows in their impotent rage.
The random chatlogs of no importance aren't properly stamped, as there is no dd/mm. Those interactions happened quite some time ago. Anyhow, I've yet to see a single argument that has any relevance to moderation. Just Bitcointalk drama; the next account is lurking behind the corner.



I am? Dammit, why did no-one tell me until now?!
I knew it all along! Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1002
neotox , why resorting this  shit today ?  go home ! ----------->  Quote from: Neotox on September 19, 2015, 05:11:02 PM
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1254
Thread-puller extraordinaire
man you're an alt of neotox , then go home with your fake accusations

I am? Dammit, why did no-one tell me until now?!

Awesome rebuttal of his, I mean 'my', evidence, btw, truly stellar comeback!

legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1002
LOL at the sudden resurgence of self-escrowing account-seller posts and their sock-puppets (gorgon666). It is almost as if they are the same person chasing the same shadows in their impotent rage.

Here is story:

I done a trade with a user "X" and after trade was complete this account"X" was sold to other user (can't reveal username because this account is now owned by a new owner who has nothing to do with this stuff so I don't want to involve him in this)
I had some problem with trade so I sent him many PMs and after he never replied left him a neg feedback but later he replied to me that he is new owner of this account and it was sold to him by user "Kanapka" using Defcon23 as escrow.


Cool

I sent message to user "Kanapka" for problem regarding my trade and this user responded me that he never sold me anything , and he bought this account from someone using Defcon23 as escrow, and asked me that I can confirm this from Defcon23
"here is screenshot of feedback left by Defcon23 on Kanapka trust page saying that this account(Kanapka) was sold using his escrow service"
https://i.imgur.com/DFebY2i.png


Ok, then I sent message to Defcon23 asking for this and he said Kanapka account was sold using his escrow when I asked when it was sold then he said it was sold after he did any trade with me(When I asked for date when the account was sold he refused).Then I asked him for some proofs that the account was sold so I know that it is not the original user who done trade with me and he didn't answered and started making fake excuses like"its my son's birthday and I am busy"


then I checked forum security log and found that password of account "Kanapka" was not changed since last 1 month? (my trade was 9-10 sepetember)
so it means that Defcon23 lied about this and account Kanapka was never sold using his escrow
, this prove that "Kanapka" is his alt account and he is defending it using hero account Defcon23


also he left positive feedback to Kanapka for this transaction and also took fees from buyer for the trade between buyer and "Kanapka"(his potential alt)
that is against forum rules.

Here are Proofs where he said that the account was sold

trust page of kanapka => https://i.imgur.com/DFebY2i.png


Pms from defcon23 =>

helo

yes i have escrowed the sale of this account recently... nothing more to say. ( as you can read in the + 1 i let him , after this sale.)


regards.

tl'dr: 'defcon23' is a proven self-escrowing account-trader. Which, in light of this, makes their question below laughable:
so in conclusion :  do you really think this guy is "credible " ?  
man you're an alt of neotox , then go home with your fake accusations
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1254
Thread-puller extraordinaire
LOL at the sudden resurgence of self-escrowing account-seller posts and their sock-puppets (gorgon666). It is almost as if they are the same person chasing the same shadows in their impotent rage.

Here is story:

I done a trade with a user "X" and after trade was complete this account"X" was sold to other user (can't reveal username because this account is now owned by a new owner who has nothing to do with this stuff so I don't want to involve him in this)
I had some problem with trade so I sent him many PMs and after he never replied left him a neg feedback but later he replied to me that he is new owner of this account and it was sold to him by user "Kanapka" using Defcon23 as escrow.


Cool

I sent message to user "Kanapka" for problem regarding my trade and this user responded me that he never sold me anything , and he bought this account from someone using Defcon23 as escrow, and asked me that I can confirm this from Defcon23
"here is screenshot of feedback left by Defcon23 on Kanapka trust page saying that this account(Kanapka) was sold using his escrow service"
https://i.imgur.com/DFebY2i.png


Ok, then I sent message to Defcon23 asking for this and he said Kanapka account was sold using his escrow when I asked when it was sold then he said it was sold after he did any trade with me(When I asked for date when the account was sold he refused).Then I asked him for some proofs that the account was sold so I know that it is not the original user who done trade with me and he didn't answered and started making fake excuses like"its my son's birthday and I am busy"


then I checked forum security log and found that password of account "Kanapka" was not changed since last 1 month? (my trade was 9-10 sepetember)
so it means that Defcon23 lied about this and account Kanapka was never sold using his escrow
, this prove that "Kanapka" is his alt account and he is defending it using hero account Defcon23


also he left positive feedback to Kanapka for this transaction and also took fees from buyer for the trade between buyer and "Kanapka"(his potential alt)
that is against forum rules.

Here are Proofs where he said that the account was sold

trust page of kanapka => https://i.imgur.com/DFebY2i.png


Pms from defcon23 =>

helo

yes i have escrowed the sale of this account recently... nothing more to say. ( as you can read in the + 1 i let him , after this sale.)


regards.

tl'dr: 'defcon23' is a proven self-escrowing account-trader. Which, in light of this, makes their question below laughable:
so in conclusion :  do you really think this guy is "credible " ?  
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1002
to the question : "Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no"

The answer is clearly NO.
how call someone abusing of this position for trying extorquing someone in this way ??

resume:  1 : Lauda collect genesis coins serie 2,
 - he got few #1 coins, and when he know i have got  1 , comes to me with a 25$ + shgipping  proposition ( wich i polite decline )

- he start to be agressive and menacing to left a negative trust . ( what he did : check my trust ranking)

- indeed my reaction was to tell him: " dont do this , that's not fair..and you will loose your credibility."..)

- precisions: few times before this, as i know lauda was a "friend" of VOD , an user who left me a neg ranking in the past for absolutely no valid reason,  i have ask to Lauda:
 " could you please try to contact VOD please, for i can try to solve this OLD story with him , as i cant contact him directly since he has block my PM's ?"

his answer was: " why should i help you... ? "  ( wich motivate in party the fact to dont sold him this genesis coin at his ridiculous offfer )


Then,   i have finaly put this coin in auction few days ago , and this auction has ended yesterday ( LINK: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15528872


the reaction to this is know well know......   he left me a bad feedback , not using the genesis coin excuse, but in getting an OLD story i 've got in the past , and about he was well informed  many many time before he left his shit on my trust ranking ..  ( as explain above , we have even talk about it days and days before.... lol )


here's now some irc publics logs where you follow the story step by step :









i will edit my post with few other links quicly..


so in conclusion :  do you really think this guy is "credible " ?  for me the answer is clearly NO.
is just a teenager who abusing of his position
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
Lauda advertises for a company she knows to be shady, get publicly called out about this, waits for her payment and then removes her signature. Not exactly a beacon of ethics if you ask me.
The evidence was inconclusive (that's why I left neutral trust, but still decided to leave them). "Waits for her payment"; what are you talking about?

Now Lauda is asking 2BTC per month for her signature and is proactively denying any consequences of advertising for a future shady company: "[...]can not be held accountable for any misdoings by the client"
No, neither one of those is correct. ACE is asking 2 BTC for the whole group (not myself). The secondary implies that in the case that a client goes rogue (e.g. scams) during an AD period (not prior) that we can't be held accountable for this in any way.

So he's a shady sig spamming staff member.
Shady? No, I haven't done anything wrong, don't let yourself fooled by the 'anti-Lauda' movement.

I'm serious, sig spamming etc.... has zero to do with moderating.
That is correct.
legendary
Activity: 1210
Merit: 1024
What a day for Lauda!

Lauda advertises for a company she knows to be shady, get publicly called out about this, waits for her payment and then removes her signature. Not exactly a beacon of ethics if you ask me.

Now Lauda is asking 2BTC per month for her signature and is proactively denying any consequences of advertising for a future shady company: "[...]can not be held accountable for any misdoings by the client"

Anyone that follows Lauda's posts knows that she does not keep an open mind


So he's a shady sig spamming staff member.

Still would be a great mod.

I'm serious, sig spamming etc.... has zero to do with moderating.


~BCX~
member
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
What a day for Lauda!

Lauda advertises for a company she knows to be shady, get publicly called out about this, waits for her payment and then removes her signature. Not exactly a beacon of ethics if you ask me.

Now Lauda is asking 2BTC per month for her signature and is proactively denying any consequences of advertising for a future shady company: "[...]can not be held accountable for any misdoings by the client"

Anyone that follows Lauda's posts knows that she does not keep an open mind
full member
Activity: 167
Merit: 100
Lauda to replace Badbear, now that the latter is no longer as active anymore!


If that were to happen, he would have to change his name to "BadLauda" LOL


~BCX~
Dude, please. Can you not do that? You're killing me.
legendary
Activity: 1210
Merit: 1024
Lauda to replace Badbear, now that the latter is no longer as active anymore!


If that were to happen, he would have to change his name to "BadLauda" LOL


~BCX~
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
Lauda to replace Badbear, now that the latter is no longer as active anymore!
legendary
Activity: 1210
Merit: 1024
I think Lauda should be the only proven Sig Spammer to be a Global Moderator.

He does a good job, annoyingly sig spamming at the same time, but good job.


~BCX~
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 2472
https://JetCash.com
Yawn. Why don't we ban Bitcoin from this forum - after all it's linked to the drug trade. Smiley
copper member
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
Funny how this thread is still going on (you might call it a running gag by now).
And also funny that in the meantime, while here the discussions were going on, Lauda got more (rather than less) responsibilities.





I see Lauda acting/posting more often than any other moderator, and it is always helpful.
Ewh, he's a sigspammer.
I guess you can turn everything either way or the other.

IMO he is doing a great job.
And that's only your opinion. Mine could be completely different the same.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
Dear Lauda,

Stop cramping my style!

Sincerely,

~BMB~
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 2472
https://JetCash.com
If threads like this are created, he's obviously doing a really good job.

Mods - please review the posters who feel he cramps their style.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
Oh do we get to "vote" Mitchell Wink
..joke from comment on page 1 (i did not go past that point)

I have had a couple incidents of butting heads with Lauda.
But what ever..

Let me offer my own perspective.
Lauda has opinions which is fair.. staff are allowed to share them.
They are also entitled to interpret the rules how they like.. it's their job.
Nothing much we can do but whine to thymos about it etc
BUT !
What is "it" ?
Seems you created this topic NOOB / OP with out saying WHY.
You clearly made this because of some incident you failed to bring up.
Not a good sign LOL

I do appreciate that Lauda makes more of an effort to communicate with the users here.
Some staff moderate and never say a word to anyone about anything.

Anyway i seen no reason why Lauda should be demoted.
I did not think i would either clicking on this topic.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 1000
Not a bad mod. Usually helpful or informative posts and i havent seen much censorship tbh.

If you dont agree with her opinion then debate her openly, no need to call for an active, useful mod to stand down.
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 2472
https://JetCash.com
I vote remain

This isn't a Brexit thread is it? Smiley
Pages:
Jump to: