@Lauda- are the screenshots of those messages an accurate representation of what you said to defcon23 at one point? If not then what is inaccurate?
They are, but I consider them random gibberish.
I have left you appropriate feedback, and I encourage others to leave similar negative feedback.
The representation of the story is inaccurate,
What exactly is inaccurate?
From what I gather from the screenshots alone (which you admitted are generally accurate, so there is no reason to need to trust the person who posted the screenshots to not have forged the logs), the following happened:
-you offer to buy a coin from defcon23 for ~11% of what the coin eventually sells for (and what I presume similar coin(s) have sold for in the past) - via direct message
-you follow up with this offer in the public chat
-you say that you will leave negative feedback if defcon23 does not sell the coin to you for your 11% price
-you say that it will be impossible to link IRC-lauda to btctlk-lauda
-you say that IRC logs are not evidence
-you leave negative trust for defcon23 the very same day that he sells the coin to someone else via an auction over an issue that you knew about well in advance
I don't see how this can be seen as anything except extortion.
and I disagree with posting screenshot of private conversations without permission.
I don't see any indication that any of the conversations were intended to be private. Also most scammers/extortionists do not want their scam attempts/extortion attempts to be made public
All of this is off-topic to this thread.
I don't think it is appropriate to have extortionists as moderators.
I have read your feedback against me. You called me a scammer when I have never scammed anyone, and you called QS innocent when it was proven he scammed by self escrow. That alone makes you untrustworthy.
It sounds to me like you are leaving negative ratings over personal feelings