Pages:
Author

Topic: [QCN] QuazarCoin | Full anonymity | Privacy&Data protection | Egalitarian PoW - page 28. (Read 87129 times)

full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Extreme Pool Critical Update
Everyone that is mining at http://qcn.extremepool.org please download the latest miner and connect using stratum to the stratum ports.

This latest pool update will be much more stable and fixes the constant reject issue everyone was seeing with the old software/miner and http ports.

My goal today, now that this update is complete, will be to get many miners and get the pool hash rate up.

Enjoy!!
member
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
this coin is crazy cheap! better then MRO imo, and a lot of people say MRO is better then DRK! and it's rare, doesn't get much better then this, and it's almost unknown, crazy stuff.

indeed

Which one is better depend on the first GUI client comes out. No GUI, no better.

They will take the GUI from each other.  That will not distinguish them.
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 252
this coin is crazy cheap! better then MRO imo, and a lot of people say MRO is better then DRK! and it's rare, doesn't get much better then this, and it's almost unknown, crazy stuff.

indeed

Which one is better depend on the first GUI client comes out. No GUI, no better.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
this coin is crazy cheap! better then MRO imo, and a lot of people say MRO is better then DRK! and it's rare, doesn't get much better then this, and it's almost unknown, crazy stuff.

+1  Cool
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1010
this coin is crazy cheap! better then MRO imo, and a lot of people say MRO is better then DRK! and it's rare, doesn't get much better then this, and it's almost unknown, crazy stuff.

indeed
member
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
Maybe thats the wrong place to ask, but whats the difference between Monero, Fantom and Quazar? Pls be a little self critical if I may ask that of you. I know its the early stages for all of those new chains but maybe some differences may exist already, like dev team, community, vision, etc.
Thx
Quote from: Brilliantrocket on May 19, 2014, 02:31:20 PM
What is the advantage of QCN, compared to BCN and MRO?

QuazarCoin requires 60 confirmations per transaction which enhances the protection against double-spending.
Emission curve is more flutter, 50% QCN will be emitted in 6 years.
Also QCN was launched without premine and instamine.

I dont get it. 60 confirms per transaction?? That sounds like a huge disadvantage. That means I gotta wait 60x2mins= 2hours!! before I can spend my Quazars? I know this has been broad up before but I still dont fully understand. Pls explain. thx

I thought 60 confirms (or 60*2mins = 2 hours) as unlock time for newly mined coins.

https://github.com/quazarcoin/quazarcoin/commit/fad044e0ded3e9f821c0a40a139de36ef4ffc9ee

The link shows the differences between the original Bytecoin code vs. the first Quazarcoin code.
Search for "60" and you will get:
-#define CRYPTONOTE_MINED_MONEY_UNLOCK_WINDOW            10            // for Bytecoin (& maybe Monero)
+#define CRYPTONOTE_MINED_MONEY_UNLOCK_WINDOW            60            //for Quazarcoin

Newly mined coins are prohibited from being spent for 100 confirms (or 120 for the Satoshi client, ~17hours and 20hours respectively) in case of Bitcoin protocol.
I've heard Monero developers discussing about the poorly chosen parameters (including the above), which Quazarcoin fixed.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
this coin is crazy cheap! better then MRO imo, and a lot of people say MRO is better then DRK! and it's rare, doesn't get much better then this, and it's almost unknown, crazy stuff.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
Can anyone tell me how many quasar coins have been mined to date?

Thank you in advance!!
i think there is around 90k mate
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Can anyone tell me how many quasar coins have been mined to date?

Thank you in advance!!
member
Activity: 68
Merit: 10

the pool is going to be updated to stratum shortly.  there will also be a new miner.


Stratum does not work for me, I always get some kind of JSON error with any coin when mining from Windows 7, so I have to use a stratum proxy, and they are hard to find for new coins.

I have looked a bit deeper.  I replaced the simpleminer.exe with one from the monero project, and now the hashrate is reasonable again.  Perhaps the cryptonote-easyminer installs the old unoptimised monero simpleminer.exe (that is expected to be 4.5 times slower).
My hashrate is now reported about 90 H/s by the pool.

If anyone else wants to do this, replace the Binaries/64 or Bineries/32 with the optimised monero simpleminer.exe. Copy you wallet files to the cyptonote-easyminer directory and rename them to wallet, wallet.address.txt and wallet.keys. Actually you can use dummy files for the wallet and keys, only the wallet.address.txt needs to have correct data. You don't need the simplewallet.exe in the Bineries directories, just remove the default one (you don't really want it to run anyway). cryptonote-easyminer complains about the simplewallet.exe being missing, click OK, and it then starts up normally.
member
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
How to get the wallet private key?

Files .bin & .address.txt & .keys are in the same folder as the binaries.

Any command to dump the private key? Can store it as a paper wallet?

The keys file is the one you need to print out. But it's a binary file, so if you really want to do this, use a uuencoder (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uuencoding) to convert the binary file to text. That is a reversible process, so you can recreate the binary file using a decoder, from the text version. I would print the address file as well, it is already text and you may want a record of it, or you can create a new address when you restore your wallet from the binary keys file later.

Personally I would just store the binary file on usb drive or cd, why use paper?
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 252
How to get the wallet private key?

Files .bin & .address.txt & .keys are in the same folder as the binaries.

Any command to dump the private key? Can store it as a paper wallet?
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Just wanted to remind everyone we have a working pool for QCN up at http://qcn.extremepool.org

Payouts are working we need more hash!
 

come join us on the pool on IRC, Server Freenode channel #extremepool

I tried mining with this pool, using the cryptonote-easy-miner as instructed.

Despite my reluctance to run untrusted windows binaries, I gave the binaries release a try but immediately there are problems.
1) It started trying to use a monero version of simpleminer, that it installed itself.  I have no idea which version that is, if if it really is simpleminer. If it optimised or what else it could be doing.
2) It created a monero wallet to use, and tried to mine with the monero key.

Quote
2014-May-24 10:40:27.901412 Connecting qcn.extremepool.org:5555....
2014-May-24 10:40:28.511447 Connected qcn.extremepool.org:5555 OK
2014-May-24 10:40:28.907469 READ ENDS: Success. bytes_tr: 221
2014-May-24 10:40:28.909470 -->>http_stream_filter::parse_cached_header(*)
2014-May-24 10:40:28.912470 <<--http_stream_filter::parse_cached_header(*)
2014-May-24 10:40:28.915470 ERROR C:\temp\bytecoin\git\bitmonero-master\contrib\
epee\include\storages/http_abstract_invoke.h:112 RPC call of "login" returned er
ror: -1, message: invalid address used for login
2014-May-24 10:40:28.921470 Failed to invoke login qcn.extremepool.org:5555, dis
connect and sleep....

After some messing around, I found I could replace the automatically created wallet with my own, had to rename it to be the same names as expected. It is mining now, but the hashrate reported by the mining pool check is way lower than it should be.

I am wondering if maybe that cryptonote-easy-miner is conning me, I have no way of knowing from the simpleminer window if it is simply sending my hashes to some other pool with another key, maybe one thread goes to the configured pool/key and the rest is skimmed off. Or is there some other explanation why the hash rate is reported so low.  I should be getting around 140 H/s with 7 threads, but I get around 6 H/s reported.

I tried another pool, with same results.  I have another server running linux and not using cryptonote-easy-miner, but cpuminer-multi compiled by myself, and that reports the correct hash rate from the pool.


the pool is going to be updated to stratum shortly.  there will also be a new miner.
member
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
Just wanted to remind everyone we have a working pool for QCN up at http://qcn.extremepool.org

Payouts are working we need more hash!
 

come join us on the pool on IRC, Server Freenode channel #extremepool

I tried mining with this pool, using the cryptonote-easy-miner as instructed.

Despite my reluctance to run untrusted windows binaries, I gave the binaries release a try but immediately there are problems.
1) It started trying to use a monero version of simpleminer, that it installed itself.  I have no idea which version that is, if if it really is simpleminer. If it optimised or what else it could be doing.
2) It created a monero wallet to use, and tried to mine with the monero key.

Quote
2014-May-24 10:40:27.901412 Connecting qcn.extremepool.org:5555....
2014-May-24 10:40:28.511447 Connected qcn.extremepool.org:5555 OK
2014-May-24 10:40:28.907469 READ ENDS: Success. bytes_tr: 221
2014-May-24 10:40:28.909470 -->>http_stream_filter::parse_cached_header(*)
2014-May-24 10:40:28.912470 <<--http_stream_filter::parse_cached_header(*)
2014-May-24 10:40:28.915470 ERROR C:\temp\bytecoin\git\bitmonero-master\contrib\
epee\include\storages/http_abstract_invoke.h:112 RPC call of "login" returned er
ror: -1, message: invalid address used for login
2014-May-24 10:40:28.921470 Failed to invoke login qcn.extremepool.org:5555, dis
connect and sleep....

After some messing around, I found I could replace the automatically created wallet with my own, had to rename it to be the same names as expected. It is mining now, but the hashrate reported by the mining pool check is way lower than it should be.

I am wondering if maybe that cryptonote-easy-miner is conning me, I have no way of knowing from the simpleminer window if it is simply sending my hashes to some other pool with another key, maybe one thread goes to the configured pool/key and the rest is skimmed off. Or is there some other explanation why the hash rate is reported so low.  I should be getting around 140 H/s with 7 threads, but I get around 6 H/s reported.

I tried another pool, with same results.  I have another server running linux and not using cryptonote-easy-miner, but cpuminer-multi compiled by myself, and that reports the correct hash rate from the pool.
member
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
how can you tell when a block is found? will it state one has been found? I can clearly tell im mining but beyond that cant tell much. how do we see what difficulty is also?

A notification that you found a block has green color and looks like: 'Found block for height: xxxxxx'.

About difficulty: use 'print_bc []' command in the daemon window. For example,
Code:
print_bc 4566
or
Code:
print_bc 1000 1005

Where does it print to (Windows 7)?

Quote
print_bc 11533
end block index should be greater than starter block index
unknown command: print_bc 11533
print_bc 11532
2014-May-24 10:01:05.454288 Blockchain printed with log level 1
2014-May-24 10:04:21.569505 [P2P4]Storing blockchain...
2014-May-24 10:04:22.167539 [P2P4]Blockchain stored OK.

Its not in the log:

Quote
2014-May-24 09:57:27.846841 [P2P3][81.221.17.244:56336 INC] SYNCHRONIZED OK
2014-May-24 09:57:29.141915 [P2P0][178.214.64.111:32476 INC] SYNCHRONIZED OK
2014-May-24 09:57:29.314925 [P2P8][2.91.79.136:49978 INC] SYNCHRONIZED OK
2014-May-24 10:01:05.454288 Blockchain printed with log level 1
2014-May-24 10:04:21.569505 [P2P4]Storing blockchain...
2014-May-24 10:04:22.167539 [P2P4]Blockchain stored OK.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Just wanted to remind everyone we have a working pool for QCN up at http://qcn.extremepool.org

Payouts are working we need more hash!
 

come join us on the pool on IRC, Server Freenode channel #extremepool
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 539
hero member
Activity: 543
Merit: 500
Nice coin, fair distribution, 120 sec block time... Good parts of BCN + good parts of MRO = QCN
I am glad I discovered this coin.
full member
Activity: 171
Merit: 100
Hi,

What's mean this line please ?
"2014-May-23 19:38:25.447032 [P2P9][sock 1192] Some problems at write: Une connex
ion existante a d¹ Ûtre fermÚe par lÆh¶te distant:10054"
Problems at write ? don't tell me that I found a block and i can't spread it on the network ...  Cry

No, it's a problem with the coding (a language) your OS. This doesn't affect the finding of blocks.

I'm a dev so I understand but I see this message only since today, I'm on quazar since one week that's why I'm a little surprise, perhaps new version ?
In my own computer, compter's brother and school (yeah I'm a kind of bad guy) I saw this message too.

But if it does'nt affect anything, not a big deal !
Pages:
Jump to: