[QCN] QuazarCoin | Full anonymity | Privacy&Data protection | Egalitarian PoW - page 26.

griffin

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: Xdragon on May 25, 2014, 06:21:56 PM

Quote from: griffin on May 25, 2014, 05:19:11 PM

I've tried to mining some quazarcoin and have 92433 hashes submitted but i dont get qcn Huh

Or maybe because im using exchanger wallet, because desktop wallet doesnt working out for me Undecided

But the exchanger says i need payment id and wallet address to receive qcn, but pool says i only need wallet address. Can someone help me Huh

your coins are lost forever. you must withdraw coins from pool to your wallet, and than from wallet with proper id send them to exchange. why is desktop wallet not working for you?

I need some dependencies i think to run desktop wallet because im using linux.
Maybe this pict can tell the prob http://imgur.com/NkjJN6R

Xdragon

hero member

Activity: 543

Merit: 500

Quote from: griffin on May 25, 2014, 05:19:11 PM

I've tried to mining some quazarcoin and have 92433 hashes submitted but i dont get qcn Huh

Or maybe because im using exchanger wallet, because desktop wallet doesnt working out for me Undecided

But the exchanger says i need payment id and wallet address to receive qcn, but pool says i only need wallet address. Can someone help me Huh

your coins are lost forever. you must withdraw coins from pool to your wallet, and than from wallet with proper id send them to exchange. why is desktop wallet not working for you?

griffin

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

I've tried to mining some quazarcoin and have 92433 hashes submitted but i dont get qcn Huh

Or maybe because im using exchanger wallet, because desktop wallet doesnt working out for me Undecided

But the exchanger says i need payment id and wallet address to receive qcn, but pool says i only need wallet address. Can someone help me Huh

Xdragon

hero member

Activity: 543

Merit: 500

Looks like QCN is the new King of CryptoNote coins, MRO is falling

polecrab

member

Activity: 68

Merit: 10

Quote from: cubydu on May 25, 2014, 12:50:29 PM

Code:

transfer 0 1VQpANF1pcKHPRAsZpeyG4jLDd1kbPn32YMeXkr9n8jNFvf8aaJdecB3FyAvo7X1DWJDQt3nii9eUTP5kJSfRpL5AwT72FM 5 cdeab1bfd1a9f0c408d6f2a2ee2d4b7b7afe5a9bddd4d34ba63956de5d0044bd
Error: transaction <6f4dc37e935e65e35462efe9b6ce1ead22ba3933db80c5db3d65225606012217> is too big. Transaction size: 72827 bytes, transaction size limit: 39400 bytes

I tried different amount

It means those 5 coins were collected from a large number of transactions, too many to send in one go. Try sending 2.5 to yourself and then try again.

duuuuude

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 500

Hell yeah,
that totally worked, thanks dude,

j

sorryforthat

hero member

Activity: 994

Merit: 500

Quote from: duuuuude on May 25, 2014, 01:43:29 PM

Hi,
this may be a stupid question, but is there a way to send my cloud miners to mine QCN at miners gate, i see a way to do that with bytecoin there but not with QCN, any info is appreciated,

j

qcn.pool.minergate.com:5557

Give this a shot

duuuuude

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 500

Hi,

this may be a stupid question, but is there a way to send my cloud miners to mine QCN at miners gate, i see a way to do that with bytecoin there but not with QCN, any info is appreciated,

j

AdamWhite

hero member

Activity: 605

Merit: 500

qcn.extremepool.org has been extremely reliable here since the update

let's find a block!!

cubydu

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Code:

transfer 0 1VQpANF1pcKHPRAsZpeyG4jLDd1kbPn32YMeXkr9n8jNFvf8aaJdecB3FyAvo7X1DWJDQt3nii9eUTP5kJSfRpL5AwT72FM 5 cdeab1bfd1a9f0c408d6f2a2ee2d4b7b7afe5a9bddd4d34ba63956de5d0044bd
Error: transaction <6f4dc37e935e65e35462efe9b6ce1ead22ba3933db80c5db3d65225606012217> is too big. Transaction size: 72827 bytes, transaction size limit: 39400 bytes

I tried different amount

sid7039

full member

Activity: 221

Merit: 100

Quote from: 33zer0w0lf on May 25, 2014, 12:39:42 PM

Quote from: sid7039 on May 25, 2014, 12:18:23 PM

Quote from: polecrab on May 25, 2014, 10:15:59 AM

Some QCN pools based on node-cryptonote-pool are reporting the network hashrate as double what it should be (check it against the difficulty).
They are using the MRO formula, and not adjusting for 2 minute blocktime.

Also, some of these pools are linking block ids to the monero blockinfo URL.

1. Yes, mro pools give me better results that current qcn pools Sad

Waiting for good pool...
2. Don't you think that minerd gives lower hashrate that "old" simpleminer when used with AES enabled CPU?

qcn.extremepool.org

Maybe in the future.
As for today not many miners and half of the blocks orphaned in last few days Sad

Maybe good when we compare to other qcn pools but not as good as some of mro pools.

33zer0w0lf

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: sid7039 on May 25, 2014, 12:18:23 PM

Quote from: polecrab on May 25, 2014, 10:15:59 AM

Some QCN pools based on node-cryptonote-pool are reporting the network hashrate as double what it should be (check it against the difficulty).
They are using the MRO formula, and not adjusting for 2 minute blocktime.

Also, some of these pools are linking block ids to the monero blockinfo URL.

1. Yes, mro pools give me better results that current qcn pools Sad

Waiting for good pool...
2. Don't you think that minerd gives lower hashrate that "old" simpleminer when used with AES enabled CPU?

qcn.extremepool.org

sid7039

full member

Activity: 221

Merit: 100

Quote from: polecrab on May 25, 2014, 10:15:59 AM

Some QCN pools based on node-cryptonote-pool are reporting the network hashrate as double what it should be (check it against the difficulty).
They are using the MRO formula, and not adjusting for 2 minute blocktime.

Also, some of these pools are linking block ids to the monero blockinfo URL.

1. Yes, mro pools give me better results that current qcn pools Sad

Waiting for good pool...
2. Don't you think that minerd gives lower hashrate that "old" simpleminer when used with AES enabled CPU?

polecrab

member

Activity: 68

Merit: 10

Some QCN pools based on node-cryptonote-pool are reporting the network hashrate as double what it should be (check it against the difficulty).
They are using the MRO formula, and not adjusting for 2 minute blocktime.

Also, some of these pools are linking block ids to the monero blockinfo URL.

loremipsum

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 501

They are indeed Bytecoin forks. However, Bytecoin has supposedly been in the deepweb for more than 2 years and 80% has already been mined. There is no proof whatsoever that it was mined beyond a handful of developers (see bytecoin discussion thread), so this is something like a large premine. We still don't know who holds this 80% of all Bytecoins.

Monero and QuazarCoin were recently created, to avoid Bytecoin's "premine". But they are not identical. I prefer QuazarCoin because it has a flutter emission curve, allowing for a fairer coin distribution.

Zer0Sum

legendary

Activity: 1588

Merit: 1000

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on May 25, 2014, 09:23:11 AM

Could anyone briefly point out the main difference(s) between QCN and MRO?

They appear to be nearly identical forks of BCN...
With MRO 60 sec vs QCN 120 sec confirmation.

Both are quality anon coins...
We will see who has the better Dev team.

bitcoinrocks

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1000