Pages:
Author

Topic: R9 Nano Modded Rom - page 19. (Read 60873 times)

legendary
Activity: 4256
Merit: 8551
'The right to privacy matters'
May 26, 2016, 07:15:09 PM
okay I have a rig with 2 r9 nanos and 1 r9 390

this is my premium rig  it does about 77mh at about 600 watts.

I know this is good,but I am looking for better.

this is done with msi afterburner

the nanos are
 -100
  1000 freq clock
  500 freq clock

the r9 390

is

-100 clock
1000 freq clock gpu
1250  freq clock memory

a 760 watt plat corsair
dd4r4 low volt ram
a m2 ssd
a biostar z170 mobo
an i5 -6500t cpu

this mobo can do 4 cards if they were all nano so I have a few options to improve this board.

I have a 3rd nano I could add it and add a r9 380   it would all fit.

but I really want to know how low are you getting the nanos to do lets say 26mh a nano

can you get them to 170 watts and do 26mh with the mods / flash
legendary
Activity: 1453
Merit: 1011
Bitcoin Talks Bullshit Walks
May 24, 2016, 09:24:26 AM
this is one of the many guides i stumbled on my journey's.. Its very nice. http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/amd-ati-flashing-guide.212849/

Best Regards
d57heinz
legendary
Activity: 1453
Merit: 1011
Bitcoin Talks Bullshit Walks
May 24, 2016, 09:18:39 AM
Citronick.

Try atiflash -i or -ai and make sure the devices are being listed at the dos prompt.. your command line looks correct.

Best Regards
d57heinz

same error... strange.... but I can see them on TRIXX and Device Manager

check my previous post for edit.. Also are you booting into dos. or is this at windows command prompt
you have to be in dos only for atiflash to work and i dont trust winflash for this operation.

Best Regards
Citronick.

Try atiflash -i or -ai and make sure the devices are being listed at the dos prompt.. your command line looks correct.  no it is wrong my bad

a -f -p 0 DPM-100mV.rom

first run the command above making sure you assign the right slot with the -p command.. its either going to be slot 1 or 0

Best Regards
d57heinz
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
May 24, 2016, 09:11:10 AM
Citronick.

Try atiflash -i or -ai and make sure the devices are being listed at the dos prompt.. your command line looks correct.

Best Regards
d57heinz

same error... strange.... but I can see them on TRIXX and Device Manager
legendary
Activity: 1453
Merit: 1011
Bitcoin Talks Bullshit Walks
May 24, 2016, 09:08:05 AM
Citronick.

Try atiflash -i or -ai and make sure the devices are being listed at the dos prompt.. your command line looks correct.  no it is wrong my bad

a -f -p 0 DPM-100mV.rom

first run the command above making sure you assign the right slot with the -p command.. its either going to be slot 1 or 0

Best Regards
d57heinz
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
May 24, 2016, 12:36:47 AM
I have a "Adapter not found" error message, after attempting "atiflash -p -f 0 DPM-100mV.rom" at command prompt.
But in device manager, both of the Nanos are present. The first Nano is on the 16x slot without riser, and the second one on PCI-USB riser on slot 0. My environment is W8.1, Asrock H81 BTC board, Celeron 1840 and 8GB RAM. Any advise?
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
May 23, 2016, 06:46:15 PM
I have a question...

I run my Nano's at -96mv In afterburner with a -25% Power Limit. (55.3MH for the pair) Whole rig with i7-3770k (330Watts from the wall)

Core and Mem @ 1020/500

However....

When I Flash the cards to 800/300... -100mv

I cant over clock the core to 1000 without it crashing....

Not sure what else I could try?



Ive been having this problem too, from what i have tested on stock ROM with afterburner - voltage -100mv and a power limit of like 5-10% will run the cards at 1000mhz stock. They get throttled hard by running hot though. The cooler you can keep them the faster they will be able to run. My cards this way use 950 watts on corsair Link. Has speed on cards varies, because they are getting hot between 62C-70C. Cool ones run 28mh, hot ones 23-25mh/s.

I've messed with flashing quite a bit. I have not been able to get a 1000mhz clock. I have 5 XFX nanos/H81 BTC pro/ax1500i PSU/i5/windows 8.1/Powered USB risers and 1 card on the board. I flashed with the mildest ROM, I think the -100mV.ROM. If in afterburner i put voltage at +50 and power limit at +25% I can get the cards to run at like 920Mhz. Any more than that and the screen lags and I get black screen flashes until the whole thing crashes. Im running 16.1 drivers. This is running with a monitor attached, but not turned on. IIve been using google chrome remote desktop. If I try to do it powering a monitor it will crash out at like 815mhz instead of 915. I turned all appearance settings to performance in control panel. Running like this im using I think 600-650 watts and getting 27Mh/s on each card from them running cooler.

Also, at first I thought my cards werent working. If I would reboot, it would post and then hang on a black screen for like 1 minute. I always reset thinking it was froze. Instead I accidentally left it and it finally opened windows. I think the new roms must not feature fast boot.

Maybe we need like a -50Mv core volt, 1000mhz core, or maybe a 400mhz memory? I'm not up to speed on all of it though  Tongue
hero member
Activity: 693
Merit: 508
May 23, 2016, 12:33:05 PM
I have a few R9 nano can only work with th e-100mV memory undervolt BIOS. It will crash the computer if I use -150mV.
hero member
Activity: 1638
Merit: 576
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
May 23, 2016, 08:45:25 AM
I have a question...

I run my Nano's at -96mv In afterburner with a -25% Power Limit. (55.3MH for the pair) Whole rig with i7-3770k (330Watts from the wall)

Core and Mem @ 1020/500

However....

When I Flash the cards to 800/300... -100mv

I cant over clock the core to 1000 without it crashing....

Not sure what else I could try?



That means you need to use higher memory voltage BIOS, like the -100mV instead of -150 mV for the memory voltage
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
May 23, 2016, 07:52:57 AM
just got my Sapphire R9 Nano today...

before I begin the mod, just curious what's the best OC and undervolting settings at stock before modding?

I want to set that as baseline to compare performance before modding.

Thanks!
sr. member
Activity: 253
Merit: 250
May 23, 2016, 05:28:47 AM
I have a question...

I run my Nano's at -96mv In afterburner with a -25% Power Limit. (55.3MH for the pair) Whole rig with i7-3770k (330Watts from the wall)

Core and Mem @ 1020/500

However....

When I Flash the cards to 800/300... -100mv

I cant over clock the core to 1000 without it crashing....

Not sure what else I could try?

sr. member
Activity: 642
Merit: 292
May 21, 2016, 04:04:00 AM
also don´t know then...
except connecting a real display for one time and then set the display driver.
sr. member
Activity: 270
Merit: 250
May 20, 2016, 06:08:17 AM
Open Device Manager
Expand the "Monitors" list, right-click on the "Plug and Play Monitor" (or whatever here is listed) and then select "Update Driver Software"
Click "Browse my computer for driver software"
Click the "Let me pick from a list of device drivers on my computer"
Unmark "show compatible hardware"
at standard display drivers (left, 1st position) select a driver with the desired resolution (right)
thats all.


My display is already in the mobile mode, I cannot find the monitor in the device manager, what should I do?
sr. member
Activity: 642
Merit: 292
May 20, 2016, 05:59:10 AM
Open Device Manager
Expand the "Monitors" list, right-click on the "Plug and Play Monitor" (or whatever here is listed) and then select "Update Driver Software"
Click "Browse my computer for driver software"
Click the "Let me pick from a list of device drivers on my computer"
Unmark "show compatible hardware"
at standard display drivers (left, 1st position) select a driver with the desired resolution (right)
thats all.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
May 20, 2016, 05:43:05 AM
I use 6 R9 nano, not attaching to the monitor. The dispplay will come "mobile display", the resolution is just 640*480, how can we make it display normally?

Had the same problem on my remote RIG using Windows 7 and Teamviewer.
After unmarking "show compatible hardware" I´d selected a standard VGA display driver (1280x1024) manually, since then I get this resolution although no TFT is connected to the card.

How do you do that, in which option?
sr. member
Activity: 642
Merit: 292
May 20, 2016, 03:36:44 AM
I use 6 R9 nano, not attaching to the monitor. The dispplay will come "mobile display", the resolution is just 640*480, how can we make it display normally?

Had the same problem on my remote RIG using Windows 7 and Teamviewer.
After unmarking "show compatible hardware" I´d selected a standard VGA display driver (1280x1024) manually, since then I get this resolution although no TFT is connected to the card.
full member
Activity: 229
Merit: 100
May 20, 2016, 03:29:37 AM
Use a dummy plug :-)

Do you use the dummy plug for all your rigs?

No i don't Smiley

I have a few, but for my nano rigs i would need HDMI dummy plugs, and i find them to expensive to buy 20 of those just to have a larger screen :p

Greetings
hero member
Activity: 693
Merit: 508
May 20, 2016, 02:54:17 AM
Use a dummy plug :-)

Do you use the dummy plug for all your rigs?
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
May 20, 2016, 01:05:40 AM
Use a dummy plug :-)
newbie
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
May 19, 2016, 03:02:02 PM
I use 6 R9 nano, not attaching to the monitor. The dispplay will come "mobile display", the resolution is just 640*480, how can we make it display normally?
Pages:
Jump to: