Radeon released RX 480. (Card is Released) - page 32.

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: Psynthax on June 21, 2016, 03:02:34 PM

what kind of vmod? software mod via bios or hardware by soldering potentiometer ?

bios vmod, check the thread about the nano mod, it can really lower the wattege to a great extent, if a nano which is 28nm can be lowered to 80 watt which is like more thna 50% from the original tdp

i can't see why you can not do the same with a 470....

greaterninja

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Psynthax on June 21, 2016, 03:02:34 PM

what kind of vmod? software mod via bios or hardware by soldering potentiometer ?

Either can most likely be used.

Psynthax

hero member

Activity: 2366

Merit: 504

what kind of vmod? software mod via bios or hardware by soldering potentiometer ?

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

the nano can do 80w on ethereum with the right vmod, the same will be for the 470, with the right mod a lower wattage than 50 is more than possible, maybe not as a low as 25, but 30-40w is utterly possible

greaterninja

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 1000

Wow I tell everyone the CEO of AMD says the 470 will be 2.5x more efficient than the 370 and now everyone starts saying 25 watts? LOL

But yes...AMD does sometimes fudge numbers. Sometimes quite a bit more, sometimes less.

If the r7 370 is rated to use 150 watts, then then 470 should be rated ~60 watts according to the CEO's 2.5 efficiency claim.
However, my MSI 370 gamer OC cards use 125-130 watts on a gold power supply.
145 w overclocked.

I would say the 470 will most likely use 50 to 75 watts.

asdalani

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 500

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

I will buy the 470 if the 256 bit memory bus is the bottle neck for the Ethereum mining. It seems it is still profitble to mine Eth.

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: CryR on June 21, 2016, 06:28:17 AM

The R9 470 only 25W? Shocked

In my PC only my CPU (stock) consumes 50W. lol

25w may be far-stretched, but it's so out of reality to think that they might consume around 25-50w with the right voltage

CryR

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

kcin obazs

The R9 470 only 25W? Shocked

In my PC only my CPU (stock) consumes 50W. lol

anatolikostis

legendary

Activity: 2026

Merit: 1005

Quote from: adaseb on June 21, 2016, 03:48:26 AM

Quote from: anatolikostis on June 21, 2016, 03:36:24 AM

Quote from: anatolikostis on June 12, 2016, 11:05:22 AM

Quote from: Liquid71 on June 12, 2016, 09:35:49 AM

The 380x did 25mhs until the latest dag, now it's doing ~21mh so with the 14nm chips in the 480 should offer a jump in performance and efficiency, especially for claymore's dualminer.

whaaaat?!
do you got some real ethereum miner pics?
PS 380x of mine pushes 21.45mh/s @1500MHz gddr5 (elpida)

sapphire nitro oc r9 380x
now i can do 23.5mh/s @900/1625 (elpida-mod bios)

The 380 will never slow down for the DAG change, those only affected the Pitcairn and Tahiti based cards, not Tonga.

I mean, I managed to do some bios optimizations with elpida gddr timings (hex workshop) and stock 21.5mh/s has been reverted to 23.5mh/s Cool

adaseb

legendary

Activity: 3808

Merit: 1723

Quote from: anatolikostis on June 21, 2016, 03:36:24 AM

Quote from: anatolikostis on June 12, 2016, 11:05:22 AM

Quote from: Liquid71 on June 12, 2016, 09:35:49 AM

The 380x did 25mhs until the latest dag, now it's doing ~21mh so with the 14nm chips in the 480 should offer a jump in performance and efficiency, especially for claymore's dualminer.

whaaaat?!
do you got some real ethereum miner pics?
PS 380x of mine pushes 21.45mh/s @1500MHz gddr5 (elpida)

sapphire nitro oc r9 380x
now i can do 23.5mh/s @900/1625 (elpida-mod bios)

The 380 will never slow down for the DAG change, those only affected the Pitcairn and Tahiti based cards, not Tonga.

Marvell1

legendary

Activity: 2408

Merit: 1102

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Erkallys on June 21, 2016, 03:15:43 AM

Quote from: Amph on June 21, 2016, 12:54:39 AM

Quote from: Dev_Sempak_coin on June 20, 2016, 10:35:21 PM

not sure this article is true 100%,because not yet people can review it,
just for speculation

AMD Radeon RX 480 May Not be That Great for Mining
source : http://cryptomining-blog.com/7989-amd-radeon-rx-480-may-not-be-that-great-for-mining/

i'm also more interested in the 470, there are great possibility with that gpu, it may consume only 25w in soem case, if limited correctly, which is far beyond amazing

I saw it. Thr R9 470 might only consume 25W Shocked

? If so, I order twelve the day of the release. Do you imagine how wonderful it would be ?!

i cant see it using that little wattage even with bios mods, remember the 370 class cards are not voltage unlocked because they are budget cards , even some 380 cards are not voltage unlocked too although amd has already stated the 480 cards will be
voltage unlocked which should bring them to 100 watt or so.

I suspect without a voltage mod the 470 cards will do around 75watts from the wall maybe they can be tweaked to 50 with a bios mod. 25 watt is a fantasy, since the PIC power connector usually draws 25-75 watts itself on most cards.

We will see though.

anatolikostis

legendary

Activity: 2026

Merit: 1005

Quote from: anatolikostis on June 12, 2016, 11:05:22 AM

Quote from: Liquid71 on June 12, 2016, 09:35:49 AM

The 380x did 25mhs until the latest dag, now it's doing ~21mh so with the 14nm chips in the 480 should offer a jump in performance and efficiency, especially for claymore's dualminer.

whaaaat?!
do you got some real ethereum miner pics?
PS 380x of mine pushes 21.45mh/s @1500MHz gddr5 (elpida)

sapphire nitro oc r9 380x
now i can do 23.5mh/s @900/1625 (elpida-mod bios)

Erkallys

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1004

Quote from: Amph on June 21, 2016, 12:54:39 AM

Quote from: Dev_Sempak_coin on June 20, 2016, 10:35:21 PM

not sure this article is true 100%,because not yet people can review it,
just for speculation

AMD Radeon RX 480 May Not be That Great for Mining
source : http://cryptomining-blog.com/7989-amd-radeon-rx-480-may-not-be-that-great-for-mining/

i'm also more interested in the 470, there are great possibility with that gpu, it may consume only 25w in soem case, if limited correctly, which is far beyond amazing

I saw it. Thr R9 470 might only consume 25W Shocked

? If so, I order twelve the day of the release. Do you imagine how wonderful it would be ?!

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: Dev_Sempak_coin on June 20, 2016, 10:35:21 PM

not sure this article is true 100%,because not yet people can review it,
just for speculation

AMD Radeon RX 480 May Not be That Great for Mining
source : http://cryptomining-blog.com/7989-amd-radeon-rx-480-may-not-be-that-great-for-mining/

i'm also more interested in the 470, there are great possibility with that gpu, it may consume only 25w in some case, if limited correctly, which is far beyond amazing

rockyforever

sr. member

Activity: 429

Merit: 250

Quote from: Dev_Sempak_coin on June 20, 2016, 10:35:21 PM

not sure this article is true 100%,because not yet people can review it,
just for speculation

AMD Radeon RX 480 May Not be That Great for Mining
source : http://cryptomining-blog.com/7989-amd-radeon-rx-480-may-not-be-that-great-for-mining/

Good find but poorly written article and provides nothing more than what has been speculated on the boards. No one knows for sure what the performance will be for ethereum mining. He literally took what has been said already, compiled into a blog and posted it. And he ended with the DAO issue and POS in a year.........

That is some deep journalism lol

U253

member

Activity: 76

Merit: 10

Quote from: Bemerand on June 18, 2016, 10:52:06 AM

We just need to wait for 2 weeks to see the mining performance. If it is better than the 390 by 50%, I will buy.

Most likely 480 won't outperform 390. I don't believe the price of 390 will be cut to ~$200 very soon.

Psynthax

hero member

Activity: 2366

Merit: 504

title of the post is misleading.. its all speculation so far..

hopefully we get a breakdown of performance like they did wih GTX 1080 on the crypto-mining blog

Dev_Sempak_coin

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

not sure this article is true 100%,because not yet people can review it,
just for speculation

AMD Radeon RX 480 May Not be That Great for Mining
source : http://cryptomining-blog.com/7989-amd-radeon-rx-480-may-not-be-that-great-for-mining/

Psynthax

hero member

Activity: 2366

Merit: 504

cant wait to get my hands on 4 of those for my small mining rig..
hopefully it will be good for mining not just dagger-hashimoto but other algos..

Kwiksave

member

Activity: 102

Merit: 10

Quote from: Amph on June 19, 2016, 04:19:08 AM

Quote from: rockyforever on June 19, 2016, 01:47:48 AM

Quote from: Amph on June 19, 2016, 01:03:10 AM

Quote from: rockyforever on June 18, 2016, 07:26:41 PM

Quote from: Amph on June 18, 2016, 11:39:59 AM

the simple thing that ethereum will go to pos, make your whole post invalid, so yes they are apple and orange

and now etheruem is even tanking, so it's dead prematurely, good luck to you investing in 480 farm now to milk the last value from that scam called etheruem

it's funny, because now it does not matter anymore how well those new gpu will perform on dagger, but it matter more how they will perform on neoscrypt and lyra

Rofl. You're now officially retarded and a troll against Ethereum. I now noticed this after looking at your previous posts.

Did bitcoin die when Mt Gox happened? (the answer is no btw).

And them you cap off by promoting to additional altcoins..... lol *thumbs up*

so i'm stating the true = troll? i think the troll is someone else here

you can not compare etheruem with bitcoin, they are different one is a ico shitty thing prone to centralization and the other is truly decentralized

the fact that they want to fork without consensus prove this easily, also mtgox has nothing to do with and internal hack because of code done with the ass, that was mtgox fault, not bitcoin fault, big difference

The DAO hack was a DAO smart contract failure, not an Ethereum failure. Once again, your logic and understanding has hit a peak of retardation.

Also, you stated decentralization, yet I guess you have not followed the debate whether to increase the block size? If the coin is decentralized, how come a few miners hold the votes on what to do? So is bitcoin "truly" decentralized? I would refer to a dictionary, google, and some studying before you respond again, without, again, any knowledge or legitimate argument.

Can't argue with stupid.

it does not matter if it was the dao or etheruem(besides that i didn't stated that etehruem was hacked, you made that up), you are not understanding, this place is sustained only by hype and trust if investor see bad trust they simply dump and forget

miners are not holding the vote on bitcoin, they must follow what merchants want too, also miner should not even vote against current block limit if it was the case

because the current situation it's good for them, since you need to increase fee to have your transaction among those with prioroty

With the 2MB block size, there will be more transactions and the bitcoin price will be higher, the miners can earn higher fees.

Topic: Radeon released RX 480. (Card is Released) - page 32. (Read 60193 times)