Pages:
Author

Topic: RATING of TOP 20 CRYPTOCURRENCY SPORTSBOOKS - page 7. (Read 2309 times)

newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 2
I think one of the most important information you can impart to players is whether or not the bookie uses kyc,
be a lot more informative than saying, "this site has an amazing layout".
Having said that, I think you have done a very good job with your site.
member
Activity: 406
Merit: 10
Agree that Nitrogen is #1 and Betcoin #2. I'm not a big fan of 1xbit or Cloudbet but as you pointed out, all ratings guides will be somewhat different.

Me only agree to the top 1 and 2 but about 1xbit I read someone complaining that sites because he can't withdraw his winninh funds. 
member
Activity: 773
Merit: 17
I see you have given Sportsbet.io the rating of 'B'. One of the disadvantage in review section of Sportsbet.io says that it is 'Relatively young Sportsbook'.
But Sportsbet is online since 2016 which in my opinion is decent time in gambling business. Moreover, Sportsbet.io recently entered into deal with Premier League club, Watford which makes them official sponsor of Watford for 3 years. The deal is estimated to be worth £20-25M. I don't think there exists any other sportsbook which spent amount that high in marketing. It clearly placed SportsBet.io ahead others in both competitiveness and trustworthiness. I would suggest you to reconsider review of Sportsbet. Regards!
Thank you for your feedback, thanks to which the review of Sportsbet.io was recently revised and updated: http://100bookies.com/sportsbet-io-review/

I disagree with most of what's written about Sportsbet but the most glaring is that for all intents and purposes, they are a fiat book and not bitcoin only. They accept Skrill, Neteller and other forms of deposit.
Quote
Sportsbet.io is undoubtedly a leader in the field of bitcoin only online bookmakers
Thank you, this is also corrected.
member
Activity: 280
Merit: 14
good job. There is a similar theme but with poker? rating of poker rooms with freerolls.
Don't go about searching for list of top poker gambling site or any other gambling site so many out there are inaccurate and easily land you into deep trouble. Let it be known to you some site are paid by gambling site to rate them high on there list
legendary
Activity: 3561
Merit: 1058
Nitrogensports and Betcoin both have poker rooms.
hero member
Activity: 2968
Merit: 609
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
good job. There is a similar theme but with poker? rating of poker rooms with freerolls.
There are not many popular crypto sportsbooks out there that offer pvp poker, but I recommend Fair.poker since I have checked it out recently and it seems like a decent website which will continue improving over time.

I usually stick to playing poker on sites like Bodog which are FIAT based sportsbooks and accept BTC deposits and withdrawals.
You mean that fair.poker new site which doesnt have any players? Their site design isnt really that good at all.

I would rather prefer on using up SWC than on this one.
hero member
Activity: 3010
Merit: 969
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
good job. There is a similar theme but with poker? rating of poker rooms with freerolls.
There are not many popular crypto sportsbooks out there that offer pvp poker, but I recommend Fair.poker since I have checked it out recently and it seems like a decent website which will continue improving over time.

I usually stick to playing poker on sites like Bodog which are FIAT based sportsbooks and accept BTC deposits and withdrawals.
jr. member
Activity: 168
Merit: 3
good job. There is a similar theme but with poker? rating of poker rooms with freerolls.
legendary
Activity: 3561
Merit: 1058
I see you have given Sportsbet.io the rating of 'B'. One of the disadvantage in review section of Sportsbet.io says that it is 'Relatively young Sportsbook'.
But Sportsbet is online since 2016 which in my opinion is decent time in gambling business. Moreover, Sportsbet.io recently entered into deal with Premier League club, Watford which makes them official sponsor of Watford for 3 years. The deal is estimated to be worth £20-25M. I don't think there exists any other sportsbook which spent amount that high in marketing. It clearly placed SportsBet.io ahead others in both competitiveness and trustworthiness. I would suggest you to reconsider review of Sportsbet. Regards!

Now or in the past.

1xBet/1xBit - Liverpool FC and FC Barcelona (Both current)
Betway – West Ham United
Bet365 – Stoke City
Dafabet – Sunderland
TLCBEt – West Bromwich Albion
138 Bet – Watford
legendary
Activity: 3561
Merit: 1058
I see you have given Sportsbet.io the rating of 'B'. One of the disadvantage in review section of Sportsbet.io says that it is 'Relatively young Sportsbook'.
But Sportsbet is online since 2016 which in my opinion is decent time in gambling business. Moreover, Sportsbet.io recently entered into deal with Premier League club, Watford which makes them official sponsor of Watford for 3 years. The deal is estimated to be worth £20-25M. I don't think there exists any other sportsbook which spent amount that high in marketing. It clearly placed SportsBet.io ahead others in both competitiveness and trustworthiness. I would suggest you to reconsider review of Sportsbet. Regards!
Thank you for your feedback, thanks to which the review of Sportsbet.io was recently revised and updated: http://100bookies.com/sportsbet-io-review/

I disagree with most of what's written about Sportsbet but the most glaring is that for all intents and purposes, they are a fiat book and not bitcoin only. They accept Skrill, Neteller and other forms of deposit.
Quote
Sportsbet.io is undoubtedly a leader in the field of bitcoin only online bookmakers
member
Activity: 773
Merit: 17
I see you have given Sportsbet.io the rating of 'B'. One of the disadvantage in review section of Sportsbet.io says that it is 'Relatively young Sportsbook'.
But Sportsbet is online since 2016 which in my opinion is decent time in gambling business. Moreover, Sportsbet.io recently entered into deal with Premier League club, Watford which makes them official sponsor of Watford for 3 years. The deal is estimated to be worth £20-25M. I don't think there exists any other sportsbook which spent amount that high in marketing. It clearly placed SportsBet.io ahead others in both competitiveness and trustworthiness. I would suggest you to reconsider review of Sportsbet. Regards!
Thank you for your feedback, thanks to which the review of Sportsbet.io was recently revised and updated: http://100bookies.com/sportsbet-io-review/
member
Activity: 773
Merit: 17
Rating of TOP 20 Cryptocurrency Sportsbooks see here: http://100bookies.com/cryptocurrency-sportsbooks-eng/

First I would like to say that you should optimize your websites for mobile devices. And secondly, how did you come up with these ratings, you just rated the ones you liked good and the others bad I guess. Did you consider getting information from those who have made use of the sites or have you yourself made use of these sites before rating them? You need to prove it before can take you serious. And you didn’t even leave any review about them, just a list and no description at all. There are some sites that you gave a good rating that doesn’t deserve it, because I have seen lots of complaints about them.
Thanks for your advice, we will try to fix it in the future. Unfortunately, we do not have the opportunity to test all the sites of sportsbooks on our own, except perhaps some of them. Therefore, for evaluation, we use in some cases indirect data, which include a general inspection of sites: the site’s age, information about license, the number of sports, the number of types and betting options, the level of odds, a list of available payment methods, feedback methods and many others. We also take into account player reviews and other information about sites on the Internet. In addition, we also take into account information about sites traffic according to Alexa Rank, which informs about their popularity directly among the players themselves. Thus we get a comprehensive assessment as a result.
hero member
Activity: 2464
Merit: 585
Rating of TOP 20 Cryptocurrency Sportsbooks see here: http://100bookies.com/cryptocurrency-sportsbooks-eng/

First I would like to say that you should optimize your websites for mobile devices. And secondly, how did you come up with these ratings, you just rated the ones you liked good and the others bad I guess. Did you consider getting information from those who have made use of the sites or have you yourself made use of these sites before rating them? You need to prove it before can take you serious. And you didn’t even leave any review about them, just a list and no description at all. There are some sites that you gave a good rating that doesn’t deserve it, because I have seen lots of complaints about them.
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1126
It's been a while since seeing a rating website.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place  , else people won't believe in your ratings.

In drawing up the ratings, we use an integrated approach: to evaluate the sportsbooks we take the opinions of the betting business experts and players feedback, as well as information about the websites of the bookmakers in global Internet traffic according to Alexa Rank (alexa.com). Despite this, it is impossible to make a rating that all users would agree with, since each individual player considers his favorite bookmakers the best.

The rating is just a guide to all users out there but it doesn't mean that those are considered to be the ultimate rating of those sportsbooks. You are right, you can't satisfy every single user with the ratings presented. What they can do, is try those sportsbooks and evaluate on his own. Anyway, they are not forced to believe all the information provided, just a rating to get a glimpse of those sites. It is up to them how they will use each of them.

But it still shows that site has some issues there which is never reccomend to show it public, especially when it is for new players to read. This will mislead so many new players to be wrong in choosing a good and a bad one. I do not even believe in some kind of this reviews, better to check direcly on the thread as well instead of believing something like this.

if you are a new player, i think you should not look for only one rating site. there are other threads or sites discussing crypto sportsbooks.
and most reviews are paid, so you cant really rely their authenticity. if you want to test a specific sportsbook, use a small amount of money and assess whats gonna happen.
some feedbacks also are case to case basis. there are reasons why they are encountering such issues. so we cant generalise whats the image of a sportsbook by few feedbacks. some good reviews are not recorded as a matter of fact

It isnt really that necessary for you to risk up anytime some money to spend on even how small it is which there are persons who dont really like to risk up anything unless if those things are already legit ones.
You can always have the spare time to read up and find feedbacks because looking for those informations wont really cost an arm and leg as long you do know that your money is at risk.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1100
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
It's been a while since seeing a rating website.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place  , else people won't believe in your ratings.

In drawing up the ratings, we use an integrated approach: to evaluate the sportsbooks we take the opinions of the betting business experts and players feedback, as well as information about the websites of the bookmakers in global Internet traffic according to Alexa Rank (alexa.com). Despite this, it is impossible to make a rating that all users would agree with, since each individual player considers his favorite bookmakers the best.

The rating is just a guide to all users out there but it doesn't mean that those are considered to be the ultimate rating of those sportsbooks. You are right, you can't satisfy every single user with the ratings presented. What they can do, is try those sportsbooks and evaluate on his own. Anyway, they are not forced to believe all the information provided, just a rating to get a glimpse of those sites. It is up to them how they will use each of them.

But it still shows that site has some issues there which is never reccomend to show it public, especially when it is for new players to read. This will mislead so many new players to be wrong in choosing a good and a bad one. I do not even believe in some kind of this reviews, better to check direcly on the thread as well instead of believing something like this.

if you are a new player, i think you should not look for only one rating site. there are other threads or sites discussing crypto sportsbooks.
and most reviews are paid, so you cant really rely their authenticity. if you want to test a specific sportsbook, use a small amount of money and assess whats gonna happen.
some feedbacks also are case to case basis. there are reasons why they are encountering such issues. so we cant generalise whats the image of a sportsbook by few feedbacks. some good reviews are not recorded as a matter of fact
member
Activity: 773
Merit: 17
Is this the real top 20 ctypto sportsbooks & this is already updated?

It is the most progressive rating of cryptocurrency bookmakers at the moment, which you can find on the Internet. Of course, it is not ideal yet, but we are constantly improving and supplementing it with new sportsbooks. In addition, we making ratings of bookmakers for quite long time, so we understand this topic very well.
legendary
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1870
dice9.win
Is this the real top 20 ctypto sportsbooks & this is already updated?
It's not the real top 20, his rating is based off from different factors which you can find in the first page of the thread and it's not fully updated since you can still see old sites listed below that stopped operating.

If you're looking for a good sportsbook you should look for other lists or try each one out first imo.

member
Activity: 406
Merit: 10
Is this the real top 20 ctypto sportsbooks & this is already updated?
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1008
It's been a while since seeing a rating website.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place  , else people won't believe in your ratings.

In drawing up the ratings, we use an integrated approach: to evaluate the sportsbooks we take the opinions of the betting business experts and players feedback, as well as information about the websites of the bookmakers in global Internet traffic according to Alexa Rank (alexa.com). Despite this, it is impossible to make a rating that all users would agree with, since each individual player considers his favorite bookmakers the best.

The rating is just a guide to all users out there but it doesn't mean that those are considered to be the ultimate rating of those sportsbooks. You are right, you can't satisfy every single user with the ratings presented. What they can do, is try those sportsbooks and evaluate on his own. Anyway, they are not forced to believe all the information provided, just a rating to get a glimpse of those sites. It is up to them how they will use each of them.

But it still shows that site has some issues there which is never reccomend to show it public, especially when it is for new players to read. This will mislead so many new players to be wrong in choosing a good and a bad one. I do not even believe in some kind of this reviews, better to check direcly on the thread as well instead of believing something like this.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1804
guess who's back
1xbit doesn't have the best line. They also use two sets of lines. Winning players get a second set of lines with even higher margins. I'm not sure what the exact criteria is to get the second line.

for the popular and top leagues no they don't , but they have a lot of betting options that aren't available in the other bitcoin bookies
you can find whatever you want to bet there , also they offer a lot more leagues and competitions as well and you can find any match easily there

if they weren't scam they would be my #1 book actually
Pages:
Jump to: