RATING of TOP 20 CRYPTOCURRENCY SPORTSBOOKS - page 8.

Peeps Place

legendary

Activity: 3564

Merit: 1058

Quote from: sportbettor on June 28, 2019, 03:15:35 AM

Quote from: SyGambler on June 27, 2019, 07:12:36 PM

Quote from: sportbettor on June 27, 2019, 01:15:18 PM

Quote from: LimLims on June 27, 2019, 11:08:00 AM

It's been a while since seeing a rating website.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.

In drawing up the ratings, we use an integrated approach: to evaluate the sportsbooks we take the opinions of the betting business experts and players feedback, as well as information about the websites of the bookmakers in global Internet traffic according to Alexa Rank (alexa.com). Despite this, it is impossible to make a rating that all users would agree with, since each individual player considers his favorite bookmakers the best.

you might be right but having 1xbit listed only means you care about the referral money , I doubt that you even use all of these sites
how on earth can you put a scam website in #3 , alex ranking ? you know Alexa ranking has nothing to do with the actual ratings right ?

THEY DON"T PAY WINNERS

that's a fact and at any stage they will lock you out of your account and refuse to pay you your money

the whole ranking thing is so wrong IMO but don't want to discuss it , seeing nitro on #1 while you can 100% of the times find better odds in other sites explain the whole thing

but having 1xbit listed is so wrong

Each bookmaker has some drawbacks. 1xBit is represented in the rating, as it is a cryptocurrency sportsbook. In addition, they have the best line and the most modern website (service) in the betting industry, therefore, they have every right to be listed on our list. Moreover, their disadvantages are listed in the review on our website. So to play there or not let everyone decide for himself as a result. Our main mission is to show you a list of all possible bookmakers, which, I am sure, many have not even heard. However, players must make the final choice themselves.

1xbit doesn't have the best line. They also use two sets of lines. Winning players get a second set of lines with even higher margins. I'm not sure what the exact criteria is to get the second line.

SyGambler

legendary

Activity: 2436

Merit: 1804

guess who's back

Quote from: sportbettor on June 28, 2019, 03:15:35 AM

Each bookmaker has some drawbacks. 1xBit is represented in the rating, as it is a cryptocurrency sportsbook. In addition, they have the best line and the most modern website (service) in the betting industry, therefore, they have every right to be listed on our list. Moreover, their disadvantages are listed in the review on our website. So to play there or not let everyone decide for himself as a result. Our main mission is to show you a list of all possible bookmakers, which, I am sure, many have not even heard. However, players must make the final choice themselves.

indeed they have the best lines , but what makes them special since they can freeze your account at any moment ??
until now all the people I know that used 1xbit ended having their account closed and their money stuck in that scam site

odds and lines don't mean a thing if the bookie won't pay you

sportbettor

member

Activity: 773

Merit: 17

Quote from: SyGambler on June 27, 2019, 07:12:36 PM

Quote from: sportbettor on June 27, 2019, 01:15:18 PM

Quote from: LimLims on June 27, 2019, 11:08:00 AM

It's been a while since seeing a rating website.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.

In drawing up the ratings, we use an integrated approach: to evaluate the sportsbooks we take the opinions of the betting business experts and players feedback, as well as information about the websites of the bookmakers in global Internet traffic according to Alexa Rank (alexa.com). Despite this, it is impossible to make a rating that all users would agree with, since each individual player considers his favorite bookmakers the best.

you might be right but having 1xbit listed only means you care about the referral money , I doubt that you even use all of these sites
how on earth can you put a scam website in #3 , alex ranking ? you know Alexa ranking has nothing to do with the actual ratings right ?

THEY DON"T PAY WINNERS

that's a fact and at any stage they will lock you out of your account and refuse to pay you your money

the whole ranking thing is so wrong IMO but don't want to discuss it , seeing nitro on #1 while you can 100% of the times find better odds in other sites explain the whole thing

but having 1xbit listed is so wrong

Each bookmaker has some drawbacks. 1xBit is represented in the rating, as it is a cryptocurrency sportsbook. In addition, they have the best line and the most modern website (service) in the betting industry, therefore, they have every right to be listed on our list. Moreover, their disadvantages are listed in the review on our website. So to play there or not let everyone decide for himself as a result. Our main mission is to show you a list of all possible bookmakers, which, I am sure, many have not even heard. However, players must make the final choice themselves.

SyGambler

legendary

Activity: 2436

Merit: 1804

guess who's back

Quote from: sportbettor on June 27, 2019, 01:15:18 PM

Quote from: LimLims on June 27, 2019, 11:08:00 AM

It's been a while since seeing a rating website.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.

In drawing up the ratings, we use an integrated approach: to evaluate the sportsbooks we take the opinions of the betting business experts and players feedback, as well as information about the websites of the bookmakers in global Internet traffic according to Alexa Rank (alexa.com). Despite this, it is impossible to make a rating that all users would agree with, since each individual player considers his favorite bookmakers the best.

you might be right but having 1xbit listed only means you care about the referral money , I doubt that you even use all of these sites
how on earth can you put a scam website in #3 , alex ranking ? you know Alexa ranking has nothing to do with the actual ratings right ?

THEY DON"T PAY WINNERS

that's a fact and at any stage they will lock you out of your account and refuse to pay you your money

the whole ranking thing is so wrong IMO but don't want to discuss it , seeing nitro on #1 while you can 100% of the times find better odds in other sites explain the whole thing

but having 1xbit listed is so wrong

dark08

full member

Activity: 798

Merit: 104

Quote from: tippytoes on June 27, 2019, 06:36:30 PM

Quote from: sportbettor on June 27, 2019, 01:15:18 PM

Quote from: LimLims on June 27, 2019, 11:08:00 AM

It's been a while since seeing a rating website.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.

In drawing up the ratings, we use an integrated approach: to evaluate the sportsbooks we take the opinions of the betting business experts and players feedback, as well as information about the websites of the bookmakers in global Internet traffic according to Alexa Rank (alexa.com). Despite this, it is impossible to make a rating that all users would agree with, since each individual player considers his favorite bookmakers the best.

The rating is just a guide to all users out there but it doesn't mean that those are considered to be the ultimate rating of those sportsbooks. You are right, you can't satisfy every single user with the ratings presented. What they can do, is try those sportsbooks and evaluate on his own. Anyway, they are not forced to believe all the information provided, just a rating to get a glimpse of those sites. It is up to them how they will use each of them.

I agree to you dude this is a guide to know will gambling site is the legit or not if the owner reputation is good or bad but its up to you if you take a risk for those gambling site that have a lot of problem and issues thats a reason we need to check first if the website have a problem before doing any action.

tippytoes

sr. member

Activity: 1988

Merit: 275

Quote from: sportbettor on June 27, 2019, 01:15:18 PM

Quote from: LimLims on June 27, 2019, 11:08:00 AM

It's been a while since seeing a rating website.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.

In drawing up the ratings, we use an integrated approach: to evaluate the sportsbooks we take the opinions of the betting business experts and players feedback, as well as information about the websites of the bookmakers in global Internet traffic according to Alexa Rank (alexa.com). Despite this, it is impossible to make a rating that all users would agree with, since each individual player considers his favorite bookmakers the best.

The rating is just a guide to all users out there but it doesn't mean that those are considered to be the ultimate rating of those sportsbooks. You are right, you can't satisfy every single user with the ratings presented. What they can do, is try those sportsbooks and evaluate on his own. Anyway, they are not forced to believe all the information provided, just a rating to get a glimpse of those sites. It is up to them how they will use each of them.

sportbettor

member

Activity: 773

Merit: 17

Quote from: LimLims on June 27, 2019, 11:08:00 AM

It's been a while since seeing a rating website.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.

In drawing up the ratings, we use an integrated approach: to evaluate the sportsbooks we take the opinions of the betting business experts and players feedback, as well as information about the websites of the bookmakers in global Internet traffic according to Alexa Rank (alexa.com). Despite this, it is impossible to make a rating that all users would agree with, since each individual player considers his favorite bookmakers the best.

LimLims

sr. member

Activity: 1204

Merit: 272

1xbit.com

It's been a while since seeing a rating website.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.

Sharon121212

full member

Activity: 280

Merit: 215

Quote from: avikz on June 25, 2019, 12:21:04 PM

Please note down the parametera based kn which you have rated the websites. Otherwise it literally no sense for anyone to belive in your ratings.

Also have you considered user's feedback while rating a website??

They most often pay minimal attentions to all those details. They are more interested in there site getting more views when most of there ratings might be similar to those of other websites.
Rating of cryptocurrency sport booking site should not be done by every one if you can find a good rating or had seen one before you can just post the link here or on your site there are benefits in being different

beerlover

legendary

Activity: 2842

Merit: 1152

I think there are levels of hate towards betking, I would totally understand the hate for gamblers who are trying to withdraw and can't but I haven't seen that happen way too much, maybe it happens and that is horrible too and I would be glad to hear that people are coming out against it and if there are proofs they should put it on the forum and show that as a reason to put a negative trust to them.

However, the main problem with them occurred when they did their own ICO and their currency promised a lot of things yet they failed to provide those things, giving promises on an ICO and then not making them a reality was the biggest problem if you ask me, they made sure they got their own currency back far cheaper than they sold it and trying to brag about how "they didn't promise any price points" because they are capable of ruining the worth of coin themselves they see it as a regular coin price change.

omonuyak

sr. member

Activity: 882

Merit: 269

Quote from: carlfebz2 on June 25, 2019, 03:49:45 PM

Quote from: sportbettor on June 25, 2019, 12:06:54 PM

Rating of TOP 20 Cryptocurrency Sportsbooks see here: http://100bookies.com/cryptocurrency-sportsbooks-eng/

Do this rating is just basing on personal choice? and why Betking is included?

We have negative feedback of betking in this forum and some user on their gambling sites said "they could not make withdrawal" I don't really know what is in him mind for rating them. I also believe that op only make the reviews base on the personal judgment and he really did not used basic review tools. Very nice work anyway!

sportbettor

member

Activity: 773

Merit: 17

Quote from: DarkDays on June 26, 2019, 06:15:31 PM

Not really sure how you could possible say that Bitcoin Rush is better than FortuneJack, I mean.... Come on.

We have a fairly simple and clear approach to the evaluation of new sportsbooks. So, for all new bookmakers, we initially assign a rating of "C-". However, if a well-known and trusted brand is behind the recently opened bookmaker, then in this case we can assign it a rating "C" immediately. This is what happened on our website as a result with FortuneJack.

(!) I want to remind that we present the rating of bookmakers, and not a casinos.

Therefore, in this case, an estimate was given only to the sportsbook section of FortuneJack, and not to the whole site as a whole. FortuneJack Sportsbook was opened just a few months ago, so it cannot yet have a rating higher than "C-". And just for the well-known name of its brand, it was immediately rated half a point higher. In any case, this assessment is not final and may be revised over time. Bitcoin Rush we know for a long time, so it is rated higher.

Flagship11

full member

Activity: 853

Merit: 144

Quote from: sportbettor on June 26, 2019, 07:29:02 AM

Thanks for your comment! We will try to revise it in the future. The fact is that many of the reviews on our site have not been updated for several years, so most likely they are a bit outdated. On our site more than 400 sportsbooks are represented in general, so often we simply do not have time to follow the changes in the work of individual bookmakers.

You may want to consider updating your reviews before starting a thread with outdated ratings. Some of the sportsbooks you rate are not in business anymore.

DarkDays

legendary

Activity: 2030

Merit: 1189

Not really sure how you could possible say that Bitcoin Rush is better than FortuneJack, I mean.... Come on.

Also, your website design is absolutely disgusting, how can we trust your reviews are credible when you can't even see that your website looks like it was made by an amateur.

sportbettor

member

Activity: 773

Merit: 17

Quote from: webtricks on June 26, 2019, 06:42:55 AM

I see you have given Sportsbet.io the rating of 'B'. One of the disadvantage in review section of Sportsbet.io says that it is 'Relatively young Sportsbook'.
But Sportsbet is online since 2016 which in my opinion is decent time in gambling business. Moreover, Sportsbet.io recently entered into deal with Premier League club, Watford which makes them official sponsor of Watford for 3 years. The deal is estimated to be worth £20-25M. I don't think there exists any other sportsbook which spent amount that high in marketing. It clearly placed SportsBet.io ahead others in both competitiveness and trustworthiness. I would suggest you to reconsider review of Sportsbet. Regards!

Thanks for your comment! We will try to revise it in the future. The fact is that many of the reviews on our site have not been updated for several years, so most likely they are a bit outdated. On our site more than 400 sportsbooks are represented in general, so often we simply do not have time to follow the changes in the work of individual bookmakers.

webtricks

legendary

Activity: 1918

Merit: 1728

I see you have given Sportsbet.io the rating of 'B'. One of the disadvantage in review section of Sportsbet.io says that it is 'Relatively young Sportsbook'.
But Sportsbet is online since 2016 which in my opinion is decent time in gambling business. Moreover, Sportsbet.io recently entered into deal with Premier League club, Watford which makes them official sponsor of Watford for 3 years. The deal is estimated to be worth £20-25M. I don't think there exists any other sportsbook which spent amount that high in marketing. It clearly placed SportsBet.io ahead others in both competitiveness and trustworthiness. I would suggest you to reconsider review of Sportsbet. Regards!

sportbettor

member

Activity: 773

Merit: 17

Quote from: pakhitheboss on June 25, 2019, 07:26:33 PM

Very good website you have. It is mobile friendly but, banner placement are looking awkward. I did read those detailed information about each website. I must say very nicely written. Good job.

What I wanted to know is on what basis are you eating these websites? Is it customer reviews, revenue generation, user base or customer poll. This part should be made clear by adding an about page on your website.

It would be very easy for people like us to search on your website using the search bar, if you could actually put on the top of your sidebar. I found it a bit annoying at the end of the banner.

Also adding star rating based on user inputs will be a great idea. 🙂

Thank you for your comments, we will try to take this into account to improve the site. However, we do not always have the opportunity to change all the marked elements at the request of users.

Also on our site there is a rating by the voices of the players, but there are in general all known bookmakers (including Fiat), and not just cryptocurrency sportsbooks: http://100bookies.com/interactive-poll-where-do-you-bet/

Haunebu

hero member

Activity: 3038

Merit: 969

www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games

Quote from: pakhitheboss on June 25, 2019, 07:26:33 PM

What I wanted to know is on what basis are you eating these websites? Is it customer reviews, revenue generation, user base or customer poll. This part should be made clear by adding an about page on your website.

He probably rated them based on their alexa ranking and individual reviews spread out here and there which seems legit since Nitrogen and Cloudbet are 2 of my favorite sportsbooks and they are on top of the rankings.

Quote from: FFrankie on June 25, 2019, 08:55:00 PM

As the list goes down, I feel like you just threw sites on it because you didnt know any others. You should have a list of all the ones that did not make it on.

I doubt it. He clearly seems to have done his research. I don't see any big players missing here. Which ones are you talking about? Nitrogen, Cloudbet, Onehash, Sportsbet etc are all there.

FFrankie

hero member

Activity: 2254

Merit: 960

100% Deposit Match UP TO €5000!

As the list goes down, I feel like you just threw sites on it because you didnt know any others. You should have a list of all the ones that did not make it on.

pakhitheboss

hero member

Activity: 2100

Merit: 771

Top Crypto Casino

Very good website you have. It is mobile friendly but, banner placement are looking awkward. I did read those detailed information about each website. I must say very nicely written. Good job.

What I wanted to know is on what basis are you eating these websites? Is it customer reviews, revenue generation, user base or customer poll. This part should be made clear by adding an about page on your website.

It would be very easy for people like us to search on your website using the search bar, if you could actually put on the top of your sidebar. I found it a bit annoying at the end of the banner.

Also adding star rating based on user inputs will be a great idea. 🙂

Topic: RATING of TOP 20 CRYPTOCURRENCY SPORTSBOOKS - page 8. (Read 2314 times)