Rating of TOP 20 Cryptocurrency Sportsbooks see here: http://100bookies.com/cryptocurrency-sportsbooks-eng/
First I would like to say that you should optimize your websites for mobile devices. And secondly, how did you come up with these ratings, you just rated the ones you liked good and the others bad I guess. Did you consider getting information from those who have made use of the sites or have you yourself made use of these sites before rating them? You need to prove it before can take you serious. And you didn’t even leave any review about them, just a list and no description at all. There are some sites that you gave a good rating that doesn’t deserve it, because I have seen lots of complaints about them. 
Topic: RATING of TOP 20 CRYPTOCURRENCY SPORTSBOOKS - page 8. (Read 2554 times)
It's been a while since seeing a rating website.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.
In drawing up the ratings, we use an integrated approach: to evaluate the sportsbooks we take the opinions of the betting business experts and players feedback, as well as information about the websites of the bookmakers in global Internet traffic according to Alexa Rank (alexa.com). Despite this, it is impossible to make a rating that all users would agree with, since each individual player considers his favorite bookmakers the best.
The rating is just a guide to all users out there but it doesn't mean that those are considered to be the ultimate rating of those sportsbooks. You are right, you can't satisfy every single user with the ratings presented. What they can do, is try those sportsbooks and evaluate on his own. Anyway, they are not forced to believe all the information provided, just a rating to get a glimpse of those sites. It is up to them how they will use each of them.
But it still shows that site has some issues there which is never reccomend to show it public, especially when it is for new players to read. This will mislead so many new players to be wrong in choosing a good and a bad one. I do not even believe in some kind of this reviews, better to check direcly on the thread as well instead of believing something like this.
if you are a new player, i think you should not look for only one rating site. there are other threads or sites discussing crypto sportsbooks.
and most reviews are paid, so you cant really rely their authenticity. if you want to test a specific sportsbook, use a small amount of money and assess whats gonna happen.
some feedbacks also are case to case basis. there are reasons why they are encountering such issues. so we cant generalise whats the image of a sportsbook by few feedbacks. some good reviews are not recorded as a matter of fact
It isnt really that necessary for you to risk up anytime some money to spend on even how small it is which there are persons who dont really like to risk up anything unless if those things are already legit ones.
You can always have the spare time to read up and find feedbacks because looking for those informations wont really cost an arm and leg as long you do know that your money is at risk.
It's been a while since seeing a rating website.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.
In drawing up the ratings, we use an integrated approach: to evaluate the sportsbooks we take the opinions of the betting business experts and players feedback, as well as information about the websites of the bookmakers in global Internet traffic according to Alexa Rank (alexa.com). Despite this, it is impossible to make a rating that all users would agree with, since each individual player considers his favorite bookmakers the best.
The rating is just a guide to all users out there but it doesn't mean that those are considered to be the ultimate rating of those sportsbooks. You are right, you can't satisfy every single user with the ratings presented. What they can do, is try those sportsbooks and evaluate on his own. Anyway, they are not forced to believe all the information provided, just a rating to get a glimpse of those sites. It is up to them how they will use each of them.
But it still shows that site has some issues there which is never reccomend to show it public, especially when it is for new players to read. This will mislead so many new players to be wrong in choosing a good and a bad one. I do not even believe in some kind of this reviews, better to check direcly on the thread as well instead of believing something like this.
if you are a new player, i think you should not look for only one rating site. there are other threads or sites discussing crypto sportsbooks.
and most reviews are paid, so you cant really rely their authenticity. if you want to test a specific sportsbook, use a small amount of money and assess whats gonna happen.
some feedbacks also are case to case basis. there are reasons why they are encountering such issues. so we cant generalise whats the image of a sportsbook by few feedbacks. some good reviews are not recorded as a matter of fact
Is this the real top 20 ctypto sportsbooks & this is already updated?
It is the most progressive rating of cryptocurrency bookmakers at the moment, which you can find on the Internet. Of course, it is not ideal yet, but we are constantly improving and supplementing it with new sportsbooks. In addition, we making ratings of bookmakers for quite long time, so we understand this topic very well.
Is this the real top 20 ctypto sportsbooks & this is already updated?
It's not the real top 20, his rating is based off from different factors which you can find in the first page of the thread and it's not fully updated since you can still see old sites listed below that stopped operating. If you're looking for a good sportsbook you should look for other lists or try each one out first imo.
Is this the real top 20 ctypto sportsbooks & this is already updated?
It's been a while since seeing a rating website.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.
In drawing up the ratings, we use an integrated approach: to evaluate the sportsbooks we take the opinions of the betting business experts and players feedback, as well as information about the websites of the bookmakers in global Internet traffic according to Alexa Rank (alexa.com). Despite this, it is impossible to make a rating that all users would agree with, since each individual player considers his favorite bookmakers the best.
The rating is just a guide to all users out there but it doesn't mean that those are considered to be the ultimate rating of those sportsbooks. You are right, you can't satisfy every single user with the ratings presented. What they can do, is try those sportsbooks and evaluate on his own. Anyway, they are not forced to believe all the information provided, just a rating to get a glimpse of those sites. It is up to them how they will use each of them.
But it still shows that site has some issues there which is never reccomend to show it public, especially when it is for new players to read. This will mislead so many new players to be wrong in choosing a good and a bad one. I do not even believe in some kind of this reviews, better to check direcly on the thread as well instead of believing something like this.
1xbit doesn't have the best line. They also use two sets of lines. Winning players get a second set of lines with even higher margins. I'm not sure what the exact criteria is to get the second line.
for the popular and top leagues no they don't , but they have a lot of betting options that aren't available in the other bitcoin bookies
you can find whatever you want to bet there , also they offer a lot more leagues and competitions as well and you can find any match easily there
if they weren't scam they would be my #1 book actually
It's been a while since seeing a rating website.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.
In drawing up the ratings, we use an integrated approach: to evaluate the sportsbooks we take the opinions of the betting business experts and players feedback, as well as information about the websites of the bookmakers in global Internet traffic according to Alexa Rank (alexa.com). Despite this, it is impossible to make a rating that all users would agree with, since each individual player considers his favorite bookmakers the best.
you might be right but having 1xbit listed only means you care about the referral money , I doubt that you even use all of these sites
how on earth can you put a scam website in #3 , alex ranking ? you know Alexa ranking has nothing to do with the actual ratings right ?
THEY DON"T PAY WINNERS
that's a fact and at any stage they will lock you out of your account and refuse to pay you your money
the whole ranking thing is so wrong IMO but don't want to discuss it , seeing nitro on #1 while you can 100% of the times find better odds in other sites explain the whole thing
but having 1xbit listed is so wrong
Each bookmaker has some drawbacks. 1xBit is represented in the rating, as it is a cryptocurrency sportsbook. In addition, they have the best line and the most modern website (service) in the betting industry, therefore, they have every right to be listed on our list. Moreover, their disadvantages are listed in the review on our website. So to play there or not let everyone decide for himself as a result. Our main mission is to show you a list of all possible bookmakers, which, I am sure, many have not even heard. However, players must make the final choice themselves.
indeed they have the best lines , but what makes them special since they can freeze your account at any moment ??
until now all the people I know that used 1xbit ended having their account closed and their money stuck in that scam site
odds and lines don't mean a thing if the bookie won't pay you
It's been a while since seeing a rating website.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.
In drawing up the ratings, we use an integrated approach: to evaluate the sportsbooks we take the opinions of the betting business experts and players feedback, as well as information about the websites of the bookmakers in global Internet traffic according to Alexa Rank (alexa.com). Despite this, it is impossible to make a rating that all users would agree with, since each individual player considers his favorite bookmakers the best.
you might be right but having 1xbit listed only means you care about the referral money , I doubt that you even use all of these sites
how on earth can you put a scam website in #3 , alex ranking ? you know Alexa ranking has nothing to do with the actual ratings right ?
THEY DON"T PAY WINNERS
that's a fact and at any stage they will lock you out of your account and refuse to pay you your money
the whole ranking thing is so wrong IMO but don't want to discuss it , seeing nitro on #1 while you can 100% of the times find better odds in other sites explain the whole thing
but having 1xbit listed is so wrong
It's been a while since seeing a rating website.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.
In drawing up the ratings, we use an integrated approach: to evaluate the sportsbooks we take the opinions of the betting business experts and players feedback, as well as information about the websites of the bookmakers in global Internet traffic according to Alexa Rank (alexa.com). Despite this, it is impossible to make a rating that all users would agree with, since each individual player considers his favorite bookmakers the best.
you might be right but having 1xbit listed only means you care about the referral money , I doubt that you even use all of these sites
how on earth can you put a scam website in #3 , alex ranking ? you know Alexa ranking has nothing to do with the actual ratings right ?
THEY DON"T PAY WINNERS
that's a fact and at any stage they will lock you out of your account and refuse to pay you your money
the whole ranking thing is so wrong IMO but don't want to discuss it , seeing nitro on #1 while you can 100% of the times find better odds in other sites explain the whole thing
but having 1xbit listed is so wrong
It's been a while since seeing a rating website.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.
In drawing up the ratings, we use an integrated approach: to evaluate the sportsbooks we take the opinions of the betting business experts and players feedback, as well as information about the websites of the bookmakers in global Internet traffic according to Alexa Rank (alexa.com). Despite this, it is impossible to make a rating that all users would agree with, since each individual player considers his favorite bookmakers the best.
The rating is just a guide to all users out there but it doesn't mean that those are considered to be the ultimate rating of those sportsbooks. You are right, you can't satisfy every single user with the ratings presented. What they can do, is try those sportsbooks and evaluate on his own. Anyway, they are not forced to believe all the information provided, just a rating to get a glimpse of those sites. It is up to them how they will use each of them.
I agree to you dude this is a guide to know will gambling site is the legit or not if the owner reputation is good or bad but its up to you if you take a risk for those gambling site that have a lot of problem and issues thats a reason we need to check first if the website have a problem before doing any action.
It's been a while since seeing a rating website.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.
In drawing up the ratings, we use an integrated approach: to evaluate the sportsbooks we take the opinions of the betting business experts and players feedback, as well as information about the websites of the bookmakers in global Internet traffic according to Alexa Rank (alexa.com). Despite this, it is impossible to make a rating that all users would agree with, since each individual player considers his favorite bookmakers the best.
The rating is just a guide to all users out there but it doesn't mean that those are considered to be the ultimate rating of those sportsbooks. You are right, you can't satisfy every single user with the ratings presented. What they can do, is try those sportsbooks and evaluate on his own. Anyway, they are not forced to believe all the information provided, just a rating to get a glimpse of those sites. It is up to them how they will use each of them.
It's been a while since seeing a rating website.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.
In drawing up the ratings, we use an integrated approach: to evaluate the sportsbooks we take the opinions of the betting business experts and players feedback, as well as information about the websites of the bookmakers in global Internet traffic according to Alexa Rank (alexa.com). Despite this, it is impossible to make a rating that all users would agree with, since each individual player considers his favorite bookmakers the best.
It's been a while since seeing a rating website.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.
Are these ratings based on your jurisdiction?
Have you considered user's users feedback on the particular site?
Moreover can you just justify how you have ranked the sites?
It's better to be transparent here in this place , else people won't believe in your ratings.
Please note down the parametera based kn which you have rated the websites. Otherwise it literally no sense for anyone to belive in your ratings.
Also have you considered user's feedback while rating a website??
They most often pay minimal attentions to all those details. They are more interested in there site getting more views when most of there ratings might be similar to those of other websites.Also have you considered user's feedback while rating a website??
Rating of cryptocurrency sport booking site should not be done by every one if you can find a good rating or had seen one before you can just post the link here or on your site there are benefits in being different
I think there are levels of hate towards betking, I would totally understand the hate for gamblers who are trying to withdraw and can't but I haven't seen that happen way too much, maybe it happens and that is horrible too and I would be glad to hear that people are coming out against it and if there are proofs they should put it on the forum and show that as a reason to put a negative trust to them.
However, the main problem with them occurred when they did their own ICO and their currency promised a lot of things yet they failed to provide those things, giving promises on an ICO and then not making them a reality was the biggest problem if you ask me, they made sure they got their own currency back far cheaper than they sold it and trying to brag about how "they didn't promise any price points" because they are capable of ruining the worth of coin themselves they see it as a regular coin price change.
However, the main problem with them occurred when they did their own ICO and their currency promised a lot of things yet they failed to provide those things, giving promises on an ICO and then not making them a reality was the biggest problem if you ask me, they made sure they got their own currency back far cheaper than they sold it and trying to brag about how "they didn't promise any price points" because they are capable of ruining the worth of coin themselves they see it as a regular coin price change.
Rating of TOP 20 Cryptocurrency Sportsbooks see here: http://100bookies.com/cryptocurrency-sportsbooks-eng/
Do this rating is just basing on personal choice? and why Betking is included?Not really sure how you could possible say that Bitcoin Rush is better than FortuneJack, I mean.... Come on.
We have a fairly simple and clear approach to the evaluation of new sportsbooks. So, for all new bookmakers, we initially assign a rating of "C-". However, if a well-known and trusted brand is behind the recently opened bookmaker, then in this case we can assign it a rating "C" immediately. This is what happened on our website as a result with FortuneJack.
(!) I want to remind that we present the rating of bookmakers, and not a casinos.
Therefore, in this case, an estimate was given only to the sportsbook section of FortuneJack, and not to the whole site as a whole. FortuneJack Sportsbook was opened just a few months ago, so it cannot yet have a rating higher than "C-". And just for the well-known name of its brand, it was immediately rated half a point higher. In any case, this assessment is not final and may be revised over time. Bitcoin Rush we know for a long time, so it is rated higher.
Jump to: