Re: [AXIOM] AxiomMemHash, Schnorr Sigs Implemented, APOS 3.0, AXH 2.0 Proposed - page 104.

MickGhee

legendary

Activity: 1428

Merit: 1001

Fucker of "the system"

Quote from: Litejavichu on July 30, 2015, 12:53:26 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Litejavichu on July 29, 2015, 11:50:09 PM

guys you know what ima total fucktard i think my bullshit stems from my upbringing you see as a child i couldn't get assraped enough by my father and now all i can think about is raping little boys... btw can i see a picture of your little boy MICK

whoa dude TMI if u ever come near my kids ill introduce u to my second amendment rig ht now we asked u to leave please dont make this hard on yourself now go back to whatever backward letter country u came from and let the smart people decide how the future will happen

You are a poor man's sick mind. I hope that everything you win here spend in medicines...You need evident

bro i give more away to noobs than i keep im here for the tech and of course to FUCK THE SYTEM money dosent matter what matters is that i can . maybe you should try doing something here instead of crying about your misfortunes .please consider being part of the solution and you will see the rewards.. in crypto sometimes it just boils down to you .... are u gonna bitch and make people hate you or are you gonna come up with the right way.. until you understand that you have the power to do great things go over to a website were people complain about how much they hate being sad...now u have been asked to go somewhere else by several good people that are contributers please do so .. u may come back when u realize we cant do it without you bro .. now hurry up shoo but the minute you realize you are the entire universe of possiblites please come back cause we need your help

a1binos

full member

Activity: 201

Merit: 100

Hi.
How I can compile axiomd? Stuck at this point:

key.cpp: In member function ‘CPubKey CKey::GetPubKey() const’:
key.cpp:487:129: error: cannot convert ‘unsigned char*’ to ‘secp256k1_pubkey_t*’ for argument ‘2’ to ‘int secp256k1_ec_pubkey_create(const secp256k1_context_t*, secp256k1_pubkey_t*, const unsigned char*)’
int ret = secp256k1_ec_pubkey_create(instance_of_csecp256k1.ctx, (unsigned char*)pubkey.begin(), &clen, begin(), fCompressed);
^
key.cpp: In member function ‘bool CKey::Sign(const uint256&, std::vector&) const’:
key.cpp:505:169: error: ‘secp256k1_schnorr_sign’ was not declared in this scope
if (secp256k1_schnorr_sign(instance_of_csecp256k1.ctx, (const unsigned char*)&hash, (unsigned char*)&vchSig[0], begin(), secp256k1_nonce_function_rfc6979, NULL))
^
key.cpp: In member function ‘bool CPubKey::Verify(const uint256&, const std::vector&) const’:
key.cpp:552:118: error: ‘secp256k1_schnorr_verify’ was not declared in this scope
if (secp256k1_schnorr_verify(instance_of_csecp256k1.ctx, (const unsigned char*)&hash, &vchSig[0], begin(), size()) != 1)
^
key.cpp: In member function ‘bool CPubKey::Recover(const uint256&, const std::vector&)’:
key.cpp:562:141: error: ‘secp256k1_schnorr_recover’ was not declared in this scope
if(!secp256k1_schnorr_recover(instance_of_csecp256k1.ctx, (const unsigned char*)&hash, &vchSig[0], (unsigned char*)begin(), &clen, fComp))
^
key.cpp: In member function ‘bool CPubKey::IsFullyValid() const’:
key.cpp:617:80: error: ‘secp256k1_ec_pubkey_verify’ was not declared in this scope
if (!secp256k1_ec_pubkey_verify(instance_of_csecp256k1.ctx, begin(), size()))
^
key.cpp: In member function ‘bool CPubKey::Decompress()’:
key.cpp:628:104: error: ‘secp256k1_ec_pubkey_decompress’ was not declared in this scope
int ret = secp256k1_ec_pubkey_decompress(instance_of_csecp256k1.ctx, (unsigned char*)begin(), &clen);
^
key.cpp: In member function ‘bool CPubKey::Derive(CPubKey&, unsigned char*, unsigned int, const unsigned char*) const’:
key.cpp:682:134: error: cannot convert ‘unsigned char*’ to ‘secp256k1_pubkey_t*’ for argument ‘2’ to ‘int secp256k1_ec_pubkey_tweak_add(const secp256k1_context_t*, secp256k1_pubkey_t*, const unsigned char*)’
bool ret = secp256k1_ec_pubkey_tweak_add(instance_of_csecp256k1.ctx, (unsigned char*)pubkeyChild.begin(), pubkeyChild.size(), out);
^
make: *** [obj/key.o] Error 1

DJ_Rick

member

Activity: 241

Merit: 10

a node?

Litejavichu

hero member

Activity: 693

Merit: 500

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Litejavichu on July 29, 2015, 11:50:09 PM

guys you know what ima total fucktard i think my bullshit stems from my upbringing you see as a child i couldn't get assraped enough by my father and now all i can think about is raping little boys... btw can i see a picture of your little boy MICK

whoa dude TMI if u ever come near my kids ill introduce u to my second amendment right now we asked u to leave please dont make this hard on yourself now go back to whatever backward letter country u came from and let the smart people decide how the future will happen

You are a poor man's sick mind. I hope that everything you win here spend in medicines...You need evident

MickGhee

legendary

Activity: 1428

Merit: 1001

Fucker of "the system"

Quote from: LordPiccolo on July 30, 2015, 12:47:31 AM

Right, I decided to let my share stake in my wallet and I'm going to see how small i can get these blocks before I get a load of orphans.

Experimenting time

good work please share because its a questrion i hear alot thanks beinga part of the solution

brian_nguyen

legendary

Activity: 1404

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Litejavichu on July 29, 2015, 11:50:09 PM

I think what Sergio meant is that no real testing was done with different GPUs. You Dev, you have precipitated in the launch and should clarify that well.
...

I'm actually impressed with the way it held up even after a few years with much more powerful GPUs. There's the cost of power associate with the mere gain of mining by GPU but who cares, we're gettting more PoS rewards anyways. I feel like this is the next big coin!

LordPiccolo

hero member

Activity: 1022

Merit: 1000

Right, I decided to let my share stake in my wallet and I'm going to see how small i can get these blocks before I get a load of orphans.

Experimenting time

Litejavichu

hero member

Activity: 693

Merit: 500

Quote from: MickGhee on July 30, 2015, 12:27:24 AM

Quote from: Litejavichu on July 30, 2015, 12:24:16 AM

Quote from: Lore06 on July 30, 2015, 12:21:50 AM

People like litejavichu are disgusting. Killing for crypto. I wish nobody replied to him so hell just fuck off. Fucking cunt.

respect young padawan...

igot ur pad-o - wand right here bub

hit the bricks

I have every right in the world to give my opinion....If you do not like it, ignore list

MickGhee

legendary

Activity: 1428

Merit: 1001

Fucker of "the system"

Quote from: Litejavichu on July 30, 2015, 12:24:16 AM

Quote from: Lore06 on July 30, 2015, 12:21:50 AM

People like litejavichu are disgusting. Killing for crypto. I wish nobody replied to him so hell just fuck off. Fucking cunt.

respect young padawan...

igot ur pad-o - wand right here bub

hit the bricks

LordPiccolo

hero member

Activity: 1022

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Lore06 on July 30, 2015, 12:21:50 AM

People like litejavichu are disgusting. Killing for crypto. I wish nobody replied to him so hell just fuck off. Fucking cunt.

Wow, let's not get swearing and attacking folks young man. If you dislike someone, simply state that and put them on your ignore list

Litejavichu

hero member

Activity: 693

Merit: 500

Quote from: Lore06 on July 30, 2015, 12:21:50 AM

People like litejavichu are disgusting. Killing for crypto. I wish nobody replied to him so hell just fuck off. Fucking cunt.

No answer difficult questions and is committed specialty DEV.

Litejavichu

hero member

Activity: 693

Merit: 500

Quote from: Lore06 on July 30, 2015, 12:21:50 AM

People like litejavichu are disgusting. Killing for crypto. I wish nobody replied to him so hell just fuck off. Fucking cunt.

respect young padawan...

Lore06

sr. member

Activity: 792

Merit: 251

People like litejavichu are disgusting. Killing for crypto. I wish nobody replied to him so hell just fuck off. Fucking cunt.

Litejavichu

hero member

Activity: 693

Merit: 500

Quote from: AxiomCryptocurrency on July 30, 2015, 12:05:02 AM

Quote from: Litejavichu on July 29, 2015, 11:50:09 PM

I think what Sergio meant is that no real testing was done with different GPUs. You Dev, you have precipitated in the launch and should clarify that well.
Nothing yet nobody says unlike other more established currencies, with more community (Digibyte ... etc).
If everything has been based on innovation, but this does not exist.... WTF?.... I hope to see that keeps coming out of the hat magician

We get it, you don't like the coin, you were in here at launch calling us a scam and a dump coin.. Why are you wasting your valuable time reiterating your disdain for us over and over. Go do something constructive instead. We launched the coin day 1 with features that many regard as interesting. Perhaps contribute something of innovative value to the project yourself?

The currency I do not care ..... In short, you lied.

AxiomCryptocurrency

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: Litejavichu on July 29, 2015, 11:50:09 PM

I think what Sergio meant is that no real testing was done with different GPUs. You Dev, you have precipitated in the launch and should clarify that well.
Nothing yet nobody says unlike other more established currencies, with more community (Digibyte ... etc).
If everything has been based on innovation, but this does not exist.... WTF?.... I hope to see that keeps coming out of the hat magician

We get it, you don't like the coin, you were in here at launch calling us a scam and a dump coin.. Why are you wasting your valuable time reiterating your disdain for us over and over. Go do something constructive instead. We launched the coin day 1 with features that many regard as interesting. Perhaps contribute something of innovative value to the project yourself?

Litejavichu

hero member

Activity: 693

Merit: 500

I think what Sergio meant is that no real testing was done with different GPUs. You Dev, you have precipitated in the launch and should clarify that well.
Nothing yet nobody says unlike other more established currencies, with more community (Digibyte ... etc).
If everything has been based on innovation, but this does not exist.... WTF?.... I hope to see that keeps coming out of the hat magician

AxiomCryptocurrency

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

It certainly was wonderful to have Sergio stop in and wish us well

! Our heads are down working tonight, updates coming.

MickGhee

legendary

Activity: 1428

Merit: 1001

Fucker of "the system"

Quote from: timertrainer on July 29, 2015, 09:18:41 PM

Quote from: Sergio_Demian_Lerner on July 29, 2015, 12:44:59 PM

AXIOM developers pinged me to give an opinion on the GPU speedup of the AXIOM PoW function.

I wrote the draft of the paper about RandMemoHash back in 2013, after playing with RandMemoHash a bit. I tested it with a SINGLE GPU (that was even older), and could not get any speedup. My paper does not show any proof, not any real world comparison over several GPU models, so it is definitively unfinished. The suggested parameters are not proven to be valid for all existent GPU models (and less for future models). People should never take for granted what an non-peer-reviewed privately-published draft paper says.

I would have liked that Axiom developers would have pinged me to give an update on it before implementing it.

Having said this, I find that a 5x GPU speedup quite good resistance, considering that a GPU is generally better than a CPU in almost every task. CPUs are good at executing large programs, doing paging, protecting memory, doing I/O. Nothing that a PoW can make use of.

GPU memory system is designed for throughput, and it has generally about 6 times the bandwidth available to a CPU. RandMemoHash bottleneck is the DDR/GDDR memory bus, so that speedup can be expected.

Also you must consider power-usage in the equation: that may make it better or worse for GPU-mining.

I don't know if tweaking the parameters would improve it. Maybe using 8 MB instead of 2 MB can prevent the use of some L2 caches in some boards. But the more space you require, the slower it is to verify the PoW. And this is a cat-and-mouse race, since future models will probably increase the size of the cache.

The Axiom developers & community could collect some real world numbers and try to find an improved parameter set (if it is really needed and if there is a better one).

I wish AXIOM users the best luck.

Sergio.

Wow, straight from the horse's mouth! Thanks a lot for your input Mr. Lerner, I hope we'll see some revolutionary results from AXIOM.

4

but the real thing i see here is this... your dev CAN get the security blah blah of the BITCOIN FOUNDATION to come here and do anything (HINT) why do you think he would do something for this dev whoever it is MUST be A PEER of lerner .... see what i AM getting at us "AXIOTS" must be a part of something that is on that same level WOW
can u believe it there is magic in the air

danilo303

member

Activity: 107

Merit: 10

Quote from: Nassau on July 29, 2015, 10:46:50 PM

Quote from: danilo303 on July 29, 2015, 10:25:49 PM

My wallet connections just dropped to 0 Huh

I added the nodes from the 2nd page, but nothing.
Can somebody share more nodes?

93.157.25.130
104.236.231.72
158.181.253.55
187.74.206.189
72.92.19.54
24.56.61.247
89.212.140.63
46.101.23.149
68.41.180.163
46.72.126.178
193.198.102.32
161.53.40.94
192.52.166.80
104.238.133.29
197.89.64.51
122.107.182.65
82.236.68.185
5.9.72.102
212.45.26.38
104.238.133.29
197.89.64.51

Back to 1 active connection. Thanks, dude.

donnyespo

hero member

Activity: 827

Merit: 1000

Twitter: @bitcoin_dad

Quote from: Nassau on July 29, 2015, 10:46:50 PM

Quote from: danilo303 on July 29, 2015, 10:25:49 PM

My wallet connections just dropped to 0 Huh

I added the nodes from the 2nd page, but nothing.
Can somebody share more nodes?

93.157.25.130
104.236.231.72
158.181.253.55
187.74.206.189
72.92.19.54
24.56.61.247
89.212.140.63
46.101.23.149
68.41.180.163
46.72.126.178
193.198.102.32
161.53.40.94
192.52.166.80
104.238.133.29
197.89.64.51
122.107.182.65
82.236.68.185
5.9.72.102
212.45.26.38
104.238.133.29
197.89.64.51

syncing now, thanks!

Topic: Re: [AXIOM] AxiomMemHash, Schnorr Sigs Implemented, APOS 3.0, AXH 2.0 Proposed - page 104. (Read 204903 times)