Topic: Re: [AXIOM] AxiomMemHash, Schnorr Sigs Implemented, APOS 3.0, AXH 2.0 Proposed - page 51. (Read 204903 times)
August 06, 2015, 03:35:41 PM
One thing that can be said is the Devs are really professional, don't get caught up in arguments. Also, did axiom set a record for it's first 3 days of existence, so many pages from such a young coin.
August 06, 2015, 03:33:49 PM
why price is droping 
August 06, 2015, 03:31:24 PM
Keep selling 
August 06, 2015, 03:31:06 PM
Barabbas, while we are working, we did not set a specific date deadline. This is a large undertaking and will take more than a few more days.
As "danonthehills" has posted (and I agree 100%), this is EXTREMELY damaging.
August 06, 2015, 03:29:22 PM
Bottomed out?
August 06, 2015, 03:28:19 PM
FUD? Thanks!
Buying againg at 9k now!
Buying againg at 9k now!
August 06, 2015, 03:27:24 PM
I was thinking to invest in AXIOM but i think i should wait before i can see whitepaper update and few more things. Anyways i already set a buy order below 8k hope it gets filled. Once updates comes on development i will buy few more coins.
August 06, 2015, 03:04:42 PM
...so whitepaper should be here this week, as promised or it's over. Also please respond to the guy who says this is straight up blackcoin fork.
August 06, 2015, 02:58:23 PM
Barabbas, while we are working, we did not set a specific date deadline. This is a large undertaking and will take more than a few more days.
from ANN:
1) "This is a short brief of our near-future plans. More information, details, timeline, and whitepaper will be released during this week of August 3rd."
2) "We have spent the last several days researching different algorithms that may solve our current needs for continued GPU resistance.
We will be making these methods and the dates of our planned implementations public during this week of Monday August 3rd."
August 06, 2015, 02:57:04 PM
Barabbas, while we are working, we did not set a specific date deadline. This is a large undertaking and will take more than a few more days.
from ANN: "This is a short brief of our near-future plans. More information, details, timeline, and whitepaper will be released during this week of August 3rd."
August 06, 2015, 02:43:20 PM
Barabbas, while we are working, we did not set a specific date deadline. This is a large undertaking and will take more than a few more days.
August 06, 2015, 01:57:13 PM
August 06, 2015, 01:43:24 PM
I'm just flabbergasted.
Number one.- If this is a knock off of BlackCoin, then it has, by far, the solidest base code in existence in crypto, Rat4 being a deservedly respected institution in the whole alt world.
Number two.- The tech differences are quite notorious, in fact, so I won't even bother to point them out.
Number three.- The main and most attractive feature this coin has, by miles, is that people can and do mine it from their desktop/laptop computer in significant numbers.
Number four.- Even if you missed phase one of big rewards, there's still plenty of time to collect quite a bit of free coins via mining/staking, before distribution ends.
So even if the pointed out so clumsily "worst case scenario" comes to fruition, we still have a shiny new design over not an old Ford Pinto carcass and engine, but a top of the line, reliable, powerful Mercedes. Or even Lamborghini.
I appreciate only too well the attempts at being critical of the project as well as the different reasons of the individual doing it. As I have posted, it is positive in almost every way, since this project, at this moment, needs more than anything to be kept at the top of the front page of BTCT and on the top positions of trading volume at Bittrex, so thank you for every contribution on behalf of my modest investment. As most of you already know, I'd be even more appreciative if you would look for really funny animated GIF's memes to go with the rest.
I also appreciate and like it very much that the dev team doesn't get involved in this brouahaha. No need. There are a white paper, a roadmap and a website that need to be completed and released within three days... if at all possible preceded or closely followed by an update of the code that evens the playing field and makes GPU mining nearly obsolete in AXIOM. Before that happens, it all is talk. And mining/staking.
And, hopefully, enjoying the memes...
Number one.- If this is a knock off of BlackCoin, then it has, by far, the solidest base code in existence in crypto, Rat4 being a deservedly respected institution in the whole alt world.
Number two.- The tech differences are quite notorious, in fact, so I won't even bother to point them out.
Number three.- The main and most attractive feature this coin has, by miles, is that people can and do mine it from their desktop/laptop computer in significant numbers.
Number four.- Even if you missed phase one of big rewards, there's still plenty of time to collect quite a bit of free coins via mining/staking, before distribution ends.
So even if the pointed out so clumsily "worst case scenario" comes to fruition, we still have a shiny new design over not an old Ford Pinto carcass and engine, but a top of the line, reliable, powerful Mercedes. Or even Lamborghini.
I appreciate only too well the attempts at being critical of the project as well as the different reasons of the individual doing it. As I have posted, it is positive in almost every way, since this project, at this moment, needs more than anything to be kept at the top of the front page of BTCT and on the top positions of trading volume at Bittrex, so thank you for every contribution on behalf of my modest investment. As most of you already know, I'd be even more appreciative if you would look for really funny animated GIF's memes to go with the rest.
I also appreciate and like it very much that the dev team doesn't get involved in this brouahaha. No need. There are a white paper, a roadmap and a website that need to be completed and released within three days... if at all possible preceded or closely followed by an update of the code that evens the playing field and makes GPU mining nearly obsolete in AXIOM. Before that happens, it all is talk. And mining/staking.
And, hopefully, enjoying the memes...
I appreciate your writing but man, where is my memes
August 06, 2015, 01:34:12 PM
I'm just flabbergasted.
Number one.- If this is a knock off of BlackCoin, then it has, by far, the solidest base code in existence in crypto, Rat4 being a deservedly respected institution in the whole alt world.
Number two.- The tech differences are quite notorious, in fact, so I won't even bother to point them out.
Number three.- The main and most attractive feature this coin has, by miles, is that people can and do mine it from their desktop/laptop computer in significant numbers.
Number four.- Even if you missed phase one of big rewards, there's still plenty of time to collect quite a bit of free coins via mining/staking, before distribution ends.
So even if the pointed out so clumsily "worst case scenario" comes to fruition, we still have a shiny new design over not an old Ford Pinto carcass and engine, but a top of the line, reliable, powerful Mercedes. Or even Lamborghini.
I appreciate only too well the attempts at being critical of the project as well as the different reasons of the individual doing it. As I have posted, it is positive in almost every way, since this project, at this moment, needs more than anything to be kept at the top of the front page of BTCT and on the top positions of trading volume at Bittrex, so thank you for every contribution on behalf of my modest investment. As most of you already know, I'd be even more appreciative if you would look for really funny animated GIF's memes to go with the rest.
I also appreciate and like it very much that the dev team doesn't get involved in this brouahaha. No need. There are a white paper, a roadmap and a website that need to be completed and released within three days... if at all possible preceded or closely followed by an update of the code that evens the playing field and makes GPU mining nearly obsolete in AXIOM. Before that happens, it all is talk. And mining/staking.
And, hopefully, enjoying the memes...
Number one.- If this is a knock off of BlackCoin, then it has, by far, the solidest base code in existence in crypto, Rat4 being a deservedly respected institution in the whole alt world.
Number two.- The tech differences are quite notorious, in fact, so I won't even bother to point them out.
Number three.- The main and most attractive feature this coin has, by miles, is that people can and do mine it from their desktop/laptop computer in significant numbers.
Number four.- Even if you missed phase one of big rewards, there's still plenty of time to collect quite a bit of free coins via mining/staking, before distribution ends.
So even if the pointed out so clumsily "worst case scenario" comes to fruition, we still have a shiny new design over not an old Ford Pinto carcass and engine, but a top of the line, reliable, powerful Mercedes. Or even Lamborghini.
I appreciate only too well the attempts at being critical of the project as well as the different reasons of the individual doing it. As I have posted, it is positive in almost every way, since this project, at this moment, needs more than anything to be kept at the top of the front page of BTCT and on the top positions of trading volume at Bittrex, so thank you for every contribution on behalf of my modest investment. As most of you already know, I'd be even more appreciative if you would look for really funny animated GIF's memes to go with the rest.
I also appreciate and like it very much that the dev team doesn't get involved in this brouahaha. No need. There are a white paper, a roadmap and a website that need to be completed and released within three days... if at all possible preceded or closely followed by an update of the code that evens the playing field and makes GPU mining nearly obsolete in AXIOM. Before that happens, it all is talk. And mining/staking.
And, hopefully, enjoying the memes...
August 06, 2015, 01:17:11 PM
new dump? More free money for me? 
I like this shit, so dump bro!
I like this shit, so dump bro!
August 06, 2015, 12:38:17 PM
Sell sell sell I'm waiting at 9000 sat 
August 06, 2015, 12:34:38 PM
... I spent the past 48hrs looking into it exploring what is on offer ... Next up is the dev. I see initial commits from Rat4 on MASTER branch this is the guy which has bought a lot of tech into alts. All i can say regarding this matter is I am very reassured to know he is doing apart with this project (in whichever capacity
).You have no idea what you are talking about, do you? Seeing the audience here and who has been deployed in this project, it could be very possible that this is a rat4 action, I don't know whether the dev is rat4 or not, but from the commits you can't make this conclusion - except if you have no idea what you are talking about.
I have not checked the source code, I have better things to do than to check blackcoin forks, but when I open the source repository web page I can see that this is a fork of rat4's blackcoin. So, if it is a fork of blackcoin than how on the earth could not be commits from rat4 the guy who maintain the blackcoin repository in the first place? Of course there are commits from rat4 - his blackcoin was forked. I understand you spent the past 48hrs "looking into" the source code, but do you understand at all what fork means and how the source code repository works?
lmfao .. yes i do I have been around the block with alts many times built coins participated under various alt projects under various pseudonyms played with some progressive BC ideas and pushed some ideas co-authored 2 w.papers along with participation of independent peer reviews for unnamed alts.. Worked on anon mixer and coinjoin techniques. Multiple token rings <-- Hint to who I am.
So yeah I do kinda know a little, just a little bit about spotting a very solid code base and novel approach to fixing Small spend DoS issue as this is one of the ways I believed its rat4 who is behind this as during another project which I was apart of he pointed out this vuln in my alt which needed correcting. Now low and behold its apart of this src code.. plus other hints and i picked up on.
Who knows I maybe completely off the mark but regardless of true dev code is still very solid!
Its my job to spot good strong code so I can clone it as ruthless as that sounds and use elements in my own works, if appropriate!..
Frankly, I don't care who you are, all I know, which should be clear to even junior software engineers that you had no idea what you are talking about regarding the commits of rat4.
If you say so then I have no doubt that you are the most influential and accomplished software engineer since Satoshi Nakamoto disappeared from here - yet you don't know how the fucking source control works, which knowledge should be the material of a high school software development class.
You still don't understand that the reason you can see rat4 commits because his software was forked, and therefore of course his fucking commits are in the fork.
Now, this project is might rat4's project, as I said seeing the deployed support I wouldn't be surprised if it is, however from the fact that the master branch of the fork includes his commits you can't make this conclusion. That's all I said in my post which obviously you couldn't understand.
Don't bother explaining its a lost cause lol
Now just for sanity check reasons and spent exactly 50 seconds to check the commits of AXIOM. The last commit that has anything to do with the software was from rat4 on the 21 July - to the blackcoin repository. That was forked - without a line of addition. The AXIOM developer has added exactly 0 lines of code to rat4's blackcoin. Not even one line.
Therefore, the young Satoshi who was banging on above what an expert he is, was checking for 48 hours rat4's blackcoin commits - and he made the conclusion the AXIOM code base is great :-))))) After all his "job to spot good strong code" LOL
This is one of the most fucked up place of the planet, but this is one of the funniest shit I have ever seen on Bitcointalk :-)))))))
SCAM!!!! LOL!
It's not even a scam, it must be a surreal human experiment at it best :-))))
Even Bobsurplus' coins make more sense from technology viewpoint because lately Bob at least add some shiny features to his coins before he P&D the shit out of the coins, but this coin has added zero (0) line of code never mind new feature to the blackcoin source - it was forked, renamed and released without any additions. WTF?
Hero and senior members support this coin, and all right, they want to make somehow some money, but are they aware of that this is a plain blackcoin fork without any modifications whatsoever or are they just here without knowing anything about how software development works?
Anyway, it's funny sometimes in many ways, but mostly of course it's sad what is happening (fork after fork without any innovations) in digital currency in the last year.
Uhm, are you a little bit retarded? Blackcoin is scrypt with ecsda sigs, axiom is RandMemHash with schnorr sigs,,,
some github tutorials here ;0
In the "Moved from bitbucket" commit the HashShabal stuff was added and "Blackcoin" was replaced with "Axiom". That's all the changes are compared to Blackcoin.
As I said, this is a Blackcoin fork that's why you see the rat4 commits.
That's all. Good luck with it.
August 06, 2015, 12:12:46 PM
... I spent the past 48hrs looking into it exploring what is on offer ... Next up is the dev. I see initial commits from Rat4 on MASTER branch this is the guy which has bought a lot of tech into alts. All i can say regarding this matter is I am very reassured to know he is doing apart with this project (in whichever capacity
).You have no idea what you are talking about, do you? Seeing the audience here and who has been deployed in this project, it could be very possible that this is a rat4 action, I don't know whether the dev is rat4 or not, but from the commits you can't make this conclusion - except if you have no idea what you are talking about.
I have not checked the source code, I have better things to do than to check blackcoin forks, but when I open the source repository web page I can see that this is a fork of rat4's blackcoin. So, if it is a fork of blackcoin than how on the earth could not be commits from rat4 the guy who maintain the blackcoin repository in the first place? Of course there are commits from rat4 - his blackcoin was forked. I understand you spent the past 48hrs "looking into" the source code, but do you understand at all what fork means and how the source code repository works?
lmfao .. yes i do I have been around the block with alts many times built coins participated under various alt projects under various pseudonyms played with some progressive BC ideas and pushed some ideas co-authored 2 w.papers along with participation of independent peer reviews for unnamed alts.. Worked on anon mixer and coinjoin techniques. Multiple token rings <-- Hint to who I am.
So yeah I do kinda know a little, just a little bit about spotting a very solid code base and novel approach to fixing Small spend DoS issue as this is one of the ways I believed its rat4 who is behind this as during another project which I was apart of he pointed out this vuln in my alt which needed correcting. Now low and behold its apart of this src code.. plus other hints and i picked up on.
Who knows I maybe completely off the mark but regardless of true dev code is still very solid!
Its my job to spot good strong code so I can clone it as ruthless as that sounds and use elements in my own works, if appropriate!..
Frankly, I don't care who you are, all I know, which should be clear to even junior software engineers that you had no idea what you are talking about regarding the commits of rat4.
If you say so then I have no doubt that you are the most influential and accomplished software engineer since Satoshi Nakamoto disappeared from here - yet you don't know how the fucking source control works, which knowledge should be the material of a high school software development class.
You still don't understand that the reason you can see rat4 commits because his software was forked, and therefore of course his fucking commits are in the fork.
Now, this project is might rat4's project, as I said seeing the deployed support I wouldn't be surprised if it is, however from the fact that the master branch of the fork includes his commits you can't make this conclusion. That's all I said in my post which obviously you couldn't understand.
Don't bother explaining its a lost cause lol
Now just for sanity check reasons and spent exactly 50 seconds to check the commits of AXIOM. The last commit that has anything to do with the software was from rat4 on the 21 July - to the blackcoin repository. That was forked - without a line of addition. The AXIOM developer has added exactly 0 lines of code to rat4's blackcoin. Not even one line.
Therefore, the young Satoshi who was banging on above what an expert he is, was checking for 48 hours rat4's blackcoin commits - and he made the conclusion the AXIOM code base is great :-))))) After all his "job to spot good strong code" LOL
This is one of the most fucked up place of the planet, but this is one of the funniest shit I have ever seen on Bitcointalk :-)))))))
SCAM!!!! LOL!
It's not even a scam, it must be a surreal human experiment at it best :-))))
Even Bobsurplus' coins make more sense from technology viewpoint because lately Bob at least add some shiny features to his coins before he P&D the shit out of the coins, but this coin has added zero (0) line of code never mind new feature to the blackcoin source - it was forked, renamed and released without any additions. WTF?
Hero and senior members support this coin, and all right, they want to make somehow some money, but are they aware of that this is a plain blackcoin fork without any modifications whatsoever or are they just here without knowing anything about how software development works?
Anyway, it's funny sometimes in many ways, but mostly of course it's sad what is happening (fork after fork without any innovations) in digital currency in the last year.
Uhm, are you a little bit retarded? Blackcoin is scrypt with ecsda sigs, axiom is RandMemHash with schnorr sigs,,,
some github tutorials here ;0
Is only FUD man!
They only want to buy back at 10k now...this thread is so funny guys!
But is strange to see a lot of Hero member here...!
Funny or not u need to dump it now
Just do it while noone is watching
August 06, 2015, 12:09:20 PM
... I spent the past 48hrs looking into it exploring what is on offer ... Next up is the dev. I see initial commits from Rat4 on MASTER branch this is the guy which has bought a lot of tech into alts. All i can say regarding this matter is I am very reassured to know he is doing apart with this project (in whichever capacity
).You have no idea what you are talking about, do you? Seeing the audience here and who has been deployed in this project, it could be very possible that this is a rat4 action, I don't know whether the dev is rat4 or not, but from the commits you can't make this conclusion - except if you have no idea what you are talking about.
I have not checked the source code, I have better things to do than to check blackcoin forks, but when I open the source repository web page I can see that this is a fork of rat4's blackcoin. So, if it is a fork of blackcoin than how on the earth could not be commits from rat4 the guy who maintain the blackcoin repository in the first place? Of course there are commits from rat4 - his blackcoin was forked. I understand you spent the past 48hrs "looking into" the source code, but do you understand at all what fork means and how the source code repository works?
lmfao .. yes i do I have been around the block with alts many times built coins participated under various alt projects under various pseudonyms played with some progressive BC ideas and pushed some ideas co-authored 2 w.papers along with participation of independent peer reviews for unnamed alts.. Worked on anon mixer and coinjoin techniques. Multiple token rings <-- Hint to who I am.
So yeah I do kinda know a little, just a little bit about spotting a very solid code base and novel approach to fixing Small spend DoS issue as this is one of the ways I believed its rat4 who is behind this as during another project which I was apart of he pointed out this vuln in my alt which needed correcting. Now low and behold its apart of this src code.. plus other hints and i picked up on.
Who knows I maybe completely off the mark but regardless of true dev code is still very solid!
Its my job to spot good strong code so I can clone it as ruthless as that sounds and use elements in my own works, if appropriate!..
Frankly, I don't care who you are, all I know, which should be clear to even junior software engineers that you had no idea what you are talking about regarding the commits of rat4.
If you say so then I have no doubt that you are the most influential and accomplished software engineer since Satoshi Nakamoto disappeared from here - yet you don't know how the fucking source control works, which knowledge should be the material of a high school software development class.
You still don't understand that the reason you can see rat4 commits because his software was forked, and therefore of course his fucking commits are in the fork.
Now, this project is might rat4's project, as I said seeing the deployed support I wouldn't be surprised if it is, however from the fact that the master branch of the fork includes his commits you can't make this conclusion. That's all I said in my post which obviously you couldn't understand.
Don't bother explaining its a lost cause lol
Now just for sanity check reasons and spent exactly 50 seconds to check the commits of AXIOM. The last commit that has anything to do with the software was from rat4 on the 21 July - to the blackcoin repository. That was forked - without a line of addition. The AXIOM developer has added exactly 0 lines of code to rat4's blackcoin. Not even one line.
Therefore, the young Satoshi who was banging on above what an expert he is, was checking for 48 hours rat4's blackcoin commits - and he made the conclusion the AXIOM code base is great :-))))) After all his "job to spot good strong code" LOL
This is one of the most fucked up place of the planet, but this is one of the funniest shit I have ever seen on Bitcointalk :-)))))))
SCAM!!!! LOL!
It's not even a scam, it must be a surreal human experiment at it best :-))))
Even Bobsurplus' coins make more sense from technology viewpoint because lately Bob at least add some shiny features to his coins before he P&D the shit out of the coins, but this coin has added zero (0) line of code never mind new feature to the blackcoin source - it was forked, renamed and released without any additions. WTF?
Hero and senior members support this coin, and all right, they want to make somehow some money, but are they aware of that this is a plain blackcoin fork without any modifications whatsoever or are they just here without knowing anything about how software development works?
Anyway, it's funny sometimes in many ways, but mostly of course it's sad what is happening (fork after fork without any innovations) in digital currency in the last year.
Uhm, are you a little bit retarded? Blackcoin is scrypt with ecsda sigs, axiom is RandMemHash with schnorr sigs,,,
some github tutorials here ;0
Is only FUD man!
They only want to buy back at 10k now...this thread is so funny guys!
But is strange to see a lot of Hero member here...!
August 06, 2015, 12:06:36 PM
... I spent the past 48hrs looking into it exploring what is on offer ... Next up is the dev. I see initial commits from Rat4 on MASTER branch this is the guy which has bought a lot of tech into alts. All i can say regarding this matter is I am very reassured to know he is doing apart with this project (in whichever capacity
).You have no idea what you are talking about, do you? Seeing the audience here and who has been deployed in this project, it could be very possible that this is a rat4 action, I don't know whether the dev is rat4 or not, but from the commits you can't make this conclusion - except if you have no idea what you are talking about.
I have not checked the source code, I have better things to do than to check blackcoin forks, but when I open the source repository web page I can see that this is a fork of rat4's blackcoin. So, if it is a fork of blackcoin than how on the earth could not be commits from rat4 the guy who maintain the blackcoin repository in the first place? Of course there are commits from rat4 - his blackcoin was forked. I understand you spent the past 48hrs "looking into" the source code, but do you understand at all what fork means and how the source code repository works?
lmfao .. yes i do I have been around the block with alts many times built coins participated under various alt projects under various pseudonyms played with some progressive BC ideas and pushed some ideas co-authored 2 w.papers along with participation of independent peer reviews for unnamed alts.. Worked on anon mixer and coinjoin techniques. Multiple token rings <-- Hint to who I am.
So yeah I do kinda know a little, just a little bit about spotting a very solid code base and novel approach to fixing Small spend DoS issue as this is one of the ways I believed its rat4 who is behind this as during another project which I was apart of he pointed out this vuln in my alt which needed correcting. Now low and behold its apart of this src code.. plus other hints and i picked up on.
Who knows I maybe completely off the mark but regardless of true dev code is still very solid!
Its my job to spot good strong code so I can clone it as ruthless as that sounds and use elements in my own works, if appropriate!..
Frankly, I don't care who you are, all I know, which should be clear to even junior software engineers that you had no idea what you are talking about regarding the commits of rat4.
If you say so then I have no doubt that you are the most influential and accomplished software engineer since Satoshi Nakamoto disappeared from here - yet you don't know how the fucking source control works, which knowledge should be the material of a high school software development class.
You still don't understand that the reason you can see rat4 commits because his software was forked, and therefore of course his fucking commits are in the fork.
Now, this project is might rat4's project, as I said seeing the deployed support I wouldn't be surprised if it is, however from the fact that the master branch of the fork includes his commits you can't make this conclusion. That's all I said in my post which obviously you couldn't understand.
Don't bother explaining its a lost cause lol
Now just for sanity check reasons and spent exactly 50 seconds to check the commits of AXIOM. The last commit that has anything to do with the software was from rat4 on the 21 July - to the blackcoin repository. That was forked - without a line of addition. The AXIOM developer has added exactly 0 lines of code to rat4's blackcoin. Not even one line.
Therefore, the young Satoshi who was banging on above what an expert he is, was checking for 48 hours rat4's blackcoin commits - and he made the conclusion the AXIOM code base is great :-))))) After all his "job to spot good strong code" LOL
This is one of the most fucked up place of the planet, but this is one of the funniest shit I have ever seen on Bitcointalk :-)))))))
SCAM!!!! LOL!
It's not even a scam, it must be a surreal human experiment at it best :-))))
Even Bobsurplus' coins make more sense from technology viewpoint because lately Bob at least add some shiny features to his coins before he P&D the shit out of the coins, but this coin has added zero (0) line of code never mind new feature to the blackcoin source - it was forked, renamed and released without any additions. WTF?
Hero and senior members support this coin, and all right, they want to make somehow some money, but are they aware of that this is a plain blackcoin fork without any modifications whatsoever or are they just here without knowing anything about how software development works?
Anyway, it's funny sometimes in many ways, but mostly of course it's sad what is happening (fork after fork without any innovations) in digital currency in the last year.
Fud more my buys are not hitting
Jump to: