Topic: Re: LoyceV vs theymos (and get your own Merit graph: up to 20 users per graph) - page 13. (Read 14878 times)
January 24, 2019, 07:50:34 PM
can i get one for myself only? curious to know how my merit journey looks like.
January 20, 2019, 03:31:03 PM
Thanks for the graph, but clearly we can't see which line belongs to a user.
I wonder how many times your spreadsheet crashed or freezing
I wonder how many times your spreadsheet crashed or freezing
January 21, 2019, 05:33:49 PM
LOL... looking at those graphs I seem to have done "OK"... Just for the record, the flattening on my graph correlates nicely with starting a new job back in September... 
Also, thanks to those that requested my inclusion so I didn't have to do it myself
Also, thanks to those that requested my inclusion so I didn't have to do it myself
January 20, 2019, 03:53:31 PM
I wonder how many times your spreadsheet crashed or freezing
It crashed right after saving January 20, 2019, 02:42:41 PM
ME vs chipmixer participants. Let's do an orgy of stats.
You asked for it 
Thanks to DarkStar_, here it is:
(direct link to image)
My spreadsheet was not happy with this
January 20, 2019, 01:55:37 PM
mdayonliner vs S_Therapist
mdayonliner vs S_Therapist
S_Therapist vs mdayonliner http://archive.is/m1EqT#selection-12058.1-12058.2It is posted above. Scroll up thread. How have you missed it?
January 20, 2019, 03:12:47 AM
Can you get me up to 10 users to compare per graph? Even better: use this format with only userIDs:
If you use this format, it's okay to ask for multiple sets.
@pugman if you still wanted the comparison, here are all userIDs in the ChipMixer campaign:Code:
976210 879277 867786 820936
-snip-
Here's the first 10 from that list which I did as a self-test. A graph with so many users would be a real mess IMO. Pugman pick a subset of users if you want a comparison (preferably without hilariousetc - as you can see above it does not scale well
). January 19, 2019, 08:30:07 PM
Can you get me up to 10 users to compare per graph? Even better: use this format with only userIDs:
If you use this format, it's okay to ask for multiple sets.
Code:
976210 879277 867786 820936
@pugman if you still wanted the comparison, here are all userIDs in the ChipMixer campaign:
Code:
557798
299894
525056
458393
153041
397737
99837
379147
374061
867786
375981
667916
696532
308793
306338
507856
405464
175361
552813
543626
803757
403303
886521
155345
901859
783422
459836
877396
136484
68364
405889
171896
109482
164749
154539
338591
143168
903702
579628
162680
487418
325061
370611
465017
1059082
381705
84521
85033
1112531
334898
787736
1291828
187618
1582324
1169179
662570
359716
533583
1188543
January 19, 2019, 10:42:00 AM
This. The most annoying part of this is fetching the UUID + name.
For the names: http://loyce.club/Merit/usernames.html 
January 19, 2019, 10:41:39 AM
What’s interesting is to be able to play around with filters and do stuff like delimit the time scope when the chart should add the sMerits, or the boards they were received in.
Something like: exclude the top 200 Merit receivers and all Merit earned in Meta? That's very tempting to do January 19, 2019, 10:39:52 AM
Code:
30747 11425 101872 38894 64507 60820 24140 164822 113670 51173
January 19, 2019, 10:39:14 AM
What’s interesting is to be able to play around with filters and do stuff like delimit the time scope when the chart should add the sMerits, or the boards they were received in.
Something like: exclude the top 200 Merit receivers and all Merit earned in Meta? That's very tempting to do January 19, 2019, 10:36:34 AM
Actually, these type of charts are rather interesting to play around with. For fun ,I’ve silently added a similar one to the Merit Dashboard (Received Merit Charts tab). What’s interesting is to be able to play around with filters and do stuff like delimit the time scope when the chart should add the sMerits, or the boards they were received in.
January 19, 2019, 10:33:38 AM
Pitting the top 10 or top 50 if it's not too much trouble! Against each other from Vod's most recognized users on Bitcointalk would be interesting. A few of his reports would be interesting to compare, actually.
One graph with 50 users will be impossible to read, and any graph with theymos in it gets "compressed" vertically.Most Recognized 2-11:
Code:
30747 11425 101872 38894 64507 60820 24140 164822 113670 51173
January 19, 2019, 10:25:06 AM
Pitting the top 10 or top 50 if it's not too much trouble! Against each other from Vod's most recognized users on Bitcointalk would be interesting.
Nevermind. I read that link as top merit receivers!Mine supports 50, but it is rather annoying to set that up. 50 UUIDs.
January 19, 2019, 10:23:22 AM
Pitting the top 10 or top 50 if it's not too much trouble! Against each other from Vod's most recognized users on Bitcointalk would be interesting. A few of his reports would be interesting to compare, actually.
January 19, 2019, 10:06:17 AM
Trust me, those details are irrelevant and you've just created more work for yourself.
The details came out like this on their own, I didn't do anything for it Quote
I simplified it to 8 fixed UNIX timestamps. Could always trivially make it more or less detailed, but I don't see a reason to do this.
The only reason I left it in, is to emphasize the graph starts the second theymos sent the first Merit. I've made it human readable now. January 19, 2019, 09:56:29 AM
Meh, this thread makes me feel totally inadequate. 
I feel like Santa Clause getting no milk and cookies.
A cryptic challenge, I like it! Here's your graph: I feel like Santa Clause getting no milk and cookies.
Trust me, those details are irrelevant and you've just created more work for yourself.
The details came out like this on their own, I didn't do anything for it Quote
I simplified it to 8 fixed UNIX timestamps. Could always trivially make it more or less detailed, but I don't see a reason to do this.
The only reason I left it in, is to emphasize the graph starts the second theymos sent the first Merit. I've made it human readable now. January 19, 2019, 09:18:58 AM
I quickly hacked it through 4 pages of excel. What details are missing? The chart type is just different.
The chart type removes most of the details.-snip-
I simplified it to 8 fixed UNIX timestamps. Could always trivially make it more or less detailed, but I don't see a reason to do this.
January 19, 2019, 09:17:08 AM
Meh, this thread makes me feel totally inadequate. I feel like Santa Clause getting no milk and cookies. Oh well, at least no one is siccing their pitbull on me, yet, when I come down the chimney.
I feel like Santa Clause getting no milk and cookies. Oh well, at least no one is siccing their pitbull on me, yet, when I come down the chimney. Jump to: