Re: read now! - page 13. | Bitcointalksearch.org

howzar

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 500

Quote from: alani123 on March 26, 2015, 03:56:24 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: 120bitcoin on March 26, 2015, 03:03:01 AM

BLATANT SCAM Shocked

only scam if not paying.. we paid morethan 98btc .. thank you for wonderfull post Shocked

Quote from: alani123 on March 26, 2015, 02:28:48 AM

How come OP lists ponzi schemes as paying and classic HYIPs as blatant scams?

They are not Ponzi Schemes majority of theme are ponzi GAMES the admit to being a game and are in fact paying.
Only paying sites are in the paying section. It's not about whether they are a legit company or not it is about if they are paying or not hence the PAYING status. We are in the Investor-Based Game board no the Investors or Securities section.
Why don't both you idiots read the reasoning for each listing?

Reason for 120Bitcoins: Default Listing. GoldCoders Script, *MAY* be paying but do not rely on this site to pull through.

Gold coders are defaulted on blatant scam due to high amounts of scams using this script, They aren't accepted in this board for this thread.

So you're trying to tell me that games that admit to being run as ponzi schemes aren't going to scam people? Rrright...

No that's not what he is trying to say. This thread is based on the sites that ARE PAYING NOW, not on what the future might hold. If it was based on the future, every single site would be in the scam list.
Use your logic, sounds like you're pretty short sided lol

alani123

legendary

Activity: 2422

Merit: 1451

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: 120bitcoin on March 26, 2015, 03:03:01 AM

BLATANT SCAM Shocked

only scam if not paying.. we paid morethan 98btc .. thank you for wonderfull post Shocked

Quote from: alani123 on March 26, 2015, 02:28:48 AM

How come OP lists ponzi schemes as paying and classic HYIPs as blatant scams?

They are not Ponzi Schemes majority of theme are ponzi GAMES the admit to being a game and are in fact paying.
Only paying sites are in the paying section. It's not about whether they are a legit company or not it is about if they are paying or not hence the PAYING status. We are in the Investor-Based Game board no the Investors or Securities section.
Why don't both you idiots read the reasoning for each listing?

Reason for 120Bitcoins: Default Listing. GoldCoders Script, *MAY* be paying but do not rely on this site to pull through.

Gold coders are defaulted on blatant scam due to high amounts of scams using this script, They aren't accepted in this board for this thread.

So you're trying to tell me that games that admit to being run as ponzi schemes aren't going to scam people? Rrright...

120bitcoin

newbie

Activity: 16

Merit: 0

BLATANT SCAM Shocked

only scam if not paying.. we paid morethan 98btc .. thank you for wonderfull post Shocked

alani123

legendary

Activity: 2422

Merit: 1451

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

How come OP lists ponzi schemes as paying and classic HYIPs as blatant scams?

SNavy

sr. member

Activity: 268

Merit: 250

I sent 0.01 BTC to your account.
You can check what is going on with your payment here http://doublebot.com/?q=XJ3wVQv4ujt7Pzhn4of68ieZqQwr9oN5513a60c1d330
It's how the regular payments are being.

Bit-Ponzi

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Bit-Ponzi on March 25, 2015, 05:53:58 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: serkuch777 on March 25, 2015, 04:46:02 PM

Quote

All listings have a reason behind them they are not based on invalid info.

Of course, but without proof it's only your opinion. I can create my own listing and mark all sites as I want and say 'all listings based on valid info from reliable source'. It's your position, and you are full right on it

I already made post with warning, so nuff said

No, read the Op I describe how listings are made.
Coin rise is listed collapse due to inactivity and complaints via PM.
Other collapsed sites are mostly offline.
Paying sites reallymare paying their users and watch list sites are being watched.
I don't see how this is 'my opinion' ?

You marked one site as a scam for saying they pay out 56x QUOTE "
56xBTC | http://www.56xbtc.com | 56x your btc. As wonderful as it sounds, it's not real. Faked investments | Thread | SCAM
" END QUOTE
Yet cryptopyramid says "3) Get 56x what you invest for free!!"
And bitcoinpyrmid says "Earn up to 22.5x bitcoins while having the time of your life!"

Blatant indications of a scam in the background. If 56x is a scam for offering 56x your coins, then both of these websites should be considered scams also, or you are being bias towards certain sites.

56x is a htmk based piece of crap that says they found an exploit in Bitcoin and duplicate coins
BitcoinPyramid and CryptoPyramid explain you earn money from being higher on the pyramid which is a scheme that can collapse. BitcoinPyramid has been online and paying since 2011 and CryptoPyramid has been paying instantly since launch. 56xBTC has scam claims and fake investments on their homepage as soon as they launched.

Don't argue with me, you are digging yourself a deeper hole and showing you have no knowledge about what is a scam and what isn't.

I'm pointing out similar design, fonts, graphics, layouts and interfacing between multiple sites. If that isn't enough indication of a scam I don't know what is. But I guess we can still see who is online in months to come.

Bit-Ponzi

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: serkuch777 on March 25, 2015, 04:46:02 PM

Quote

All listings have a reason behind them they are not based on invalid info.

Of course, but without proof it's only your opinion. I can create my own listing and mark all sites as I want and say 'all listings based on valid info from reliable source'. It's your position, and you are full right on it

I already made post with warning, so nuff said

No, read the Op I describe how listings are made.
Coin rise is listed collapse due to inactivity and complaints via PM.
Other collapsed sites are mostly offline.
Paying sites reallymare paying their users and watch list sites are being watched.
I don't see how this is 'my opinion' ?

You marked one site as a scam for saying they pay out 56x QUOTE "
56xBTC | http://www.56xbtc.com | 56x your btc. As wonderful as it sounds, it's not real. Faked investments | Thread | SCAM
" END QUOTE
Yet cryptopyramid says "3) Get 56x what you invest for free!!"
And bitcoinpyrmid says "Earn up to 22.5x bitcoins while having the time of your life!"

Blatant indications of a scam in the background. If 56x is a scam for offering 56x your coins, then both of these websites should be considered scams also, or you are being bias towards certain sites.

PonZ

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: PonZ on March 25, 2015, 12:05:08 PM

Great site, I have a question. Why does my site, 7DayPonzi.com, have a lower "trust" rating than a site that came out 2 weeks after it? Not to bash cryptopyramid, I've used it myself. I'm just trying to understand the logic behind it.

Thanks and keep up the great work!

CryptoPyramid can't hold much BTC at one time hence less chance of being scammed.
I'll update soon though, just in case I am wrong. Ponzi's are always going to be less trust than pyramids.

We are very similar, as you can see in the link below, we have barely had over BTC1.0 in our wallet at a given time. This is a single week round. Also, we are the only "ponzi" site that is backed by a 3rd party, verified, escrow of which we have a little over BTC1.0 in.

https://blockchain.info/charts/balance?timespan=all&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=1&show_header=true&scale=0&address=1x7DayAYJEEiayKbipEShCT8v9ika5nwT

The escrow has got to at least give us 2 attaboys and/or a +2.654 Trustability. ;o)

serkuch777

newbie

Activity: 20

Merit: 0

Quote

All listings have a reason behind them they are not based on invalid info.

Of course, but without proof it's only your opinion. I can create my own listing and mark all sites as I want and say 'all listings based on valid info from reliable source'. It's your position, and you are full right on it

I already made post with warning, so nuff said

Bit-Ponzi

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

Quote from: serkuch777 on March 25, 2015, 12:57:29 PM

By using this listing keep in mind that it's only ONLY POINT OF VIEW OF dmugetsu .
No facts no proofs, someone of competitors wrote that site not paying - site status changed to collapsed. weird. Undecided

Is'nt he running his own ponzi site??

HourlyCoins

newbie

Activity: 13

Merit: 0

You need to update HourlyCoins info:

Currencies Accepted: Bitcoins+Dogecoins
Plans Offerred: 1% per hr for 200hrs

serkuch777

newbie

Activity: 20

Merit: 0

By using this listing keep in mind that it's only ONLY POINT OF VIEW OF dmugetsu .
No facts no proofs, someone of competitors wrote that site not paying - site status changed to collapsed. weird. Undecided

PonZ

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Great site, I have a question. Why does my site, 7DayPonzi.com, have a lower "trust" rating than a site that came out 2 weeks after it? Not to bash cryptopyramid, I've used it myself. I'm just trying to understand the logic behind it.

Thanks and keep up the great work!

hunkey600

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: hunkey600 on March 24, 2015, 05:11:56 PM
i am getting 0.0002 in two days for my investment of 0.01, which shows my ROI will reach in 100 days. Poor project i can earn more than this from a faucet. Is there way to sell my assets?

was think same.... so very bad to go here ((

can you do something with bitcoinbricks.org, don't think willing to pay to anyone.

howzar

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 500

Quote from: Bit-Ponzi on March 25, 2015, 09:20:21 AM

Quote from: howzar on March 25, 2015, 09:16:42 AM

What browser are you using? working fine for me, i've got 4.5LTC and just put another 10PPC in there right now.
I'm on Chrome and FF, both working fine (login, change pw, affiliate, etc all works). Been flawless for me right now hence why i've been using it. I usually don't use sites with bugs or shitty functionality.

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/36.0

Maybe its just my browser. Who knows.

probably, all good for me on Chrome

Bit-Ponzi

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

Quote from: howzar on March 25, 2015, 09:16:42 AM

What browser are you using? working fine for me, i've got 4.5LTC and just put another 10PPC in there right now.
I'm on Chrome and FF, both working fine (login, change pw, affiliate, etc all works). Been flawless for me right now hence why i've been using it. I usually don't use sites with bugs or shitty functionality.

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/36.0

Maybe its just my browser. Who knows.

howzar

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 500

Quote from: Bit-Ponzi on March 25, 2015, 09:11:58 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

what site are you talking about?

If it's crypterest:
1. I see no errors or trustability would be lower
2. There are no broken links or trustability would be lower
3. Ref payments aren't listed, but i've been paid via referrals:

As soon as I clicked withdraw I got my payouts
4. Deposits for me have been no issue and ALL deposits there link perfectly with TXID's. Also, there are a lot of people posting on their thread with deposit TXID's

if it's another site let me know and i'll re-review

Please don't trash other sites since yours is inactive. If you are unhappy about it focus on promoting your own site and making yours better instead of worrying about others. That job is for me to do, not you.

I'm not trashing it. I tried logging in and signing up. Neither of them worked. Just saying. I'm not trying to trash it I was looking for a deposit address and couldn't see it. Signing up isn't working. Can anyone else verify its working? Maybe It's just my browser is incompatible with the site. In which case it is a poor design. I am under linux, not windows.

What browser are you using? working fine for me, i've got 4.5LTC in there right now.
I'm on Chrome and FF, both working fine (login, change pw, affiliate, etc all works). Been flawless for me right now hence why i've been using it. I usually don't use sites with bugs or shitty functionality.

Bit-Ponzi

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

Quote from: ?? on ??

what site are you talking about?

If it's crypterest:
1. I see no errors or trustability would be lower
2. There are no broken links or trustability would be lower
3. Ref payments aren't listed, but i've been paid via referrals:
https://i.imgur.com/J9HFXb3.png
As soon as I clicked withdraw I got my payouts
4. Deposits for me have been no issue and ALL deposits there link perfectly with TXID's. Also, there are a lot of people posting on their thread with deposit TXID's

if it's another site let me know and i'll re-review

Please don't trash other sites since yours is inactive. If you are unhappy about it focus on promoting your own site and making yours better instead of worrying about others. That job is for me to do, not you.

I'm not trashing it. I tried logging in and signing up. Neither of them worked. Just saying. I'm not trying to trash it I was looking for a deposit address and couldn't see it. Signing up isn't working. Can anyone else verify its working? Maybe It's just my browser is incompatible with the site. In which case it is a poor design. I am under linux, not windows.

Bit-Ponzi

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

That site you just posted barely even works. All the links are broken. There is also no txids to even verify money is actually being sent into that site or if they are shill transactions to steal your money.
Zero payouts.

Bit-Ponzi

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

Hello,

You have labeled my site as inactive and we are not inactive. Please fix it.

Topic: Re: read now! - page 13. (Read 44581 times)