Re: read now! - page 22. | Bitcointalksearch.org

enhancedfuel

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

"I haven't stuck up for any sites nor will I ever own a ponzi scheme or game. "

I was speaking as in if I stick up for sites and get called owner of ponzi games. Which I was. I was using the royal hypothetical 'you' where you describe your own situation as if it could be happening to any one

(not to mention I was replying to FUNtoTRY)

EDIT: I will say we disagree on this. I even agree it probably or could be the same guy it is just your practices. Anyway we will all find out soon enough and we can put this discussion to rest

by the way I have enjoyed discussing with you

enhancedfuel

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote

And again my justification is that BitGet.in used this script and they ran with 21BTC, so why wouldn't BitoBits do the same? If they really wanted to earn members money with their ultimate trading techniques they could have hired a dev to make a unique platform (or a cheap design to at minimum change the way the site looks) instead of copy/pasting a scammers script, hence it is under blatant scam because it's only a matter of time before the site funds go bye-bye.

Agree with all of this UNTIL it should be 'hence THERE IS EVERY POSIBILITY it is under blatant scam because it's only a matter of time before the site funds go bye-bye'

It is the 'IT is a scam' fact I have a problem with

(sorry for 3 posts in a row)

enhancedfuel

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: funtotry on March 13, 2015, 10:44:14 PM

Quote from: enhancedfuel on March 13, 2015, 10:20:10 PM

Quote from: yrm on March 13, 2015, 10:51:21 AM

I think OP's process of defining sites as a scam is unfair and nothing more than a personal opinion but you havent actually tested anything.
I've had succes with bitobits.biz for 2 days now, just because they used someone others code dont make them a scammer but you put them on the list twice..

He has a personal bias against him based on they used the same code and up till now bitobits has scammed no one. How many times do we need to explain a ponzi scheme? I wouldn't trust this list as far as I could throw it. Its a good basic guide but seems to be a lot of personal vendetta's in who he is saying scam or not, either that or he is just making it up with his own opinions and touting them as fact.

I feel sorry for bitobits, at least wait till he's done one or started scamming. Not fair to jump on the ponzi's before they have done anything wrong.

Lol you are defending bitobits, maybe you are the owner or affiliated with it? Something like this is quite large, mistyping bitget.in instead of bitsobits. My theory is that as they were copying layout over, they forgot to rename it to bitsobits.

I can understand enhancedfuel's post but he isn't the admin after looking at his post history. and I am sure he is well un-aware of Bitget.in who ran with over 21BTC with the SAME SCRIPT bitobits is using https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitgetin-invest-btc-and-get-110-profit-in-100-hours-10-referral-program-960676

And again my justification is that BitGet.in used this script and they ran with 21BTC, so why wouldn't BitoBits do the same? If they really wanted to earn members money with their ultimate trading techniques they could have hired a dev to make a unique platform (or a cheap design to at minimum change the way the site looks) instead of copy/pasting a scammers script, hence it is under blatant scam because it's only a matter of time before the site funds go bye-bye.

List Update:
Added WeeklyPonzi.com to Collapsed list
Added 24HourPonzi.com to Collapsed list
Added MultiCryptos.com to Paying list

I must admit I wasn't around for the bit-get in scandal. I can see where you guys are coming from and IF he is the BITGETIN guy then he has made one huge stupid error. I just think they need to actually SCAM someone with the new site before you can legitimately put him on the list. What if he really did just get the script and forgot to change it. If he is what you say he is, he will slip up soon enough.

enhancedfuel

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: funtotry on March 13, 2015, 10:44:14 PM

Quote from: enhancedfuel on March 13, 2015, 10:20:10 PM

Quote from: yrm on March 13, 2015, 10:51:21 AM

I think OP's process of defining sites as a scam is unfair and nothing more than a personal opinion but you havent actually tested anything.
I've had succes with bitobits.biz for 2 days now, just because they used someone others code dont make them a scammer but you put them on the list twice..

He has a personal bias against him based on they used the same code and up till now bitobits has scammed no one. How many times do we need to explain a ponzi scheme? I wouldn't trust this list as far as I could throw it. Its a good basic guide but seems to be a lot of personal vendetta's in who he is saying scam or not, either that or he is just making it up with his own opinions and touting them as fact.

I feel sorry for bitobits, at least wait till he's done one or started scamming. Not fair to jump on the ponzi's before they have done anything wrong.

Lol you are defending bitobits, maybe you are the owner or affiliated with it? Something like this is quite large, mistyping bitget.in instead of bitsobits. My theory is that as they were copying layout over, they forgot to rename it to bitsobits.

Ha I love this, heaven forbid you stick up for a site and you are suddenly the owner or getting paid by them. Mate I wish. Never even had a proper look around the site. I was just saying it all seemed very SCAMSCAMSCAM before he had scammed anyone. And for the other guys point about how all ponzi's pay in the first few days then the list might as well have ALL the ponzi's on the scam list the second they are announced. Just seems to defy the point of this list.

PonZ

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

What about simpleponzi.com. Anyone get a payout?

funtotry

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Ever wanted to run your own casino? PM me for info

Quote from: enhancedfuel on March 13, 2015, 10:20:10 PM

Quote from: yrm on March 13, 2015, 10:51:21 AM

I think OP's process of defining sites as a scam is unfair and nothing more than a personal opinion but you havent actually tested anything.
I've had succes with bitobits.biz for 2 days now, just because they used someone others code dont make them a scammer but you put them on the list twice..

He has a personal bias against him based on they used the same code and up till now bitobits has scammed no one. How many times do we need to explain a ponzi scheme? I wouldn't trust this list as far as I could throw it. Its a good basic guide but seems to be a lot of personal vendetta's in who he is saying scam or not, either that or he is just making it up with his own opinions and touting them as fact.

I feel sorry for bitobits, at least wait till he's done one or started scamming. Not fair to jump on the ponzi's before they have done anything wrong.

Lol you are defending bitobits, maybe you are the owner or affiliated with it? Something like this is quite large, mistyping bitget.in instead of bitsobits. My theory is that as they were copying layout over, they forgot to rename it to bitsobits.

enhancedfuel

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: yrm on March 13, 2015, 10:51:21 AM

I think OP's process of defining sites as a scam is unfair and nothing more than a personal opinion but you havent actually tested anything.
I've had succes with bitobits.biz for 2 days now, just because they used someone others code dont make them a scammer but you put them on the list twice..

He has a personal bias against him based on they used the same code and up till now bitobits has scammed no one. How many times do we need to explain a ponzi scheme? I wouldn't trust this list as far as I could throw it. Its a good basic guide but seems to be a lot of personal vendetta's in who he is saying scam or not, either that or he is just making it up with his own opinions and touting them as fact.

I feel sorry for bitobits, at least wait till he's done one or started scamming. Not fair to jump on the ponzi's before they have done anything wrong.

JCaferJr_

newbie

Activity: 25

Merit: 0

Quote from: dmugetsu on March 14, 2015, 01:24:44 AM

Quote from: JCaferJr_ on March 13, 2015, 06:07:29 PM

Why do you ignoring my request to add weeklyponzi/24hourponzi? Proof has been shown.

Because both sites are no longer in operation, and you're missing that they paid hundreds of BTC out.

I won't list them, as there won't be a point in doing so

I really question the motives of the op, after showing proof of scams done by weeklyponzi/24hourponzi, this is the reply I get. Looks like if you pay enough people out, you can steal 5btc+ with no reprimand. dmugetsu, I bet you own those pathetic sites...

CryptoIncrease

newbie

Activity: 44

Merit: 0

Quote from: ShrykeZ on March 13, 2015, 01:00:19 PM

I came in directly from OP here but cleared cookies just to be sure, the address I linked is still wrong. Seems very bugged Undecided

Not sure about worth of XPY but I will edit that post, is better if you make it more clear for others though, looks very scam like with no proof on main page.

Thanks for the edit. *Edit: Just seen it. I lol'ed

***

We are building the history pages over the weekend, we are always behind on the dev work as we have been running live rounds since Dec and it's been busy.. $255k busy!

I've worked out what you have noticed. It's not a bug.
That was us opening the round by sending in the minimum payment to confirm everything worked. We changed the payout address to our fee address which is why it's different.
You'll only see this type of action on the first transaction of a round, if the coin is of any value.

We only do this to proof check the round is working as expected, we had a bug months ago and no transactions appeared and we got 101 death threats from people thinking we had scammed.
It's part of our test process now.

ShrykeZ

hero member

Activity: 630

Merit: 500

I came in directly from OP here but cleared cookies just to be sure, the address I linked is still wrong. Seems very bugged Undecided

Not sure about worth of XPY but I will edit that post, is better if you make it more clear for others though, looks very scam like with no proof on main page.

CryptoIncrease

newbie

Activity: 44

Merit: 0

* Edit... The address you list is one generated uniquely to track a referral code. You must have come in from someones ref code rather than direct. Clear your cookies to see the main current address*

Be kind, I just grabbed this on the fly and I'm at work so hopefully did not miss anything our up-coming history page will show all in/out transactions to provide transparency.
I wanted to nip this in the bud asap as we built the site after we got scammed. We don't hold coins, we payout straight away when the fund is able to, so we can't scam and run.

Please also note that the cash value was logged at the end of the round, so for example, paycoin has dropped a lot so at today's rate it's much lower, but we still paid that amount out at the time.
It does not include the current rounds running either but that's only about 20 BTC

*** IN FUTURE, CONTACT US DIRECTLY IN OUR THREAD FOR ANYTHING. IT WAS ONLY LUCK I SEEN THIS ***

Thanks!

XPY:

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PCUjv3pgLggffSK4zM1Kd5hqqUhcRXSdWP.htm
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PXTgcVVyF9kT8ZFgWhGCdAts47KxN2YoN6.htm
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PEwF2uZRjn1eLrfLJGgj3nyhBfDEZffhAF.htm
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PScrGLDdnZcLYw54z3KKRrotrC2NjC6w1B.htm
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PXtbRyXJpiGknEMoZFrcVFTJFbTbx2rCUn.htm
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PGEXwMQzvCyujgYKpVi1Pwrb8QD1PehC7v.htm
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PHwTGbFCyB1HUW53nkYhqqe5Z8pnH5JmBr.htm
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?P9kESYkTjEmMCnKR3RDhEW9B59Th2tvnYE.htm
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PQzWSRb3QPQKB2Lp3PFQ6FxzvQE4XhVUPj.htm

BTC:

https://blockchain.info/address/1PpzvtJkFsrAYAFUz2vP6o79BEtqNF1aMh
https://blockchain.info/address/1KRFBzQk5Am6JchQJpXMNz9gCRi4trb5ZJ
https://blockchain.info/address/1Peq2Lq3nzpnrP3fGLzCtqu6E8wbwowPJk

ShrykeZ

hero member

Activity: 630

Merit: 500

Quote from: CryptoIncrease on March 13, 2015, 12:42:11 PM

Quote from: ShrykeZ on March 13, 2015, 12:29:56 PM

I think CryptoIncrease is likely scam like since they lie about having $255k invested. Go check for yourself, the most I could get to was just under $50k and I didn't check to see if the input amounts were even real or not.
I would add it to a scam list, since they lie about the $255k.

I'll go fetch proof for you. Give me a few minutes.
This will all be included on a history page we are building.

We have been paying out since Dec 2014.

Ok will edit comment when shown proof.
Also I checked to see if payments were real, and the BTC payment at bottom to address: 1Edj5Cok8yGNFUaiDyjWurVMXEB2Uj5r2b
is wrong address
https://blockchain.info/tx/901ecdcc8304b2c240e89ed8f7115df7a137c75553c9d3a349ec6ff270cd8c5a
https://blockchain.info/tx/1be9ea6de7cbd260d51b72ee8650e4a0d5a95d44f1ebbadcdd46c37ff7b00889

Undecided

CryptoIncrease

newbie

Activity: 44

Merit: 0

Quote from: ShrykeZ on March 13, 2015, 12:29:56 PM

I think CryptoIncrease is likely scam like since they lie about having $255k invested. Go check for yourself, the most I could get to was just under $50k and I didn't check to see if the input amounts were even real or not.
I would add it to a scam list, since they lie about the $255k.

I'll go fetch proof for you. Give me a few minutes.
This will all be included on a history page we are building.

We have been paying out since Dec 2014.

ShrykeZ

hero member

Activity: 630

Merit: 500

CryptoIncrease have a nice website and many altcoins. Cool

Mi5h0

sr. member

Activity: 560

Merit: 273

Quote from: yrm on March 13, 2015, 10:51:21 AM

I think OP's process of defining sites as a scam is unfair and nothing more than a personal opinion but you havent actually tested anything.
I've had succes with bitobits.biz for 2 days now, just because they used someone others code dont make them a scammer but you put them on the list twice..

And I think you create a new account here just to make a little shill for your ponzi scheme Cheesy

Nice try ...

yrm

newbie

Activity: 16

Merit: 0

I think OP's process of defining sites as a scam is unfair and nothing more than a personal opinion but you havent actually tested anything.
I've had succes with bitobits.biz for 2 days now, just because they used someone others code dont make them a scammer but you put them on the list twice..

Gibbs187x

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Moon

Quote from: ?? on ??

What the hell guys I go offline for two days and you accuse me of being crypto raise admin
Go and see the op, I haven't edited it in days. Crypto raise WAS/USED to be legit when my post was last edited.

Jesus guys.

but you are?

Fiiasco

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: coolorpop on March 13, 2015, 06:33:20 AM

multicryptos is this good? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/multicryptos-x2-x10-x100-many-games-50-btc-invested-946814

+1 this
would like to see it on the list

coolorpop

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

multicryptos is this good? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/multicryptos-x2-x10-x100-many-games-50-btc-invested-946814

enthus

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

i am very scared for bitcone, keep your eye on it!! a lot like btc-flow and btc-wolf

Topic: Re: read now! - page 22. (Read 44569 times)