Topic: Red trust bullies - page 2. (Read 697 times)

Mind sharing who they are and what they did to break your heart?

What's the points of creating a brand-new account if you cannot even properly state what happened?
Man up or "woman up" and go straight to the point. It's just a bitcointalk account anyway. Nobody is gonna shot you or beat you up for clearly stating your dissatisfaction.

It's not like that at all. What you're proposing would put all decisions into the hands of one individual - theymos, and that doesn't seem to be something he wants. Nor is he elected in any way so if the community doesn't like his decisions - SOL. On the other hand, the current system is based on voting and the community has a lot of influence on how DT is formed.

Perhaps you'd have more success if you actually exposed the "massive regulation by a select few who are accountable to no one" using facts and not some cockamamie theories. Simple math shows that this mythical group would need more than "few" of the ~80 DT1 members to have any sort of control.

IMO the trust system should go back to how things worked prior to when trust exclusions were introduced. I don't think it should be controversial to say that someone who is behaving in a way that would warrant an exclusion should be removed from DT if they will not correct their behavior (and previous inappropriate ratings). Similarly if someone on DT1 is refusing to remove someone acting inappropriately refuses to remove someone acting inappropriately (after a discussion and a period of time) from DT2, they have no business being on DT1 in the first place.

The practice of having ~zero regulation of the trust system has only lead to massive regulation by a select few who are accountable to no one, and will face no real repercussions for acting in bad faith and/or unfairly.  

The above practice is analogous to the government refusing to impose modest regulations on the actions of an oligopoly, which results in the oligopoly imposing many restrictions on what citizens can and cannot do, and acting unfairly in the process. It is nearly impossible to rid the oligopoly of its power, due in large part to high barriers to entry. While on the other hand, if the government were to impose modest regulations unfairly, voters could vote the government out of power.

The resulting drama from the above, does result in a lot of page views however....

DT's were created to prevent the scam or to alert users in this forum. This is why DT were being created to act on the scam threads. If there ain't any of them here then this forum would be flooded with scammers. These DT's are responsible and if you think that it is being abused then that DT user must be reported. There is no better way to promote the forum for its betterment by reporting scammers and to those who abused the DT system.

It would be easy to report if you can show images showing out the said abuse/s. Just stand up if you think that you are right. There is no way you can be left behind if your accusations has a good basis for we have some good users willing to help here.

(Big Boobies talkinDoubleD) i think if you reverse the username you may make more sense.

Don't you try to undercut the market rate. Mobsters gonna fit you with cement shoes.

Post proof so we all know it for a fact and you can be sure they will be out of DT extremely soon.

You're not doing any favors to the forum by keeping this information to yourself and just rant instead. Don't be an accomplice. Share the information you have... Or lock this thread if that was just a lie.

This does.

What guy? Is there someone specific you're complaining about?

Really? What are they asking? I've often wondered what the going rate for red trust removal is.

Yet your post is completely devoid of any.

closed