Topic: Reddit’s science forum banned climate deniers. - page 11. (Read 636443 times)
the technoaristocrats started with questionning... when will they activate their persuasion machines to make pedophila legal like their master eric schimdt taught them? China is so right to have ban them all... never let an american company in your country, never use one, clone what they do, and fuck them if they dare to move, using AI + CSS to flag their little CIA agents and farm them like flies on high speed maglev train...
^^^ To use the same example as the video I posted, you can go visit a military base and they've got a visitors center etc. If you start wandering around and exploring on your own you're going to get shot. The same applies to Antarctica.
Everything you do in Antarctica has to be OK'd by your government i.e. the men in small hats. They're not going to OK an expedition that could possibly disprove all the lies they've been telling.
Everything you do in Antarctica has to be OK'd by your government i.e. the men in small hats. They're not going to OK an expedition that could possibly disprove all the lies they've been telling.
You guys want to argue with me over the dumbest shit most provable shit, Antarctica is closed.
I mention the steel dome covering Earth was built by two mile tall giants and nobody bats an eye. I say the government controls access to Antarctica and everybody goes insane trying to deny this provable fact!
Do you have any idea how much an environmental impact study for Antarctica costs? Once the multi-million dollar study is complete then the government arbitrarily decides whether or not you go and once you're there (if you're not denied), there's massive restrictions on what you can and can't do. You can't even bring dogs for a sled let alone a vehicle and fuel for dog's sake.
I mention the steel dome covering Earth was built by two mile tall giants and nobody bats an eye. I say the government controls access to Antarctica and everybody goes insane trying to deny this provable fact!
Do you have any idea how much an environmental impact study for Antarctica costs? Once the multi-million dollar study is complete then the government arbitrarily decides whether or not you go and once you're there (if you're not denied), there's massive restrictions on what you can and can't do. You can't even bring dogs for a sled let alone a vehicle and fuel for dog's sake.
I'll get around to the two mile high giants if you want, no problem.
Right now we're discussing the fact that you can, TODAY, get a ticket on the flights I linked to over Antarctica.
You guys want to argue with me over the dumbest shit most provable shit, Antarctica is closed.
I mention the steel dome covering Earth was built by two mile tall giants and nobody bats an eye. I say the government controls access to Antarctica and everybody goes insane trying to deny this provable fact!
Do you have any idea how much an environmental impact study for Antarctica costs? Once the multi-million dollar study is complete then the government arbitrarily decides whether or not you go and once you're there (if you're not denied), there's massive restrictions on what you can and can't do. You can't even bring dogs for a sled let alone a vehicle and fuel for dog's sake.
I mention the steel dome covering Earth was built by two mile tall giants and nobody bats an eye. I say the government controls access to Antarctica and everybody goes insane trying to deny this provable fact!
Do you have any idea how much an environmental impact study for Antarctica costs? Once the multi-million dollar study is complete then the government arbitrarily decides whether or not you go and once you're there (if you're not denied), there's massive restrictions on what you can and can't do. You can't even bring dogs for a sled let alone a vehicle and fuel for dog's sake.
^^^ No you can't you fucking retard, your government has to OK it and they don't just OK it for anybody. The steps you have to go through are impossible and cost millions, YOU CAN NOT GO THERE INDEPENDANTLY!!!!!
If the man with the small hat isn't there to hold your hand while your there and OK the trip then YOU DON'T GO!
So you are just plain wrong, how about some humility instead of the insults.If the man with the small hat isn't there to hold your hand while your there and OK the trip then YOU DON'T GO!
You or I certainly can fly over Antarctica.
https://www.antarcticaflights.com.au
You realize, I hope, that Antarctica is a really huge place. FYI there are no military forces stationed there to stop anyone.
There would be no way to stop an aircraft from going over Antarctica. However there are some generally accepted rules.
https://www.quora.com/Do-any-airline-flights-fly-over-Antarctica-If-not-why-not
Due to the arrangement of the three populated southern continents, flying over Antarctica wouldn't actually be shorter for most routes. South America, Africa, and Australia form a rough triangle at the "bottom of the world" and the shortest leg between their largest airports misses most of Antarctica.
Still, there are a few routes where it would make sense. And the shortest route isn't always best, since one must also consider prevailing winds. I read that it would be favorable to fly Sydney to Buenos Aires (currently the most-southern flight) at 80 degrees south (over Antarctica) rather than 72 degrees (the great circle) due to winds.
ETOPS
ETOPS rules cover where twin-engine jets can fly. Antarctica is considered off-limits for twin-engine jets even though it's technically "land". This isn't a real roadblock since there are a good number of 4-engine jets that don't need to abide by ETOPS, but it limits the type of plane that theoretically could fly there and thus rules out all but the largest jets. So any flight over Antarctica would have to connect large-enough cities to fill a large four-engine jet. Bringing us back to the answer about geography...
Special Rules
The real reason no commercial flight over-flies Antarctica is that there are special aviation rules for flights that do. These rules were designed for sightseeing flights but apply to commercial flights as well. Planes flying below 72 degrees latitude need special survival equipment on board, and no commercial carrier would want to stock planes with all this stuff just to save a bit of fuel. It would limit the number of seats available (see ETOPS above) and would require special equipment and training. This could seriously screw up the airline's schedules.
I have been numerous times on commercial flights that overflew the North Pole. USA - China, USA - Australia are examples.
^^^ No you can't you fucking retard, your government has to OK it and they don't just OK it for anybody. The steps you have to go through are impossible and cost millions, YOU CAN NOT GO THERE INDEPENDANTLY!!!!!
If the man with the small hat isn't there to hold your hand while your there and OK the trip then YOU DON'T GO!
If the man with the small hat isn't there to hold your hand while your there and OK the trip then YOU DON'T GO!
^^^ Dude, you're so full of crap. Independent travel is NOT ALLOWED, PERIOD!
Antarctica - Sorry We're Closed! -- https://youtu.be/vnNlbNtuv1g
Antarctica - Sorry We're Closed! -- https://youtu.be/vnNlbNtuv1g
Lets see who is full of shit.
"Article I
1. Antarctica shall be used for peaceful purposes only. There shall be prohibited, inter alia, any measures of a military nature, such as the establishment of military bases and fortifications, the carrying out of military maneuvers, as well as the testing of any type of weapons.
2. The present treaty shall not prevent the use of military personnel or equipment for scientific research or for any other peaceful purposes."
So right off the bat, it says no military allowed and that antarctica should be used only for peaceful purposes only. How bad is that???
You are such a bafoon. I would punch you hard in real life.
https://www.ats.aq/documents/recatt/Att483_e.pdf
There are fucking guidelines in case you go there idiot, you can go there at anytime you fucking dumbfuck.
^^^ Dude, you're so full of crap. Independent travel is NOT ALLOWED, PERIOD!
Antarctica - Sorry We're Closed! -- https://youtu.be/vnNlbNtuv1g
Antarctica - Sorry We're Closed! -- https://youtu.be/vnNlbNtuv1g
^^^ If the oxide is formed under high voltage it retains its electrical polarization when cooled, it's a kind of electret.
After much discussion and a failed first attempt at calculation, I've arrived at a distance of 3440 nautical miles for both Sun and Moon.
First I measure the Sun/Moon at sunrise/sunset with the luminary 50% visible (16 minutes), then I calculate the distance to the horizon with a 1 foot eye elevation and an eye angular resolution limit of 1 minute (1 nautical mile to horizon), then I calculate the luminaries un-refracted size (1 minute). Finally I measure the luminary at 90 degrees (32 minutes). Now without making any assumptions I know the radius of the luminary (16 minuets) and using standard right angle trigonometry and the 1 nautical mile per minuet defined during the first measurement/calculation we find the luminary is at a height of 3440 nautical miles with 32 nautical mile diameter.
There isn't really an edge with the dome and the ice wall, however Antarctica is protected by the Antarctic Treaty System so you can't go there un-escorted for any reason under any circumstance. If you try you'll be stopped by military force.
After much discussion and a failed first attempt at calculation, I've arrived at a distance of 3440 nautical miles for both Sun and Moon.
First I measure the Sun/Moon at sunrise/sunset with the luminary 50% visible (16 minutes), then I calculate the distance to the horizon with a 1 foot eye elevation and an eye angular resolution limit of 1 minute (1 nautical mile to horizon), then I calculate the luminaries un-refracted size (1 minute). Finally I measure the luminary at 90 degrees (32 minutes). Now without making any assumptions I know the radius of the luminary (16 minuets) and using standard right angle trigonometry and the 1 nautical mile per minuet defined during the first measurement/calculation we find the luminary is at a height of 3440 nautical miles with 32 nautical mile diameter.
There isn't really an edge with the dome and the ice wall, however Antarctica is protected by the Antarctic Treaty System so you can't go there un-escorted for any reason under any circumstance. If you try you'll be stopped by military force.
Do you realize you keep going back and forth to the same concepts, right? "Protected" by the antarctic treaty does not mean you cant go there, in fact nowhere in the few article/rules there does it say you will be stopped by military force.
^^^ If the oxide is formed under high voltage it retains its electrical polarization when cooled, it's a kind of electret.
After much discussion and a failed first attempt at calculation, I've arrived at a distance of 3440 nautical miles for both Sun and Moon.
First I measure the Sun/Moon at sunrise/sunset with the luminary 50% visible (16 minutes), then I calculate the distance to the horizon with a 1 foot eye elevation and an eye angular resolution limit of 1 minute (1 nautical mile to horizon), then I calculate the luminaries un-refracted size (1 minute). Finally I measure the luminary at 90 degrees (32 minutes). Now without making any assumptions I know the radius of the luminary (16 minuets) and using standard right angle trigonometry and the 1 nautical mile per minuet defined during the first measurement/calculation we find the luminary is at a height of 3440 nautical miles with 32 nautical mile diameter.
There isn't really an edge with the dome and the ice wall, however Antarctica is protected by the Antarctic Treaty System so you can't go there un-escorted for any reason under any circumstance. If you try you'll be stopped by military force.
edit:
Sorry for going off-topic here but we're inside a climate controlled high-tech structure built by giants (Titans). Modern humans are the "son of man" and we do not control the climate, all the shit the men with small hats spray on us (chemtrails) not withstanding.
After much discussion and a failed first attempt at calculation, I've arrived at a distance of 3440 nautical miles for both Sun and Moon.
First I measure the Sun/Moon at sunrise/sunset with the luminary 50% visible (16 minutes), then I calculate the distance to the horizon with a 1 foot eye elevation and an eye angular resolution limit of 1 minute (1 nautical mile to horizon), then I calculate the luminaries un-refracted size (1 minute). Finally I measure the luminary at 90 degrees (32 minutes). Now without making any assumptions I know the radius of the luminary (16 minuets) and using standard right angle trigonometry and the 1 nautical mile per minuet defined during the first measurement/calculation we find the luminary is at a height of 3440 nautical miles with 32 nautical mile diameter.
There isn't really an edge with the dome and the ice wall, however Antarctica is protected by the Antarctic Treaty System so you can't go there un-escorted for any reason under any circumstance. If you try you'll be stopped by military force.
edit:
Sorry for going off-topic here but we're inside a climate controlled high-tech structure built by giants (Titans). Modern humans are the "son of man" and we do not control the climate, all the shit the men with small hats spray on us (chemtrails) not withstanding.
^^^ If you analyze a meteorite fragment (a piece of the dome) you'll find that it's made from a long grain Damascus type nickel-iron steel alloy; a manufactured material.
As for gravity making a steel dome impossible, you would have to assume gravity is anything more than an unproven theory that was falsified along with relativity in 1939 (Sagnac D&P). The reality is that the dome holds in the atmosphere in under pressure and the forces on the dome come from inside trying to push out. The force that pushes objects down (that you believe is gravity pulling) comes from the atmosphere (aether in the case of an evacuated chamber) the object has displaced and, the direction it falls or sinks is defined by the electric field created by dome and its electrically polarized oxide surface.
....
As for gravity making a steel dome impossible, you would have to assume gravity is anything more than an unproven theory that was falsified along with relativity in 1939 (Sagnac D&P). The reality is that the dome holds in the atmosphere in under pressure and the forces on the dome come from inside trying to push out. The force that pushes objects down (that you believe is gravity pulling) comes from the atmosphere (aether in the case of an evacuated chamber) the object has displaced and, the direction it falls or sinks is defined by the electric field created by dome and its electrically polarized oxide surface.
....
Oxide surfaces of metals do not polarize. Virtually all aluminum has an AL-O oxide surface, as does any piece of rusted metal, Fe-O.
Next you claim the dome is a pressure dome. Previously you claimed the Moon was 32 miles long, a flat plate, and it was 3100 miles distant. Is that how high this dome is?
I would be happy to meet you by the edge of this dome so we can examine its construction technique. It shouldn't be too hard. We would just have to go to the end of the world.
^^^ If you analyze a meteorite fragment (a piece of the dome) you'll find that it's made from a long grain Damascus type nickel-iron steel alloy; a manufactured material.
As for gravity making a steel dome impossible, you would have to assume gravity is anything more than an unproven theory that was falsified along with relativity in 1939 (Sagnac D&P). The reality is that the dome holds in the atmosphere in under pressure and the forces on the dome come from inside trying to push out. The force that pushes objects down (that you believe is gravity pulling) comes from the atmosphere (aether in the case of an evacuated chamber) the object has displaced and, the direction it falls or sinks is defined by the electric field created by dome and its electrically polarized oxide surface.
Open your eyes and see that you're being fed 100% grade "A" bullshit by the men in small hats.
@Astargath, it's not about money it's about fucking you over as hard as possible and making you into a retarded powerless slave who believes nothing but complete bullshit.
As for gravity making a steel dome impossible, you would have to assume gravity is anything more than an unproven theory that was falsified along with relativity in 1939 (Sagnac D&P). The reality is that the dome holds in the atmosphere in under pressure and the forces on the dome come from inside trying to push out. The force that pushes objects down (that you believe is gravity pulling) comes from the atmosphere (aether in the case of an evacuated chamber) the object has displaced and, the direction it falls or sinks is defined by the electric field created by dome and its electrically polarized oxide surface.
Open your eyes and see that you're being fed 100% grade "A" bullshit by the men in small hats.
@Astargath, it's not about money it's about fucking you over as hard as possible and making you into a retarded powerless slave who believes nothing but complete bullshit.
The earth is an advanced engineered structure covered by a steel dome . .....
Steel is pretty elastic.
Ever seen a crane moving a 150' long steel section? It will be wobbling around like rubber.
It does not have the strength in compression to withstand the gravitational forces for a dome of that size. No material does, this is why large masses collapse into spheres we call planets. An an example, suppose we created a perfect cube of high carbon steel, 6000 miles on each side. It would immediately collapse into a sphere, about the size of the Earth.
Got any other ideas that'll keep the Earth flat? If you could shrink the Earth to a couple miles across, you might be able to keep that flat surface working.
The earth is an advanced engineered structure covered by a steel dome and the temperature is controlled by not man. The level of clown world insanity here is really over the top.
People ask why would clowns lie about the shape of the earth, well carbon taxes are one of million fucking reasons.
People ask why would clowns lie about the shape of the earth, well carbon taxes are one of million fucking reasons.
There are like thousands of different ways they could have used to make money, you think it's more logical to believe they made this huge conspiracy about the shape of the earth and the universe to make some money? Madoff was able to scam victims for a total of $65 Billion and he didn't need to lie about the shape of the earth.
holy shit, you guys are still at it lol
The earth is an advanced engineered structure covered by a steel dome and the temperature is controlled by not man. The level of clown world insanity here is really over the top.
People ask why would clowns lie about the shape of the earth, well carbon taxes are one of million fucking reasons.
People ask why would clowns lie about the shape of the earth, well carbon taxes are one of million fucking reasons.
The Stunning Statistical Fraud Behind The Global Warming Scare
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/the-stunning-statistical-fraud-behind-the-global-warming-scare/?sfns=xmwa
What do we mean by fraudulent? How about this: NOAA has made repeated "adjustments" to its data, for the presumed scientific reason of making the data sets more accurate.
Nothing wrong with that. Except, all their changes point to one thing — lowering previously measured temperatures to show cooler weather in the past, and raising more recent temperatures to show warming in the recent present.
This creates a data illusion of ever-rising temperatures to match the increase in CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere since the mid-1800s, which global warming advocates say is a cause-and-effect relationship. The more CO2, the more warming.
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/the-stunning-statistical-fraud-behind-the-global-warming-scare/?sfns=xmwa
What do we mean by fraudulent? How about this: NOAA has made repeated "adjustments" to its data, for the presumed scientific reason of making the data sets more accurate.
Nothing wrong with that. Except, all their changes point to one thing — lowering previously measured temperatures to show cooler weather in the past, and raising more recent temperatures to show warming in the recent present.
This creates a data illusion of ever-rising temperatures to match the increase in CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere since the mid-1800s, which global warming advocates say is a cause-and-effect relationship. The more CO2, the more warming.
Man-eating tigers could hunt down more humans due to climate change
The reasons why big cats turn on humans are complex and can be specific to individuals. But they can no longer be explained outside the context of climate change. Biodiversity depletion, habitat loss, extreme weather events, and a greater struggle over natural resources are affecting how animals live across the entire Indian subcontinent, and indeed the world. We should look to the case of Avni not for the peculiar baiting method, but rather for what her life and death tells us about the climate crisis.
I am not sure whether you are serious here, i have not heard about young tigers hunting down humans, majority of these case have being reported when an old tiger who does not have the strength to hunt in the wild come over to residential areas for easy prey and other things can be factored into it such as the deforestation and that is the root cause of animals vs human encounters. The reasons why big cats turn on humans are complex and can be specific to individuals. But they can no longer be explained outside the context of climate change. Biodiversity depletion, habitat loss, extreme weather events, and a greater struggle over natural resources are affecting how animals live across the entire Indian subcontinent, and indeed the world. We should look to the case of Avni not for the peculiar baiting method, but rather for what her life and death tells us about the climate crisis.
Look at my sig, then look at who started this thread so to have a better understanding of the... mmm... atmosphere here. It is a listing, among other things, of all the stupidest excuses invented to justify the lie called
Thank you for your participation.
I must suggest here, that there is more to the subject of tigers and humans than you may know. Here is a story of a tiger in a residential area in Houston, Texas. Now, how many more tigers may be hiding out that we don't know about?
https://www.nbcdfw.com/news/weird/Pot-Smokers-Find-Caged-Tiger-in-Abandoned-Houston-House-Werent-Hallucinating-Police-505711841.html
Man-eating tigers could hunt down more humans due to climate change
The reasons why big cats turn on humans are complex and can be specific to individuals. But they can no longer be explained outside the context of climate change. Biodiversity depletion, habitat loss, extreme weather events, and a greater struggle over natural resources are affecting how animals live across the entire Indian subcontinent, and indeed the world. We should look to the case of Avni not for the peculiar baiting method, but rather for what her life and death tells us about the climate crisis.
I am not sure whether you are serious here, i have not heard about young tigers hunting down humans, majority of these case have being reported when an old tiger who does not have the strength to hunt in the wild come over to residential areas for easy prey and other things can be factored into it such as the deforestation and that is the root cause of animals vs human encounters. The reasons why big cats turn on humans are complex and can be specific to individuals. But they can no longer be explained outside the context of climate change. Biodiversity depletion, habitat loss, extreme weather events, and a greater struggle over natural resources are affecting how animals live across the entire Indian subcontinent, and indeed the world. We should look to the case of Avni not for the peculiar baiting method, but rather for what her life and death tells us about the climate crisis.
Look at my sig, then look at who started this thread so to have a better understanding of the... mmm... atmosphere here. It is a listing, among other things, of all the stupidest excuses invented to justify the lie called
Thank you for your participation.
Man-eating tigers could hunt down more humans due to climate change
The reasons why big cats turn on humans are complex and can be specific to individuals. But they can no longer be explained outside the context of climate change. Biodiversity depletion, habitat loss, extreme weather events, and a greater struggle over natural resources are affecting how animals live across the entire Indian subcontinent, and indeed the world. We should look to the case of Avni not for the peculiar baiting method, but rather for what her life and death tells us about the climate crisis.
I am not sure whether you are serious here, i have not heard about young tigers hunting down humans, majority of these case have being reported when an old tiger who does not have the strength to hunt in the wild come over to residential areas for easy prey and other things can be factored into it such as the deforestation and that is the root cause of animals vs human encounters. The reasons why big cats turn on humans are complex and can be specific to individuals. But they can no longer be explained outside the context of climate change. Biodiversity depletion, habitat loss, extreme weather events, and a greater struggle over natural resources are affecting how animals live across the entire Indian subcontinent, and indeed the world. We should look to the case of Avni not for the peculiar baiting method, but rather for what her life and death tells us about the climate crisis.
Jump to: