New study reaffirms the link between conservative religious faith and climate change doubt
Last week, I blogged about a striking figure created by evolutionary biologist Josh Rosenau of the National Center for Science Education, plotting U.S. based faiths and denominations based on 1) their members’ views about the reality of human evolution and 2) those members’ support for tough environmental laws.
The figure (below) has created much discussion, both because of what it seems to suggest about the unending debate over the relationship between science and religion, but also because of how it appears to confirm that more conservative leaning denominations harbor a form of science resistance that extends well beyond evolution rejection and into the climate change arena. ....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/05/29/this-fascinating-chart-on-faith-and-climate-change-denial-has-been-reinforced-by-new-research/
I'm not surprised by this. To me it is a reflection of underlying human psychological and political features. I'll explain.
All higher vertebrates (including humans) are born with an innate sense of dependency. With maturation this wears off. It must do so necessarily to allow the adult creature to exist in it's environment. As with any other feature, the extent to which such behavior occurs varies from individual to individual.
Social creatures (e.g., wolves, many primates including humans, etc) have evolved to have this maturation process become more partial than solitary creatures such as felines. As a side note, the process of domesticating a creature involves selecting individuals who are on the outer bounds of normal and selectively breading them. Domestic animals tend to thus be animals who are immature in some ways throughout their life.
Humans, as social creatures, are normally programmed to have an emotional dependence on a 'higher power'. This can be a group leader or a God or a government. Indeed, a key element of leadership is to understand this feature of those to be led. Certainly governments recognize this and leverage it. More totalitarian governments discourage our ban religion with the expectation that the innate psychological dispositions of the masses will shift to the state.
So, called 'agnostics' are not so much non-believers as they are people direct their dependence toward the state. Thus, it is unsurprising that they will be more prone to support efforts driven by the state apparatus.
Environmental issues are not generally a focus of traditional religious organizations so their leaderships don't focus on the topic and neither do their flocks. In a lot of cases the flock has a general gut feeling that there is a leadership struggle between church and state and will be actually antagonistic to state sponsored efforts. Probably mostly this will happen at a sub-conscious level.
A competent State leadership will recognize these dynamics and will deal with things not by open antagonism but by subverting the church leadership itself (when they have gained the power necessary to do so, and the U.S. passed that threshold some time ago.) We have seen on this thread several instances of the state acting in this manner. e.g., giving churches a tax break if their preachers will to preach 'green' stuff.