Topic: Reddit’s science forum banned climate deniers. - page 185. (Read 636443 times)

Here's the trend from 4 different sources:

But yes, the air temperature has not risen much in the last years.

The photo with the cloud is stunning.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/kerry-if-were-wrong-climate-change-whats-worst-can-happen_793392.html

If I was trying to change the climate in Australia, I'd be advocating nuclear power running giant desalinization plants and carving rivers inland from the sea.  Turning that huge desert into a paradise.

Terraforming right here.

Check out the weather around the bunny fence:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/14/science/earth/14fenc.html

I have to admit to a bit of exaggeration when I have been using the phrase "no warming for the last 20 years".  Knowing it was 17+, close enough.

Then again, since this is measurements of temperature and not latent heat or energy content, it may be meaningless. 

“The coalition government acknowledges the role of renewable energy in Australia’s energy mix,” said Industry Minister Ian Macfarlane. “There is over $1 billion in funding for existing renewable projects to be completed over the coming years.”

“Given the tight fiscal environment as a result of [liberal] Labor’s legacy of debt and deficit, the government considers there is a very significant investment in renewable energy,” MacFarlane added.

Abbott’s Liberal-National coalition won a landslide victory in Australia’s election last fall. One of the main promises of Abbott’s coalition was to repeal the country’s carbon tax and costly environmental agenda.

http://dailycaller.com/2014/05/19/aussies-to-slash-90-of-global-warming-funding-from-budget/

--------------------------------------
What I would call "A good start!"

According to the RSS satellite data, whose value for April 2014 is just in, the global warming trend in the 17 years 9 months since August 1996 is zero. The 212 months without global warming represents more than half the 423-month satellite data record, which began in January 1979. No one now in high school has lived through global warming.

Key facts about global temperature:
** The RSS satellite dataset shows no global warming at all for 213 months from August 1996 to April 2014. That is more than half the entire 423-month satellite record.
** The fastest centennial warming rate was in Central England from 1663-1762, at 0.9 Cº per century – before the industrial revolution began. It cannot have been our fault.
** The global warming trend since 1900 is equivalent to 0.8 Cº per century. This is well within natural variability and may not have much to do with us.
** The fastest warming trend lasting ten years or more occurred over the 40 years from 1694-1733 in Central England. It was equivalent to 4.3 Cº per century.
** Since 1950, when a human influence on global temperature first became theoretically possible, the global warming trend is equivalent to 1.2 Cº per century.
** The fastest warming rate lasting ten years or more since 1950 occurred over the 33 years from 1974 to 2006. It was equivalent to 2.0 Cº per century.
** In 1990, the IPCC’s mid-range prediction of the near-term warming trend was equivalent to 3.5 Cº per century.
** The global warming trend since 1990, when the IPCC wrote its first report, is equivalent to 1.4 Cº per century – two-fifths of what the IPCC had then predicted.
** In 2013 the IPCC’s new mid-range prediction of the near-term warming trend was for warming at a rate equivalent to 1.7 Cº per century – just half its 1990 prediction.

http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/05/04/global-temperature-update-no-global-warming-at-all-for-17-years-9-months/



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wow! 17 years and 9 months? That's almost as good as some people believing in AGW for the past 20 years... Well, almost.

Sorry, before you wreck the world wide economy and cause the death of many innocent people due to increased food an fuel costs and lower the standard of living for every person on the planet you might want to provide some proof. I am open to all ideas, but I could never accept the idea that we have to destroy the lives of people to prevent something that might happen. That is immoral and unconscionable.

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-brown-lax-remarks-20140514-story.html?track=rss


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Will you get a set of free rubber boots from the TSA 200 years from now?

that does sum up your general attitude and position quite nicely.

really. i always thought that was an area of disagreement between us. can you provide a link please.

Don't take offense at this Wilky, but I actually sorta like you.  You have a sense of humor a lot of the others don't.

Why go elsewhere when the party is here? The hottest climate change thread club in town! With the smallest carbon footprint to boot.
Our door will always stay open. You and your friends are always welcome here, insults included...

Lol.  Well you should start a subreddit named "/r/ClimateChangeDeniers" or what have you and trust me, I won't show up there.  Then you guys can kick out anyone who believes in global warming attributed to man.

Also while you are at, create "/r/Smokingdoesntcausecancer"  and possibly "/r/Flatearthsociety"... continue on with "/r/vacinationssuck"

I'll preemptively say thanks for the accolades, but send the tips to the american cancer society, please.

What is going on is that people should have a right to live their life free of listening to your bullshit, regardless of your sense of entitlement on the issue.

Perfect reciprocity

Everyone has opinions. When someone has the opinion that vaccines are bad and given the clear record of history, one should question whether their opinions are worth following.  

Since everyone has opinions, you can endlessly listen to opinions all day.  A smart person will find some way to filter which opinions are worth following and which aren't.

When a guy goes off on vaccines, I know which category I'll put him in.  It is the "not worth my time" category.

You can claim this isn't logical or whatever, but frankly I don't give a shit.  This is the same reason you guys are filtered on a certain subreddits.  This is America and if you were completely forced into silence I'd quicky defend your side.  

That is not what is going on here though. What is going on is that people should have a right to live their life free of listening to your bullshit, regardless of your sense of entitlement on the issue.

BTW, music is very subjective and not really particularly analogous to what is going on.

In this instance the word retard was not referring to anyone in this thread either directly or indirectly.  Someone said something asinine then when I questioned them, they told me they don't tutor for free.  I suggested they wouldn't be able to tutor anyone but retards and since they were keen on charging for their tutoring services they would need retards with money.  I then wished them luck with finding clients.


All editing I do is only for grammatical mistakes or  bungled sentences.  I don't think I've ever changed my opinion on anything as the result of this thread.  I'd like to and I sometimes listen to you guys enough to go chase down your sources, but changing any opinion has yet to happen.

Good job on red herrings and completely avoiding anything relevant.

...So we may never share the same love for a particular artist just because we disagree on the subject disputed here? You are telling me I should have watched every single video from that dude, then  agree with every single one of them before agreeing with the one directly linked to the topic at hand in this thread?

Very illogical...