Pages:
Author

Topic: Reddit’s science forum banned climate deniers. - page 77. (Read 636455 times)

legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1251
Looks at those fucking pictures, I just proved that NASA are liars!

Dude you're serious? Nobody can be this dumb surely? You're not real?

You call those real photographs of Earth? You're the retard here if you believe that!

Ok. You're the first user I ignore but you really deserve it.

So much stupidity and bullshit in only one person. That's scary! The problem being that people like you actually vote  Cry

Your faith and belief in the high priests of NASA is greater than any extremist religious zealot out there!

Was waiting for your answer. I give you one last chance of proving that stupidity has limits.

Answering the question I managed to read on your picture:
-Here is a video of earth spinning https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVuqcEuIRgs
-Color of the ocean highly depends on the season, which part of the ocean you photograph, the average temperature, the density of clouds. Those are just the major factors, there are lots more to deal with but if you'd manage to get all those parameters identical, you would have something rather correct.
-how big is America is totally dependent on where you're looking from! The Earth is round, so any part of the ball appears bigger or smaller depending on how you watch it! The photos you're showing are never taken from the same angle so OF COURSE America is not the same size, the contrary would mean that Earth is not round you dumbass.

And I don't remember the other questions, but you got the idea.

And if you don't trust NASA, I bet you don't use airplanes? Cause they work solely on NASA measurements for flights.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
Looks at those fucking pictures, I just proved that NASA are liars!

Dude you're serious? Nobody can be this dumb surely? You're not real?

You call those real photographs of Earth? You're the retard here if you believe that!

Ok. You're the first user I ignore but you really deserve it.

So much stupidity and bullshit in only one person. That's scary! The problem being that people like you actually vote  Cry

Your faith and belief in the high priests of NASA is greater than any extremist religious zealot out there!
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1251
Quote
What a marvelous discussion we have here xD
You're right, its a been a real roller coaster.  I have put together a montage of my reactions as I read the thread.
 Angry Sad Shocked Shocked  CryShocked Smiley Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Cool  Cry Undecided  Tongue Roll Eyes Roll Eyes  Wink Lips sealed Kiss Cheesy Wink Smiley Kiss Grin

Seems like we lost our time buddy. I don't know if they're trolls or just completely stupid, but I understand why Reddit closed their thread. Seeing something like that really makes you lose faith in humanity xD
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1251
Looks at those fucking pictures, I just proved that NASA are liars!

Dude you're serious? Nobody can be this dumb surely? You're not real?

You call those real photographs of Earth? You're the retard here if you believe that!

Ok. You're the first user I ignore but you really deserve it.

So much stupidity and bullshit in only one person. That's scary! The problem being that people like you actually vote  Cry
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
Looks at those fucking pictures, I just proved that NASA are liars!

Dude you're serious? Nobody can be this dumb surely? You're not real?

You call those real photographs of Earth? You're the retard here if you believe that!
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Quote
What a marvelous discussion we have here xD
You're right, its a been a real roller coaster.  I have put together a montage of my reactions as I read the thread.
 Angry Sad Shocked Shocked  CryShocked Smiley Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Cool  Cry Undecided  Tongue Roll Eyes Roll Eyes  Wink Lips sealed Kiss Cheesy Wink Smiley Kiss Grin
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1251
Looks at those fucking pictures, I just proved that NASA are liars!

Dude you're serious? Nobody can be this dumb surely? You're not real?
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1251
...
So... My chart coming directly from NASA measurements is lying, but the graph coming from a website with more porno adds than actual text, not giving ONE SINGLE SOURCE is telling the truth?

Do you want to talk about denying now?
Yes.  You really don't even know what the Met is?

First no I don't know what it is, never heard of it. And can't find it on google by typing met so not that famous whatever it is.

Second, it doesn't matter, there isn't any source in the article, it's not because i write "Spendulus said blahblah" that it's true. Next time gives directly the MET report whatever it is if that's your argument. I didn't give you a dubious shitty article of the worst French newspapper, I gave you directly the NASA result.

I think the MET is the British Meteorological society?  Or their weather agency...

Well if that's the case sorry if I don't know the name of the weather agency of your country... Can't know all of them xD

And met agrees with me as it seems:
http://www.rmets.org/weather-and-climate/climate/has-global-warming-stalled

Seems like they do measure a fucking huge rise trend. Don't know if you can read a graph though...

You are going to quote Trenberth?

Here is what he said in private - as shown by the Climategate emails.

Kevin Trenberth to Micheal Mann on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 and copied to most of the leading academics...(Cc: Stephen H Schneider , Myles Allen , peter stott , “Philip D. Jones” , Benjamin Santer , Tom Wigley , Thomas R Karl , Gavin Schmidt , James Hansen , Michael Oppenheimer. )


The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t.


So yes, Trenberth was a liar.

Can't we get real about this stuff?  There is clearly both a political and a scientific part to it all.

Don't know who he is and you're not giving me any proof. I'm not quoting anyone, I just linked you to the met graph as you were saying that met explained that there is no global warming...

I'm trying to find YOUR source as you don't give me any proof... Can we just get to the scientific part yeah? Show me ONE report, graph or anything proving your point. Please a real one, not something from the daily mail...
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
Looks at those fucking pictures, I just proved that NASA are liars!
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1251
Ok well I understand clearly why reddit closed your thread guys, hard to not want to kill you all xD

So it seems we're done here. You all believe that anyone and any infrastructure, even the most officials ones are lying if they claim climate change is real.

You ARE all deniers. In the sense that if we show you proofs (as I've done) you just say that the NASA is lying.

Well if the NASA is lying, what are we talking about? Where do you find any real data? And how do you know it's real?

You're just all saying things, without any proof arguing that it's the truth. And you just explain any opposing proof by saying that they're lies.

What a marvelous discussion we have here xD
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
My ONE SINGLE SOURCE is reason!



NASA claimed each and every one of these pictures was an actual photograph of Earth. They are obvious fakers, liars and hoaxers stealing your tax money and pushing self serving propaganda. NASA doesn't just lie about some things, they lie about everything!

I always wonder, are you for real or are you just a big troll?
NASA lies about everything? So we never landed on the moon that's it?

LOL, It's a whole lot bigger then that.  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
...
So... My chart coming directly from NASA measurements is lying, but the graph coming from a website with more porno adds than actual text, not giving ONE SINGLE SOURCE is telling the truth?

Do you want to talk about denying now?
Yes.  You really don't even know what the Met is?

First no I don't know what it is, never heard of it. And can't find it on google by typing met so not that famous whatever it is.

Second, it doesn't matter, there isn't any source in the article, it's not because i write "Spendulus said blahblah" that it's true. Next time gives directly the MET report whatever it is if that's your argument. I didn't give you a dubious shitty article of the worst French newspapper, I gave you directly the NASA result.

I think the MET is the British Meteorological society?  Or their weather agency...

Well if that's the case sorry if I don't know the name of the weather agency of your country... Can't know all of them xD

And met agrees with me as it seems:
http://www.rmets.org/weather-and-climate/climate/has-global-warming-stalled

Seems like they do measure a fucking huge rise trend. Don't know if you can read a graph though...

You are going to quote Trenberth?

Here is what he said in private - as shown by the Climategate emails.

Kevin Trenberth to Micheal Mann on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 and copied to most of the leading academics...(Cc: Stephen H Schneider , Myles Allen , peter stott , “Philip D. Jones” , Benjamin Santer , Tom Wigley , Thomas R Karl , Gavin Schmidt , James Hansen , Michael Oppenheimer. )


The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t.


So yes, Trenberth was a liar.

Can't we get real about this stuff?  There is clearly both a political and a scientific part to it all.
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1251
My ONE SINGLE SOURCE is reason!



NASA claimed each and every one of these pictures was an actual photograph of Earth. They are obvious fakers, liars and hoaxers stealing your tax money and pushing self serving propaganda. NASA doesn't just lie about some things, they lie about everything!

I always wonder, are you for real or are you just a big troll?
NASA lies about everything? So we never landed on the moon that's it?
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
My ONE SINGLE SOURCE is reason!



NASA claimed each and every one of these pictures was an actual photograph of Earth. They are obvious fakers, liars and hoaxers stealing your tax money and pushing self serving propaganda. NASA doesn't just lie about some things, they lie about everything!
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1251
...
So... My chart coming directly from NASA measurements is lying, but the graph coming from a website with more porno adds than actual text, not giving ONE SINGLE SOURCE is telling the truth?

Do you want to talk about denying now?
Yes.  You really don't even know what the Met is?

First no I don't know what it is, never heard of it. And can't find it on google by typing met so not that famous whatever it is.

Second, it doesn't matter, there isn't any source in the article, it's not because i write "Spendulus said blahblah" that it's true. Next time gives directly the MET report whatever it is if that's your argument. I didn't give you a dubious shitty article of the worst French newspapper, I gave you directly the NASA result.

I think the MET is the British Meteorological society?  Or their weather agency...

Well if that's the case sorry if I don't know the name of the weather agency of your country... Can't know all of them xD

And met agrees with me as it seems:
http://www.rmets.org/weather-and-climate/climate/has-global-warming-stalled

Seems like they do measure a fucking huge rise trend. Don't know if you can read a graph though...
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
...
So... My chart coming directly from NASA measurements is lying, but the graph coming from a website with more porno adds than actual text, not giving ONE SINGLE SOURCE is telling the truth?

Do you want to talk about denying now?
Yes.  You really don't even know what the Met is?

First no I don't know what it is, never heard of it. And can't find it on google by typing met so not that famous whatever it is.

Second, it doesn't matter, there isn't any source in the article, it's not because i write "Spendulus said blahblah" that it's true. Next time gives directly the MET report whatever it is if that's your argument. I didn't give you a dubious shitty article of the worst French newspapper, I gave you directly the NASA result.

I think the MET is the British Meteorological society?  Or their weather agency...
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
I AM
I'm not going to read all the way back through this thread but does anyone remember 'Climategate' all those leaked emails from late 90's where leading UK and US climate scientists from the IPCC were working out how to 'bodge up' the findings?

If not the Commies it's Y2K if not Anthrax, Mad Cow Disease & SARS  it's Saddam's WOMD, Al-Qaeda or ISIS

Fear is the game.
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1251
...
So... My chart coming directly from NASA measurements is lying, but the graph coming from a website with more porno adds than actual text, not giving ONE SINGLE SOURCE is telling the truth?

Do you want to talk about denying now?
Yes.  You really don't even know what the Met is?

First no I don't know what it is, never heard of it. And can't find it on google by typing met so not that famous whatever it is.

Second, it doesn't matter, there isn't any source in the article, it's not because i write "Spendulus said blahblah" that it's true. Next time gives directly the MET report whatever it is if that's your argument. I didn't give you a dubious shitty article of the worst French newspapper, I gave you directly the NASA result.
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1251
I dont think he knows about the daily mail...  
they are a joke.  It does not matter, though.  They accurately report the statements of the Met.

Arguing that "Since 1880 it's warmed 0.75 degrees" is not inconsistent with "The last two decades there has been no significant warming."

The last two decades are very important though - because they contradict the predictions of the scientists whom, m0glie argues, we should rely.  It is not little me "a Denier" against the great number of scientists, but mother earth herself...

She just isn't going along with their schemes, now, is she?

I didn't know about the daily mail, thought you were serious.

But do you know how to actually read a graph? Look again and you'll see a 0.2° increase since 2000, a 0.4° increase in the last two decades.
You call that "no warming"? Are you dumb AND blind?

legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
...
So... My chart coming directly from NASA measurements is lying, but the graph coming from a website with more porno adds than actual text, not giving ONE SINGLE SOURCE is telling the truth?

Do you want to talk about denying now?
Yes.  You really don't even know what the Met is?
Pages:
Jump to: