Topic: Reddit’s science forum banned climate deniers. - page 86. (Read 636455 times)

Video: Forget Climate Change: Why Hasn't Obama Addressed the Massive "Unstoppable" Gas Leak in Cali?

"While Obama spent weeks apprising us before, during, and after of the UN climate talks in Paris which are set to cost developed nations upwards of $100 billion dollars a year — an estimated $170 billion to US GDP in 2030 — all so they can lower the planet's temperature a whole 1.5 degrees... Have you heard the man say anything about the massive "unstoppable" methane leak in California that's been happening this whole time? They're calling it the worst environmental disaster since the BP oil spill. No one has any idea how to stop or fix it.

Punchline? This leak has put out the equivalent of what six coal fired power plants (the ones Obama wants to regulate out of existence) would put out in 20 YEARS while the UN climate change talks in Paris were going down and it's still spewing methane into the air like a volcano right now. The president who cares so much about the environment hasn't mentioned it once."

Unstoppable California Gas Leak Being Called Worst Catastrophe Since BP Spill

"Methane gas continues spewing, unchecked, into the air over southern California from a fractured well to an underground storage site — at such an alarming rate that low-flying planes have necessarily been diverted by the FAA, lest internal combustion engines meet highly volatile gas and, well, blow the entire area to hell. 

This is, indeed, the biggest environmental catastrophe since the BP Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010; and for now, there is no way to stop it...."

kinda one of the first of the kind if i recall correctly.

Disinforming Disinformation to disinform.

http://www.drroyspencer.com/2014/04/do-aliens-cause-global-warming-the-data-say-yes/

The correlation between UFO reports and ocean temperature is over 0.95, clearly better than the correlation between that boring old carbon dioxide and ocean warming.

In fact, note the tendency for CO2 to follow ocean temperature , suggesting a weak tendency for warming ocean water to outgas CO2 (or reduce the uptake of atmospheric CO2). In other words, warming causes a CO2 increase, versus the common view that CO2 causes warming. In contrast, the peak correlation between UFO reports and ocean temperature is at zero time lag. UFOs visit, the ocean warms.

(And for you alien deniers out there, here’s the spreadsheet with the data and links.)

But correlation isn’t necessarily causation. We need some sort of hypothesized mechanism for how — any maybe why — aliens cause global warming.

My hypothesis is that the extraterrestrials’ spaceships have some sort of powerful heat generators which are dumping energy into the ocean. Maybe an antigravity-based thermogenic flux capacitor technology (that’s just a guess…I’m only a rocket scientist, not a nuclear physicist or movie star).

theonion.com is a satire website, been around a long time.

I wonder how climate deniers would react to this, "Oh it's all a coincidence, since the industrial revolution the climate has remained the same. The polar bears are moving north because they like the cold better. This is all normal you see."

http://www.theonion.com/graphic/worlds-22000-polar-bears-forced-share-last-remaini-50930

I do so like those huge underground tunneling machines.  I have a dream of setting a couple to work under Washington DC until it simply collapses in on itself.

You're going need a submarine and some way to get past the dome that covers our flat earth and keeps the water out.



Alternatively there's some tunneling machines that might do the job.

I.6 Measuring the Earth - Moon Distance with a Laser

1. Principle of this measurement

From the Earth, a flash of light is sent towards the Moon. This light is reflected back to the Earth with a reflector which was placed on the Moon ground by members of an Apollo mission. The duration of the travel of the light there and back dt is measured, and as the velocity of light is well known, the Earth-Moon distance can then be computed.
Suggestion:

Find the average distance Earth-Moon from the the books you have, or among the data on the server, or the minimum and maximum distances between these two celestial bodies, and find out the exact value of the velocity of light. Then, infer the duration of the light travel time (to the Moon and back) in those cases.


http://www.eso.org/public//outreach/eduoff/aol/market/experiments/middle/skills206.html

The overwhelming amount evidence proving that the moon-landings were faked leads me to believe that the mars landings, and other planetary landings were faked too. If we can't even make it to the moon how can we make it to planets farther away?

Source: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/32581790/ns/technology_and_science-space/t/moon-rock-museum-just-petrified-wood/



Now the question is, how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

You know, I'd really like to believe that.  But there's this pesky little problem of rocks being brought back from the moon that could not have been made here on earth.  Different geological processes, you know?

I would like to believe, I really would.....

It's made from real wood.

Oh, really?

So what was faked?  Apollo 11?  Apollo 8?  Apollo 13?  The Saturn booster?  The CM?  The LEM?

From what I've seen out of the Obama admin, I'm surprised that NASA has not replace satellite data feeds with a script that produces whatever readings they want (and protect the program via 'national security' of course.)

Perhaps they have not had the opportunity yet to replace the satalite team with more appropriate personnel.  I suppose that'll be one of Clinton's projects over her eight years.

Bet they pull a "matter of national security" rabbit out of the hat to keep that under wraps. 

Judicial Watch Sues for Documents Withheld From Congress in New Climate Data Scandal


(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a lawsuit on December 2, 2015, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia seeking records of communications from National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) officials regarding methodology for collecting and interpreting data used in climate models (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Commerce (No 1:15-cv-02088)). The lawsuit sought the same documents unsuccessfully subpoenaed by a House committee.  Less than week after Judicial Watch served its lawsuit on NOAA, the agency finally turned over the targeted documents to Congress.

Judicial Watch sued the Department of Commerce after the agency failed to respond to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request submitted on October 30, 2015 – NOAA is a component of the Department of Commerce.  The timeframe for the requested records is October 30, 2014, through October 30, 2015, and requests all documents and records of communications between NOAA officials, employees, and contractors regarding:

    The methodology and utilization of night marine air temperatures to adjust ship and buoy temperature data;
    The use of other global temperature datasets for both NOAA’s in-house dataset improvements and monthly press releases conveying information to the public about global temperatures;
    The utilization and consideration of satellite bulk atmospheric temperature readings for use in global temperature datasets; and
    A subpoena issued for the aforementioned information by Congressman Lamar Smith on October 13, 2015.

Judicial Watch is investigating how NOAA collects and disseminates climate data that is used in determining global climate change. NOAA collects data in thousands of ways – from temperature gauges on land and buoys at sea, to satellites orbiting Earth.  Considered the “environmental intelligence agency,” NOAA is the nation’s leading collector of climate data.  In July, Representative Lamar Smith (R-TX) asked NOAA for both data and internal communications related to a controversial climate change study.  After the agency refused to comply with the document request, Smith’s committee issued a subpoena on October 13.  According to the Science, Space, and Technology Committee:

    In June, NOAA widely publicized a study as refuting the nearly two-decade pause in climate change. After three letters requesting all communications from the agency surrounding the role of political appointees in the agency’s scientific process, Chairman Smith issued a subpoena for the information. Smith subsequently sent a letter on December 1st offering to accept documents and communications from NOAA political, policy and non-scientific staff as a first step in satisfying the subpoena requirements.

    Information provided to the Committee by whistleblowers appears to show that the study was rushed to publication despite the concerns and objections of a number of NOAA employees.

Judicial Watch sued the agency on December 2 and served the complaint on the agency on December 8.  Less than a week later, on Tuesday, December 15, NOAA finally began to turn over documents to the House committee.  That same day, NOAA called and told Judicial Watch that it would begin searching for documents responsive to Judicial Watch’s FOIA request.

On November 26, Smith published an opinion editorial in The Washington Times, which accused NOAA of tampering with data to help promote global warming alarmism:

    NOAA often fails to consider all available data in its determinations and climate change reports to the public. A recent study by NOAA, published in the journal Science, made “adjustments” to historical temperature records and NOAA trumpeted the findings as refuting the nearly two-decade pause in global warming. The study’s authors claimed these adjustments were supposedly based on new data and new methodology. But the study failed to include satellite data.

“We have little doubt that our lawsuit helped to pry these scandalous climate change report documents from the Obama administration.  The Obama administration seems to care not one whit for a congressional subpoena but knows from prior experience that a Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit cannot be ignored,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.  “Given the lawless refusal to comply with our FOIA request and a congressional subpoena, we have little doubt that the documents will show the Obama administration put politics before science to advance global warming alarmism.”

Judicial Watch previously investigated alleged data manipulation by global warming advocates in the Obama administration.  In 2010, Judicial Watch obtained internal documents from NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) related to a controversy that erupted in 2007 when Canadian blogger Stephen McIntyre exposed an error in NASA’s handling of raw temperature data from 2000-2006 that exaggerated the reported rise in temperature readings in the United States. According to multiple press reports, when NASA corrected the error, the new data apparently caused a reshuffling of NASA’s rankings for the hottest years on record in the United States, with 1934 replacing 1998 at the top of the list.

In late 2014, Judicial Watch litigation forced out documents withheld in response to another congressional subpoena – one issued in the Fast and Furious scandal.  Thanks to the Judicial Watch lawsuit, Congress finally obtained the information it had sought for years on Obama’s gun-running scandal.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-sues-for-documents-withheld-from-congress-in-new-climate-data-scandal/


-------------------------------
Good luck dudes! You'll need it with that rat infested regime.

truth is a hoax. ^^