Topic: Ree @hacker1001101001 ICO bump account - page 15. (Read 5749 times)

Don't have solid proofs so can't go on (could have in future). I don't prefer half baked accusations.

All you ever did, I will duplicate in one day. Where's will be need to keep a dirtbag like you around when we have so many observable instances of your wrongdoing? When you have no idea how to construct logical arguments, then they can easily be thrown your way with a "NOU" flip.

I have no idea. Quoted for reference. Do go on please now that we've started this.

They are not occasional but frequent good deeds of mine. Anyways, your 5000+ valid ratings are already duplicated by many other DTs around last time when you were off DT IIRC ( don't know if it was filtered with the abusive ones ), so they are no more needed to be shown under trusted to default trust users like me.

No one can imagine a person like you blaming others for playing political games on you, that's the only thing you do frequently on the forum, other than your occasional cherry scam busting.



You know what I am talking about just don't let it slip from your hands this time.

Funny how this is supposed to work, innit? Ignore all your bad past deeds because of your occasional good deeds, whilst we should ignore all of my >5000 past valid ratings because of an occasional bad one. Very lovely game these people are playing, pocketed even the gullible brains of a couple of Americans into believing you're as honest as an saint whilst having as much baggage as your friendly neighbourhood devil. Give me a break.


You're literally quoting my reply from a thread in which I was, you've guessed it, right all along.

Ok, yes they were targeted reviews but as I said I use to follow many ICOs back then on telegram. A normal user like me and many others could never say which projects were going to fail at the time of hype, I have personally lost funds in such ICOs back then.


IIRC it was KEPLER, as I said I even use to follow those projects I was posting in.



It was naive because a newbie to the forum could surely not always know that posting for ICO projects on their thread is an unaccepted activity here, later when I came to knew such things and the risk involved, I have never ever engaged in it again from years and even discouraged it as much as I can to others.



I have not bought any accounts here and no successful trades happen in the posts you quoted.


Funny to put up names for you right. God Bless that guy with a nice life, he left the forum due to the same torcher.  


Again funny for you, I already agreed I was involved in posting for ICOs and following them even on telegram, which I left when I got to know it is forbidden on the forum.


Some user has already vomited some shit on in a thread for something I am grateful to the theymos and administration around. You could get more info there.

The fastest UNBAN for plagiarism

---

As explained above, I being engaged with these peoples and activity for very early times of mine on the forum and for short interval too which I left and discouraged too when I got to knew the risks and occurring damages to the crypto environment in all.

---

@marlboroza just catch up with your said alt, he seems to be involved in more shady activities than what you are accusing me about, you could catch more dangerous scammers.

That's why I elaborated too(!), especially why I added the following:

We sometimes do sound and behave like purrrfect alts.


Right, I will clarify for those that may not be following or are having a difficult time to do so. There are only two possible cases at this point in time:

• He/she/it purchased or "hacked" the account: He/she/it claimed previously that they did not - This is true if they fail to sign/confirm ownership of the address. This may still be true if they manage to prove address ownership.
• He/she/it is involved or even is behind actual ICO bumping services - This is true if they manage to sign/confirm ownership of the address.

---

The only third possible case is one where both points are true. I'll wait for a clarification.

I get your point, I am just making it clear for everyone who will read post, when you say to someone "you sound like.." sometimes some people use it as "you said he/she/it is..", that's all
There is one 7 days old transaction https://etherscan.io/tx/0xa80610a055815e42347614654d4d701770fb306ceec49402e2b4aacdcde56f35

Hacker said he is original owner of account so I guess signing message from that ethereum address will clear all doubts (about account owner).

You misunderstood me. I meant to say that it sounded like mday to me as well, but I couldn't remember the username that I had in mind! Obviously I have no evidence to support this connection.

Let me guess:

I'll take a wild guess[1] on why the wording is real victims: People rushing into ICOs aren't really victims. "They got what they deserved", maybe that's his twisted view of reality which I have observed over the years in shady crypto groups.

---

Note: Still haven't set a flag precedent for ICO-bumping, but that is worse than account trading (where no known direct scam has yet occurred), thus it should be trivial.

---

[1] What are "fake victims" in the context of actual financial damage (and not somebody pretending to be a victim)?

Eh, I only said that he sounds like mday, nothing else. Btw, Lauda, since you are here and google just showed me something, I don't see you have addressed this:


Now, here it become interesting, Myserious01 has some -ve (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=829330):



Account is connected to few other accounts here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51840608, and there is this address 0x5aF75BF78984F3e22CFCCcB52BF62f529bCB440b which is used by both PDAngel and Mysterious1.

This address 0x15ba9083b4c96421827ae85d7a7d211f5862fcde belongs to account hacker1001101001, he used it here:


...and, hacker's address has exactly 319 transactions https://etherscan.io/address/0x15ba9083b4c96421827ae85d7a7d211f5862fcde, I'll post few links to pictures but I guess everyone could just CTRL+F Mysterious01's address 0x5aF75BF78984F3e22CFCCcB52BF62f529bCB440b:

https://i.imgur.com/xw4L3H2.png
https://i.imgur.com/FT6XODt.png
https://i.imgur.com/EsRM3uh.png
https://i.imgur.com/4Q5k5XR.png
https://i.imgur.com/fSTPMyZ.png
https://i.imgur.com/u5cOLQi.png

There must be perfectly valid explanation why this address has ~20% transactions to and/or from this group of payed ICO bumping shills...

Nailed it. I was wondering about the resemblance, but I couldn't put a username to it. Please not that guy again.

I am not talking about forum rules, I am talking about you knowingly giving fake reviews and shilling for random projects and bumping them telling people to invest.
When someone ask you "is it raining" do you respond "I ate yesterday"?
I see that you have tried to buy at least 2 accounts:
...so how many accounts have you bought and for what reason?


Btw, you are starting to sound like mdayonliner, may I remind you that this thread is not about TECSHARE it is about you if you don't mind stop deflecting it with irrelevant things.

---

---

Back to topic, this is funny, from one ICO thread, on this page https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.27892538






hacker:



How all that happened?  

Adding this to list of coincidences:

1) reddit account which used hacker's telegram and bitcointalk nick
2) bitcointalk account which used hacker's telegram  
3) something which looks like "payed to bump ICO"
4) some strange coincidences between other accounts
5) some (potentially) bought accounts
6) some banned and unbanned accounts

I am talking about the rules and operating of the forum not about crypto overall.



OK, I agree it looks like bumping but I had no incentive from that posts more than increasing my weekly post counts back then. IF you want to blame me as a scammer by looking at some nave activities of mine in the past which I left 2 years ago rather working towards making the forum a better and scam-free place now than so be it. I cannot stop you from doing what you just did with TECSHARE.



None of the above-quoted accounts is mine or was in control of me in the past.

---

thank you for enlighting it here, but it was just suspected, I am the only owner of this account right from the date of its creation.

I had suspected that hacker1001.. was a bought account. IIRC, he kinda came out of nowhere and lent money to marcotheminer.

I think him previously being an ICO bump spammer would support the above.

What does it mean to be "newbie on forum"? For example, after 15 years driving Audi you join Audi forum and you are "newbie about Audi" then and all of sudden you don't know anything about Audi 
If anyone here was pretty much scamming then it is ok to scam, right  Anyway, it doesn't look like "your regular bounty posts", for example, [ANN][BTC FORK] [BITFINEX] Bitcoin Interest - Decentralized Savings - Join Now

Good old bump and there are some other ico bumps.

---

How many accounts "forum newbie" bought and for what reason?

I was newbie on the forum, but not in an overall crypto space, I use to use the same telegram from long time ago. I really had no notice of that reddit account and the post before I got notified here.


The truth is, that post and the account was made without my notice, if I would have knew who did it, I would have already asked to them to remove it, I know it is forbidden on the forum !



As I said, that was the only level of contents I could produce on the forum back then to reach my atlcoin signature bountys post requirements weekly and I read the rules as post in altcoin sections as accepted which encouraged me to stumble over there. It was pretty much hype time for crypto and pretty much everyone came here to shill from atlcoin bounties, I was one of it. I have never repeated such shit there after, not even did any annoying long quotes.

I have tagged many accounts so I understand that someone might try to frame me but what is the reason to frame newbie?

What, they offered the same service you offered here and they pointed to your contact info so people could contact you so you could make money?  Yeah, makes sense 
What is the truth?

Reply to Efta321's post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28159134
Reply to Efta321's post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28159253 (note - account Probablylikely)
Reply to Efta321's post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28159458
Reply to Efta321's post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28159609
Reply to Efta321's post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28159740

Reply to Probablylikely's post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28175799

Reply to rec1ess's post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28228338 (note: account Probablylikely)

Reply to Efta321's post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28229995

Reply to rec1ess's post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28230078
Reply to ishin99's post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28538459 (note: accounts Efta321 and reck1ess)

Reply to Probablylikely's post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.27463496
Reply to Probablylikely's post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.27463683

Reply to rec1ess's post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.27634943 (note: account Probablylikely)
Reply to rec1ess's post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.27635440
Reply to rec1ess's post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28228952
Reply to rec1ess's post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28538756

Reply to Slimshady's post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28851832 (note: account Probablylikely)
Reply to Probablylikely's post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28852260
Reply to Probablylikely's post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28754537
Reply to frenkelebre's post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.29528525 (note: account Probablylikely)

Reply to rec1ess's post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.29291590

Reply to Probablylikely's post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.29130946
Reply to Probablylikely's post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.29130751
Reply to Probablylikely's post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.29130552

and so on.

How this happened?

It was used for a specific reason, don't you think someone can impersonator you by using your pseudoynym without your notice. There are just two simple pieces of text from which you could never judge who has posted it, even I am personally unable to identify. Although, the truth is I would never create a social media account under my pseudoynym as I mostly use this for crypto realted works. And yaa, I am really not that nave to market services related to Bitcointalk on reddit !  



I could have not explicitly posted it, but I once confirmed it to Avirunes here. On rest of the occasions, I have usually used it in PMs many times. Still, yes, it is mine and I am in control of that telegram ID until.

Mr rabbit fucker above, I take ICO bumping job and creating fake buzz around projects to attract people/naive people/newbies in this space very serious, I am pretty sure you haven't read anything as usual so if you don't mind go troll somewhere else.

---

@hacker What do you mean it is not you? Looks like you, unless you are saying that someone accidentally used your bitcointalk account name and your telegram (twice) for no specific reason?




Speaking of, where did you post your telegram? I just can't find it anywhere.

This is just more of the usual MO of the DT mob of attacking people their buddies have just victimized digging up any dirt they can to create a false equivalence. None of this bullshit negates the fact Lauda abused the trust system against this user, and this is a very transparent attempt at retribution for making a public grievance over it.

Yes, I accept I was a signature shitposter back then but sir it was when I was a newbie here. I accept being a reformed shit poster which I have already said about. Back then you would know bounty campaigns were highly profitable due to the bull run, which surely attracted users like me to crypto. I agree I use to post for some time in some ICO threads, but that was the only level on which I could produce content back then to get through the signature post requirements. I know how annoying those pyramids look now, but didn't know such things as I was new here. I was not involved in any type of paid posting promotion rather was just filling my signature campaigns post requirements.



The Reddit account in the question just has two posts, both on Dec 20, 2017. It was never used for any other reason as you can see. To me it is just an impersonator, that account was not even in the notice to me. I have not even mentioned any such type of Reddit account in my post history.