Pages:
Author

Topic: Regarding my negative trust (Read 529 times)

full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 114
July 16, 2018, 03:20:05 PM
#31
You cant declare my article "shitposter" you dont even have the right for this.

You're the shitposter, not your article. Your article is shit, you posted it, you're the shitposter, i.e. one who posts shit. Quite simple really. I don't need any special rights for this.


The only shitposter here is you !
- you still keep digressing the main subject.
- you are trying to defend that racist person by distributing the subject.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
July 16, 2018, 03:07:23 PM
#30
You cant declare my article "shitposter" you dont even have the right for this.

You're the shitposter, not your article. Your article is shit, you posted it, you're the shitposter, i.e. one who posts shit. Quite simple really. I don't need any special rights for this.
hero member
Activity: 807
Merit: 522
July 16, 2018, 03:06:38 PM
#29
I don't fucking get why those fucktards defend Lauda. You get paid, perhaps? Or worse, multis?

Don't you fucking see that bitch abuses both trust and merit system?
full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 114
July 16, 2018, 02:48:12 PM
#28
1. it is not your f.cking business. and i dont know why you interested in my work. Do you check all the articles ppl write here for >2500 characters Smiley
2. there is no problem with my article. if you really care you can write better.

I'm not interested in your "work" at all. Just stating the obvious fact that you're a shitposter whining about not getting paid.

"nothing paid" is not about the content. It is about "insufficient character" according to the idiot Kitty. There was a picture about Roadmap that i used in the article.  My content has a picture about coin roadmap and i thought she would count that words but she didint. So i changed the picture with the text and ask her to check it again. But instead of accepting work she blamed me as a cheater. And send me negative Trust.
You cant declare my article "shitposter" you dont even have the right for this. And there is nothing to talk about it here you still keep digressing the main subject here. The subject is here that fcking Kitty.
She banned me while i was trying to ask about my article. After than i wrote it in the MANO's discord and she tried to ban me form there but the team banned her from banning ppl.

here is the proof that she banned me while i were trying to ask her kindly but banned me for no reason.



And MANO team banned her after this manner


legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
July 16, 2018, 02:28:58 PM
#27
1. it is not your f.cking business. and i dont know why you interested in my work. Do you check all the articles ppl write here for >2500 characters Smiley
2. there is no problem with my article. if you really care you can write better.

I'm not interested in your "work" at all. Just stating the obvious fact that you're a shitposter whining about not getting paid.
full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 114
July 16, 2018, 02:14:14 PM
#26
What you talk about? who cares f.cking spell check here. Everyone understand what i meant.
Writing here and taking money for a work is very different things to compare laziness.
I think you miss the main idea here and talking bullshit. Or you are an other fake account of that f.cking Kitty that you try to digress the main subject here.

I'm talking about your "work" that you expect to get paid for. If you can't be bothered to do your "work" properly - why should you get paid?

https://medium.com/@saphiretr

Your article is a steaming pile of horseshit.

1. it is not your f.cking business. and i dont know why you interested in my work. Do you check all the articles ppl write here for >2500 characters Smiley
2. there is no problem with my article. if you really care you can write better.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
July 16, 2018, 01:21:07 PM
#25
What you talk about? who cares f.cking spell check here. Everyone understand what i meant.
Writing here and taking money for a work is very different things to compare laziness.
I think you miss the main idea here and talking bullshit. Or you are an other fake account of that f.cking Kitty that you try to digress the main subject here.

I'm talking about your "work" that you expect to get paid for. If you can't be bothered to do your "work" properly - why should you get paid?

https://medium.com/@saphiretr

Your article is a steaming pile of horseshit.
full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 114
July 16, 2018, 01:10:43 PM
#24
Lauda is lazy, rude, liar, scammer (has some clone accounts on this forum-there are some topics on forum if you search) no one loves her/him.
That person is violating the trust system on the forum to use her/his campaigns if someone join that campaign without her/his wish.
Neither campaign participants not coin owners like her.
Last time i joined her campaign for MANO coin team members said me they regret to hire her because she is lazy (dont do her job on time) and rude ppl on the the campaign. I have screenshot about that conversation with mano team.

Speaking of lazy, I wouldn't pay you either if you can't be bothered to even run a spell check on your garbage, let alone write something that makes sense.

"Foundaiton" LOL

What you talk about? who cares f.cking spell check here. Everyone understand what i meant.
Writing here and taking money for a work is very different things to compare laziness.
I think you miss the main idea here and talking bullshit. Or you are an other fake account of that f.cking Kitty that you try to digress the main subject here.
newbie
Activity: 161
Merit: 0
July 16, 2018, 12:02:49 PM
#23
That is exactly what I am saying.  Issues regarding merit system should not be labeled as "Spammer" with red color negative trust, because there were no spamming attempted.  One alternative is de-merit system with (minus) Merit points for any issues with merits which should be aggregated with positive merit points.  Giving negative trust for merit is misuse of trust system.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
July 16, 2018, 11:15:13 AM
#22
Lauda is lazy, rude, liar, scammer (has some clone accounts on this forum-there are some topics on forum if you search) no one loves her/him.
That person is violating the trust system on the forum to use her/his campaigns if someone join that campaign without her/his wish.
Neither campaign participants not coin owners like her.
Last time i joined her campaign for MANO coin team members said me they regret to hire her because she is lazy (dont do her job on time) and rude ppl on the the campaign. I have screenshot about that conversation with mano team.

Speaking of lazy, I wouldn't pay you either if you can't be bothered to even run a spell check on your garbage, let alone write something that makes sense.

"Foundaiton" LOL
full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 114
July 16, 2018, 09:44:01 AM
#21
Lauda is lazy, rude, liar, scammer (has some clone accounts on this forum-there are some topics on forum if you search) no one loves her/him.
That person is violating the trust system on the forum to use her/his campaigns if someone join that campaign without her/his wish.
Neither campaign participants not coin owners like her.
Last time i joined her campaign for MANO coin team members said me they regret to hire her because she is lazy (dont do her job on time) and rude ppl on the the campaign. I have screenshot about that conversation with mano team.
hero member
Activity: 807
Merit: 522
June 25, 2018, 11:36:10 AM
#20
Please stop shitposting on my thread. There is a serious situation here. From now on, only and only relevant people write to this thread. I have no time do deal with clowns.
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1808
Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do
June 25, 2018, 06:46:54 AM
#19
I smell used tampon sweat..

why cheat then moan? best action is to not cheat at all in the 1st place.

Smelly used tampon Pajeet
hero member
Activity: 807
Merit: 522
June 25, 2018, 06:05:41 AM
#18
This is definitely not fair. It needs to be kicked out of this fucking default trust group. I have never seen such abuse of a power.

You were trying to cheat the merit system - it such looks fair to me.

The people who scream "abuse" the loudest are usually the ones that deserve it the most.  :/

Are you kidding me? Did you ever check the thread? Just gtfo
member
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
DAMN SON!
June 24, 2018, 10:06:46 PM
#17
What a son of a bitch is this Lauda. Please have a look: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/atriz-and-lauda-just-got-merit-2829282 Sorry, but she certainly deserves that curse.
what i get from that link is
it must be the dowry for the marriage

Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
June 24, 2018, 09:13:36 PM
#16
This is definitely not fair. It needs to be kicked out of this fucking default trust group. I have never seen such abuse of a power.

You were trying to cheat the merit system - it such looks fair to me.

The people who scream "abuse" the loudest are usually the ones that deserve it the most.  :/
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1253
So anyway, I applied as a merit source :)
June 16, 2018, 07:32:09 AM
#15
Obviously you don't get it now or ever. You have no clue how Trust works.

This was evident when they left a retaliatory feedback on Lauda's profile. Doing so only seals the fate of that account.

OP can stop blabbering and trying to grab at illusions. The negative trust will never be removed in future.
KWH
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1045
In Collateral I Trust.
June 16, 2018, 06:27:00 AM
#14
Reading through your Trust left, you did not have any trades with them either?


combeltga   2017-07-30   0.00000000      SPAM ACCOUNT. POTENTIAL SCAMMER. BE AWARE!
Xmaseven   2017-08-10   0.00000000   Reference   Solely bought to manage the scam project Snapshot.
TeamSnapshot   2017-08-10   0.00000000   Reference   Scam project Snapshot. Scammed 20K+ worth of Eth.
In fact, they scammed me. Those are the accounts of ICO scammers. I translated their material for the bounty that I have never received. Get it now?

Obviously you don't get it now or ever. You have no clue how Trust works.
KWH
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1045
In Collateral I Trust.
June 16, 2018, 06:25:52 AM
#13
From: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2221664


I added a trust system to the marketplace sections. When you're logged in, you'll now see something like this next to Marketplace posts:
Quote
Trust: 1: -0 / +12(3)

The first number is the user's trust score calculated based on how consistently they've received positive feedback. Probably no one will get a score above 0 until the system has been around for at least a month. The second number is the number of reported scams. The third number increases with the number of positive reports, as does the fourth number in parenthesis, though the fourth number is more resistant to abuse. This text changes color depending on the score. Users with a negative score (attainable through scamming) get a red warning attached to their posts.

These scores are taken from your trust network. They are not global scores. You can edit your trust network here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust
If your trust depth is set to 2 (the default), you will trust feedback by people you trust, people they trust, and people they trust. I might change the default in the future; we'll see how this works. Your trust list is public.

On feedback pages, you can leave trade feedback. There are no rules for this, but here are some guidelines:
- List all of the trades that you do with people (or at least the major ones). This is not like #bitcoin-otc where you give people just one score.
- Do not rate people based on the quality of their posts.
- Older ratings count for more, so don't delete old ratings if you can avoid it.
- "Risked BTC" is how much money you could have lost if the person you're rating had turned out to be a scammer. Or, if they are a scammer, it's how much you lost. Use the BTC value at the time of reporting.
- It's OK to post a rating about the person in general, not tied to a specific trade.
- If you want to make a rating stronger, increase "Risked BTC". 50 extra risked BTC is equivalent to an additional rating.

If your trust list is totally empty, you trust "DefaultTrust", which includes some trustworthy people that I'll select. But if you add anyone to your trust list, even if they don't trust anyone, DefaultTrust will no longer be considered part of your trust list.

In the near future I'll add these same ratings to PMs.

Tell me if you see any bugs. I didn't test this much yet.


hero member
Activity: 807
Merit: 522
June 16, 2018, 06:22:58 AM
#12
Reading through your Trust left, you did not have any trades with them either?


combeltga   2017-07-30   0.00000000      SPAM ACCOUNT. POTENTIAL SCAMMER. BE AWARE!
Xmaseven   2017-08-10   0.00000000   Reference   Solely bought to manage the scam project Snapshot.
TeamSnapshot   2017-08-10   0.00000000   Reference   Scam project Snapshot. Scammed 20K+ worth of Eth.
In fact, they scammed me. Those are the accounts of ICO scammers. I translated their material for the bounty that I have never received. Get it now?
Pages:
Jump to: