Let them change the protocol. I won't use their fork.
Don't be a purist, use the fork exactly once and trade those coins for a sound currency, i.e. bitcoin! It'll drive the value of a coin on the fork to near 0.
Topic: Regulate my ass - page 2. (Read 3678 times)
Don't be a purist, use the fork exactly once and trade those coins for a sound currency, i.e. bitcoin! It'll drive the value of a coin on the fork to near 0.
im still a little concerned that the major exchanges are also inbed with the foundation.
much like state governors and members of parliament are also chairmen of corporations..
this means if the foundation changes code, exchanges will take on that change without question and thus making the community, like sheeple follow suite as their funds will become less useful, unless using the same fork as the exchanges.
so don't fully believe that if the foundation makes a bad coding decision that the majority would automatically reject it. not unless the majority want to be stuck with only using local bitcoins.com as the only way to cash in and out.
much like state governors and members of parliament are also chairmen of corporations..
this means if the foundation changes code, exchanges will take on that change without question and thus making the community, like sheeple follow suite as their funds will become less useful, unless using the same fork as the exchanges.
so don't fully believe that if the foundation makes a bad coding decision that the majority would automatically reject it. not unless the majority want to be stuck with only using local bitcoins.com as the only way to cash in and out.
Well, if he's saying that Fidor are offering to buy the requisite BTC to mirror the accounts balances at any one time, then I think it sounds like a good idea! I think the OP assumes that letting the banks change the protocol generate a theft fund for deposit guarantees is the only "way"... it's not even a way at all, it requires a chain fork, as already mentioned (another idea could just be offering two factor authentication in it's many guises)
It was in the c't magacine? The actual?
yup, in the actual and current c't magazine.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/2013-08-26-ct-coins-fur-alle-falle-281661
The banksters just don't get it.
I'm sure if we hand over Bitcoin to banking regulators, they'll get it right this time.
What did he say?
I don't understand. If he talks about protecting the consumer in this eco-system - why does it mean he wants to change the protocoll?
I think, some off-the-chain-transaction would make reverse transaction possible, e. G., without changing the protocoll, or maybe he wants to make super-secure wallets on his servers so noone can hack inside or forget the passphrase ...
It was in the c't magacine? The actual?
I don't understand. If he talks about protecting the consumer in this eco-system - why does it mean he wants to change the protocoll?
I think, some off-the-chain-transaction would make reverse transaction possible, e. G., without changing the protocoll, or maybe he wants to make super-secure wallets on his servers so noone can hack inside or forget the passphrase ...
It was in the c't magacine? The actual?
If a bank gets robbed, and this happens all the time, your money is still in your account, when a bitcoin exchange, online wallet, whatever bitcoin gets robbed, your coins are gone!
Yes, this is Bitcoin. And regulation won't change that.Of course regulation works with banks as payments are far from instant.
Uh I can't really see that statement as being about the Bitcoin Protocol. He's talking about the economy, most likely that concerns exchanges, merchants and such.
Everybody who uses Bitcoin is part of the Botcoin-economy and every transaction is an economic act. If someone demands "oversight" or regulation of the Bitcoin economy he talks about every user and every transaction.
Hence, he is talking about the protocol.
I just put my tinfoil hat on and tried to interpret it any other way but failed.
Joe
You can change the bitcoin protocol all you want. You can even come out with your own.
Doesn't mean I'm going to run it.
Doesn't mean I'm going to run it.
We are having a major press hit in Germany today, 4 pages in Germany's most important IT-magazine, the "c't".
Very high quality journalism and I did get a huge say in this, explaining the independance from banks and governments and why I see this as a good thing.
The shocking statement comes on page three, from the guy who runs the Fidor bank, now partner of Bitcoin.de
"The trend is rather going towards an adoption of the still young Bitcoin-ecosystem to the existing legal guidelines. ... Because in the end it is about protecting the money of the customers and to guarantee the stability of the economy."
HE IS TALKING ABOUT THE PROTOCOL.
A BANKER WANTS TO SEE THE BITCOIN PROTOCOL CHANGED SO THAT BANKS CAN PROTECT PEOPLE'S MONEY AND STABILIZE THE ECONOMY.
A BANKER SAYS THAT.
IN THE YEAR 2013!
And that's why people running huge Bitcoin businesses depending on the goodwill of governments should be nowhere where they can have any influence on the protocoll whatsoever.
Joe
Well, if you wanna dissect that quote he did mention the bitcoin-ecosystem, and I believe referring to the exchanges, the bank did partnered with an exchange not a development team.
There is regulation in place for business like exchanges, I don't see any good reason why bitcoin exchanges should not have to follow that regulation.
If a bank gets robbed, and this happens all the time, your money is still in your account, when a bitcoin exchange, online wallet, whatever bitcoin gets robbed, your coins are gone!
There is regulation and practices in place to protect the money of costumers just like that guy said.
The unregulated market is all fun and games until your coins are gone and the people who lost them are not liable for that mistake...
why change the bitcoin code
how about make their own alt coin the way they want it..
how about make their own alt coin the way they want it..
Uh I can't really see that statement as being about the Bitcoin Protocol. He's talking about the economy, most likely that concerns exchanges, merchants and such.
Still remember that the main reason for the crash at 266 is commonly attributed to the inability of mtgox to provide a decent market platform?
Still remember that the main reason for the crash at 266 is commonly attributed to the inability of mtgox to provide a decent market platform?
well, if they want to have control over people's money "SO THAT BANKS CAN PROTECT PEOPLE'S MONEY AND STABILIZE THE ECONOMY", just tell them to use EUR or USD or other fiat in those cases. Simple as that. 
I couldn't agree with you more. Sadly myself and others are experiencing some major issues with Campbx. I know in the old days people that did wrong were dealt with by the public... What options do people have when we don't want regulation but, companies like CampBX do this -> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/newbie-warning-campbx-info-you-must-know-bitstamp-and-localbitcoins-are-ok-278973
Real regulation was intended to allow a free market to flourish, the "regulation" we're seeing by most govts is actually "competition elimination". I know this and many other intelligent folks do as well... Yet without exercising quite literally violence against someone, what recourses do we have? One thing to consider in "recourse" is that a lot of people have worked very hard for their money that the scammers/fraudsters/banksters try to steal.... Again what can be suggested as a course of action?
Personally I can think about a preventive measure so it doesn't even have to go that far: Make a thread/webpage/whatever that has the exchanges for example listed, and this central spot is simply for posting info positive or negative plus a person's comments on the experience. Over time a rating will become clear as to who the best exchange is. In fact as I write this I think I'll get something like this going because of the evil, disregard that scammers and co. have for people.
Anyways, keep fighting the good fight.
Real regulation was intended to allow a free market to flourish, the "regulation" we're seeing by most govts is actually "competition elimination". I know this and many other intelligent folks do as well... Yet without exercising quite literally violence against someone, what recourses do we have? One thing to consider in "recourse" is that a lot of people have worked very hard for their money that the scammers/fraudsters/banksters try to steal.... Again what can be suggested as a course of action?
Personally I can think about a preventive measure so it doesn't even have to go that far: Make a thread/webpage/whatever that has the exchanges for example listed, and this central spot is simply for posting info positive or negative plus a person's comments on the experience. Over time a rating will become clear as to who the best exchange is. In fact as I write this I think I'll get something like this going because of the evil, disregard that scammers and co. have for people.
Anyways, keep fighting the good fight.
We are having a major press hit in Germany today, 4 pages in Germany's most important IT-magazine, the "c't".
Very high quality journalism and I did get a huge say in this, explaining the independance from banks and governments and why I see this as a good thing.
The shocking statement comes on page three, from the guy who runs the Fidor bank, now partner of Bitcoin.de
"The trend is rather going towards an adoption of the still young Bitcoin-ecosystem to the existing legal guidelines. ... Because in the end it is about protecting the money of the customers and to guarantee the stability of the economy."
HE IS TALKING ABOUT THE PROTOCOL.
A BANKER WANTS TO SEE THE BITCOIN PROTOCOL CHANGED SO THAT BANKS CAN PROTECT PEOPLE'S MONEY AND STABILIZE THE ECONOMY.
A BANKER SAYS THAT.
IN THE YEAR 2013!
And that's why people running huge Bitcoin businesses depending on the goodwill of governments should be nowhere where they can have any influence on the protocoll whatsoever.
Joe
Jump to: