Pages:
Author

Topic: Regulating Bitcoin - page 8. (Read 4669 times)

sr. member
Activity: 423
Merit: 250
December 11, 2017, 07:15:16 AM
I think it needs to be done to regulate Bitcoin because this currency is very freely used by many people for crime. But just for the use, but if regulating the Bitcoin price I refuse.
Apparently, without regulations, a whole lot of people will even consider it as a way to loot funds easily into bitcoin and then not being traced. As bitcoin's growth increases and becomes well known, the activities surrounding bitcoin will be monitored which will definitely be done via exchanges. Why do we think some of them are insisting you go to verification before you convert into fiat?
sr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 256
December 09, 2017, 12:13:13 PM
Cryptocurrency has been widely criticised for lack of regulation. Do you think it is possible to come up with a regulatory framework around Bitcoin?

Yes of course it is possible. And if it is happen but not control it, it will be good news for bitcoiners.
If regulation happen, more people will interest because people believe with government.
Are you crazy or drunk? Who told you that people really trust governments and they are in favor of making them the masters of everything they hold. All government are corrupt and they use just few money on the welfare of people, rest are used for their own interest. You should understand that people are really after bitcoin because it is not controlled by governments. Governments are simply wasting our money.
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
December 09, 2017, 01:22:25 AM
Cryptocurrency has been widely criticised for lack of regulation. Do you think it is possible to come up with a regulatory framework around Bitcoin?
We all know that bitcoin is one of the most beautiful and profitable coins we have this days and bitcoin is beneficial coins to all of us. It is been so valuable because of the price of it. And about the lack of regulation of bitcoin well it is more better for me because I have my own privacy in my earnings and profits. The best we have now is bitcoin so if bitcoin will needed some framework I think they will become more strict about identity of each person.
sr. member
Activity: 1652
Merit: 262
December 09, 2017, 01:15:19 AM
I think Bitcoin and digital coins are built on freedom, non-binding, decentralized and autonomous so binding rules and common rules are not necessary. It makes people feel uncomfortable when drinking Bitcoin, making more people hate Bitcoin. This is not necessary because people are always aware of their work and they always want to make money so putting constraints is not a good idea.
Lol. Do you think that government officials are interested in your problems? People looking for extra income because all governments do not want to manage the economy so that people have a decent income. If we allow the state to regulate bitcoin it will happen the same as with Fiat. Why do it? Allowing the idea of state regulation do you kill bitcoin.
And that is where you have gotten it all wrong. I really wonder if people read through the threads or they take their time to understand what regulation really means. Regulation can never change the properties of bitcoin and it will remain decentralized as long as it remains the way it is now. Regulation will only end up when the users are dealing with exchanges and as long as you are either using fiats to buy or you are converting to fiats, you have to stay within the laws and policies of the government.

The value can never be controlled like fiats and you can decide to your P2P exchange as much as you want. No government can stop you with that.

I don't think it is possible to regulate the use of bitcoin if government make some rules for spending or using bitcoins no use in it because bitcoin transaction is fully anonymous so no one can trace our transaction and no way to find we are following the rules or not.
So still you guys are thinking bitcoin transactions can be regulated?
perhaps in this case is a limit in the bitcoin wallet of each user. limiting the amount of deposit is a regulation that may be applicable. the goal is to reduce crime, such as "money laundering".
hero member
Activity: 1820
Merit: 515
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino
December 09, 2017, 01:10:49 AM
I think Bitcoin and digital coins are built on freedom, non-binding, decentralized and autonomous so binding rules and common rules are not necessary. It makes people feel uncomfortable when drinking Bitcoin, making more people hate Bitcoin. This is not necessary because people are always aware of their work and they always want to make money so putting constraints is not a good idea.
Lol. Do you think that government officials are interested in your problems? People looking for extra income because all governments do not want to manage the economy so that people have a decent income. If we allow the state to regulate bitcoin it will happen the same as with Fiat. Why do it? Allowing the idea of state regulation do you kill bitcoin.
And that is where you have gotten it all wrong. I really wonder if people read through the threads or they take their time to understand what regulation really means. Regulation can never change the properties of bitcoin and it will remain decentralized as long as it remains the way it is now. Regulation will only end up when the users are dealing with exchanges and as long as you are either using fiats to buy or you are converting to fiats, you have to stay within the laws and policies of the government.

The value can never be controlled like fiats and you can decide to your P2P exchange as much as you want. No government can stop you with that.

I don't think it is possible to regulate the use of bitcoin if government make some rules for spending or using bitcoins no use in it because bitcoin transaction is fully anonymous so no one can trace our transaction and no way to find we are following the rules or not.
So still you guys are thinking bitcoin transactions can be regulated?
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 516
December 09, 2017, 01:09:45 AM
Bitcoin was made independently that no one has to produce or build up any consequences for it. We, people are the one's who is responsible for every matter or problem that can occur on our account. 
Exactly. And if anyone decides they want to stick with exchanges while dealing with bitcoin-fiat-bitcoin, then they must be ready to abide by the monetary rules of the country. But I can decide to make transactions from my wallet to someone else’s' without being monitored by the government as there is no way they can ever do that.
legendary
Activity: 1137
Merit: 1000
December 09, 2017, 01:06:46 AM
I think Bitcoin and digital coins are built on freedom, non-binding, decentralized and autonomous so binding rules and common rules are not necessary. It makes people feel uncomfortable when drinking Bitcoin, making more people hate Bitcoin. This is not necessary because people are always aware of their work and they always want to make money so putting constraints is not a good idea.
Lol. Do you think that government officials are interested in your problems? People looking for extra income because all governments do not want to manage the economy so that people have a decent income. If we allow the state to regulate bitcoin it will happen the same as with Fiat. Why do it? Allowing the idea of state regulation do you kill bitcoin.
And that is where you have gotten it all wrong. I really wonder if people read through the threads or they take their time to understand what regulation really means. Regulation can never change the properties of bitcoin and it will remain decentralized as long as it remains the way it is now. Regulation will only end up when the users are dealing with exchanges and as long as you are either using fiats to buy or you are converting to fiats, you have to stay within the laws and policies of the government.

The value can never be controlled like fiats and you can decide to your P2P exchange as much as you want. No government can stop you with that.

This^
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
December 09, 2017, 12:56:02 AM
Great idea, I like this!
hero member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 541
December 09, 2017, 12:39:32 AM
I think Bitcoin and digital coins are built on freedom, non-binding, decentralized and autonomous so binding rules and common rules are not necessary. It makes people feel uncomfortable when drinking Bitcoin, making more people hate Bitcoin. This is not necessary because people are always aware of their work and they always want to make money so putting constraints is not a good idea.
Lol. Do you think that government officials are interested in your problems? People looking for extra income because all governments do not want to manage the economy so that people have a decent income. If we allow the state to regulate bitcoin it will happen the same as with Fiat. Why do it? Allowing the idea of state regulation do you kill bitcoin.
And that is where you have gotten it all wrong. I really wonder if people read through the threads or they take their time to understand what regulation really means. Regulation can never change the properties of bitcoin and it will remain decentralized as long as it remains the way it is now. Regulation will only end up when the users are dealing with exchanges and as long as you are either using fiats to buy or you are converting to fiats, you have to stay within the laws and policies of the government.

The value can never be controlled like fiats and you can decide to your P2P exchange as much as you want. No government can stop you with that.
full member
Activity: 248
Merit: 100
WWW.BLOCKCHAIN021.COM
December 08, 2017, 03:34:44 AM
Cryptocurrency has been widely criticised for lack of regulation. Do you think it is possible to come up with a regulatory framework around Bitcoin?
I don't think it is possible because there is no one who wants to be a responsible if something happens to bitcoin because it will be expensive for that people. There is no one who wants to pull out some money just to regulate bitcoin in this time.
hero member
Activity: 768
Merit: 1000
December 07, 2017, 11:46:00 PM
For security reason, it is necessary to every investor to have a protection for their investments. So its really possible on a country who will accept bitcoin to come up with a regulatory framework. But ofcourse if this will happen, we will no longer enjoy bitcoin because for sure that government will imposed tax and transaction fees.
Besides, if the authorities regulate bitcoin, it will fall in price and popularity, and then a new decentralized currency will appear.
full member
Activity: 952
Merit: 104
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
December 07, 2017, 11:08:26 PM
Cryptocurrency has been widely criticised for lack of regulation. Do you think it is possible to come up with a regulatory framework around Bitcoin?

Yes it is posible to have a regulatory framework for bitcoin, but is it really needed? Bitcoin is made decentralized in order to let people do what they want to do with their financial resources without the government interrupting the income from bitcoin. Regulating bitcoin will mean that it price will be predictable which make it less exciting to invest and make other investors to invest on other cryptocurrency that would divide investors from bitcoin to other coins.
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
December 07, 2017, 11:01:02 PM
Cryptocurrency has been widely criticised for lack of regulation. Do you think it is possible to come up with a regulatory framework around Bitcoin?

Yes of course it is possible. And if it is happen but not control it, it will be good news for bitcoiners.
If regulation happen, more people will interest because people believe with government.
newbie
Activity: 73
Merit: 0
December 07, 2017, 10:54:57 PM
Cryptocurrency has been widely criticised for lack of regulation. Do you think it is possible to come up with a regulatory framework around Bitcoin?

It is regulated in some countries. Decentralization is its best assets and it entices more and more people everyday. It is possible to build regulations around digital currencies but it just result to forks and drop in pricing.
member
Activity: 238
Merit: 10
December 07, 2017, 10:48:25 PM
In the system and there is no control over each transaction. Bitcoin is similar this one .it is open source and nobody can regulating here when you are stabbing in bitcoin and not print like dollars this and made by people to increase or digress are the same .bitoin still bitcoin nobody can can regulate here....
Bitcoin cannot be regulated but definitely we as users can be regulated through a law as we are all bound to follow it, otherwise we will be dealt accordingly. There is no way to stop bitcoin if we continue to support it because the government also listen to us and they will serve what is the interest of the majority and there is nothing wrong we see on bitcoin but it can only help us to ease our transaction online and also it can give us a chance to invest.
They only serve the interests of the majority if there is absolutely no other way around for them. They serve their own interests first, everything else comes after and only if it doesn't hinder their own interests.
May be some government regulate Bitcoin because their own currency is not value able in world trading, by regulating the bitcoin weak countries can improve their economical stat. But most likely strong countries will not regulate Bitcoin because it will create a hard impact on their banks.
sr. member
Activity: 672
Merit: 271
December 05, 2017, 11:27:04 AM
Ideally, crypto means working on a P2P network in which only two people are interrelated with each other they are the ones which frame their protocols and transact through it. But as crypto has developed to such stage that we can see its mass adoption. Therefore, there is increase in black market too. So, going with the ideal information if we regulate crypto its no more P2P network. But there is only one way in which it could be regulated that is govt. creating its own crypto. India is developing Laxmi coin which will contain all traits of crypto but would be regulated.
newbie
Activity: 143
Merit: 0
December 05, 2017, 11:18:34 AM
Bitcoin is made to be decentralized so it won't mind being lack of regulation. The government can't ban it since there are many people who uses bitcoin. They also lack of right to regulate it since they didn't own it on the first place.
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1023
December 05, 2017, 11:04:21 AM
Nope that wont be possible, if you regulate bitcoin then most users will leave bitcoin and look for another coin that is decentralized.
If there is one coin that is regulated then i dont think it will gain user across the globe.
Regulating does not mean that it will become decentralized,if a government could decentralize a currency in the crypto platform then they can do that with any currency  Cheesy Cheesy .Regulating bitcoin means they could tax and monitor the flow of money going in and out of the country and that is the best they can do with regulations.
hero member
Activity: 3066
Merit: 629
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
December 05, 2017, 10:59:58 AM
For security reason, it is necessary to every investor to have a protection for their investments. So its really possible on a country who will accept bitcoin to come up with a regulatory framework. But ofcourse if this will happen, we will no longer enjoy bitcoin because for sure that government will imposed tax and transaction fees.
They had to be secured with their investments but you must know that bitcoin is volatile. In what term of security of the investors you want us to have? To have assurance that it is backed up by the government? I can't understand what you are trying to prove, first you want investors to have protection for investments which can be good for regulation by the government and last you'll say that we will no longer enjoy it.
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
December 05, 2017, 10:56:02 AM
For security reason, it is necessary to every investor to have a protection for their investments. So its really possible on a country who will accept bitcoin to come up with a regulatory framework. But ofcourse if this will happen, we will no longer enjoy bitcoin because for sure that government will imposed tax and transaction fees.
Pages:
Jump to: