Topic: Removal of signature before end of the campaign shouldn't cause disqualification (Read 862 times)
December 29, 2019, 03:14:01 AM
Every campaign has their own rules, if you find it unfair, just try not to join even if the reward is too attractive, everyone live by the rules man but the campaign has the advantage as they will put they have the right to change the rules.
December 29, 2019, 03:11:32 AM
If you have worked more than 10 weeks of the campaign and removed the signature because you joined another campaign its really just gonna turn the hard work to waste and I hope the bounty manager consider counting stakes. For me, joining a campaign that would take 20 weeks is a tiring campaign, this is when bounty manager has to have a voice when they extend another weeks for the campaign. 20 weeks is a sign of scam.
December 29, 2019, 01:03:31 AM
I think he's just saying a general thing. not complaining about a specific campaign. its same with almost every campaign. and he's right. campaign managers should not force this rule from beginning.
but it's their campaign rules so he can do that but i think the user itself must read it before joining
because there is a few campaigns that not force this rules
Anyway, OP created this thread last August so perhaps he even got over by this or at least get back here if he got anything from the bounty.
December 28, 2019, 07:43:14 PM
I think he's just saying a general thing. not complaining about a specific campaign. its same with almost every campaign. and he's right. campaign managers should not force this rule from beginning.
but it's their campaign rules so he can do that but i think the user itself must read it before joining
because there is a few campaigns that not force this rules
December 28, 2019, 08:43:46 AM
If you have worked more than 10 weeks of the campaign and removed the signature because you joined another campaign its really just gonna turn the hard work to waste and I hope the bounty manager consider counting stakes. For me, joining a campaign that would take 20 weeks is a tiring campaign, this is when bounty manager has to have a voice when they extend another weeks for the campaign. 20 weeks is a sign of scam.
December 28, 2019, 08:36:36 AM
I think campaign manager should consider this rule. and allow users to leave the campaign if they want to after finishing the running week..
why you said it's not fair? as you can see usually that rules already there before you join it
so it will be good if you not join it at first and just choose another bounty
I think he's just saying a general thing. not complaining about a specific campaign. its same with almost every campaign. and he's right. campaign managers should not force this rule from beginning.
It's true, it's not fair for those who work for weeks. But these rules will still apply so that all participants can better support the project to completion. In my opinion, there are a number of campaign managers who give participants to their signature campaigns the opportunity to remove their signatures but must be reported in advance. Without reporting, all bets will also be deleted. I think this is fair enough for participants.
why you said it's not fair? as you can see usually that rules already there before you join it
so it will be good if you not join it at first and just choose another bounty
December 28, 2019, 08:32:13 AM
It's true, it's not fair for those who work for weeks. But these rules will still apply so that all participants can better support the project to completion. In my opinion, there are a number of campaign managers who give participants to their signature campaigns the opportunity to remove their signatures but must be reported in advance. Without reporting, all bets will also be deleted. I think this is fair enough for participants.
why you said it's not fair? as you can see usually that rules already there before you join it
so it will be good if you not join it at first and just choose another bounty
its look hard but requirement have to do, if not you have unfair in your life
December 28, 2019, 06:57:37 AM
This situation varies from person to person. When you accept a bounty, you must stick to the end. If you quit halfway, you can only blame the initial decision.
October 15, 2019, 01:21:28 PM
Most of the bounty programs won't mention this rule in their thread. But when users want to leave the campaign in the middle, they will impose this rule.
So far every bounty I participated had rule about it and I don't recall that any bounty which didn't let me leave if rule about leaving wasn't there.You can't permanently stick to a campaign which won't end after a certain period of time. I have seen some campaigns which are running for almost a year. Do you still think it's a good idea to stick into these type of campaigns?
Don't do long term campaigns, stay some time but not too long, manage your time better and join each month different campaign.We don't know how long will the campaign last. Most of the bounty programs won't mention this. You can't join a new campaign every month in case of signature campaigns.
October 14, 2019, 12:31:52 PM
Most of the bounty programs won't mention this rule in their thread. But when users want to leave the campaign in the middle, they will impose this rule.
So far every bounty I participated had rule about it and I don't recall that any bounty which didn't let me leave if rule about leaving wasn't there.You can't permanently stick to a campaign which won't end after a certain period of time. I have seen some campaigns which are running for almost a year. Do you still think it's a good idea to stick into these type of campaigns?
Don't do long term campaigns, stay some time but not too long, manage your time better and join each month different campaign. October 13, 2019, 01:18:33 PM
Dude this is one of unofficial rule you can find in all the signature campaigns as well as in bounty campaigns. Is that this discussion is under that much low level.
I hope we might not be created this thread to discuss it. Simple pm answer from the manager will be enough for it.
I hope we might not be created this thread to discuss it. Simple pm answer from the manager will be enough for it.
October 13, 2019, 01:27:22 AM
That rule is often included in most bounty campaigns where they wrote "all signature code must be kept on throughout the campaign period and removal of the signature will result to disqualification without payment", but I think any bounty that is more than a month long can always give opportunity for those who intends to leave to do so provided they have given a prior notice to the bm, this shouldn't be a problem or reason to lose months of hard work over, bm should be more understanding in this aspect.
October 13, 2019, 12:23:42 AM
No this is unfair.
Most of the bounty programs won't mention this rule in their thread. But when users want to leave the campaign in the middle, they will impose this rule. You can't permanently stick to a campaign which won't end after a certain period of time. I have seen some campaigns which are running for almost a year. Do you still think it's a good idea to stick into these type of campaigns?
Most of the bounty programs won't mention this rule in their thread. But when users want to leave the campaign in the middle, they will impose this rule. You can't permanently stick to a campaign which won't end after a certain period of time. I have seen some campaigns which are running for almost a year. Do you still think it's a good idea to stick into these type of campaigns?
i rarely see any bounty program that don't mention this rules in their thread.
In that case why you not join the bounty at the last month and join another bounty before that
I've checked many altcoin bounty programs. None of them mentioned this rule in their thread. But I'm sure most of them will impose this at the end.
It's true, it's not fair for those who work for weeks. But these rules will still apply so that all participants can better support the project to completion. In my opinion, there are a number of campaign managers who give participants to their signature campaigns the opportunity to remove their signatures but must be reported in advance. Without reporting, all bets will also be deleted. I think this is fair enough for participants.
why you said it's not fair? as you can see usually that rules already there before you join it
so it will be good if you not join it at first and just choose another bounty
Most of the bounty programs won't mention this rule in their thread. But when users want to leave the campaign in the middle, they will impose this rule. You can't permanently stick to a campaign which won't end after a certain period of time. I have seen some campaigns which are running for almost a year. Do you still think it's a good idea to stick into these type of campaigns?
There are bounty managers and campaigns that have the rules on leaving the campaign since the start and some are just adding it right in the middle period of the campaign, it the latter is the case then we shouldn't join any bounty of that type as we never know if there will be extensions on the campaign which lots of project do
October 12, 2019, 02:44:23 PM
It's true, it's not fair for those who work for weeks. But these rules will still apply so that all participants can better support the project to completion. In my opinion, there are a number of campaign managers who give participants to their signature campaigns the opportunity to remove their signatures but must be reported in advance. Without reporting, all bets will also be deleted. I think this is fair enough for participants.
why you said it's not fair? as you can see usually that rules already there before you join it
so it will be good if you not join it at first and just choose another bounty
Most of the bounty programs won't mention this rule in their thread. But when users want to leave the campaign in the middle, they will impose this rule. You can't permanently stick to a campaign which won't end after a certain period of time. I have seen some campaigns which are running for almost a year. Do you still think it's a good idea to stick into these type of campaigns?
There are bounty managers and campaigns that have the rules on leaving the campaign since the start and some are just adding it right in the middle period of the campaign, it the latter is the case then we shouldn't join any bounty of that type as we never know if there will be extensions on the campaign which lots of project do
October 12, 2019, 12:00:22 PM
No this is unfair.
Most of the bounty programs won't mention this rule in their thread. But when users want to leave the campaign in the middle, they will impose this rule. You can't permanently stick to a campaign which won't end after a certain period of time. I have seen some campaigns which are running for almost a year. Do you still think it's a good idea to stick into these type of campaigns?
Most of the bounty programs won't mention this rule in their thread. But when users want to leave the campaign in the middle, they will impose this rule. You can't permanently stick to a campaign which won't end after a certain period of time. I have seen some campaigns which are running for almost a year. Do you still think it's a good idea to stick into these type of campaigns?
i rarely see any bounty program that don't mention this rules in their thread.
In that case why you not join the bounty at the last month and join another bounty before that
October 12, 2019, 05:32:37 AM
It's true, it's not fair for those who work for weeks. But these rules will still apply so that all participants can better support the project to completion. In my opinion, there are a number of campaign managers who give participants to their signature campaigns the opportunity to remove their signatures but must be reported in advance. Without reporting, all bets will also be deleted. I think this is fair enough for participants.
why you said it's not fair? as you can see usually that rules already there before you join it
so it will be good if you not join it at first and just choose another bounty
Most of the bounty programs won't mention this rule in their thread. But when users want to leave the campaign in the middle, they will impose this rule. You can't permanently stick to a campaign which won't end after a certain period of time. I have seen some campaigns which are running for almost a year. Do you still think it's a good idea to stick into these type of campaigns?
October 11, 2019, 11:10:44 AM
It's true, it's not fair for those who work for weeks. But these rules will still apply so that all participants can better support the project to completion. In my opinion, there are a number of campaign managers who give participants to their signature campaigns the opportunity to remove their signatures but must be reported in advance. Without reporting, all bets will also be deleted. I think this is fair enough for participants.
why you said it's not fair? as you can see usually that rules already there before you join it
so it will be good if you not join it at first and just choose another bounty
October 11, 2019, 09:06:02 AM
It's true, it's not fair for those who work for weeks.
Work for weeks on some shitcoin project? Nah, those guys should know better what t promote and what not to. They are a part of this forum and they need to know the things that go on the forum. Otherwise they are just being selfish.Most managers do really have this kind of mindset where they do mind up on accepting projects without having any strict criterias on which one should really be supposed to be accepted and which is not.Due to greed and the thirst of community handling for the sake of getting some shit tokens they do accept without minding the possibilities of scam and fraud.Even they do tagged up theirselves on not getting paid on all the work that have been done specially if the project team do deal out with shit tokens payout for someone who do manage but if its on btc and other top alts then i shall say that they are too greedy without minding others situation.
October 11, 2019, 04:20:59 AM
From my perpective it is to prevent people who want to join and out from campaign. I think there are some people who join in 2 signature campaign and i think managers only want people to be serious join project that they handle. But if people think it is unfair, just pick project that the manager said can remove as long tell them first to keep the stake, in past Sylon did it.
October 11, 2019, 02:44:41 AM
It's true, it's not fair for those who work for weeks.
Work for weeks on some shitcoin project? Nah, those guys should know better what t promote and what not to. They are a part of this forum and they need to know the things that go on the forum. Otherwise they are just being selfish.Quote
But these rules will still apply so that all participants can better support the project to completion. In my opinion, there are a number of campaign managers who give participants to their signature campaigns the opportunity to remove their signatures but must be reported in advance. Without reporting, all bets will also be deleted. I think this is fair enough for participants.
Depends on individual projects as per the decision of the team. Most of the time when the funding for the project is going badly you will see such measures of forcing people to wear signatures. You can get the hint that the project would not be able to reach a good cap and so its better to exit and consider the money you expected to get as lost. Those tokens anyway are worthless so dont waste time on them but develop your own skills and go for bitcoin payment campaigns.Jump to: