I think as long as hunters can inform the bounty manager of their intention to leave campaign it should be okey to keep your stakes or not to get disqualified,
But I don't it is right for hunters to just work away from a campaign just like that without given prior notice, such actions can warrant disqualification, this things should work both ways.
Topic: Removal of signature before end of the campaign shouldn't cause disqualification - page 2. (Read 861 times)
October 11, 2019, 02:26:57 AM
October 09, 2019, 07:49:50 AM
It's true, it's not fair for those who work for weeks. But these rules will still apply so that all participants can better support the project to completion. In my opinion, there are a number of campaign managers who give participants to their signature campaigns the opportunity to remove their signatures but must be reported in advance. Without reporting, all bets will also be deleted. I think this is fair enough for participants.
October 09, 2019, 07:22:57 AM
There is a same rule in all of signature campaigns
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"
In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"
In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.
It really is unfair, it's wasted effort in the part of bounty hunters and there should not be this kind of rules, but each campaign has their own set of rules, if they have then it's better that you not participate or as the bounty manager to change the rule, majority of the bounty hunters will not like this kind of rules, bounty hunters that has this kind of rules seldom attract bounty hunters in the signature campaign.
October 09, 2019, 06:33:16 AM
Every campaign have it's own rules that's why you should read the rules before joining on campaigns so that you won't get annoyed if the campaign manager imposed there rules and also I suggest that if you are in a signature finish it since sometimes leaving on campaigns without prior notice can give bad impact to your account since some other managers will mark you and they will not let you join on there camps on next time around especially if they have a btc paying campaign.
and also dont forget before removing the signature code ask the manager if you are able to remove it, wait for the reply in that case you will not be remove in that particular campaign. Other participants do not know that manager also needs some time to calculate all stakes before they are able to remove it. 
October 08, 2019, 04:45:44 AM
Every campaign have it's own rules that's why you should read the rules before joining on campaigns so that you won't get annoyed if the campaign manager imposed there rules and also I suggest that if you are in a signature finish it since sometimes leaving on campaigns without prior notice can give bad impact to your account since some other managers will mark you and they will not let you join on there camps on next time around especially if they have a btc paying campaign.
October 07, 2019, 09:36:23 PM
I think that it depends on the campaign that you are currently in.
If the rule was in place before you even signed up, then it's nothing unfair. Every single campaign manager can set their own terms, and it's up to the people providing the service to decide whether or not these terms are favourable to them or not.
If they only changed the rules after you removed your signature, then it may be shady. Especially if they haven't mentioned of this rule previously, they should at least pay on a pro-rata basis.
If the rule was in place before you even signed up, then it's nothing unfair. Every single campaign manager can set their own terms, and it's up to the people providing the service to decide whether or not these terms are favourable to them or not.
If they only changed the rules after you removed your signature, then it may be shady. Especially if they haven't mentioned of this rule previously, they should at least pay on a pro-rata basis.
October 04, 2019, 10:22:36 PM
Its your due diligence you should have read the rules first before you wear signature of particular campaign. If the campaign is not yet ended but you had removed your signature already you should have asked permission or acknowledged that you have stopped the campaign even its not require just to pay respect for the bounty managers. No rules are perfect.
October 03, 2019, 11:46:50 AM
It's really unfair but they are the one that is setting the rules and we are just here to follow it if you are not comfortable wearing the signature in the duration of the campaign, nobody's forcing you to join, I will not laso join that kind of campaign and with these kinds of rules, I doubt if many signature bounty hunters will join the campaign, I think only few campaign are implementing this.
October 03, 2019, 11:41:12 AM
There is a same rule in all of signature campaigns
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"
In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.
It's really unfair but they are the one that is setting the rules and we are just here to follow it if you are not comfortable wearing the signature in the duration of the campaign, nobody's forcing you to join, I will not laso join that kind of campaign and with these kinds of rules, I doubt if many signature bounty hunters will join the campaign, I think only few campaign are implementing this. "You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"
In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.
September 20, 2019, 04:15:07 PM
It was indeed unfair and I was ready with the risk even though in the end I chose to never participate again in the bounty campaign. IMO, Because that decision would be better if we had agreed to the rules but finally we complained. Imagine, in the past I have long been a participant and the campaign has been finished but there are rules for not releasing the signature until the prize is credited. So the problem here is, when the campaign was over I decided to remove the signature because I was interested in participating in other campaigns, but still, even though I participated and wearing signature until the last week of the campaign but I didn't get any prize just because I removed the signature before the prize is credited.
That's annoying since the campaign already ended there's should some consideration from the manager, you completed the required weeks and it's only the extended time for calculations when you removed the signature codes, you can try communicating with the manager and state your case. Though if there's really a set of rules in regards to this matter and it's clearly stated from the start but it should discuss from the manger and know how to workout with your case.any violations or that doesn't able to comply with the rules even with the slightest error would really face up the consequences.Unless, if the team itself do able to check the spreadsheet and saw that you haven't wear the signature then they do have the right to do such action since they already announced that it should be wear until they do pay up.
If you do join up other campaign and you are pretty aware on that certain rule then the mistake was on yours and yes it do sucks but rules is rules which should be followed.
September 20, 2019, 12:24:32 PM
It was indeed unfair and I was ready with the risk even though in the end I chose to never participate again in the bounty campaign. IMO, Because that decision would be better if we had agreed to the rules but finally we complained. Imagine, in the past I have long been a participant and the campaign has been finished but there are rules for not releasing the signature until the prize is credited. So the problem here is, when the campaign was over I decided to remove the signature because I was interested in participating in other campaigns, but still, even though I participated and wearing signature until the last week of the campaign but I didn't get any prize just because I removed the signature before the prize is credited.
That's annoying since the campaign already ended there's should some consideration from the manager, you completed the required weeks and it's only the extended time for calculations when you removed the signature codes, you can try communicating with the manager and state your case. Though if there's really a set of rules in regards to this matter and it's clearly stated from the start but it should discuss from the manger and know how to workout with your case.
September 20, 2019, 12:06:21 PM
It was indeed unfair and I was ready with the risk even though in the end I chose to never participate again in the bounty campaign. IMO, Because that decision would be better if we had agreed to the rules but finally we complained. Imagine, in the past I have long been a participant and the campaign has been finished but there are rules for not releasing the signature until the prize is credited. So the problem here is, when the campaign was over I decided to remove the signature because I was interested in participating in other campaigns, but still, even though I participated and wearing signature until the last week of the campaign but I didn't get any prize just because I removed the signature before the prize is credited.
September 20, 2019, 11:49:32 AM
People who are participating in the bounties which has long campaign period to get rewards are literally stupids because even if the project is worth to do we are not going to anything valuable for few months even after the campaign completion because lot of works needed to get some value for that token so pick campaign with 8 or less weeks or don't just participate on the bounties.
September 20, 2019, 01:18:20 AM
There is a same rule in all of signature campaigns
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"
In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"
In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.
If the rules state that you should keep the signature at all time during the campaign, then we can't do anything on it, it looks unfair but this is their rule, their token and their campaign, just don't participate if you cannot keep going, or join a short term campaign like 4 weeks.
September 19, 2019, 06:39:22 AM
There is a same rule in all of signature campaigns
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"
In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"
In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.
You should understand that every campaign has a set of rules and they always state that they can change the rules anytime, it's unfair but this is their campaign and their project, if it's a long campaign, then look for a short one if you think the project is good to promote in a long term, then bear with it.
September 19, 2019, 12:44:40 AM
There is a same rule in all of signature campaigns
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"
In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.
If that is the rule from the start of the campaign, then it's your fault if you remove the signature, but if there is no mention from the start of the campaign that removing the signature will remove from all your stakes, then it's really unfair."You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"
In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.
This is the reason why I never join a long campaign when I was still active in ICO bounty campaign, they can change the rule, so it's better to join short duration campaign.
September 13, 2019, 12:09:09 PM
There is a same rule in all of signature campaigns
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"
In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"
In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.
I never enroll in this kind of campaign, it's unfair for bounty hunter, but there are bounty managers that cheats their participants from weekly stakes they make it disqualification from stakes from removing the signature, so you will be forced to wear the signature for the whole duration of the campaign.
It's much better to join a short campaign, so you can wear it on the whole campaign
September 12, 2019, 10:20:36 AM
I think making participants that have promoted the project for like 50% of the bounty duration should be allowed to take off their signature. Just my opinion though.
it will be better and clear if they ask the bounty manager if they are allowed to remove thier signatures and it wont cost any trouble on both parties. If you cant follow the rules then dont join.
September 12, 2019, 05:27:45 AM
I think making participants that have promoted the project for like 50% of the bounty duration should be allowed to take off their signature. Just my opinion though.
it will be better and clear if they ask the bounty manager if they are allowed to remove thier signatures and it wont cost any trouble on both parties. If you cant follow the rules then dont join.
September 11, 2019, 04:35:56 PM
There is a same rule in all of signature campaigns
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"
That is the rule in the first place, if you don't want to follow it then stay away with that campaign, simply as that.
In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.
Again, there are rules in joining a bounty campaign, that's why we have this rule. Some managers though are very lenient, if you PM them in advance then probably you can still get your stakes. Others have a 4 week rule, you need to stay at least 4 weeks before you can get your bounty. So I don't think it's unfair, why are you leaving the campaign in the first place? If your remove the signature prior to the end of the campaign then you forfeit everything here.
when they don't able to get stakes they do normally complain and not even realizing that they are the ones whose wrong into this situation.Its been clearly stated that you wont get any stakes if you leave out the campaign but there are some managers that do consider out on giving stakes even if you do leave.Its just a matter of explanation or some sort of negotitiation between participants and the manager.They aren't that hard to convince if you do really need to transfer from other bounties.Just explain everything and if they do consider it out then your lucky but if not then you should call it a day.
That is exactly my point, they find something new with supposedly "good" pay, removed their signatures without any explanation to the previous manager and then they expect something in return? That's not how a business run here, if you don't read the rules of the campaign then I'm so sorry bounty hunters are at fault here and there's no need to bitch around and complain that they have been short changes here. And obviously if the previous manager saw that you remove the signature when counting the previous weeks stakes and seeing that you didn't even bother to PM him/her then I don't see you getting the stakes unless you are lucky, but rules is rules, IMHO.
It will vary on how you do explain to him on the most polite way.If they got convinced then you did well because you are hitting 2 projects in one go without
minding too much if you wont actually paid.Lastly, why would care too much if majority of projects becomes shit anyway?
Jump to: