I'm really really not getting it.
So far as I can see, you've proved the following:
1. Any asset traded on a BTC exchange does not have the level of government protection that shares traded on the NYSE do.
2. That a couple of brothers are hustling really hard to build their businesses.
3. That they occasionally use profane language on internet chat rooms.
4. That the person they used to incorporate their business is shady.
5. That one of the brothers used to own an SEO company.
6. That the price of RENT shares is extremely volatile.
I'm impressed with your ability to dig up background info, BTW. That takes a lot of skill.
I'm unable to draw a line from these factoids to the inference that this somehow proves fraudulent intent. All of this just sounds like the normal activity of starting a company.
** I think everybody with money on Havelock understands clearly that no small business really should be a publicly traded company (just on the basis that they're too new and too small, and the underlying economic model isn't proven), that there have been numerous instances of fraud and poor enforcement, and that there's a significant element of risk.
So far as I can see, you've proved the following:
1. Any asset traded on a BTC exchange does not have the level of government protection that shares traded on the NYSE do.
2. That a couple of brothers are hustling really hard to build their businesses.
3. That they occasionally use profane language on internet chat rooms.
4. That the person they used to incorporate their business is shady.
5. That one of the brothers used to own an SEO company.
6. That the price of RENT shares is extremely volatile.
I'm impressed with your ability to dig up background info, BTW. That takes a lot of skill.
I'm unable to draw a line from these factoids to the inference that this somehow proves fraudulent intent. All of this just sounds like the normal activity of starting a company.
** I think everybody with money on Havelock understands clearly that no small business really should be a publicly traded company (just on the basis that they're too new and too small, and the underlying economic model isn't proven), that there have been numerous instances of fraud and poor enforcement, and that there's a significant element of risk.
What are the odds?
http://www.dcirules.org/resources/french/MTG_PEIP-10_10Feb01_FR.pdf
http://archive.wizards.com/Magic/magazine/article.aspx?x=grandprix/hongkong04/facts
Quote
PLAYER CONTACT
David Ong
Territory Manager, Far East
[email protected]
TOURNAMENT
The main tournament at Grand Prix–Hong Kong is open to Magic players of all ages.
David Ong
Territory Manager, Far East
[email protected]
TOURNAMENT
The main tournament at Grand Prix–Hong Kong is open to Magic players of all ages.
Quote
The Magic: The Gathering® Grand Prix tournament series is an international circuit of large-scale Qualifier tournaments featuring cash prizes and multiple invitations to Pro TourTM events.
Gleb,
you put a great effort into digging up shit in this thread (which is fine for me) but then I see you praising (and willing to participate in) a scheme which has clearly tricked its investors from day one after the fundraiser:
In between my rants, I've been working behind the scenes on a project I believe is tailor-made for Swarm/CounterParty (no, it's not CoinProLite, a spoof alt).
Yes, it's an alt, moreover, an ongoing series of alts, whereupon miners can alternated between the most profitable alts via the parameters they preset. All the alts would be based on the same exact hashing algorithm, et al.
Distribution of alts won't be a problem, for many non-cryptocoiners will not have a problem participating. Also, getting notables to back their various alts will be accomplished fairly easily.
I've already procured domain names for the project, with a handful more needing to be purchased outta my pocket (what's another hundred+ bucks?).
The site is already live, albeit not indexable for the search engines. The few I presented the idea to while in Chicago a couple weeks ago loved the idea, offering up their kind input, of which led me indirectly to Swarm, et al. albeit I, too, am still getting my head wrapped around the whole thing, but see its promise.
Currently, I'm seeking a trustworthy team to further develop the idea to a point of garnering minimal funding. I would love to see my project be the first mega project spawn from Swarn, offering up nothing less than FULL transparency along the way, for the notable reps of those attached to the various alts DON'T want their brands scarred by a misstep on theirs, or ours part while they hope to benefit handsomely for their involvement.
Needless to say, such an endeavor seen to fruition WILL bring further awareness to all viable cryptocurrencies.
Don't you see a contradiction here?
Nope! No contradiction, albeit I WILL look into the allegations you kindly provided, for I WILL not be part of Swarm if wrongdoings are afoot. Thanks, bud.
