Pages:
Author

Topic: Report plagiarism (copy/paste) here. Mods: please give temp or permban as needed - page 74. (Read 118776 times)

legendary
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1118
Guys, you are probably not paying attention to what I wrote earlier about the correspondence with the photos owner.

- Please tell me, can I use them for republication on other resources? I will need to use the link to your resource as the original source and author?
- yes, please link to the original source www.dietmareckell.com and claim copyright holder: © Dietmar Eckell

This was not done!
What else do I need to explain?
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1059
nutildah-III / NFT2021-04-01
FYI, wrongfully accusing someone from an offense defines as slander or defamation, which is by the way an offense in itself.

Just sayin, WMW.

You probably meant well (or not, dunno), but you're wrong.
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 2614
If you don’t do PGP, you don’t do crypto!
Plagiarism without author link and claim copyright holder

33. Posting plagiarized content is not allowed.

User: icopress

Plagiarism :

Post link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.55483191
Archived: https://archive.is/mHGLC#selection-5973.0-5973.32

Post link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.55487951
Archived: https://archive.is/AHuMC#selection-5329.0-5329.37

Post link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.55507252
Archived: https://archive.is/AxfvT#selection-855.0-855.14

Source :

https://www.dietmareckell.com
https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2011/04/artificial-reefs-around-the-world/100042/
https://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2010-02/worlds-largest-airplane-graveyard-high-resolution-now-google-maps/
and other authors sources from Internet.

I made a request to one of the authors of these photos, Dietmar Eckell.



original source: www.dietmareckell.com © Dietmar Eckell

He said me that the reference to his copyright is mandatory. I publish here a screen of correspondence, some personal data has been deleted.



For this serious violation, this user should be banned

  • This is not plagiarism at all.  As explained below, there is a difference between plagiarism and improper attribution.  No reasonable person would have read the posts as purporting in any way that icopress was the author of the images; thus, at worst, this was improper attribution (which I now see is remediated).  —This is a subject that I have intended to address for awhile; I will do so below, more briefly than I had intended before.
  • The allegation nonsensically throws in a statement about the “copyright holder”.  Plagiarism has nothing whatsoever to do with copyright, as I have said repeatedly in many of my posts; e.g.:

    “Open source” is only a copyright issue.  Whereas the confusion of plagiarism and copyright violation is a pet peeve of mine, one which I believe is deliberately promulgated by the copyright lobby.  Even the Cypherpunks Public License embodies this confusion, for which reason I have always disliked it.

    For an extreme illustration of the difference in concepts:  The complete works of William Shakespeare are in the public domain.  You can legally copy them as much as you want, under any existing copyright law in the world.  But if you claim Shakespeare’s work as your own, under the byline of your name, then you can and will be expelled from university, have your university degrees retroactively revoked, and/or be fired from any type of intellectual job.  —And if you claim to be Shakespeare—not even the psychic reincarnation of Shakespeare, but William Shakespeare in the flesh!—then you should be committed to an asylum for the insane.

    Lest anyone mistake that as merely my anticopyright opinion, here is the matching opinion of a well-known pro-copyright website, which properly distingushes between plagiarism and copyright issues:

    Yeah, obviously A-Bolt and WhiteManWhite are just victims .... I emphasized directly linked accounts

    Plagiarism without author link and claim copyright holder

    33. Posting plagiarized content is not allowed.

    User: icopress


The following is copied from the draft of a post that I had intended for the RegulusHR case, but never completed.  I also intended to post this in the “hacker1001101001” case.  (For the record, I think that RegulusHR was a shitposter, but not a plagiarist; “hacker” is a clear-cut plagiarist; and icopress is obviously neither.)


On the Substance of Plagiarism


To avoid ad hominem counterarguments by people who dislike me personally, I think that I should borrow somebody else’s definition; and I will borrow it with proper attribution from “Defining and Avoiding Plagiarism: The WPA Statement on Best Practices”, Council of Writing Program Administrators (2003), pp. 1f., with my highlights added on wording that I deem relevant to the RegulusHR case:

https://web.archive.org/web/20040102042235/http://www.wpacouncil.org/positions/WPAplagiarism.pdf
Quote from: Council of Writing Program Administrators
What Is Plagiarism?

In instructional settings, plagiarism is a multifaceted and ethically complex problem.  However, if any definition of plagiarism is to be helpful to administrators, faculty, and students, it needs to be as simple and direct as possible within the context for which it is intended.

Definition:  In an instructional setting, plagiarism occurs when a writer deliberately uses someone else’s language, ideas, or other original (not common-knowledge) material without acknowledging its source.

This definition applies to texts published in print or on-line, to manuscripts, and to the work of other student writers.

Many current discussions of plagiarism fail to distinguish between:

1. submitting someone else’s text as one’s own or attempting to blur the line between one’s own ideas or words and those borrowed from another source, and

2. carelessly or inadequately citing ideas and words borrowed from another source.

Such discussions conflate plagiarism with the misuse of sources.

Ethical writers make every effort to acknowledge sources fully and appropriately in accordance with the contexts and genrres of their writing.  A student who attempts (even if clumsily) to identify and credit his or her source, but who misuses a specific citation format or incorrectly uses quotation marks or other forms of identifying material taken from other sources, has not plagiarized.  Instead, such a student should be considered to have failed to cite and document sources appropriately.

What are the Causes of Plagiarism and the Failure to Use and Document Sources Appropriately?

Students who are fully aware that their actions constitute plagiarism—for example, copying published information into a paper without source attribution for the purpose of claiming the information as their own, or turning in material written by another student—are guilty of academic misconduct. [...]

Students are not guilty of plagiarism when they try in good faith to acknowledge others’ work but fail to do so accurately or fully.  These failures are largely the result of failures in prior teaching and learning: students lack the knowledge of and ability to use the conventions of authorial attribution.



I have hereby expended far more effort than necessary to address WhiteManWhite’s accusation, for, as aforesaid, I have been intending for awhile to clear up some common confusions on this forum:  Plagiarism versus copyright violation, and plagiarism versus improper attribution.  Neither is strictly relevant here; but WMW’s tortuously constructed accusation somehow tangentially invoked both, so I will take it as a felicitous opportunity to educate others.

If necessary, I could draw on many other sources to support what I hereby say.  The forum really needs to get its concepts straight.  Plagiarism is bad—and the concept must not be diluted by confusion with things that are not plagiarism.
legendary
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1118
He said me that the reference to his copyright is mandatory.
First: I think you may find some images without source reference if you search back my oldest posts. But just like in this case, I don't think the user who posts it claims it as their own work. Just to be sure, I nowadays always add a source link to images, but not all users do that. Especially in the Wall Observer thread I've seen many (innocent) cases.

Plagiarism isn't the same as a copyright violation. Plagiarism can get you banned, copyright violations can get you into other problems. Either way, plagiarism is handled by forum rules, and shouldn't be used for negative feedback:
The system is for handling trade risk, not for flagging people for good/bad posts/personalities/ideas.

The person himself admits that in his personal blog he publishes links for the author, but this is not necessary for the BT Forum. Bravo!

I posted the images and did not initially indicate the source as they were taken from my blog. https://cont.ws/@inc/90101 (Where I indicated the name of the photographer without ambiguity).

I specifically quoted the author of these photos, he is against his property being disposed of without mentioning it.
In my trust, I indicated that I personally do not want to trust the plagiarist, this is my personal trust. Moreover, I will not have any trade deals with him. You can do something else.
I am sure that I do not look at any past merits, it is the user who should suffer the punishment they deserve. The rules are the same for everyone.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
He said me that the reference to his copyright is mandatory.
First: I think you may find some images without source reference if you search back my oldest posts. But just like in this case, I don't think the user who posts it claims it as their own work. Just to be sure, I nowadays always add a source link to images, but not all users do that. Especially in the Wall Observer thread I've seen many (innocent) cases.

Plagiarism isn't the same as a copyright violation. Plagiarism can get you banned, copyright violations can get you into other problems. Either way, plagiarism is handled by forum rules, and shouldn't be used for negative feedback:
The system is for handling trade risk, not for flagging people for good/bad posts/personalities/ideas.
legendary
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1118
Plagiarism without author link and claim copyright holder

33. Posting plagiarized content is not allowed.

User: icopress

Plagiarism :

Post link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.55483191
Archived: https://archive.is/mHGLC#selection-5973.0-5973.32

Post link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.55487951
Archived: https://archive.is/AHuMC#selection-5329.0-5329.37

Post link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.55507252
Archived: https://archive.is/AxfvT#selection-855.0-855.14

Source :

https://www.dietmareckell.com
https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2011/04/artificial-reefs-around-the-world/100042/
https://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2010-02/worlds-largest-airplane-graveyard-high-resolution-now-google-maps/
and other authors sources from Internet.

I made a request to one of the authors of these photos, Dietmar Eckell.



original source: www.dietmareckell.com © Dietmar Eckell

He said me that the reference to his copyright is mandatory. I publish here a screen of correspondence, some personal data has been deleted.



For this serious violation, this user should be banned
legendary
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1043
αLPʜα αɴd ΩMeGa
Plagiarized Content/Fake ICO:

User: SyllaCredits ◄◄◄ Banned

ANN-Thread: [ANN][ICO]Sylla: Future blockchain Human exchange ◄◄◄ Deleted
Archive

Copy:
SYLLA - BLOCKCHAIN HUMAN EXCHANGE

Knowledge seekers and knowledge providers don’t have adequate incentives to share personal contact information with each other, because neither can beguaranteed that the other will follow through with the exchange. To solve this, a third party organizer is often brought in, but these services take a large cut of the profit, resulting in a knowledge seeker being charged more, or a knowledge provider walking away with less. To get around this, many knowledge providers will ask for payment in advance, but this demands trust from the knowledge seeker’s end. There is currently no efficient application on the market to solve this problem. Information is exchanged for money daily throughout the world, but the current tools to do so are cumbersome, costly, and inefficient. Blockchain technology has opened up the possibility for borderless peer to peer transactions. This means that the exchange of information for money can be made on a global scale without a costly intermediary. Sylla, our cutting edge application, is designed to connect knowledge providers and knowledge seekers anywhere in the world using blockchain technology. Payments are automated through our operations contract (OC), allowing voice and video calls to be monetized without a lengthy setup or upfront payment. Knowledge providers can advertise their services through a direct call link or QR code, which can be placed on any social media platform. A knowledge provider simply sets their rate per minute, and when the call is complete, the OC settles the charges based on the predetermined rate. Knowledge seekers will only be charged for the length of the call. We believe Sylla will save countless man hours due to its ability to increase efficiency and accessibility to the exchange of knowledge worldwide. Our solution will help level the playing field, especially for those without access to the traditional banking systems.

Full whitepaper is available on our website.

Please visit: www.ico-sylla.com for more information

Any questions or support please use our chat on website to get quick respond.

Thank you

SyllaTeam

Original:
Knowledge  seeKers  and  Knowledge  providers  don’t  have  adequate  incentives  to  share  personal  contact  information  with each other, because neither can be guaranteed that the other will follow through with the exchange. to solve this, a third party organizer is  often  brought  in,  but  these  services  take  a  large  cut  of  the  profit,  resulting in a knowledge seeker being charged more, or a knowledge provider walking away with less. to get around this, many knowledge providers will ask for payment in advance, but this demands trust from the knowledge seeker’s end. there is currently no efficient application on the market to solve this problem.Blockchain  technology  has  opened  up  the  possibility  for  borderless  peer to peer transactions. this means that the exchange of information for money can be made on a global scale without a costly intermediary. experty,   our   cutting   edge   application,   is   designed   to   connect   knowledge  providers  and  knowledge  seekers  anywhere  in  the  world  using  blockchain  technology.  payments  are  automated  through  our  operations contract (oC), allowing voice and video calls to be monetized without a lengthy setup or upfront payment. Knowledge providers can advertise their services through a direct call link or Qr code, which can be placed on any social media platform. a knowledge provider simply sets their rate per minute, and when the call is complete, the oC settles the charges based on the predetermined rate. Knowledge seekers will only be charged for the length of the call.we believe experty will save countless man hours due to its ability to increase  efficiency  and  accessibility  to  the  exchange  of  knowledge  worldwide. our solution will help level the playing field, especially for those without access to the traditional banking systems.
Original:


/edit, 03.11.2020, 18:13:

User was banned now

legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 3406
Crypto Swap Exchange
User: AyaQ
- This user is using this forum to promote his/her website with a combination of plagiarized/paraphrased content.
- I only highlighted the first few lines (due to having a headache) and I'm pretty sure, same goes for his/her other posts.


Original:

Revenue vs. Profit

Income
Revenue is often referred to as the first line because it is at the top of the income statement. The revenue number is the revenue that the company receives before the costs are deducted.


For example, in a shoe retailer, the money he earns from selling shoes to accounting for any expenses is his income. If the company also has income from investments or a subsidiary, this income is not considered income; it doesn't come from selling shoes. Additional income streams and different types of expenses are accounted for separately.

Profit
Also called the total, profit is called net income in the income statement. In the income statement, there are variations in profit that are used to analyze the company's performance.

https://www.freeforex-signals.com/
However, there are other rates of return between the top line (income) and the bottom line (net profit); the term "profit" may arise in the context of gross profit and operating profit. These are steps towards a net profit.

Gross profit is the income less the value of goods sold (COGS), which are direct costs associated with the production of goods sold in the company. This amount includes the cost of materials used to create the product, as well as the direct labor costs used to produce the product.

Operating income is gross profit less all other fixed and variable costs associated with doing business, such as rent, utilities and payroll.
forex signals free
Example: Income versus profit
Below are the figures and part of the 2017 profit and loss statement for J. C. Penny. These figures were reported in the annual report for 10 thousand, which closed on February 3, 2018.

Revenue or total net sales = $ 12.50 billion
Gross profit = $ 4.33 billion (total revenue $ 12.50 billion - COGS $ 8.17 billion)
Operating profit = $ 116 million (less all other fixed and variable costs associated with doing business, such as rent, utilities, and payroll)
Profit or net profit = - 116 million USD. USA (loss) 1
The main differences
When most people refer to the company's profit, they do not mean gross profit or operating profit, but rather net profit, which is the balance after expenses, or net profit. The company can make a profit, but have a net loss. We see that JK Penny suffered a loss of $ 116 million, despite a profit of $ 12.5 billion. Losses usually occur when debts or expenses exceed profits, as in the case of J. K. Penny.

Special considerations
Accrued revenue is the same as unrealized revenue. Accrued revenue is the income earned by a company for the delivery of goods or services that have not yet been paid by the customer.

For example, the company sells widgets for $ 5 each on a net-30 basis to all its customers, and in August sells 10 widgets. Because he invoices his customers on a net 30 basis, the company's customers will only have to pay in 30 days or on September 30. As a result, revenue for August will be considered accrued revenue until the company receives payment from the customer.
free forex signals
In terms of accounting, the company recognizes $ 50 of income in its income statement of $ 50 as an asset on its balance sheet. When a company collects $ 50, the cash account in the income statement increases, the accrued income account decreases, and the $ 50 in the income statement remains unchanged.

 It is important not to confuse accrued income with unearned income; unearned income can be perceived as the opposite of accrued income.
Unearned income is money paid by the customer for goods or services that were not delivered. If a company requires a prepayment for its goods, it recognizes revenue as unearned and will not recognize revenue in its income statement until the period during which the goods or services were delivered.
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
Plagiarism (copy paste).
User: mahboob123
Post link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54565875
[ archive ]

ARCS TOKEN BOUNTY Using multiple accounts, BAN YOUR ACCOUNT SO PLS ONE ACCOUNT ONE PERSON
cheating and spamming are not allowed. You will be disqualified from the bounty program immediately and all of your accounts will be banned permanently.



He is not a manager. His posts are simply copied from the announcement of this bounty company, with a slightly modified text.

Copied from
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-detectivearcs-85000-arx-30000-reward-pool-closed-5244177


ARCS BOUNTY LIVE GIVE UP SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN  Newbies and Junior Members are not allowed to join Posts with less than 75 characters will not be counted as valid posts Use signature to the end of the campaign




85,000 ARX tokens in ARC BOUNTY PROGRAMBounty campaign will be managed by Bounty Detective. The bounty program has been launched on 28.04.2020 AND CONTINUE IN AND RUN AT IN until 20.07.2020.

hero member
Activity: 2842
Merit: 772
User: Bubu9844
Copy and paste:
Physical Crypto Banks are coming in India very soon

India will soon get Physical Crypto Banks, according to the recent announcement on 26th Oct by Cashaa the fintech firm will be partnering with India's United Multistate Credit Cooperative Society to build a crypto-friendly financial institution called UNICAS. The new venture will open 34 “physical branches and operations” in northern India, including the cities of Delhi and Gujarat, and the state of Rajasthan.

These branches will allow Indian businesses & individual users to open savings accounts to buy, store, and save cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin (BTC), #Ethereum (ETH), XRP, and its native token CAS. The firm also reportedly will allow customers to use their crypto holdings as collateral for loans, and to buy crypto with local fiat currency.

“Most Indians are not aware or are misinformed about cryptocurrency as an online product and they tend to trust what they see or what the government recognizes and recommends,” said Cashaa CEO Kumar Gaurav. “India is still largely a cash-based economy despite a demonetization drive. We intend to address both issues which are slowing the process of cryptocurrency adoption.”
Archived: https://archive.is/RrmxD

Original: https://cointelegraph.com/news/british-fintech-firm-opening-physical-crypto-bank-branches-in-india

Quote
Earlier this month, Cashaa India stated that it would allow Indian businesses and individuals to open a savings account to buy, store, and save cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), XRP, and its native token CAS. The firm also reportedly will allow customers to use their crypto holdings as collateral for loans, and to buy crypto with local fiat currency.

In addition, Cashaa stated it would retrofit The United’s existing locations into crypto education centers.

“Most Indians are not aware or are misinformed about cryptocurrency as an online product and they tend to trust what they see or what the government recognizes and recommends,” said Cashaa CEO Kumar Gaurav. “India is still largely a cash-based economy despite a demonetization drive. We intend to address both issues which are slowing the process of cryptocurrency adoption.”
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6320
Crypto Swap Exchange
User: alevlaslo https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/alevlaslo-392914
Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/vanitysearch-yet-another-address-prefix-finder-5112311
Archive: https://archive.is/hUm13#msg55414358

Plagiarized text:
An example:
We have a hardware capable of generating 1GKey/s and we have an input list of 10^6 addresses, the following table shows the probability of finding a collision after a certain amount of time:

Time   Probability
1 second   6.8e-34
1 minute   4e-32
1 hour   2.4e-30
1 day   5.9e-29
1 year   2.1e-26
10 years   2.1e-25
1000 years   2.1e-23
Age of earth   8.64e-17
Age of universe   2.8e-16 (much less than winning at the lottery)


Taken from:  https://github.com/ZielarSRC/VanitySearch-1   (towards the bottom of the page)

legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
Plagiarism (copy paste)
User: Cekerula
Post link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/why-people-are-buying-when-the-price-is-going-up-and-not-when-it-is-down-5265600
Archived: https://archive.st/89ua

i think ,Most don't have a clue about what they are doing, they jump right in because of FOMO, they don't want to miss out and they believe that the price will keep going up for long time, mean why bears can take over at any time, always buy altcoins when they loses value only

Plagiarism (copy paste)

Most don't have a clue about what they are doing, they jump right in because of FOMO, they don't want to miss out and they believe that the price will keep going up for long time, mean why bears can take over at any time, always buy altcoins when they loses value only

https://archive.st/dwq8
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 5937
Paraphrasing/use of text spinner

User AfshinN
Posts archived https://archive.fo/D8kIJ
                      https://archive.fo/DpOHD

Original sources Cointelegraph Consulting: Ethereum’s on-chain activity surges and bullish sentiment spikes
                        DeFi Governance Tokens Face Three Challenges


I noticed that in very short period of time this newbie user managed to churn out 10 topics yesterday. At first it looked like he was copying his own reddit posts and just posting them here, but it somehow didn't add up so I just manually checked few Ethereum articles on known sites and voila, found something. It looks like he is paraphrasing and using text spinner for certain words like "Atrium" for Ethereum (I guess) and "floor" for bottom to avoid detection. I've seen some weird words due text spinner use, but I don't remember seeing "Atrium" yet.

There is one more suspicious topic that looks like its done in the same manner, but these two examples should be enough to prove @AfshinN real intentions.


A number of Ethereum floors have followed the same pattern over the past two months, representing a wave of sales due to panic and redistribution of Atrium by dominant traders, allowing for a quick return to price. Ethereum Thirty-Day Market Value Ratio (MVRV), which tracks the average profit (or loss) of all addresses purchased over the past 30 days, indicates that short-term holders earn an average of 8% profit. . At present, Atrium's 30-day MVRV ratio is still far from what has historically been considered a "danger zone", indicating the levels at which short-term holders have sought to sell their assets in the past.

Another notable trend is the 365-day atrium shutdown cycle, which tracks the movement of all tokens that have not changed in more than a year. This number remains at its lowest level on October 7 with an average daily floor of 13,438 ETH, indicating that long-term ether holders still do not intend to sell despite recent price recovery. Calculating the profit / loss of the Ethereum network, which is the average profit or loss of all the coins that change daily addresses, is a good way to find out which holders are afraid of selling at a loss. Amid the market crash on March 13, 2020, Ethereum Network reported a total loss of $ 2,932,200


Common tokens

The main trend in Governance tokens right now is that every major DeFi platform should have one. Over the past few months, we have seen Uniswap, Aave, Curve, Compound, Balancer, etc. launch their own special tokens, making a splash in the market.

Challenge One: Focus centralized

The obvious problem that most governance tokens face is focus. About 46% of COMP tokens are distributed to shareholders and founders of the Compound team. This gives the inner circle more leeway in governance decisions than the users, which exacerbates the problem that the proposers themselves are the inner circle.


The second challenge: interest farming

Extracting mining  liquidity poses another problem for interest farming that government tokens and the platforms that use them face.
Due to interest rate farming, we may potentially face a situation where debtors are unable to repay loans, creating a deficit in a particular Governance. Such a deficit can undermine the stability of the platform.

Challenge 3: Encourage the founder to leave the project

One of the main issues is for the founders to sell their tokens and leave the project sooner. This happened recently with SushiSwap,


Fashionable token

The main trend in governance tokens right now is that every major DeFi platform needs to be seen to have one. Over the past few months, we’ve seen Uniswap, Aave, Curve, Compound, and Balancer (among others) have all launched their respective governance tokens, generating market buzz in the process.

Problem one: concentration
About 46% of Compound’s COMP tokens were distributed to shareholders, founders and the Compound team. This gives the inner Compound circle much greater weight over governance decisions than users, something which compounds (pun intended) the aforementioned problem that this inner circle will also be the ones making the proposals.

Problem two: yield farming
The mention of liquidity mining, yield farming brings us to another problem faced by governance tokens and the platforms using them.
Because of yield farming, we may potentially encounter a situation where debtors are unable to repay loans, causing a deficit in a particular governance token. Such a deficit could undermine the stability of a platform, although Kivlighan said AAVE has introduced a system to guard against this possibility.

Problem three: incentivizing founder exits
One of the key issues is with founders selling their tokens and abandoning the project early. This most recently happened with SushiSwap
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
Plagiarism (copy paste).
User: shaiksajid52510
Post link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-acceptance-of-cryptocurrency-worldwide-5275521
Archived: https://archive.st/w3a4

One of the most common actions identified across the surveyed jurisdictions is government-issued notices about the pitfalls of investing in the cryptocurrency markets Currently, there are several thousand cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Ethereum are the most popular ones. Check out this infographic by Total Processing to learn more about other advantages of cryptocurrencies.

copy paste from
https://medium.com/@hakankayis/how-pax-pago-is-helping-latin-countries-with-the-power-of-cryptocurrencies-9fbf6666423b


https://www.globaltrademag.com/what-is-cryptocurrency-is-it-accepted-globally/
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 3406
Crypto Swap Exchange
#1
User: BlockchainnX
- Another website is listed on the URL part of his/her profile.

Original:

DeFi refers to financial services provided by DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations) avoiding intermediaries through smart contracts.

DeFi is a concept that he created in 2019, to name those open source financial initiatives or projects, with non-permissive architectures, which is governed and executed in a totally decentralized and public way.

If you want to know what DeFi is, we could define it as a set of financial services that use smart contracts to carry out transactions. These are executed in an automated way, without intermediaries such as banks or lawyers and they do so thanks to blockchain technology .

#2
User: poclerk

Original:

Such project giving tokens after bounty ends and no passing kyc except for those projects are not willing to do kyc. But if you send it to exchanger that available that is available for kyc and not for the project.

Copy:

Such project giving tokens after bounty ends and no passing kyc except for those projects are not willing to do kyc. But if you send it to exchanger that available that is available for kyc and not for the project.
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
Plagiarism (copy paste).
User: ArturoProfit
Post link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.55380669
Archived: https://archive.st/w3a4

If Bitcoin is a peer-to-peer electronic money system, then DeFi is a peer-to-peer electronic financial instrument system. The ecosystem of decentralized finance can provide anyone with access to traditional financial services, eliminating the need for intermediaries and lowering barriers to entry.
How useful do you think it will be in the future and will it be affordable for small investors?

Copy pasted from :

https://medium.com/@bitxmiexchange/what-is-defi-the-complete-beginners-guide-8083b198aa35
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
Plagiarism (copy paste).
User: Karanpq
Post link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/how-can-bitcoin-help-build-a-digital-global-5272672
Archived: https://archive.st/lomb

To add more to your points, you can consider these too:

  Low Transaction Costs

Because cryptocurrencies and blockchain don’t need an actual brick-and-mortar building to exist, the costs associated with their transactioning are minimal. There is no need for employee wages, utility bills or rent to be paid, so these savings naturally morph into low transaction fees. This in turn encourages more and more people to trust these new financial tools and start transactioning, allowing for the global economy to be more closely intertwined. And depending on the broker you choose, you can even trade with no minimum deposit requirements - as offered by CryptoRocket, for example.

Increased Transparency of Transactions

Since all blockchain and cryptocurrencies transactions are automated and digitized, they are all tracked in a distributed ledger. The best part about it is that it cannot be manipulated by either people or companies, which greatly diminishes the risk of fraud and corruption. This means that underdeveloped countries also have a greater chance of entering the financial transactions game and boost their own economy and social prospects. What’s more, citizens will be able to keep track of where state funds will be oriented and will thus have a say within their own political climate.

By the way, I’ve been using a method for the past 2 years now and made a couple of thousand dollars also hopefully saved myself from the wrath of the market destabilization and older mining techniques. You can sell mined BTC to RRMine directly or keep them yourself, its up to you.

In case you have some disposable income and you really want to invest in bitcoin, then I’s suggest you to go for cloud mining. Companies like RRMines and Bitdeer offer such services and this investment is definitely worth it.

I’ve been using this method for the past 2 years now and hopefully saved myself from the wrath of the market destabilization and older mining techniques. I use RRMine for this. They’ve a variety of products, lock-in period of 30 days, 90 days, 180 days are also available. After the end of the lock-in period, users can freely trade or renew their computing power contracts. The contracts can be transferred to other users or repurchased by platforms then users can recoup their costs for buying contract.

You can also pay $13.99 for 7 days, the mining profit will cover your cost for purchasing the computing power

A fixed investment will get you a more stable income, and you can choose to sell mined BTCs when the price is right for you. Also you do not need to know how to set up, operate and maintain a crypto farm, these companies will take care of them all for you, it’s more of an investment instead of a technological challenge.

You can easily register on their websites and RRMine also has a mobile app, I don’t about other but I find this very handy.

Hope you found value in this answer.

source
https://www.finextra.com/blogposting/18159/how-cryptocurrencies-can-help-global-economy-and-build-a-better-future
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 2223
Signature space for rent
Plagiarism (copy paste).
User: Sanjida789
Post link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5281781
Archived: https://archive.is/OjzSI

BTCBTCBTC
Bitcoin is like digital gold in many ways. Like gold, bitcoin cannot simply be created arbitrarily; it requires work to "extract". While gold must be extracted from the physical earth, bitcoin must be "mined" via computational means.

Bitcoin also has a stipulation—set forth in its source code—that it must have a limited and finite supply. For this reason, there will only ever be 21 million bitcoins ever produced. On average, these bitcoins are introduced to the bitcoin supply at a fixed rate of one block every ten minutes. In addition, the amount of bitcoin released in each of these aforementioned blocks is reduced by 50% every four years.

The Supply of Bitcoin Is Limited to 21 Million

In fact, there are only 21 million bitcoins that can be mined in total. Once miners have unlocked this amount of bitcoins, the supply will be exhausted. However, it's possible that bitcoin's protocol will be changed to allow for a larger supply. What will happen when the global supply of bitcoin reaches its limit? This is the subject of much debate among fans of cryptocurrency.


Currently, around 18.5 million bitcoin have been mined. This leaves less than three million that have yet to be introduced into circulation.

Bitcoin Mining Rewards
The first 18.5 million bitcoin have been mined in the ten years since the initial launch of the bitcoin network. With only three million more coins to go, it might appear like we are in the final stages of bitcoin mining. This is true but in a limited sense. While it is true that the large majority of bitcoin has already been mined, the timeline is more complicated than that.

The bitcoin mining process rewards miners with a chunk of bitcoin upon successful verification of a block. This process adapts over time. When bitcoin first launched, the reward was 50 bitcoin. In 2012, it halved to 25 bitcoin. In 2016, it halved again to 12.5 bitcoin. On May 11 2020, the reward halved again to 6.25 bitcoin.

The reward will continue to halve every four years until the final bitcoin has been mined. In actuality, the final bitcoin is unlikely to be mined until around the year 2140. However, it's possible the bitcoin network protocol will be changed between now and then.

Impacts of Finite Bitcoin Supply on Bitcoin Miners
It may seem that the group of individuals most directly affected by the limit of the bitcoin supply will be the bitcoin miners themselves. Some detractors of the protocol claim that miners will be forced away from the block rewards they receive for their work once the bitcoin supply has reached 21 million in circulation.

Without the incentive provided by a prize of bitcoin at the end of a rigorous and costly mining process, miners may not be driven to continue to support the network. This would have disastrous effects for bitcoin.

Mining is not just a process by which new tokens are introduced into the ecosystem; it is first and foremost the way in which the decentralized blockchain is supported and maintained (in the absence of a central bank or other single authority). If miners abandon their work, the network may be forced to move toward centralization or collapse entirely.

Even when the last bitcoin has been produced, miners will likely continue to actively and competitively participate and validate new transactions. The reason is that every bitcoin transaction has a small transaction fee attached to it.
These fees, while today representing a few hundred dollars per block, could potentially rise to many thousands of dollars per block, especially as the number of transactions on the blockchain grows and as the price of a bitcoin rises. Ultimately, it will function like a closed economy, where transaction fees are assessed much like taxes.

Special Considerations

It's worth noting that it is projected to take more than 100 years before the bitcoin network mines its very last token. In actuality, as the year 2140 approaches, miners will likely spend years receiving rewards that are actually just tiny portions of the final bitcoin to be mined. The dramatic decrease in reward size may mean that the mining process will shift entirely well before the 2140 deadline.

It's also important to keep in mind that the bitcoin network itself is likely to change significantly between now and then. Considering how much has happened to bitcoin in just a decade, hard forks, new protocols, new methods of recording and processing transactions, and any number of other factors, may impact the mining process. It's also true that, at some point before 2140, bitcoin may very well fall entirely out of favor. This could essentially render the entire process obsolete, as well as the question about what will happen when all bitcoin are mined.

Copy pasted from :

Quote
Bitcoin is like digital gold in many ways. Like gold, bitcoin cannot simply be created arbitrarily; it requires work to "extract". While gold must be extracted from the physical earth, bitcoin must be "mined" via computational means.

Bitcoin also has a stipulation—set forth in its source code—that it must have a limited and finite supply. For this reason, there will only ever be 21 million bitcoins ever produced. On average, these bitcoins are introduced to the bitcoin supply at a fixed rate of one block every ten minutes. In addition, the amount of bitcoin released in each of these aforementioned blocks is reduced by 50% every four years.

The Supply of Bitcoin Is Limited to 21 Million
In fact, there are only 21 million bitcoins that can be mined in total.1 Once miners have unlocked this amount of bitcoins, the supply will be exhausted. However, it's possible that bitcoin's protocol will be changed to allow for a larger supply. What will happen when the global supply of bitcoin reaches its limit? This is the subject of much debate among fans of cryptocurrency.

Bitcoin Mining Rewards
The first 18.5 million bitcoin have been mined in the ten years since the initial launch of the bitcoin network. With only three million more coins to go, it might appear like we are in the final stages of bitcoin mining. This is true but in a limited sense. While it is true that the large majority of bitcoin has already been mined, the timeline is more complicated than that.

The bitcoin mining process rewards miners with a chunk of bitcoin upon successful verification of a block. This process adapts over time. When bitcoin first launched, the reward was 50 bitcoin. In 2012, it halved to 25 bitcoin. In 2016, it halved again to 12.5 bitcoin. On May 11 2020, the reward halved again to 6.25 bitcoin.

The reward will continue to halve every four years until the final bitcoin has been mined. In actuality, the final bitcoin is unlikely to be mined until around the year 2140. However, it's possible the bitcoin network protocol will be changed between now and then.

Impacts of Finite Bitcoin Supply on Bitcoin Miners
It may seem that the group of individuals most directly affected by the limit of the bitcoin supply will be the bitcoin miners themselves. Some detractors of the protocol claim that miners will be forced away from the block rewards they receive for their work once the bitcoin supply has reached 21 million in circulation.

Without the incentive provided by a prize of bitcoin at the end of a rigorous and costly mining process, miners may not be driven to continue to support the network. This would have disastrous effects for bitcoin.

Mining is not just a process by which new tokens are introduced into the ecosystem; it is first and foremost the way in which the decentralized blockchain is supported and maintained (in the absence of a central bank or other single authority). If miners abandon their work, the network may be forced to move toward centralization or collapse entirely.2

Even when the last bitcoin has been produced, miners will likely continue to actively and competitively participate and validate new transactions. The reason is that every bitcoin transaction has a small transaction fee attached to it.

These fees, while today representing a few hundred dollars per block, could potentially rise to many thousands of dollars per block, especially as the number of transactions on the blockchain grows and as the price of a bitcoin rises. Ultimately, it will function like a closed economy, where transaction fees are assessed much like taxes.

Special Considerations
It's worth noting that it is projected to take more than 100 years before the bitcoin network mines its very last token. In actuality, as the year 2140 approaches, miners will likely spend years receiving rewards that are actually just tiny portions of the final bitcoin to be mined. The dramatic decrease in reward size may mean that the mining process will shift entirely well before the 2140 deadline.

Source: https://www.investopedia.com/tech/what-happens-bitcoin-after-21-million-mined/


Surprisingly, this user copy-pastes his first post. Hadn't even mention of the source. Banning him/her would be a lesson for all brand new accounts.
legendary
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1043
αLPʜα αɴd ΩMeGa
I have explained this soo many times!
But YOU are a really bad guy, who always whant to make stress against me, but i have never hurt you!

Oh please, enough already!
Just because you are probably sick in your head and can't accept that I am certainly not a spammer, as you claim.

You only come here to the forum to annoy members and make unsubstantiated claims...  Roll Eyes
Who is the spammer here?  Wink

You have, apart from old things that you always say, but are solved since Months, OR completely unfounded claims, nothing against me, except that you obviously hate me!

Sorry, but your behaviour is really sad.

~
Bumping this for visability, since my reports are still unanswered. The user SiNeReiNZzz clearly plagiarized the quoted posts. He tried to clean up the evidence and added a source afterwards, so please check the archived version of the post!
member
Activity: 185
Merit: 34
I can't tell for sure if it's plagiarism or not, but this post looks "from another world":


Of course, as Rikafip already noted, this is pure plagiarism. He copied entire sentences with some minor modifications. I highlighted the parts that are blatant copy/paste and the rest is partially spun.

Logistics platforms based on blockchain technology are not only technically demanding, but also require the clarification of many legal issues.
In addition to data protection, for example, the implementation of the many legal sources that are particularly relevant to transport must be taken into account.
For example, the transport law framework conditions are relatively complex, because the legal cornerstones result from a complex interplay of modality-related conventions, the (controversial) rules of multimodal transport and the different national legal norms.

Furthermore, quasi-binding specifications of the lex mercatoria (e.g. ERA 600 or BIMCO bill of lading) must also be taken into account.
Moreover, such automated systems must be coordinated with the mandatory standards at national and international level (such as formal requirements or restrictions on liability for damages).
Furthermore, questions of ownership and the role of securities and book-entry securities will have to be clarified within the block chain.
Finally, the question of how to deal with the large number of discretionary decisions must also be answered, for example in assessing fault, quantifying damages or interpreting specific contractual obligations and duties.

Archived: http://archive.is/MEOGw

Source: Innovation-Based Development of the Mineral Resources Sector: Challenges and Prospects by Vladimir Litvinenko



Bumping this for visability, since my reports are still unanswered. The user SiNeReiNZzz clearly plagiarized the quoted posts. He tried to clean up the evidence and added a source afterwards, so please check the archived version of the post!
Pages:
Jump to: