Topic: Report plagiarism (copy/paste) here. Mods: please give temp or permban as needed - page 79. (Read 118776 times)

Compound

Compound is one of the leading DeFi companies today. It’s token saw massive price gains soon after it was offered to the users of Compound. A user can immediately start earning interest on their crypto assets by contributing to the Compound’s liquidity pool. The interest rates fluctuate depending upon the supply and demand of respective cryptocurrencies. As of August 19th, 2020, over $800 million is locked-in under Compound protocol.


MakerDAO

MakerDAO currents hold the largest market share in the DeFi sector with over $1 billion in assets. MakerDAO is the most recognized player in the DeFi market. A user that knows about DeFi would have heard about MakerDAO too. It is a credit platform that is fully decentralized. It’s DAI stablecoin currently ranks among the most used stablecoins in the market.

Uniswap

Uniswap is a fully decentralized exchange. However, it is different from the other decentralized exchanges as Uniswap leverages liquidity pools. Users on the platform receive rewards for providing liquidity to the Uniswap protocol. They are rewarded with a share of the fees that Uniswap earns after each transaction. So far, the Uniswap users have locked in over $100 million in the Uniswap liquidity pools.

Dfinance

Dfinance is an innovative and unique project which is blessed with a renowned and experienced team that has a track record or integrity and excellence in the cryptocurrency space and is committed to the success of the project. This project has quite a few innovation features and I personally liked their wallet and interface a lot. They also claim that you can create your own financial instruments which seems very interesting.

Bancor

Bancor is a non-custodial DeFi platform offering users a way of swapping the crypto coins without the need for a centralized trading service. The DeFi platform also offers smart tokens to its users to increase the liquidity in the protocol. Currently, Bancor has so far accrued more than $11 million in crypto.

Username: SomeJasonGuy
Profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/somejasonguy-1567923

A merit beggar and spam, plagiarise after receive first merit.
Plagiarism: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5272362

Copy and paste from the article: https://cryptocoinchance.com/2020/08/06/top-defi-projects-to-watch-in-2020nownodesthe-capital-medium/

BUMP!

This is a crystal clear case of plagiarism. Why isnt this account nuked or at least got a two year signatur ban?

- plagiarism
- account changed has several times in the past (check the different languages and the posting gaps)
- talking about merits in almost every post
- bad post quality, meaningless posts, use a translator if you cant read it...

Other users got banned/temp banned for way less than that.

First of all: I admit to having made a mistake, especially with regard to the reference to my sources.
But I have to make it clear that I did not get anything from these sources, which were discussed in the accusation against me.

About 1 year ago, I did a 'project work' in the context of a further education, in which I talked about the future of logistics and the possibilities to make it more efficient.
I also have to say that it was not expected from our lecturer that we would give sources. (Which should not be an excuse for this anyway!)

Of course I used different sources.  I was especially interested in the topic of block chain in the interaction of different possible scenarios and processes in logistics.
For this purpose I also briefly dealt with legal issues and read an article by Prof. Dr.Andreas Furrer, which deals with this topic in detail, and used it for my project work:

Prof. Dr.Andreas Furrer:
https://www.unilu.ch/fakultaeten/rf/professuren/furrer-andreas/

Article:
https://jusletter.weblaw.ch/fr/dam/publicationsystem/articles/jusletter/2017/917/der-einsatz-der-bloc_776b0ed3df/Jusletter_der-einsatz-der-bloc_776b0ed3df_fr.pdf

As already mentioned I may have taken over too much content without marking it.
That was my mistake and that will certainly not happen again...

It's just a pity that I'm not addressed personally (not even parallel to the public accusation) in order to be able to correct misunderstandings, possible mistakes or misfortunes.

I must honestly say that I'm a little perplexed!
A forum ban would be sad, but also no end of my life...
In my case I see a small difference to real copy and paste plagiarism. But maybe I just want to see that!
But okay if you are so determined to fight against such practices, I can understand that, because there is a lot going wrong in this direction.

I can only sincerely apologize for this and in the future I can better point out possible sources!

Everything else is not in my hands...


PS: Should this be my last mail and I get banned, I still wish you all a pleasant and successful time.

Of course, as Rikafip already noted, this is pure plagiarism. He copied entire sentences with some minor modifications. I highlighted the parts that are blatant copy/paste and the rest is partially spun.

Archived: http://archive.is/MEOGw

Source: Innovation-Based Development of the Mineral Resources Sector: Challenges and Prospects by Vladimir Litvinenko

-cut-

I can't tell for sure if it's plagiarism or not, but this post looks "from another world":

Logistics platforms based on blockchain technology are not only technically demanding, but also require the clarification of many legal issues.
In addition to data protection, for example, the implementation of the many legal sources that are particularly relevant to transport must be taken into account.
For example, the transport law framework conditions are relatively complex, because the legal cornerstones result from a complex interplay of modality-related conventions, the (controversial) rules of multimodal transport and the different national legal norms.

Furthermore, quasi-binding specifications of the lex mercatoria (e.g. ERA 600 or BIMCO bill of lading) must also be taken into account.
Moreover, such automated systems must be coordinated with the mandatory standards at national and international level (such as formal requirements or restrictions on liability for damages).
Furthermore, questions of ownership and the role of securities and book-entry securities will have to be clarified within the block chain.
Finally, the question of how to deal with the large number of discretionary decisions must also be answered, for example in assessing fault, quantifying damages or interpreting specific contractual obligations and duties.

It's quite unfortunate that Bitcoin had a less user-friendly system back then Since no seed phrases or any other means of restoring access to your wallet existed at that time, BTC addresses were recorded in a single “wallet.dat” file. And so If you misplace it or it simply break for instance, you loss everything as well. And in this case, a fortune.

This is but one of the reminders that Bitcoin was a far less user-friendly system back in 2010. Since no seed phrases or any other means of restoring access to your wallet existed at the time, BTC addresses were recorded in a single “wallet.dat” file. If you lost it—due to a drive being misplaced or simply breaking, for example—you lost all your funds. And in this case, a fortune.