Am I the only one who sees this tendency? There are a lot of people who post shit posts but have lots of merits, then I check their profiles and 95% of merits come from local boards. This problem really exists, this is a loophole that shitposters use.
Normally, someone who is a source of merit was evaluated and showed that he was someone with good sense in the distribution of merits.
So, if someone makes great posts on your local board, and gets merits for it, that's fine. Who is to blame for those who give merits, for those who receive low-value posts in English? Where does the merits system fail in this regard? Merit is given not because it is person x or y, but for the posts it makes.
In addition, it is up to campaign managers to assess whether this person makes good or bad posts.
If the person makes more posts in a general way, then he doesn't have much advantage in having many merits, because he won't be able to participate in a campaign.
By the way, merits were not created to participate in campaigns. Managers use this tool to help them choose.