Topic: Request Removal of Canaryinthemine From The Default Trust List - page 3. (Read 3043 times)
February 05, 2015, 07:31:50 PM
February 05, 2015, 06:58:50 PM
Another +1. Very well put. I dont know joehoe, but i agree totally about danny and deathandtaxes
No offense buddy, but from the looks of it, you have the knowledge about the forum that vastly exceeds that of someone who has only been here a few months. This is especially true considering that you recently were posting multiple threads in the reputation section that happens to be against the rules. Are you sure that someone didn't buy your account from you? Maybe someone with a ulterior motive? Your writing style does seem to have changed.
February 05, 2015, 06:42:27 PM
Request removal of default trust list. Seriously, when will we get rid of it?
If it is used the right way it works fine. When people abuse it they should be punished. I think public disputes are the way to go.
CanaryInTheMine is time & again doing it in the wrong way. If not removed from DefaultTrust, at least he should be demoted to level 2. His choices are too bad and it has also been discussed time & again. I'd rather expect people like joehoe, DannyHammilton or Death&Taxes be added to DefaultTrust, who are actually respected by the community and does not fight to hold their seat.
Another +1. Very well put. I dont know joehoe, but i agree totally about danny and deathandtaxes
February 05, 2015, 06:28:07 PM
Request removal of default trust list. Seriously, when will we get rid of it?
If it is used the right way it works fine. When people abuse it they should be punished. I think public disputes are the way to go.
CanaryInTheMine is time & again doing it in the wrong way. If not removed from DefaultTrust, at least he should be demoted to level 2. His choices are too bad and it has also been discussed time & again. I'd rather expect people like joehoe, DannyHammilton or Death&Taxes be added to DefaultTrust, who are actually respected by the community and does not fight to hold their seat.
February 05, 2015, 05:39:43 PM
Request removal of default trust list. Seriously, when will we get rid of it?
If it is used the right way it works fine. When people abuse it they should be punished. I think public disputes are the way to go.
+1
If it is used the right way
February 05, 2015, 05:32:34 PM
Request removal of default trust list. Seriously, when will we get rid of it?
If it is used the right way it works fine. When people abuse it they should be punished. I think public disputes are the way to go.
February 05, 2015, 05:03:08 PM
Request removal of default trust list. Seriously, when will we get rid of it?
February 05, 2015, 04:46:20 PM
I would like to petition for a survivor style voting system .... where when an annoying member of the tribe cries about the trust system not working for their own scam and scammer buddies.... the rest of the tribe can vote them off of the island....so the tribe can get on with their activities....
February 05, 2015, 04:16:33 PM
You want theymos to moderate the trust system? LOL.
The reason fake amounts of Bitcoin were used was far from the reason others have been removed from the default trust network. They were removed for abusing their "power" of being in the default trust network.
CITM needs to prune his trust list to include less people with zero experience detecting scams. However he should not be removed because he gave feedback to someone who he thinks is a scammer.
The reason fake amounts of Bitcoin were used was far from the reason others have been removed from the default trust network. They were removed for abusing their "power" of being in the default trust network.
CITM needs to prune his trust list to include less people with zero experience detecting scams. However he should not be removed because he gave feedback to someone who he thinks is a scammer.
Your right, he should be removed for leaving a false amount on feedback for a transaction that never happened which is an abuse of power. But you'll never see that as you stand to lose rating on some of your alts if that happens. Thanks for your 2 satoshis, but you have already lost all credibility in my book. This is theymos's decision. He can either fix the system, moderate the system, or remove the system. or continue to be bombarded by requests and garbage every time someone in a position of power abuses it. If not just on principal alone, it behooves him to fix the problem to avoid his own frustration and wasted time.
You do not know anything about any of my alts and none of them have trust from anyone on CITMs trust list.
There is no reason why you cannot leave trust if you have not done a transaction with someone. The trust system is actually designed so that people on default trust network mainly give trust to people they have not done business with as they should be able to spot scams and leave the appropriate trust feedback. The 1,000 Btc risked amount is only a technicality and is a distraction to the conversation.
Theymos does not think the forum belongs to him. His belief is that it belongs to the community and as a result he seeks the input of the community prior to making most decisions.
February 05, 2015, 04:01:03 PM
CITM has also repeatedly failed to remove trust abusers from his trust list.
The most recent example: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10366822
The most recent example: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10366822
February 05, 2015, 03:52:31 PM
You want theymos to moderate the trust system? LOL.
The reason fake amounts of Bitcoin were used was far from the reason others have been removed from the default trust network. They were removed for abusing their "power" of being in the default trust network.
CITM needs to prune his trust list to include less people with zero experience detecting scams. However he should not be removed because he gave feedback to someone who he thinks is a scammer.
The reason fake amounts of Bitcoin were used was far from the reason others have been removed from the default trust network. They were removed for abusing their "power" of being in the default trust network.
CITM needs to prune his trust list to include less people with zero experience detecting scams. However he should not be removed because he gave feedback to someone who he thinks is a scammer.
Your right, he should be removed for leaving a false amount on feedback for a transaction that never happened which is an abuse of power. But you'll never see that as you stand to lose rating on some of your alts if that happens. Thanks for your 2 satoshis, but you have already lost all credibility in my book. This is theymos's decision. He can either fix the system, moderate the system, or remove the system. or continue to be bombarded by requests and garbage every time someone in a position of power abuses it. If not just on principal alone, it behooves him to fix the problem to avoid his own frustration and wasted time.
February 05, 2015, 03:48:03 PM
You want theymos to moderate the trust system? LOL.
The reason fake amounts of Bitcoin were used was far from the reason others have been removed from the default trust network. They were removed for abusing their "power" of being in the default trust network.
CITM needs to prune his trust list to include less people with zero experience detecting scams. However he should not be removed because he gave feedback to someone who he thinks is a scammer.
The reason fake amounts of Bitcoin were used was far from the reason others have been removed from the default trust network. They were removed for abusing their "power" of being in the default trust network.
CITM needs to prune his trust list to include less people with zero experience detecting scams. However he should not be removed because he gave feedback to someone who he thinks is a scammer.
February 05, 2015, 03:23:42 PM
I have never done business with CITM, certainly not 1,000BTC worth
yet another blatant act of abuse of the default trust system or the trust system in general. This is far from this users first offense of using bad judgment, and is most likely far from his last.
Theymos, at the very least if you are not going to modify the way the default trust system works or get rid of it all together, then you are at the very least responsible for moderating its participants and protecting its integrity. If this behavior is allowed to continue your forum is going to get run into the ground.
Use of fake value amounts has been grounds for removal of users in the past. i would like to believe that you are a fair and non biased admin who does not play favorites.
Jump to: