Topic: Requesting-Vod be prevented deleting posts Self Modded thread/Removed from DT - page 8. (Read 35624 times)

You think a site should be forced to pay for something at a price they did not agree to prior to the fact? Note that I previously backed dooglus's actions however after further consideration I have change my viewpoint on the matter.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=132677
It seems that dooglus sent retaliatory feedback to the above person because he felt dooglus's website was less then honest

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=292423
He left the above person negative trust for recommending a scam site

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=371960
He left negative trust because they "post FUD and one liners"

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=397258
His negative rating on the above person starts that he refused to pay a 1 BTC bounty for a bug, and then continues that the site he runs is a scam

These are just a few examples that did not take any kind of extensive research.

His trust list is composed of those who are already on DT and a few that echo his sentiments towards a few sites that he thinks are a scam (the fact that the site is a scam is irrelevant), so I think others can make their own conclusions about these people on his trust list. Oh and they also have zero trading history

Haha thats what I like about you.
EDIT: Nor are you
EDIT 2: Nice address you got there.
He did discover the bug though, so he should've been paid the bounty like a regular guy who found a bug.

After he paid the bounty

I have reason to believe that two of my negatives will eventually be updated to neutral, three of them will potentially be removed from DT based on a number of factors (both because of their rating on me and other additional reasons).

I haven't spoken to John K. about the situation and I have only seen him make one post about the situation (and one additional off topic post) however it is my understanding that he is a reasonable person.

You cannot predict the future, nor are you aware of all my alts

But I think he did remove it after they fixed the bug/paid the bounty, its only mitchell's feedback on them now. Care to show which other dice sites you are talking about though?

The crypto-games saga is what brought this to my attention. Crypto-games were made aware of a potential bug and took a long time to fix it even though it was not their money on the line. He has sent other trust ratings similar to those that I described above.

Are you specifically talking about crypto-games.net here? Cause I feel you are, and its true

Now that you have negative trust and will never be back to DT you are trying to take others with you?

Not a mature thing to do

dooglus has an extremely shady past with his trust ratings and his trust list. There have been multiple casinos that have shut down after receiving negative ratings from dooglus after dooglus found a "bug", refused to pay any kind of bug bounty and is also a "scam"

I agree dooglus is just helping aid Vod in abusing the trust system

It seems as if dooglus has refused to remove Vod from his trust list so far. This is despite Vod's using of his trust rating for personal reasons and him clearly not being able to properly do research and consider the relevant facts prior to making decisions that will affect others.

This fact is clear evidence that dooglus should be removed from level 1 default trust. Additional reasons why dooglus should be removed is the fact that his positive trust ratings and endorsements of multiple thefts totaling millions of dollars. I would question how many thefts need to result because of dooglus's positive ratings before he is removed from DT

You seem to be scared a lot. I don't think any lawsuit against Vod is going to harm him in anyway, he has done what was supposed to be done, he you a scammer, and you are a scammer.

Smoke and mirrors. There's so much obfuscation that it's near impossible to tell what's going on. TC is free to manage their trust list as they see fit. Though I would suggest they also have a look at the trust settings on their Tomatocage1 account, which still has both Vod and QuickSeller. It would be weird if a person trusts differently based on whatever alt they're using. But I'm sure this is just a small oversight, since the Tomatocage1 account was only used when they were locked out of their main account.


Vod is "someone who has made a lot of enemies from preventing scammers from being able to steal from others". They don't seem to mind their personal information being available all that much. I think I can guess their answer to this question based on that.

Also, did you actually file a lawsuit against Vod?

It is odd that such happens without some context. I had expected TC to make at least some kind of statement on their decision. But as I said above they can manage their trust list how they see fit.

You did take money for a service you didn't provide. Stop saying you did nothing wrong. I would count that as stealing. And the amount was not zero. So Vod did not push "someone to be publishing the dox of someone who has stolen zero money?". Two can play word games.

Why would any of this be odd? Do you think it was appropriate for Vod to be pushing someone to be publishing the dox of someone who has stolen zero money? I would doubt that anyone here would want to get doxed in a way that vod was encouraging shadow_runner to attempt to dox me.....

Come on Vod, there is no way there is any way that anything good can come of you doing this. Do you seriously think that anything good can possibly happen as a result of the following events happening in the following order:

• A lawsuit is threatened against you
• You release what you clearly believe to be the personal information of the person who would be filing the above lawsuit
• You then tell me to drop the above threatened lawsuit

I cannot see how the above is anything other then you trying to intimidate me out of taking legal action against you.

As I said previously, my goal was for you to remove the false and libelous information that you had posted against me. I think you should take a step back for a minute and think if this is really a fight that is worth winning this way. Don't you think it was probably a bad idea to release what you think was the personal information of someone who has made a lot of enemies from preventing scammers from being able to steal from others?

I am not sure where you got the information that what you believe to be my personal information, however it matches pretty much nothing about me, nor none of the aliases I have used while trading. I am honestly stumped as to where you got this information. I was able however to spend no more then 10 minutes searching the internet to find both a linkedin profile and a facebook profile of what appears to be the person you are claiming is me. From the looks of it you were fed bad information and you failed to do ant kind of independent research or verifications. I would not be surprised if scammers were to start harassing this person at work and possibly in his personal life as well. If this does happen then I would not be surprised if he attempts to take some kind of action against you.

QS just tacitly admitted he has high level acts on DT(again), meanwhile TC removed Vod from his trust list while this feud was going on. 

Does anybody find this odd?

A few more curse words than I would have used, but this is actually one of the most useful posts of the day.

Quickseller, just leave the forum. There is nothing about your need to collect a loan that entails you hanging around, fumbling over embarrassing rationalizations for your dishonorable actions. You're just embarrassing yourself. We are just revelling in your fall from grace because you're a plague on this forum. And we will continue to shit on you as you continue to embarrass yourself.

Eventually, someone will have had enough and will simply DOX you. Just sayin. Be smart, take responsibility and leave.

Ummm.. You've been doxxed now, no? Are you seriously just going to continue spouting off like this ?

Ummm, you tried to extort someone. Also once you were outed as an extortionist, you have scammed multiple people both on here, on skype and on at least one gambling site........I have been trusted with pretty significant amounts of money and never hesitated to follow through on my side of any trade I have been a party to.....I am really not sure why you are comparing you to me