The reason why it controls most gamblers is when they have considered what they have spent like their lost and how long they have been gambling quitting is like giving up or becoming defeated so easily therefore, they most keep the energy moving and gamble the more.
You have a point but there's a difference between quitting gambling, and not gambling beyond the limit, or stopping the game for another to prevent uncontrol of the game buzz.
Having said that, one of the key strategies I have used to prevent addiction so far is having the belief that every game I play either winning or losing since I did gamble beyond the limit is still winning for me. This is the mentality to always prevent me from chasing lost.
The most funniest thing is that when they gets addicted they wouldn't know and of course a gambler doesn't know when are they affected mentally, physically and biologically.
In most cases they know. It is just hard for them to control their emotions, and let go. It is just smoking addict, there's no way the person wont know he/she daily smoking is getting out of it.
A gambler most set restrictions and limitation their gambling time or how long they should spending especially when funds are exhausted from their account they should quit gambling.
Setting limitation/resticction is one thing abide by it is another thing.
You could be right as quitting gambling and not gambling beyond the limits are separate things
Of course, I am right. Quitting gambling is not the same thing as not going beyond the limit, or taking some time off gambling because when you quit something you're not doing anymore forever.
but then, we have to feature it from another picture because if a gambler can quit gambling at that point when they sees they are losing then it would better for them, maybe it seems I am not making used of my sentence at the right place. Like what I mean by quit is that "when a gambler starts incurring more lost, it's better for them to exit the gambling" that is what I meant by quit or stop gambling for the main time. Maybe after they might have that subconsciousness of their losing streak then best is to stop take a break and re-strategize on the best skills to explore to winning gradually at least 30/100 ratio.
You indeed used the wrong sentence in the wrong place.
If that's the case, I agree with you and this is something I once did last year it's not that I am not winning but after doing the calculation of my loses the game seems not to be in my favor.
I exited the game for some time and when I got back into it after a deposit I made 3 withdrawals before making another deposit which is a positive result from the previous experience.
As gamblers you need to exercise a responsible gambling practice so you can enjoy the games you are playing.
Yes, but only gamblers who are mature enough in the gambling space, and also ready to accept the genuine concept of gambling (which is winning is not guaranteed) will exercise this practice.
Casinos gives their customers the chances to exclude themselves from gambling for a moment
Yes, but not every casino. Only the casino from a certain jurisdiction of operation where this is a must or the casino whose master license rules and regulations include the practice of exiting for some time the gamblers who spend much time or funds on the game.
and they also ensure that each gamblers are above the age of eighteen(18) that's why they normally request for KYC (know your customer) verification while registering or make a huge amount of withdrawals.
No. That's not the major reason behind KYC. The major reason behind KYC implementation has to do with the exact point I provided above.