This is to point out that I have been negged by a DT member of the forum in what is explicitly a blatant disregard for any conventional wisdom on the concerned issue.
Apparently, holding a view grounded in facts borne out by actions contrary to that of a Paid Signature Holder of the stature of DT makes one a Trust Abuser and anyone dealing with him/her will have damaging consequences.
1. The issue is that I had negged FJ for this following
reason flagging it as Shady, Slow and Irresponsible IMO.
2. The Trust Abusing DT member then proceeded to neutral tag me without a reference with nearly the same accusations as they are now. Since it was a neutral I ignored it and was advised by others to not pay heed to it as well. (suchmoon, ibminer) (As a pun I even put a different version in my Sign space.
)
3. FJ recently has apparently again dealt in a shady manner and this is also implicitly agreed to by various august members of this forum community too in this
case for which I have attached the link. Various members have also expressed there opinion on this in the
Gambling section thread too.
4. After I UPDATED my neg to reflect the latest FJ fiasco after
a spat with Hhampuz. Lauda decided to UPGRADE my tag to red trust here.
which prior to this was this
This neutral had been again updated recently although the same thing has been there since the earlier issues stated in point 1.
5. Not only that but apparently to prevent any red trust appearing on FJ the DT member did put me in the excluded list (as if I am ever becoming a DT member, but the thought of it amuses me
).
I now proceed to ask members of this forum to point out if I am deserving of the TAG and how then is it justified.
Since this is un-self-moderated opinions from everyone will be welcomed and paid heed to without any malice.
