Pages:
Author

Topic: [RFC] Potential release of AMD Lyra2z miner (Raw speed: Vega64 9.8 MH/s) - page 3. (Read 7171 times)

newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
any update or a download link
newbie
Activity: 84
Merit: 0
Probably sold to highest bidder.
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
any news? will this miner be released? i'm very interested in linux version.
hero member
Activity: 628
Merit: 504
Difficulty will skyrocket within hours, and eliminate any benefits for miners. 1-2% devfee is a sane suggestion.
hero member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 556
I'd pay a 25% dev fee for this miner. At current levels it'd still yield more than twice what ETH brings in on my rigs of 570's.
member
Activity: 176
Merit: 76
someone also developing amd lyra2z miner https://github.com/todxx/tdxminer/releases
for me it cant see more then 1 card and stack at dev fee mine.

I was really hoping to get at least a beta build ready before setting this forum loose on it.
Also to get some feedback about any bugs, like the one you mention.
The github repo has an issue tracker that would be a great place to report problems like not finding devices.
Any feedback would be appreciated.

Edit: Now that I look at it, I find it strange that this was posted here half a day after I posted my alpha release.  That's a hell of a coincidence.

Just a coincidence))
To make a topic - better choice, i think. You can get more feedback.

Yep, definitely a coincidence.  I'll make sure future releases are less coincidence prone.
And yes, a topic is what I should have said.  I'm new to posting here, as I'm sure you guys have noticed Wink

Edit: topic is here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/tdxminer-lyra2zxzc-miner-for-amd-gpus-on-linux-3299496
jr. member
Activity: 37
Merit: 6
someone also developing amd lyra2z miner https://github.com/todxx/tdxminer/releases
for me it cant see more then 1 card and stack at dev fee mine.

I was really hoping to get at least a beta build ready before setting this forum loose on it.
Also to get some feedback about any bugs, like the one you mention.
The github repo has an issue tracker that would be a great place to report problems like not finding devices.
Any feedback would be appreciated.

Edit: Now that I look at it, I find it strange that this was posted here half a day after I posted my alpha release.  That's a hell of a coincidence.

Just a coincidence))
To make a topic - better choice, i think. You can get more feedback.
member
Activity: 176
Merit: 76
someone also developing amd lyra2z miner https://github.com/todxx/tdxminer/releases
for me it cant see more then 1 card and stack at dev fee mine.

I was really hoping to get at least a beta build ready before setting this forum loose on it.
Also to get some feedback about any bugs, like the one you mention.
The github repo has an issue tracker that would be a great place to report problems like not finding devices.
Any feedback would be appreciated.

Edit: Now that I look at it, I find it strange that this was posted here half a day after I posted my alpha release.  That's a hell of a coincidence.

Lol! This is like Bitmain rushing their Cryptonight ASIC to the market after Baikal announced theirs (or was it other way around).


Edit: Hey can you start your own thread for feedback? Would love to test it.


Looks like the cat's out of the bag, so I guess I should.  I'll try to get a post up tonight.  I'm trying to get my taxes done right now Sad.
Until then, you can find it at the link that was posted.  Feel free to post issues in the github repo for bugs, requests, etc.
member
Activity: 531
Merit: 29
someone also developing amd lyra2z miner https://github.com/todxx/tdxminer/releases
for me it cant see more then 1 card and stack at dev fee mine.

I was really hoping to get at least a beta build ready before setting this forum loose on it.
Also to get some feedback about any bugs, like the one you mention.
The github repo has an issue tracker that would be a great place to report problems like not finding devices.
Any feedback would be appreciated.

Edit: Now that I look at it, I find it strange that this was posted here half a day after I posted my alpha release.  That's a hell of a coincidence.

Lol! This is like Bitmain rushing their Cryptonight ASIC to the market after Baikal announced theirs (or was it other way around).


Edit: Hey can you start your own thread for feedback? Would love to test it.
member
Activity: 176
Merit: 76
someone also developing amd lyra2z miner https://github.com/todxx/tdxminer/releases
for me it cant see more then 1 card and stack at dev fee mine.

I was really hoping to get at least a beta build ready before setting this forum loose on it.
Also to get some feedback about any bugs, like the one you mention.
The github repo has an issue tracker that would be a great place to report problems like not finding devices.
Any feedback would be appreciated.

Edit: Now that I look at it, I find it strange that this was posted here half a day after I posted my alpha release.  That's a hell of a coincidence.
member
Activity: 531
Merit: 29
As someone above said at 25% you are giving more incentive for people to hack around it. Don’t be surprised to see big farms pay to get it cracked.

And also if it’s that’s profitable and doable, there will be others who eventually develop their own, though you will have first mover advantage for some time.

So a reasonable fee like 3-5% in the beginning, while you have no competition, would keep things level.

Thanks! Looking forward to this.
hero member
Activity: 1151
Merit: 528
jr. member
Activity: 94
Merit: 5
Zcoin mining almost never was highly profitable. Now zcoin mining profits in deep ass even on gtx 1070ti.


Gratz on your miner but at 25% I would have no interest in running, no matter how good your miner is with that high fees. and on a low profitability coin.
newbie
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
I think 3% a little more than claymore dual mode is a good choice.

Lots of AMD rig may rush to this miner, just like my 8*570.
However, my poor 8*1070Ti may lost another good profit coin...

so sad. Embarrassed
jr. member
Activity: 37
Merit: 6
So, just relise your miner with 2% fee.
in other case someone else do this)
jr. member
Activity: 37
Merit: 6
someone also developing amd lyra2z miner https://github.com/todxx/tdxminer/releases
for me it cant see more then 1 card and stack at dev fee mine.
jr. member
Activity: 196
Merit: 1
2% fee is reasonable. While it could be the most profitable choice to AMD videocards, 2% of many many many miners will be better than 25% of a few miners.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
 I vote for "classic dev fee miner win64" It'll be cool!
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
full member
Activity: 279
Merit: 104
A 1.5-2% devfee miner will go down well I think.   Everybody wins (some).
It gives the author income and miners a wider choice.
Pages:
Jump to: