Playing gambling is no need to use much money because poor people can enjoy playing gambling with enough money. They can minimize the risk not become bigger by always limiting the budget that will be used for playing gambling.
By rules, the poor aren't supposed to gamble because gambling is only good and fun when you have extra money to spend on it, it's not a way to earn money because it's a luck-based activity. So even if one is willing to try their luck, they should only do it when they know they have some money to spare after covering everything, and that isn't possible when a person is poor. How can you earn a minimum wage, manage your household and personal expenses, and then gamble as well? You can't even save anything when savings should be a higher priority for any person.
Most people that are poor tend to think that gambling might change their faith some day, but they don't understand that the money that they are constantly losing on gambling could be used for something better, maybe save that money and start a small business some day.
Poor arent supposed to gamble? It should be considering with their financial status on which we know that it would really be that a bad idea on dealing up with it but if that poor one would really be
just having that kind of leisure seeking kind of intent then i would say that it is really just that that fine on dealing with gambling. Doesnt matter whether you are rich or poor on which it is really always important that you should really be only playing on the time that you would really be getting bored. Dont tend to make it as an income because this is where people do usually mess up their lives
because of bad decisions towards it. The main key on here is that you should be making yourself wary about the risks involve with then then you would really be just that fine.
Because of bad decision thinking that they can take a shortcut as if they'll be lucky enough they can win huge sumo of amount that can change their lives, a misconception which really messing with a lot of those poor gambler, instead of taking this place as venue for entertainment they think it can be use as venue to make money and be as source of their income, but instead it was the gambling owners who are benefiting with that wrong treatment thru gambling.
Though both rich and poor can play and be entertain it's on their own way of managing their gambling activities, as long as they are using their time and money properly, they have an equal opportunities.
Gambling an activity for fun also has the chance to turn someone's fortune. Calculated risk when taken in gambling can be the way to big wins from gambling. Who do you think should take more risk in gambling? The rich gambler or the gambler who is not yet rich. If a rich gambler takes risks in gambling, they are risking losing money and becoming poor from gambling, or getting richer, when a gambler who is not yet rich gambles, they can also get poorer or richer, so the gambler who should take the risk should be the gambler who can handle the dangers of the risk like losing too. When a rich gambler loses from taking a risk, there is a better chance of them being in a position to manage with the losses, than someone struggling financially who a big loss will really affect. So, I am confused after asking myself this question and answering it, does this mean a poor gambler should continue to play it safe in gambling? With no risk, how can a poor gambler change their fortune in gambling?
I think that it is all a matter of percentage and financial relativity. If a poor man gambles even only 1% of his income, he might not be able to pay his bills. If a rich man does it, then he will still be just as rich as before. The problems only start to arise when either of those men develop a gambling problem. Once that happens, it is not so far to full-blown gambling addiction as well as losing all their money. In the end they will be just as poor as the other, with absolutely nothing in their pockets.
It's not just how much money a person spends, but also what percentage of their income they gamble with. Someone who is poor may be unable to afford even a minor loss, but someone who is wealthy may not feel the effects of a major loss. Everyone, regardless of income, can acquire a gambling addiction if they are not careful. It's a complex subject that requires careful consideration of all important factors.
Anyone, rich or poor, can become addicted to gambling. There is no dispute about this. In gambling without discipline anyone will become addicted anytime. The poor may find it difficult to manage money and the rich may find it easier, but it is not unusual for anyone to have high levels of addiction. Rather, a poor person may become desperate to win from gambling because he needs money. From that point of view the poor guy can get addicted to gambling quickly. This is just an estimate that will not be the same for everyone.
Normally we can take risks only when we have the capacity to bear those risks. Rich gamblers don't have a problem losing money, but it's much harder for poor gamblers to take risks. Because in gambling it is better to bet as much we afford to lose. In this respect rich gamblers have more advantages to take the risks.
Without discipline, chances of getting addicted is not impossible, it can happen to both side rich or poor if they will not be care enough with what they are doing, it can simply ruin their finances, both can risk everything as addiction most of the time leads you not think of anything but just to please your lust and desire to gamble.