The reason why I prefer centralized casinos is for the fact that they have to regulate the activities of the casino and trying to limit underage gambling which have become one of the prevailing issues and cause of gambling addictions in contemporary society.
So aside from the licensing that they get, they always set the limits to their gambling and the underaged that is why their placed a 🔞 age limit on gambling.
Topic: Risk management and responsible gaming - page 11. (Read 1523 times)
Governments and several organisations work to encourage responsible gaming. This involves establishing betting restrictions, offering support to those who think they have a gambling problem, and participating in self-exclusion programmes.
I refuse this, why? Because I think this is more about the legalization of gambling by using the government and a group of organizations that will provide certain guarantees in the games that will be played, even though there is a betting or age limit, what is called gambling is still a detrimental act.Moreover, in the process, gambling players do not recognize groups or classes. There will be many factors for people to gamble, firstly, apart from the factor that they feel capable of gambling, it could be another factor because they want to get rich instantly, then this will be more dangerous mentally for anyone who is tempted by gambling advertisements that seem to promise or guarantee human survival, even though will harm and destroy yourself and your family. We all know that there are certainly people who regulate this type of gambling, especially bookies who don't want to lose out on their gaming facilities.
Governments and several organisations work to encourage responsible gaming. This involves establishing betting restrictions, offering support to those who think they have a gambling problem, and participating in self-exclusion programmes.
The government of the developed countries alone give the positive approach to the gambling.Because people of the developed countries will have huge amount of money from the various economic sources.The most of the country which had banned gambling will be the developing country or under developing country.The gambler should ready to take responsibility of the money used in the gambling,the experienced gambler will say this to the people who was new to the gambling.If the gamblers get any issue after the win like withdrew of funds,the support is the best option given by the gambling sites.
I am not in favor of anti-gambling measures taken by government agencies as they do not work the way they want them to. A good example is the situation in my country.
In my country gambling is allowed only in specially designated locations. Naturally, many gamblers play gambling only online, because they do not have the opportunity to travel thousands of kilometers to play in a land-based casino.
Taxes on the money on which I play do not go to the state treasury. They thought that they would create an infrastructure like in Las Vegas and these gambling zones would be very crowded. How wrong they were when they passed this law.
In my country gambling is allowed only in specially designated locations. Naturally, many gamblers play gambling only online, because they do not have the opportunity to travel thousands of kilometers to play in a land-based casino.
Taxes on the money on which I play do not go to the state treasury. They thought that they would create an infrastructure like in Las Vegas and these gambling zones would be very crowded. How wrong they were when they passed this law.
Governments and several organisations work to encourage responsible gaming. This involves establishing betting restrictions, offering support to those who think they have a gambling problem, and participating in self-exclusion programmes.
And for some governments, they're even banning gambling in all forms, online and offline.Government are also the one encourage to gamble like the lottery which is I think not ethical considering they are the one asking people to encourage responsible gambling as well. They may not consider it a gambling but in my area you likely have to like bet 3x in a day in a lottery and I guess that's already gambling in its form.
Yeah, we've got the public lottery and a portion of the funds collected from it are also going to the charity. While the winners of that lottery really are winning a lot of money. Although there's a controversy right now on this matter but if its' the government that allows this, there's no problem at all but in morals, you are the one to consider it and still be responsible. 
Governments and several organisations work to encourage responsible gaming. This involves establishing betting restrictions, offering support to those who think they have a gambling problem, and participating in self-exclusion programmes.
Is there a question in this somewhere?
The complex relationship between governments and gambling... Ever notice how most governments seem to have a love-hate relationship with gambling? On one hand, they're all about those tax dollars rolling in from casinos and lotteries. But when it comes to helping folks with gambling issues, it's like they're suddenly MIA. I mean, they're not exactly losing sleep over folks with gambling problems. It's more about their own financial interests.
Governments and several organisations work to encourage responsible gaming. This involves establishing betting restrictions, offering support to those who think they have a gambling problem, and participating in self-exclusion programmes.
I am very curious which country's government has imposed this on gambling sites to limit their slowness in playing gambling, I just heard this so I am quite curious, can you mention it? And is there a script about regulations?For me personally, this will be detrimental to the casino if they really limit the time and amount of deposit or interesting, those who are accustomed to gambling with a large amount will certainly not be comfortable with this regulation, not in their case of addiction but the number of gambling they do is really Big every week or day, and in the end he will turn to gambling sites that do not have such restrictions for playing or betting. I really want to read the script clearly, so as not to become a wild view without basis.
Governments and several organisations work to encourage responsible gaming. This involves establishing betting restrictions, offering support to those who think they have a gambling problem, and participating in self-exclusion programmes.
This is normal practice for the gambling industry, but are you sure about what percentage of gamblers are able to gamble responsibly? Most of us are problem gamblers in that we find it difficult to take responsibility for what we have spent gambling. Obviously this is something bad for anyone to continue to maintain, but the government has a role so that gamblers do not become a burden on the state.
I find many casinos give problem gamblers access to solve their problems by consulting with experts. They ask gamblers to gamble responsibly instead of continuing to gamble without control, so this is a positive side that any casino may need to maintain.
Governments and several organisations work to encourage responsible gaming. This involves establishing betting restrictions, offering support to those who think they have a gambling problem, and participating in self-exclusion programmes.
Government are also the one encourage to gamble like the lottery which is I think not ethical considering they are the one asking people to encourage responsible gambling as well. They may not consider it a gambling but in my area you likely have to like bet 3x in a day in a lottery and I guess that's already gambling in its form. 
Governments and several organisations work to encourage responsible gaming. This involves establishing betting restrictions, offering support to those who think they have a gambling problem, and participating in self-exclusion programmes.
I would like you to elaborate more on those governments and organizations which allegedly try to inform and educate people about responsive gambling. Because, as far as I know most governments in the west mostly take care about casinos paying their fair share of taxes and making self exclusion programs available. I would dare to say private organizations try to do more.
In the end, most of the research and control is supposed to be done by us.
If you could provide some links do we can read more about the actions by those governments to help people with problem gambling, it would be good
That's the norm.
The government takes money from gambling through tax, the best it could do is help those who are addicted to gambling. What else they would do with the money they are receiving from all those taxes? None.
They regulated it, then they must also take responsibility for those who will be hooked by whatever gambling activity that they legalized.
Without it, there is no money for the local government, so where else will they get the funds for their own pockets and the upgrade of whatever project they are proposing? None. House taxes ain't that high, (in my country) and there's no way they could accumulate enough funds for road projects if there's no gambling industry near it.
The government takes money from gambling through tax, the best it could do is help those who are addicted to gambling. What else they would do with the money they are receiving from all those taxes? None.
They regulated it, then they must also take responsibility for those who will be hooked by whatever gambling activity that they legalized.
Without it, there is no money for the local government, so where else will they get the funds for their own pockets and the upgrade of whatever project they are proposing? None. House taxes ain't that high, (in my country) and there's no way they could accumulate enough funds for road projects if there's no gambling industry near it.
Governments and several organisations work to encourage responsible gaming. This involves establishing betting restrictions, offering support to those who think they have a gambling problem, and participating in self-exclusion programmes.
What the government in the country where I live does is more than that, not just restrictions but a ban on all activities related to gambling through a set of laws and regulations. And if someone in the community engages in gambling then this is very contrary to existing regulations and is a behavior that violates the law and later if someone in the community carries out this activity it will be prosecuted legally.However, is this policy able to completely prevent people in my country from gambling activities? In reality, this is not the case, where gambling activities in the community continue even though there have been strong measures from the government to prevent this.
"Still, to be responsible for the gambling we do, we have to start with ourselves."
Governments and several organisations work to encourage responsible gaming. This involves establishing betting restrictions, offering support to those who think they have a gambling problem, and participating in self-exclusion programmes.
I'm confused, is this actually a question or a statement?
I think everyone needs to know the limits of gambling, how much money to use for gambling and the risks of gambling, all of these things are important so that gamblers know their financial condition and are ready to accept the worst consequences (losing the game). If all of this can be accepted with common sense then it is likely that they will be ready to take responsibility for their gambling. We need to be wise in using our money and dividing it for living needs, savings, and for fun (gambling).
Looking at the risks of gambling, if we fail to manage our finances then we could go bankrupt and have a lot of debt. That is something bad and no one wants to have a future like that. So when gambling we must understand the responsibility of gambling
Governments and several organisations work to encourage responsible gaming. This involves establishing betting restrictions, offering support to those who think they have a gambling problem, and participating in self-exclusion programmes.
Honestly has there been any, can you give a recommendation or link to one so that we can use such as a reference for those that will need closer attention on such reagards, if we consider the way governments go against gambling and some other related activities on the same manner, one wouldn't have thought about if there could be any development coming from them to help gamblers have a better experience with gambling, though I know about NGOs that they can deem fit for these kind of offers because they help and assit indiscriminately to the welfare of the people, gambling could go more way better for those having difficulties with addiction and other challenges.
~snip~
There is no doubt that responsibility must really be applied there, this is always the beginning of them experiencing a long downturn, because in the absence of a strong sense of responsibility that should be before playing they apply it then it is clear that if in the end they lose they will not be able to accept the defeat, and surely lust will control him. As we know that such a cycle in gambling is very dangerous, if it is not handled quickly then the next time they will gamble with the term digging holes closing holes, meaning looking for victory to cover losses in the previous time. And I say it will continue indefinitely and obviously there will be a lot of problems that come especially in terms of finance. Honestly, I would appreciate if there is a government in a country that pays attention to the problems experienced by its people, especially in gambling, as in general the government has a fairly broad power and with that maybe they have opportunities and solutions that make more sense to help some of their people who experience problems like this, I think that the rehabilitation center will be the main solution or the main action that the government will take for them, this is pretty good if it happens.
A government that can do this will win the hearts of its people because the people can see that there is real action from the government to help overcome the problems that have existed for a long time. Perhaps the people will help with the program so that it can reduce the number of gambling addictions in the country. If it can be carried out more seriously, perhaps the country can really reduce the number of gambling addictions, and perhaps it will also become a model country for other countries with gambling addiction problems. In the future, there may be mutually beneficial cooperation between countries. What a beautiful dream
Are you talking about land-based casinos or offline gambling? As far as I know, no governments are actually doing anything about responsible gambling in online gambling platforms, all they care about is taxing the casinos that have acquired their licenses from the licensing firms and authorities, other than that, I've never heard or saw anywhere where the government is striving to keep people safe from irresponsible gambling and making them gamble with care.
However, some online gambling platforms provide warnings to gamblers to gamble responsibly and not to spend more than what they can afford to lose, they also provide a self-exclusion option for gamblers who want to use that option so that they can limit themselves from excessive gambling.
However, some online gambling platforms provide warnings to gamblers to gamble responsibly and not to spend more than what they can afford to lose, they also provide a self-exclusion option for gamblers who want to use that option so that they can limit themselves from excessive gambling.
Governments and several organisations work to encourage responsible gaming. This involves establishing betting restrictions, offering support to those who think they have a gambling problem, and participating in self-exclusion programmes.
Governments in every country in the world,even in the most developed ones do not really care about your or my health,mental health,social problems etc.They are forced to do this work and they do not really care if I or you have a gambling problem as long as we pay taxes to them and we stay humble even when the inflation rate like right now in most of the world is sky high,no they only care about their pockets.
In such programs like you mentioned sure may have been people who love to help others and may have some good cases which they have helped people get out of addiction but in the majority of the cases the governments do not care if I or you are deep in gambling addiction.
Governments and several organisations work to encourage responsible gaming. This involves establishing betting restrictions, offering support to those who think they have a gambling problem, and participating in self-exclusion programmes.
I think Australian government actually play active role in make policy that will interfere with the gambling of their citizens. They do this by placing restrictions on deposits, placing limits and sometimes outright ban of some gambling companies. Unlike the Australian government, there is no restriction or interference whatsoever, even though we have a government agency that supposedly regulates gambling. Their policies as well as the implementation are rarely felt.
Responsible gambling is not the same as responsible gaming. You can play game to gamble but you can also play game not to gamble.
Maybe it was a mistake on his part because gaming and gambling are entirely different things. People can play game for fun without comiiting money, unlike gambling, you must commit your funds unless you are given free bets. Governments and several organisations work to encourage responsible gaming. This involves establishing betting restrictions, offering support to those who think they have a gambling problem, and participating in self-exclusion programmes.
Not all governments have that kind of program. The discussion goes like this: gambling is often considered a big problem when, in fact, it's not. In reality, the gambling industry, which makes billions of dollars yearly, contributes to the government in terms of taxes. So, the government cannot be too serious about educating people, especially on the negative side, as it could discourage them from gambling.
There's no logic in that; why would they discourage people when they are benefiting from the tax remittance of casinos?
Simply putting "be responsible when gambling" is enough to remind gamblers to gamble responsibly.
Please provide a source to make this thread even more relevant.
Never heard of the government encouraging them to be responsible, but the government only makes rules about gambling. In fact, there are still pros and cons to its legality and prohibiting it, so there is no encouragement whatsoever from the government unless we ourselves are aware of it.
The government is only responsible for its regulations, if there is a problem with someone who is heavily addicted to gambling then their solution is to go to a psychologist and tell him how to stop gambling.
Never heard of the government encouraging them to be responsible, but the government only makes rules about gambling. In fact, there are still pros and cons to its legality and prohibiting it, so there is no encouragement whatsoever from the government unless we ourselves are aware of it.
The government is only responsible for its regulations, if there is a problem with someone who is heavily addicted to gambling then their solution is to go to a psychologist and tell him how to stop gambling.
Jump to: